Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources: METU Case Study

449

Published on

Bulut, B., Akbayrak, E. H. (2013). Evaluation of Open Access Resources: METU Case Study. COAR Annual Meeting, 07-08 May 2013, Özyeğin Üniversity. Presented by Burcu Bulut

Bulut, B., Akbayrak, E. H. (2013). Evaluation of Open Access Resources: METU Case Study. COAR Annual Meeting, 07-08 May 2013, Özyeğin Üniversity. Presented by Burcu Bulut

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
449
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Evaluation of Open Access (OA) Resources:METU Case StudyDr. Burcu Bulut, Middle East Technical University LibraryEmre Hasan Akbayrak, Middle East Technical University Library4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 2. Overview OA Trend Topics Goals Focuses Evaluation of OA Resources4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 3. OA Trend Topics Linking publications to data and fundingschemes Big Data Interoperability Semantic Web Complementary platforms Open educational resources Open data management,…4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 4. Goals of The Presentation To share the METU experiences onprocess of adding to the collectiondevelopment policy of the open accessresources To obtain the views andrecommendations of the participants withfeedback during/after the presentation inorder to finalize the OA resourceevaluation/selection criteria report4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 5. Why we prefer collectiondevelopment issues ?4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 6. Because, we need to thinkas a whole and getconnected4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 7. Therefore We Focused On Thinking multi-directional Reviewing the scholarly communicationprocess Restructuring services offered toinformation users…as well as infrastructural and technicalissues.4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 8. It Is Necessary To determine and apply methods toensure OA to the scientific production ofinstitutions and related data sets withoutlimitationbut also, To consider in detail the OA resourcesprovided to information users within thescope of collection development policies4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 9. Why It Is Necessary? Increasing number of OA resources OA collections of multiple formats Various data sharing services, policies,regulations,…4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 10. Evaluation Process of OAResources1. Current situation analysis2. Determination of evaluation/selectioncriteria3. Deciding the form of OA resource sharingon the web4. Evaluation of the existing and new OAresources and creation of resourcerecommendation lists5. Sharing identified resources on the web asdecided on4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 11. Determination ofEvaluation/Selection Criteria 1 The longest period has been allocatedto the this stage There are no current report or guidesprepared by institutions/organizationsthat are well-known in the area4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 12.  University web pages have beenexamined Literature reviews have been accessedas much as possible Contact has been made with groups andindividuals working on OA4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, TurkeyDetermination ofEvaluation/Selection Criteria 2
  • 13. Determination ofEvaluation/Selection Criteria 3 The general definition and policiesregarding OA Resources, general and detailed evaluationsections After completion of the preliminary study,we intend to group the criteria as relates tothe resource type, publishers and thenexpand them.4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 14. OA Resource Definition These are resources presented to theaccess of the users without any financialor legal barriers (some resources mayonly have opened some content as injournals or may require registration)…details will be listed at the final report4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 15. Policies 1 Scientific OA resources (e.g. peer-reviewed journals) are suitable forevaluation Proposals made by the librarians takepriority regarding the resources to beevaluated Suggestions can also be collected fromusers but approval of the librarians isrequired4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 16. Policies 2 The journals to be evaluated should bepart of the main topic indexes. OA resources other than journals(databases, collections of monographs,websites, maps, image collections, etc.)are also suitable for the evaluation4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 17. Evaluation Criteria (General) Does the resource support universitysresearch and educational areas? Is the resource being produced orsupported by respected authorities ororganizations in their field? Is the resource being published on aregular basis and reliable?4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 18. Evaluation Criteria (General) Is the resources interface easy to use? Does the use of the resource require aspecial technology (a special application,a custom font, etc.)?4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 19. Evaluation Criteria (Detailed)Performed under the headings of: Presentation Relevance Objectivity Method Source Timeliness Editor and editorial board4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 20. Evaluation Criteria (Detailed)Presentation: Language and writing style Structure Layout Integrity…4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 21. Evaluation Criteria (Detailed)Relevance: Academic Topical Geographical Project based4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 22. Evaluation Criteria (Detailed)Objectivity: Perspective Opinion Sponsorhip…4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 23. Evaluation Criteria (Detailed)Method: The way of information produced: Research Reports How was the study carried out? Literature Reviews Is the review covering all known literature?4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 24. Evaluation Criteria (Detailed)Source: Author details Organisations Publications…4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 25. Evaluation Criteria (Detailed)Timeliness: Date Currency4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 26. Evaluation Criteria (Detailed)Editor and editorial board Formal editorial/review board Academic information regarding to theeditor and editorial board Sufficient number of board members…4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 27. Questions in Mind How to manage open access budget? Where to evaluate OA resources within acatalog or e-resource management tools?4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 28. References (Selected List) Open Access Resources at the UC Libraries:http://www.cdlib.org/services/collections/openaccess.html Open Access Information Resources: How We EvaluateSites for Inclusion:http://www.open.ac.uk/libraryservices/pages/oair/?id=20 Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, Code ofConduct http://oaspa.org/membership/code-of-conduct/ Scholarly Open Access: Critical Analysis of ScholarlyOpen-Access Publishing:http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/11/30/criteria-for-determining-predatory-open-access-publishers-2nd-edition/4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 29. References (Selected List) Mullen, L. B. (2010). Open access and its practical impacton the work of academic librarians : collectiondevelopment, public services, and the library andinformation science literature . Oxford: Chandos Pub. Mullen, L. B. (2011). Open access and collectiondevelpment in academic libraries; digitization todiscovery. IFLA Satellite Conference: Acquisition andCollection Develeopment Section. University of the VirginIslands. DOAJ Selection Criteria:http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=loadTempl&templ=about#criteria Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, Code ofCounduct: http://oaspa.org/membership/code-of-conduct/4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 30. Thank you for your attention!Please share your feedbackand opinions!Dr. Burcu Bulutbketen@metu.edu.trEmre Hasan Akbayrakakbayrak@metu.edu.tr4th Annual Meeting of COAR May 7-8, 2013, Özyeğin University Library, Istanbul, Turkey

×