CA/Browser

Forum
May 2009 - ICANN should consider expanding reserved
names of RFC 2606 to include commonly used internal
TLDs, such as .int...
CA shouldn’t issue certificate with proposed gTLD

CA must warn applicant that certificates with
applied-for gTLD will be ...
https://www.cabforum.org/GuidanceDeprecated-Internal-Names.pdf
Ben Wilson, CA/Browser Forum
www.cabforum.org
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Addressing non-FQDNs and new gTLDs in SSL Baseline Requirements

361 views
304 views

Published on

CA/Browser Forum RSA deck on non FQDNs and new gTLDs

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
361
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Addressing non-FQDNs and new gTLDs in SSL Baseline Requirements

  1. 1. CA/Browser Forum
  2. 2. May 2009 - ICANN should consider expanding reserved names of RFC 2606 to include commonly used internal TLDs, such as .internal, .local, .private, .corp, .home May 2011 – CABF announces public review of Baseline Requirements with plan to sunset internal names July 2012 – Baseline Requirements effective – CA must notify customers that non-FQDNs deprecated Nov. 1, 2015 – No Issuance of Certificates with non-FQDNs October 1, 2016 - All Internal Name Certificates revoked February 2013 – Ballot 96 amends Baseline Requirements
  3. 3. CA shouldn’t issue certificate with proposed gTLD CA must warn applicant that certificates with applied-for gTLD will be revoked when approved 30 days to review existing certificates and cease issuing certificates containing new gTLD 120 days to revoke certificate containing new gTLD Unless Applicant entitled to use domain under new gTLD
  4. 4. https://www.cabforum.org/GuidanceDeprecated-Internal-Names.pdf Ben Wilson, CA/Browser Forum www.cabforum.org

×