Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. CHAPTER 16.2 Mining and Sustainability R. Anthony HodgeINTRODUCTION address not only the what, or the substantive part of humanThe 1987 publication of the report, Our Common Future by action, but also the how, or the process part. In other words, inthe United Nations (UN) World Commission on Environment the practical application of sustainable development concepts,and Development (WCED), brought the concept of sustainable not only what we do is important but how we do it.development into the limelight. Chaired by the former Prime Thus, the ideas of sustainable development and sustain-Minister of Norway, Gro Harlem Brundtland, and following ability are different but synchronous. Sustainability is a morehearings held across the world, the commission proposed an general term that captures the idea that we need to maintainagenda for world development that would enhance security certain important aspects of the world over the long term.and reduce North–South disparities. It would be development Sustainable development is the human or action part of this“which meets the needs of the present without compromis- set of ideas: As a society, we want to make choices about ouring the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” actions that allow us to provide for the present without under-(WCED 1987). mining the possibility for future generations to provide for Since then, a rich debate has ensued about what this themselves.means in practical terms. Though many other sets of words Together, these ideas are very appealing. However, theirhave been suggested for defining the phrase sustainable devel- translation to practical action remains much debated. This isopment, the Brundtland Commission definition has stood the not surprising. Human society is complex. There are abouttest of time and remains the anchor. For a rich discussion, 10,000 cells in the standard industrial classification—our waysee the “definitions” portal of the International Institute for of classifying human activities within the market economy.Sustainable Development, or IISD (SD Gateway n.d.) This does not account for many more activities outside the In recent years, the word sustainability has also found its market economy. There are about 200 countries across theway into common use. The idea is simple. Sustainability is the world, and the global ecosystem is complex and not fullypersistence over a long time—indefinitely—of certain neces- understood.sary and/or desired characteristics of both human society and For its part, the mining, minerals, and metals industry hasthe enveloping ecosystem (Robinson et al. 1990). These char- been a particularly active locus of sustainability-related policyacteristics range from primary needs such as air, water, food, and practice innovations becauseclothing, shelter, and basic human rights to a host of condi- • The potential implications—both positive and negative—tions that would collectively be called quality of life, not only of mining activities and the minerals and metals thatfor people but for other life forms as well. result are significant; It is here that the definitional issue becomes difficult • Many interests are touched by mining;for some, because the choice of which characteristics are to • The role of many of these interests in decision making isbe sustained and the degree to which they will be sustained growing (e.g., communities and indigenous people);depends on the particular values that are applied. In turn, these • The nature of contemporary communications systems hasdepend on who is doing the applying. In other words, it is not brought the often dramatic nature of mining operationsa closed definition. What a company CEO chooses as impor- into the public eye; andtant may be different than a politician, doctor, or librarian; • Industry, governments, civil society organizations, andwhat a Mexican chooses may be different from, for example, the public, in general, are all anxious to ensure mininga Tanzanian or Australian. Because of these potential differ- makes a positive contribution that is fairly shared.ences, a fair and effective process of interaction and seek-ing consensus is critical to the practical application of these Importantly, the concept of sustainable development has notideas. Herein lies the rationale for why it is essential to always disappeared like so many “flavor of the month” ideas. Rather,R. Anthony Hodge, President, International Council on Mining & Metals; Professor, Mining & Sustainability, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada 1665
  • 2. 1666 SME Mining Engineering Handbookit has grown in prominence and is now deeply entrenched in of the world’s largest mining companies took an unprec-legislation, government, and corporate policy and practice. edented step.Sustainability is the subject of university curricula, given as a Working through the World Business Council forlabel to vice presidents and departments of mining companies, Sustainable Development, they initiated the Global Miningincorporated into the names of service providers, and included Initiative (GMI). As part of GMI, they commissioned theas an element of key performance indicators. International Institute for Environment and Development This chapter provides an overview that links the ideas (London) to undertake a global review that would lead to theof sustainable development and sustainability to the mining, identification of how mining and minerals can best contributeminerals, and metals industry. To do so, a particular template to the global transition to sustainable development. The result-is used for organizing the many interlinked bodies of knowl- ing project, Mining, Minerals, and Sustainable Developmentedge that must be brought together: the Seven Questions to (MMSD), sparked a large and rich literature, including theSustainability (7QS) (MMSD North America 2002). project’s final report, Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals This template is pragmatic though much informed by the and Sustainable Development (MMSD 2002).theoretical foundation of systems theory. It recognizes that to Before the GMI was completed, participants movedbring sustainability ideas into practice for the mining, min- to create an organization that would carry the resulting rec-erals, and metals industry, the hard (well-defined) and the soft ommendations forward to implementation. Thus, in 2001(ill-defined) systems of the real world must both be addressed, and building on the foundation established by ICME, theas well as the objective (independent of judgment) and the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) wassubjective (dependent on judgment). In doing so, all must be created. Many of the ideas summarized in this chapter havetreated, if not exactly scientifically (which is not always pos- emerged from or been refined through subsequent work ofsible), at least in a way that is characterized by intellectual ICMM.rigor (see discussion of systems theory and sustainability in Almost simultaneously with these events, NGO pressureHodge 1995 and 1996). The 7QS template weaves together on the World Bank Group led to the initiation in 2001 of aideas from many disciplines but recognizes that deeper explo- multi-interest review of the group’s involvement in extrac-ration is often warranted depending on site-specific condi- tive industries. The Extractive Industries Review sought totions. In this context, the objective of this chapter is to open a test whether or not industry projects could be compatible withdoor as a first step to practical application. the World Bank Group’s goal of sustainable development and poverty reduction. In its final report, Striking a Better BalanceMINING AND METALS INDUSTRY RESPONSE TO (Salim 2003), the review concluded in the affirmative but onlySUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT if three enabling conditions were in place:The 1970s and 1980s were a time of reaction to dramatic 1. Public and corporate governance advocacy for the poor,change for mining. Echoing increasing concern for the envi- including proactive planning and management to maxi-ronment across society, the late 1980s saw a number of lead- mize poverty alleviation through sustainable developmenting mining companies publish “state-of-environment” reports 2. Much more effective social and environmental policiesrelated to their operations. Taking another important step, 30 3. Respect for human rightsleading mining and metals companies from across the worldcame together in 1991 to create the International Council on The resulting refocused World Bank policy emphasizesMetals and the Environment (ICME). ICME would give the strengthened governance and transparency, ensuring that ben-industry an international voice on environmental matters. efits reach the poor, mitigating environmental and social risks, Also in the early 1990s, many of these same companies protecting human rights, and promoting renewable energy andjoined with senior governments, labor unions, aboriginal efficiency to combat climate change. This refocusing has inpeoples, and environmental nongovernmental organizations turn influenced mining approaches to implementing sustain-(NGOs) in a broad review of mining practices in Canada. able development on the ground. In sum, this process hasThe Whitehorse Mining Initiative turned out to be a precur- served to elucidate and reinforce the concepts of sustainablesor of a number of initiatives convened to bring sustainability development addressed in this discussion.ideas to practical application around the world. The resultingLeadership Accord (Whitehorse Mining Initiative Leadership MINING’S CONTRIBUTION TO SUSTAINABLECouncil Accord 1993) is a summons to change, framed within DEVELOPMENTthe context of a commitment to social and environmen- At the base of the interlinked ideas of sustainability and sus-tal goals. It seeks a sustainable mining industry within the tainable development lies the simple idea that any humanframework of an evolving and sustainable society. The ideas activity—including mining—should be undertaken in such ait champions and the multi-interest process it uses elegantly way that the activity itself and the products produced togethercapture sustainable development in practice. provide a net contribution to human and ecosystem well-being For the mining industry, the decade of the 1990s was over the long term.a bleak period. Commodity prices dropped while public From an engineering design perspective in general and acriticism skyrocketed, much driven by a civil society that mine design perspective in particular, this simple idea giveswas quick to take advantage of newly available and quickly rise to an overarching two-dimensional design criterion. Thatevolving computer-based communications. As a whole, the is, mining activity (or any human endeavour for that matter)industry found itself under attack and in a defensive pos- should be designed to achieve (through the activity itself andture. Its social license to operate was threatened (though the products that result) a net contribution to both human andthat particular label was to come later). In the late 1990s and ecosystem well-being over the long term. The achievement offaced with growing concern about access to capital, land, design success should, in turn, be tested against this designand human resources, the chief executive officers of nine criterion.
  • 3. Mining and Sustainability 1667 Ten Principles for Sustainable Development Seven Position Statements 1. Implement ethical business practices and apply 1. Mining and protected areas good corporate governance. 2. Mining partnerships for development 2. Integrate sustainable development in corporate 3. Climate change decision making. 4. Mining and indigenous peoples 3. Uphold fundamental human rights. 5. Mercury risk management 4. Manage risks based on sound science. 6. Transparency of mineral revenues 5. and 6. Improve environment, health, and safety performance continuously. 7. Mineral resources and economic development 7. Conserve biodiversity and contribute to integrated land-use planning. 8. Encourage a life-cycle approach to materials management. 9. Contribute to community development. 10. Publicly report, independently assure, and engage openly and transparently.Figure 16.2-1 Principles and position statements that comprise the sustainable development framework of ICMM Thus, the focus here is not on how mining can be concentrating and refining. However, in an overarching sense,sustainable—any mining project as a discrete activity cannot the ideas of sustainability and sustainable development callcontinue indefinitely—but on how mining, minerals, and met- for both human and ecosystem well-being to be maintained orals can contribute to sustainable development. This is a con- improved over the long term. Doing one at the expense of theceptual shift away from a singular analysis and mitigation of other is not acceptable because, either way, the foundation ofimpacts to a more comprehensive analysis and encouragement life is undermined.of contribution. The focus on contribution is a tougher but fairer approach. PRINCIPLES AND FRAMEWORKSIt demands consideration of both the good and the bad. (The The nature of applied sustainability is evident from the manyidea that the mining and metals industry should be designed attempts to articulate sustainable development principles. Forfor and tested against its contribution to the well-being of peo- a listing of more than 100 such principles, see the the “prin-ple and the environment—to sustainable development—was ciples” portal of the IISD (n.d.). In short, there is no one-size-first proposed by Professor Robert Gibson in 2000 and later fits-all approach to defining, framing, and characterizing thetaken up in development of the 7QS template [MMSD North ideas of sustainable development and sustainability. One setAmerica 2002; Hodge 2004].) That a mining activity might of principles of particular relevance to the mining industry isbe challenged to make a positive contribution to the ecosys- the 10-part set developed by the ICMM, along with its com-tem over the long term may seem a tough, even impossible plementary set of position statements. ICMM brings togetherchallenge to some. However, articulating explicit engineering 19 of the largest mining companies of the world and, on andesign criteria in this way sets a design objective that is essen- annual basis, member companies assess performance againsttial if mining and metals-related activity and the resulting these commitments using a procedure that includes third-partyproducts are to achieve the sustainable development contribu- independent assurance (ICMM 2010a).tion that is being demanded by society. The ICMM principles and position statements as of 2010 Application of these ideas is not simply a greening phe- are summarized in Figure 16.2-1. Just as many definitions andnomenon; it is related as much to well-being and security of principles have been proposed, so too have many organizingpeople as the environment. And, interestingly, the mining frameworks been designed to bring theory to action. A com-industry’s capacity to deal with the environmental aspects parative analysis of about 30 such characterizations or frame-is currently stronger than its ability to address the full range works is found in Hodge 1997.of social aspects. This is likely because many environmental Almost three decades before the popularization of sustain-issues can be addressed through hard scientific and technical able development ideas, geographer Walter Firey pointed outsolutions, whereas social issues often require soft behavioral- that three broad groupings of knowledge were pertinent to natu-type solutions, which can be much harder to design and imple- ral resource use (Firey 1960; and see discussion in Hodge 1997):ment—and which often fall outside the engineer’s training. 1. Ecological (environmental) These ideas also veer sharply away from thinking in 2. Ethnological (social/culture)terms of a trade-off between human and ecosystem well- 3. Economicbeing—it is not a balancing act that pits people against theenvironment. There are obviously many small trade-offs in In the late 1980s, Firey’s three-part model of natural resourceany practical application: between interests, between compo- use was adopted by a number of those attempting to opera-nents of the ecosystem, across time, and across space. This tionalize the concept of sustainable development (Mitchellis particularly the case for mining and the related process of 1991). Since then, the three-part environmental–social–
  • 4. 1668 SME Mining Engineering Handbook As with all sustainable development frameworks, a broad Components Results range of topics is captured. However, this example is particu- • Environmental larly useful for another reason. It is clear that the simultaneous treatment of all objectives sets up tensions that must ulti- • Social mately be resolved: In a comparative analysis of alternatives, — Cultural • Human Well-being different value sets might well judge performance differently — Political — Health • Ecosystem Well-being and, at the same time, place greater weight on certain objec- tives. This is a poignant example of applied sustainability in • Economic — Institutional practice. Here again the process of finding common ground can be seen as critical to practical implementation of sustain- able development ideas. Capitals: Natural, Built, Human, Knowledge, Institutional From a different but important perspective, as part of the World Bank Group response to the Extractive IndustriesFigure 16.2-2 Different characterizations of sustainable Review, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) prepareddevelopment and adopted a sustainability framework that consists of (1) the Policy on Social and Environmental Sustainability, (2) the Policy on Disclosure of Information; and (3) a set of perfor-economic characterization of sustainable development has mance standards on social and environmental sustainability.gained broad usage. A significant limitation of this approach, In its performance standards, the IFC addresses eighthowever, arises because of the lack of common treatment for topics:the social element. 1. Social and environmental assessment and management Many other frameworks have also emerged that make systemssense for the particular application: population health, healthy 2. Labor and working conditionscommunities, sustainable communities, foreign aid, urban 3. Pollution prevention and abatementdesign, agriculture, forestry, fisheries, indigenous peoples’ 4. Community health, safety, and securityneeds, and so forth. From one particularly important perspec- 5. Land acquisition and involuntary resettlementtive, the World Bank Group has used the lens and insights of 6. Biodiversity conservation and sustainable naturaleconomics to offer a “capitals” model to apply sustainable resource managementdevelopment ideas: natural, built, human, knowledge, and 7. Indigenous peoplesinstitutional. Figure 16.2-2 is a synthesis that brings a number 8. Cultural heritageof the alternatives together. Another perspective that offers practical insight comes Here again is another definition of what is appropriate tofrom an analysis of mine closure options that was undertaken include in addressing application of sustainability concepts tofor the Faro mine project in the Yukon Territory, Canada mining. The IFC sustainability framework is currently under(Hodge and Merkhofer 2008). In this case, a sophisticated review with the expectation that a revised package is targetedmulti-attribute utility analysis—driven by a multistakeholder for release in 2011. The IFC has also published a number ofprocess—was used to assess the alternatives. Multi-attribute Good Practice Notes/Handbooks (IFC 2006) relevant to theutility analysis is a form of decision analysis in which a set of practical issues of sustainability. Most importantly, the per-objectives is articulated and each alternative’s performance is formance standards along with the World Bank Group’sassessed against those objectives. The underlying principle is Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines form the basisthat the alternative that best performs against the objectives of the Equator Principles, which have been adopted by 67is the best one. The foundation of this kind of analysis is the lending institutions worldwide (the Equator Principles lend-articulation of objectives that can be translated to a scale, which ing institutions), many of whom provide financing for min-can be assessed in terms of a direction (e.g., more is better, less ing activities. The Equator Principles are a voluntary set ofis worse) and magnitude (e.g., how much better or worse). standards for determining, assessing, and managing social and The rigorous scaling and multi-interest process of assess- environmental risk in project financing. They are considereding and judging are complex. In the Faro analysis, two time the financial industry gold standard for sustainable projecthorizons were used in the assessment: (1) short, 15–40 years; finance.and (2) long, 500–1,000 years. Of relevance to this discus- Another important framework is the Global Compact, asion is the framework of closure objectives, because it was principle-based framework for businesses, which was estab-set to reflect an overarching government policy of sustainable lished by the United Nations in 2000. The Global Compact isdevelopment. Eight objectives were used for assessing closure the world’s largest voluntary corporate citizenship initiativealternative at the Faro mine (Yukon Territory, Canada): and states 10 principles in the areas of human rights, labor, the environment, and anticorruption. Members are committed to 1. Maximize public health and safety aligning their operations and strategies with the 10 principles 2. Maximize worker health and safety (United Nations Global Compact n.d.). 3. Maximize restoration, protection and enhancement of the For their part, the Millennium Development Goals are environment eight international development goals that all 192 UN member 4. Maximize local socioeconomic benefits states and at least 23 international organizations have agreed 5. Maximize Yukon socioeconomic benefits to achieve by the year 2015: 6. Minimize cost 7. Minimize restrictions on traditional land use 1. Eradicating extreme poverty and hunger 8. Minimize restrictions on local land use 2. Achieving universal primary education
  • 5. Mining and Sustainability 1669 1a 4a Suspension or Temporary Termination Closure 1 2 3 4 5 6 Detailed Site Operation Final Closure Exploration Investigation, 2–100 years and Postclosure Construction 1–10 years Design, and progressive Decommissioning in perpetuity Estimating rehabilitation 1–5 years Typically 1–3 years 2a Suspension or Termination Mine life cycle 1960s Mine life cycle 1970s + Mine life cycle 2000Source: Adapted from John Gadsby (personal communication) and MMSD North America 2002.Figure 16.2-3 Mine project life cycle 3. Promoting gender equity and empowering women society to walk more lightly on the earth. For example, all the 4. Reducing child mortality strategies needed for development, transmission, and use of 5. Improving maternal health renewable energy sources depend on mined metals and miner- 6. Combating HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases als. Similarly, strategies to move to a carbon-reduced econ- 7. Ensuring environmental sustainability omy are only possible through creative uses of mined minerals 8. Developing a global partnership for development and metals. Thus, the sustainability-related focus is now appropriately Each of the approaches to capturing what sustainability on mining as an activity and its implications for the communi-means in terms of principles and frameworks is useful for the ties and ecosystem within which minerals are embedded. Atrelevant driving application. There is no single panacea that any given site, whether a mining, smelting, refining, primaryapplies in all cases. However, taken together they capture the metals manufacturing, or recycling operation, there is a begin-breadth of issues and topics that must be considered. ning and end: No mining/mineral activity can be expected to have an indefinite life span. However, the implications ofNONRENEWABLE NATURE OF MINING, MINERALS, that activity (not only as a direct result of the activity but alsoAND METALS through the product that is produced) go on indefinitely.Much of the literature through the 1980s and 1990s focused In that sense, mining/mineral activities serve as a bridgeon renewable resource management and the idea of living off to the future. The sustainability challenge is to ensure that thethe interest of a continuing core stock. For some, nonrenew- implications of mining activities and the products that resultable resource-related activities such as mining simply did not are net positive for people and ecosystems over the long term:fit into the sustainability concept, although the hat might be It is the well-being of human society and the enveloping eco-tipped toward recycling and reuse of nonrenewable materials systems that need sustaining. Limited-term mining projectsas helpful strategies. can serve sustainability objectives if they are designed and One result of this early emphasis was the marginaliza- implemented in ways that ensure they meet that challenge.tion, to a great extent, of concerns and perspectives about non-renewable resources. Interestingly, the fact that minerals are BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR APPLYINGnonrenewable (or stock) resources and, in some sense, fixed SUSTAINABILITY TO MININGin absolute quantity turns out to be relatively unimportant Bringing sustainability ideas into mine design has a signifi-from a sustainability perspective—at least at the macro scale cant impact on mine design boundary conditions. Four aspects(MMSD North America 2002). The nonrenewable character of boundary conditions apply in this case, each of whichof minerals received a great deal of attention in the literature has implications for setting the time and space dimensionsfrom 1950 into the 1970s. However, the long statistical record and helps to identify the system components that must beof continued output at relatively constant prices, together with considered:growing understanding first of environmental issues and thenof sustainability, has served to deemphasize this concern. At 1. Mine project life cycle (Figure 16.2-3)the same time, recognition is growing that the products of 2. Mineral life cycle (Figure 16.2-4)mining are needed both to provide for the world’s popula- 3. Time horizon (Table 16.2-1)tion and, even more so, to support approaches that will allow 4. Communities of interest
  • 6. 1670 SME Mining Engineering Handbook Table 16.2-1 Perspectives on the time horizons for applied sustainability Exploration Perspective Typical Time Horizon Waste, Environmental, and Social Stress and Restoration Financial/tax cycle Annual or quarterly Reserves Election cycle 2, 4, or 5 years Standard engineering design life Up to 50 years Mining and Milling Social time horizon (seven generations) Up to 200 years Environmental time horizon 200 to 10,000+ years Concentrate Source: Adapted from Freeze 1987. Primary Smelting Secondary Smelting and Refining and Refining and civil society organizations—and is not yet fully under- stood or appreciated. The fourth and final aspect of defining the boundary con- First Products ditions for applying sustainability relates to identifying the Recycle communities of interest that must be considered in the mine Manufacturing design, operation, and closure process. In times past, a com- pany and government would simply come to a bilateral agree- ment on conditions that would govern mine activities. Today Final Products: that is no longer the case. Many interests play active roles, and End Uses the definition of those roles itself requires great care and atten- tion. Interests important to mining areFigure 16.2-4 Mineral life cycle • Industry (investors, employees, industry associations, other companies); • Support services (financial, consultants, contractors, First, the mine design process must take into consider- suppliers);ation the full life cycle of a mine project. Many of the greatest • Government (federal, state/provincial, county/regionalproblems facing the mining industry today stem from the fact district, local);that this has not been done in the past. In the 1960s, the mine • Indigenous people and their organizations;design process was limited to the end of operations. In the • Organized labor;1970s and driven by rising environmental consciousness, the • Mining-affected communities (by economic, social, and/need for mine reclamation gave rise to concerns about clo- or environmental [e.g., watershed] dependency);sure, which at the time focused on cleaning and grooming a • NGOs or civil society organizations; andsite, with revegetation being a key activity. It is only in the • Academic, learning, and research and development sup-last decade that the realization has set in that a postclosure port (universities, technical schools, private and publicphase can in some cases extend indefinitely because of the research centers).geochemical processes at work in waste rock piles, tailings,and exposed workings. These give rise to potential liabilities SEVEN QUESTIONS TO SUSTAINABILITYthat must be factored into annual financial statements and the One product of the mining industry’s MMSD project was acalculation of share value. template aimed at assessing the compatibility between mining Second, the mine design process must consider the min- operations and sustainability criteria (MMSD North Americaeral life cycle. The mining industry has come to learn that it 2002; Hodge 2004, 2006). The 7QS offers seven queries formust not only consider the production of minerals and met- consideration in the mine design and assessment process. Eachals but also their use. Too often in the past, the mine design question is the interrogative form of a goal statement. Seen inprocess has limited its perspective in time and space to the another light, these seven goals define the application of sus-immediate mine operation. In fact, many significant implica- tainability concepts. The technique of using the interrogativetions extend across space and time in a kind of ripple effect form in this way is drawn from the accounting profession’s(Figure 16.2-5). Some of these—both positive and negative— approach to auditing and assuring the validity and accuracy ofare significant. And all must be taken into consideration to financial statements.ensure that the full contribution is accounted for. The focus on applying the 7QS approach is not on how a Third, the time horizon to be used needs particular men- given mine can be sustainable—mining as a discrete activitytion. Table 16.2-1 lists different perspectives on the time cannot continue indefinitely—but on how the process of min-horizons relevant to applied sustainability. This element of ing and the products it produces can best contribute to sus-the boundary conditions for the mine design, operation, and tainable development. Thus it enshrines the conceptual shiftclosure processes has changed dramatically in the last few away from analysis and mitigation of impacts to analysis anddecades. The mine project life cycle shown in Figure 16.2-3 encouragement of contribution.illustrates how the time horizon evolved after the 1970s to The seven questions are summarized in Figure 16.2-6. Ineventually take into considerations the postclosure phase, this section, the 7QS template is used to systematically orga-which can sometimes stretch environmental and social obliga- nize the parts of applied sustainability, rendering their applica-tions of mining operations into perpetuity. This is new terrain tion more practical. (The material presented in this section isfor all interests—industry, government, host communities, modified from MMSD North America 2002.) In applying this
  • 7. Mining and Sustainability 1671 Direct Outputs Benefits and Costs to People (Employees and their families, shareholders and investors, subcontractors, suppliers, community, region, nation, future generations) Indirect Outputs Indirect Inputs Direct Inputs (Benefits and costs to (Benefits and costs (Stakeholder Metals, Minerals, downstream consumers, to upstream engagement, labor, Metals and Minerals and Related operations, communities, consumers, operations, land, water, energy, Industry Products and ecosystems because communities, and feedstocks, reagents, of enhanced supply of ecosystems because of and supplies) metal- and mineral-linked demand for inputs) commodities and products) Benefits and Costs to the Environment (Environmental stress and restoration, chemical, physical, biological)Figure 16.2-5 Ripple effecttemplate, attention must be paid to the compilation and analy- 2. Ends. Questions 2 (people) and 3 (environment) focus onsis of both quantitative and qualitative insights. Ultimately in the end results that must be achieved and against whichassessing effectiveness, efficiency, and progress, four distinct the success of any project must be tested—human andsteps are essential (Hodge 2007): ecosystem well-being over the long term. 3. Means to achieving ends. Questions 4 (economy), 5 (tra- 1. Drawing the qualitative insight that comes through under- ditional and nonmarket activities), and 6 (governance and standing the story that is relevant to the object(s) of the institutions) cover the various means of achieving human assessment and ecosystem well-being. 2. Undertaking and compiling the relevant quantitative 4. Feedback. Lastly, Question 7 (synthesis and continuous measurement learning) provides the feedback mechanism that allows 3. Applying a systemic approach to synthesizing, setting managers and others to ensure accountability and to learn criteria, and judging significance from the inevitable mistakes, adapt and improve designs 4. Effectively communicating the results to different key as necessary, and celebrate the successes, giving credit interests where due.The 7QS approach encompasses four categories of insight: Effective Engagement 1. Relationships. Question 1 in Figure 16.2-6 (engagement) If relationships with those important to a mining/minerals/ deals with the state of relationships that are important metals project are unhealthy, the chance of achieving a suc- to any given project or within any region that is being cessful project—one that contributes to sustainability—is assessed (see Thomson and Joyce 2000 for a succinct dis- greatly reduced. Although this is a simple idea and one that cussion of this topic). A key issue facing many projects is is key to many successful nonmining businesses around the the sense that the distribution of costs, benefits, and risk world, application of this idea is only now gaining momentum is unfair. This sense can cause stakeholder reactions that across the industry. range from feelings of discontent to outright civil disobe- At any point in time, mining activities must align with dience and damage to persons and property. Although the norms and values of society as a whole. When it does, a detailed procedures will vary from site to site, the 7QS social license to operate is the result—an unwritten approval. approach calls for addressing this issue early and in a way If that alignment is not apparent, the social license will be that facilitates constructive relationships achieved over challenged. Within the mining industry, elucidation of this the full project life cycle. concept has been led by Ian Thomson and Susan Joyce (2008).
  • 8. 1672 SME Mining Engineering Handbook 1. Engagement Are engagement processes in place and working effectively? 2. People Assessing for Will people’s well-being Sustainability be maintained or improved? 3. Environment 7. Synthyesis and Is the integrity of the environment Continuous Learning assured over the long term? Does a full synthesis show that the net result will be positive or negative in 4. Economy the long term, and will there be Is the economic viability of the project or periodic reassessments? operation assured, and will the economy of the community and beyond be 6. Institutional Arrangements better off as a result? and Governance Are rules, incentives, programs, and capacities in place to address project 5. Traditional and Nonmarket Activities or operational consequences? Are traditional and nonmarket activities in the community and surrounding area accounted for in a way that is acceptable to the local people? Courtesy of the International Institute for Sustainable Development. Figure 16.2-6 Seven Questions to SustainabilityThomson and Joyce (2006) have also played a lead role inrecognizing the central role of the explorationist and juniorcompanies (that are the first to enter an area) in either creating Engagementlasting positive relationships or a climate of long-term tension.Working to entrench such acceptance is an insurance policythat includes both the ability to recognize meaningful changeand the ability to consider accommodating these changes. Dispute Reporting Informed Engagement Adequate Building a constructive engagement with the local com- Processes Resolution and Resources Voluntarymunity involves a series of challenging steps to (1) identify key Mechanism Verification Consentinterests, (2) learn how to listen to each interest’s concerns amidall the noise of existing pressures, and (3) develop a way for- Courtesy of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.ward for mining and metals operations based on mutual respect, Figure 16.2-7 Assessing the effectiveness of relationshipstrust, and integrity. It requires effort and resources, sometimes between operations and other interestsjust as much as many technical aspects of a project. And today,with the changing and growing role of many interests in society,if care is not taken to build the needed relationships, implica- A particularly important issue for the mining industrytions for proceeding effectively and efficiently on a project can is building effective relationships with indigenous people. Abe seriously undermined. At worst, physical conflict can occur. useful overview of issues relevant to this topic can be found A leading example of addressing community relationship in Render 2006. A current perspective on how to best achieveissues has been completed by Newmont Gold Corporation effective working relationships with indigenous people is pro-(2009). In this case, concerns over conflict led an ethical vided in ICMM 2010b. This is especially relevant for countriesinvestor to ask for a complete review of the relationships where the legal system does not provide strong protections forbetween Newmont operations and its host communities. The indigenous peoples. In the last decade, indigenous peoples’initial work, completed over 2 years, included an independent concerns have led to the emergence of special impact benefitreview panel. Building on existing and past attempts to build agreements that formally entrench special arrangements foreffective relationships, it led to a series of company–host com- participation. A current tool kit addressing such agreements ismunity interactions that, in turn, changed Newmont’s own now available (Gibson and O’Faircheallaigh 2010).internal management system. One result was that, in 2010, Considerations important to building effective relation-Newmont was ranked 16th in Corporate Responsibility mag- ships are shown in Figure 16.2-7. Table 16.2-2 is modified fromazine’s 11th Annual List of 100 Best Corporate Citizens in the 7QS work and lists the ideal answer to the question,“Arethe United States (Corporate Responsibility 2010), the only engagement processes in place and working effectively?,”andmining company in the top 20 and joining such businesses as offers example indicators that can be considered for compila-Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Gap, IBM, and Microsoft. tion in order to assess how close a given mining or metals
  • 9. Mining and Sustainability 1673Table 16.2-2 Engagement: Are engagement processes in place and working effectively?Question (Goal) Ideal Answer (Objectives) Example IndicatorsAre processes of engagement committed Satisfactory processes of engagement have been designed andto, designed, and implemented that implemented that Input • Ensure all affected communities of • Ensure all affected communities of interest (including vulnerable ⇓ interest (including vulnerable or or disadvantaged subpopulations due to, for example, gender, Output disadvantaged subpopulations due ethnicity, or poverty) are well informed and have the opportunity ⇓ to, for example, minority status, to participate in the decisions that influence their own future; and Result gender, ethnicity, or poverty) are well • Are understood, agreed upon, and consistent with the legal, informed and have the opportunity to institutional, and cultural characteristics of the community and participate in decisions that influence country where the project is located. their own future; • Are understood and agreed upon by As indicated by: implicated communities of interest; Engagement processes. Engagement processes are in place for all • Comprehensive mapping of interests and phases of the project/operation life cycle to serve as a mechanism for completed. • Are consistent with the legal, institu- • Collaboratively identifying desired objectives, best approaches for • Design of engagement strategy tional, and cultural characteristics of gathering evidence in support of achieving objectives (quantitative completed, including guidelines that the community and country where the and qualitative), assessment criteria, trade-offs and the bases for are agreed upon by all interests project is located? judging trade-offs; and • Full and satisfactory disclosure of • Overseeing the application of the approach to assessing the project-related information contribution to sustainability articulated here. • Effective implementation as signaled by participant satisfaction Dispute resolution mechanism. An agreed upon, affordable dispute • Dispute resolution mechanism(s) resolution mechanism (or set) exists and is understood by and • Effective mechanisms as signaled by accessible to all communities of interest. participant satisfaction Reporting and verification. Appropriate systems of reporting and • Systems in place verification are in place. • Systems working effectively from perspective of various interests Adequate resources. Adequate resources have been made available • Adequate resources available to ensure that all communities of interest can effectively participate as • Satisfaction with level of support needed. • Effective participation achieved as Note: Responsibility for ensuring that this capacity is in place rests assessed by company, community, with a mix of government, company, and the local community itself. indigenous peoples, and government The exact distribution of this responsibility should be worked out collaboratively. Informed and voluntary consent. The informed and voluntary consent • Broad community support of those affected by the project or operation has been given. Note: Inclusion of this factor does not imply that consent be given as a requirement for a project to proceed. The responsibility for approval lies with the relevant regulatory agency that is mandated by the laws of the country. Rather, this factor is included as a means to assess the extent of concurrence of those affected by a project. If that concurrence is high, the potential for achieving a net positive contribution to sustainability is greatly enhanced. In contrast, if negative feeling toward a project or operation is extensive, that potential is greatly reduced.Source: Adapted from MMSD North America 2002.operation is to achieving the ideal answer. In turn, the breadth movement came close examination of the social and economicof knowledge that Table 16.2-2 spans provides an indica- implications of mining activities, particularly in emergingtion of what any mining operation might be expected to take nations. One observation that emerged was that examples ofinto consideration when addressing this aspect of sustainable developing economies suggested a link between mining activ-development. ity and ongoing poverty. In these instances, was the presence of natural resources in fact a “resource curse” resulting fromContributing to Human Well-Being a combination of poor governance, corruption, and civil war?Most inside the mining industry take it for granted that min- There is a large amount of literature on this subject (e.g., seeing activities contribute to society in general, to investors that Davis 2009, Crowson 2009, Auty 1993, and Sachs and Warnerrisk their capital, to management and workers who are gain- 1995).fully employed as a result, and to the many host communi- More recently, work completed by the ICMM (McPhailties who experience the secondary and tertiary benefits that 2008) has demonstrated that the resource curse needn’t occurripple out from any mining activity. However, following hard if appropriate collaborative action is taken. The ICMM workon the heels of the rise of the contemporary environmental has identified six key areas of focus: (1) poverty reduction,
  • 10. 1674 SME Mining Engineering Handbook People Individuals Communities Distribution of Population health, Social and Responsibilities costs, benefits, safety, and cultural integrity and sureties are risks, and well-being are are assured assigned and responsibilities assured adequate is fair Community, Full social and organization, Worker health cultural costs, capacity, and safety are benefits, and risks infrastructure, assured have been resiliency, and considered dependency Courtesy of the International Institute for Sustainable Development. Figure 16.2-8 Example factors to consider in assessing the contributions of mining and/or metals operations to human well-being(2) revenue management, (3) regional development, (4) local operation? These factors draw on the foundation provided bycontent (the use of local labor and locally derived services socioeconomic impact analysis but use the lens of contribu-and supplies), (5) social investment, and (6) dispute resolu- tion. Table 16.2-3 then provides both the ideal answer as welltion. The key to success is the use of collaborative approaches as examples of the kind of indicators that might be consid-involving host governments, companies, civil society, and ered in assessing how close a given operation is to meeting thedonor agencies. ideal answer. As in the previous section, the range of topics One spin-off of the emergence of sustainability ideas provides a sense of what sustainable development means tostarting in the mid-1980s, the resource curse debate of the mining from this particular perspective.1990s and 2000s, and the ongoing challenging of the miningindustry by NGOs and in some cases host governments is a Contributing to Ecosystem Well-Beingrealization that much greater effort is required to understand, The relationship between a mining operation and its host envi-capture, and share the nature and extent of mining and metal’s ronment is the focus of the environmental impact assessmentcontribution to human well-being. No longer can it simply be and the resulting environmental management plan and relatedtaken for granted. environmental management systems. The approach used here A key issue requiring attention in emerging economies is builds on this foundation.a documented gender bias in mining whereby benefits (such Figure 16.2-9 shows one way of conceptualizing theas employment, income, training, education, and health care) environmental implications of a mining operation. It looks ataccrue largely to men and the local elite while most risks (such chemical, physical, and biological implications from both theas family and social disruption, domestic violence, alcohol- generation of environmental stress and the linked potential forism, HIV/AIDS, increased prostitution, loss of gardens for ecosystem restoration. The concept of restoration that is usedsubsistence agriculture, pollution, and water losses) fall on the here is not the idea that everything needs to be returned to apoorer women, the less advantaged, and the families they care chemical, physical, and biological premining state. Rather, afor (see Eftimie et al. 2009a and 2009b). A company purchas- robust ecosystem is sought that is naturally reproducing and sus-ing the bulk or all of its produce needs locally can be benefi- tainable. This is the domain of the emerging science and art ofcial for local farmers and landowners who see prices increase restoration ecology.for their produce, but this can also have the unintended effect A chemical, physical, and biological characterization ofof worsening the situation for the poor community women environmental implications is traditional and helpful fromwho may be unable to afford the higher food prices. These are several perspectives, including (1) often regulatory require-complex issues that require careful management approaches ments are organized in this manner; (2) the professionalfor any mining company. expertise that must be drawn on is often organized in this Figure 16.2-8 offers example factors to be considered in way; and (3) traditional education is offered in this way andanswering the question—“Will people’s well-being be main- therefore management’s understanding is often aided by thistained or improved” by a given mining, minerals or metals approach.
  • 11. Mining and Sustainability 1675Table 16.2-3 People: Will people’s well-being be maintained or improved?Question (Goal) Ideal Answer (Objectives) Example IndicatorsWill the project/operation lead directly or The project or operation will lead directly or indirectly toindirectly to maintenance of people’s well- the maintenance or improvement of people’s well-being Inputbeing, preferably an improvement • During the life of the project or operation or ⇓ • During the life of the project or • In postclosure Output operation, or ⇓ • In postclosure? Result As indicated by: Community organization and capacity. Effective and • Presence of an organizational structure that links representative community organization and capacity and represents the community in project-related (knowledge, skills, and resources) are in place in the local decision-making processes community, including representation of women and the • Training facilities in place disadvantaged in community leadership and decision • Local education/skills level to serve project making. needs and provide basis for postclosure Note: Responsibility for ensuring this capacity is in place activities • Community access to the information and rests with a mix of government, company, and the local community itself. The exact distribution of this responsibility expertise needed to ensure that properly should be worked out collaboratively. informed decisions are made Social/cultural integrity. All communities of interest have a • Existence of community and regional visions reasonable degree of confidence that social and cultural expressed explicitly in development and land- integrity will be maintained or preferably improved in a use plans way that is consistent with the vision and aspirations of the • Presence of key indicative social structures and community. their states • Sense of satisfaction signaled by all interests that Involuntary resettlement and other interventions will be social and cultural integrity will be maintained undertaken in such as way as to maintain or preferably or improved (including separate consultations improve social and cultural integrity. with community women and representatives of Note: This category is particularly dynamic and will change disadvantaged groups in the community) as a project proceeds. • Social and cultural indicators identified as significant by the community • Preparation and implementation of community- supported and project-induced migration management plans to help manage the impacts of the inflow of outsiders that occurs when a mining development is expected or announced Worker and population health, safety, and well-being. • Baseline studies completed that include basic Improvement of indicators of worker and population health, demographics to track population change safety, and well-being are maintained or improved. (birth rate, infant mortality, morbidity rates, Note: Responsibility for gathering this data and information in/out-migration), household incomes, and so lies with a mix of company (in terms of workers), community, forth, including gender disaggregated data and government. However, statistics on population health, • Worker health and safety training and education, jobs, income, poverty, debt, • Population health community resiliency, and community dependency typically • Training and education fall to government. • Jobs, income, poverty, debt • Crime and security • Community resiliency • Community dependency Availability of basic infrastructure. The infrastructure to meet • Water supply, sewage and wastewater treat- basic needs is available to workers and residents. ment, power, communications, transportation, education, health services Consideration of all direct, indirect, and induced or diffuse • Direct, indirect, and induced or diffuse eco- effects. All communities of interest have a reasonable degree nomic, social, and cultural effects of project of confidence that all direct, indirect, and induced or diffuse • Changes in social behavior as a result of the effects have been considered and addressed. project Note: Requirements will change through the project. Full social/cultural costs, benefits, and risks. All communities • Satisfaction that all social/cultural costs, of interest have a reasonable degree of confidence that the benefits, and risks found across the full life cycle full costs, benefits, and risks to people have been identified from exploration through postclosure have been and factored into project or operation-related decision identified and addressed making (as it applies throughout the full project or operation life cycle).Source: Adapted from MMSD North America 2002.
  • 12. 1676 SME Mining Engineering Handbook Environmental Implications of Mining Chemical Physical Biological Stress Restoration Stress Restoration Stress Restoration • Discharge of • Closure of facilities to • Alteration of surface • Closure of facilities• Introduction of exotic • Closure of facilities contaminants to ensure human safety water or ground- to ensure human species to ensure human surface water in and ecosystem water flow systems safety and ecosystem safety and ecosystem • Wildlife mortality: operational effluent integrity • Restructuring of land, integrity integrity including contaminant and runoff revegetation of • Cleanup of alteration of • Restoration of ingestion and/or disturbed areas • Discharge of previously topography and topography and roadkill contaminants to contaminated sites, landscapes landscapes • Alteration of habitat • Restoration/ groundwater in natural or human- improvement of • Instability leading to • Increased stability seepage made • Provision of access wildlife habitat in failure (slope, dam, of slopes and leading to increased adjacent areas • Discharge of tunnel, stream watercourses harvesting contaminants to air in crossing, foundation) • Enhancement of • Restoration of operational emissions human–wildlife • Noise generation surface and and dust interaction groundwater flow • Discharge of systems contaminants in accidental spills to waterways and land • Transfer of solid waste to landfills and hazardous waste to treatment or storage facilitiesFigure 16.2-9 Chemical, physical, and biological implications of mining/metals operations However, the ecological system does not function in typical economics of a mine is such that the first few yearssuch a compartmentalized way, and those expert in ecology (generally, years 1 to 5) are usually very profitable, which isin general and ecological restoration in particular have offered necessary to serve investors who require a return on investedalternative ways of addressing this challenge. Figure 16.2-10 capital. Middle years are moderately profitable (generally,offers such an approach, and Table 16.2-4 addresses the years 6 to 15), and older mines are usually marginally viable.question—“Is the integrity of the environment assured over Company managers strategize from this perspective becausethe long term?”—and provides both an ideal answer to this it is their legal responsibility to protect the investors. If aquestion as well as an example set of indicators that, if com- large number of operating mines within their system are inpiled, would serve to facilitate an assessment of how com- the older phase, a company can be vulnerable. However, frompatible a mining/metals operation would be with sustainable the perspective of an employee or service provider, the minedevelopment An increasingly important emerging issue is is meaningful as long as it operates and provides employ-understanding the full life-cycle environmental contribution ment. And the concern from the local, regional, or nationalof the metals. Much remains to be learned about the technique government is that the mine leads to a lasting contribution—of life-cycle analysis. however that is achieved. These different perspectives all fac- tor into the sustainable development equation.Economic Viability: Project, Community, Nation However, they do not imply that a project/company shouldUnderstanding the economics of a project lies at the heart of be assuming responsibility for the local, regional, or nationalsuccessful mining from a management and investment per- economy. Rather, it is often possible that by working in col-spective. Two key factors govern project economic stability: laboration with in-country partners, benefits can be achieved(1) the licensing and fiscal regimes under which mining takes for the host community, region, or country that involve littleplace—that they are efficient, noncorrupt, and result in secu- cost to the company but have significant benefits for the host.rity of tenure; and (2) an equitable sharing of costs, benefits, Further, if unintended economic consequences related to thisrisks, and responsibilities between the host country and the broader perspective arise and are not recognized, they mayinvestor. result in a liability to the company over the long term that For any project to be successful, the deposit, the com- can have grave consequences, including the possibility of thepany, and industry must all be economically viable. The national/local business environment deteriorating to the point
  • 13. Mining and Sustainability 1677 Environment Ecosystem Function, Capabilities, Environmental Full Ecosystem Resilience, and Ecological Closure Stress and Action Costs, Benefits, Responsibilities, Self-Organizing Entitlement Planning to Ensure Ecosystem and Risks and Sureties Capacity IntegrityCourtesy of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Figure 16.2-10 Elements for assessing the contribution of mining/metals operations to the environment over the long termTable 16.2-4 Environment: Is the integrity of the environment assured over the long term?Question (Goal) Ideal Answer (Objectives) Example IndicatorsWill the project or operation lead directly or The project or operation will lead directly or indirectlyindirectly to the maintenance or strengthening to the maintenance or strengthening of the integrity of Inputof the integrity of biophysical systems so that biophysical systems, as indicated by: ⇓they can continue in postclosure to provide the Outputneeded support for the well-being of people ⇓and other life forms? Result Ecosystem function, resilience, and self-organizing capacity. • Baseline studies completed All communities of interest hold a reasonable degree of • Monitoring systems in place confidence that ecosystem function, resilience, and self- • Projected effects of project on indicator species organizing capacity will be maintained or improved over of aquatic and terrestrial flora and fauna (iden- the long term. tified through both scientific assessment and traditional ecological knowledge studies) • Projected long-term well-being of water systems and renewable resources in the area of the mine/mineral project • Tracking rapid geological change Ecological entitlement. All communities of interest have • Degree of confidence a reasonable degree of confidence that the capacity of project-affected renewable and nonrenewable resources will be maintained or improved such that the needs of both present and future generations will be met. Full ecosystem costs, benefits, and risks. All communities • Full or total cost-accounting tools to assess the of interest have a reasonable degree of confidence that implications of the project the full costs, benefits, and risks to the ecosystem have • Satisfaction that all social/cultural costs, ben- been identified and factored into project/operation-related efits, and risks related to the full life cycle from decision making (as it applies throughout the full project/ exploration to postclosure have been identified operation life cycle). and addressed Capabilities, responsibilities, and sureties. All communities • Financial sureties and mechanisms to address of interest have a reasonable degree of confidence that potential present and future environmental the responsibilities and sureties for ensuring both short- liabilities and effort required to ensure the and long-term ecosystem well-being have been fully and continuing integrity of biophysical systems fairly assigned and accepted and that those responsible • Satisfaction that sureties and mechanisms will have the capacity and willingness to fulfill their roles provide adequate bridging to postclosure state. (including responsibilities attached to company, community, government, or NGO). Closure planning. All communities of interest are satisfied • Closure plans to best industry practice are in that closure plans meeting best industry practice have been place and fully integrated into mine design and completed; mine design and implementation are driven implementation by closure requirements to ensure that long-term financial, environmental, and social costs are minimized. (continues)
  • 14. 1678 SME Mining Engineering HandbookTable 16.2-4 Environment: Is the integrity of the environment assured over the long term? (continued)Question (Goal) Ideal Answer (Objectives) Example IndicatorsWill the project or operation lead directly or Environmental stress and action to ensure ecosystem • Material inputs/flows—water (surface, ground),indirectly to the maintenance or strengthening integrity. Physical, chemical, and biological stress imposed energy (by form and source), reagents (e.g.,of the integrity of biophysical systems so that on the ecosystem by the project or operation does not cyanide), fuels, solvents, lubricants, otherthey can continue in postclosure to provide the threaten the function, resilience, and self-organizing suppliesneeded support for the well-being of people capacity of the biophysical system; and appropriate • Recyclingand other life forms? actions are taken to ensure the continuing integrity of – Material recovery, oil, solvents, lubricants, biophysical systems. batteries, tires, etc. – Waste – Hazardous and solid waste generated and discharged • Water quality – Surface water: effluent chemistry, ambient water quality downstream, stream sediment storage and load – Groundwater: contaminant plume, plume chemistry, ambient quality downstream • Water quantity—maintenance of surface and groundwater supplies • Acid rock drainage and metal leaching— tailings, waste rock, workings; short- and long- term treatment required • Soils – Chemical, biological, and physical change – Erosion • Rapid and long-term landscape change – Deep open pits, mountaintop removal – Landslides and avalanches • Air quality – Emissions chemistry – Indoor air quality – Greenhouse gas emissions • Noise, on- and off-site • Environmental incidents, on- and off-site • Reclamation and restoration, on- and off-site • Environmental effects monitoring system in placeSource: Adapted from MMSD North America 2002.where the company can no longer operate efficiently or, in the a listing of the general categories of a classification of non-worst case, not at all. These are significant risks. profit institutions, which was developed at Johns Hopkins Figure 16.2-11 is a simple characterization of the eco- University and subsequently adopted by the United Nationsnomic aspects that require consideration. Table 16.2-5 (2003).responds to the question—“Is the economic viability of the Often, reacting to public criticism, mining companiesproject assured; will the community and broader economy be focus on environmental or social advocacy groups. A morebetter off as a result?” It then offers an ideal answer to that strategic approach would be to consider all aspects of civilquestion and a set of example indicators that can be compiled society that are important in a given community, ensuringto assess how close a given operation is to the ideal condition. that the contribution of the mining/metals activity to nonmar- ket and traditional activities is as efficiently and effectivelyTraditional and Nonmarket Activities pursued as possible. Traditional culture-based activities ofSince the 1980s, recognition has been growing of the signifi- indigenous people lie within this aspect of the sustainabilitycance of traditional and nonmarket activities—human activi- equation and are of particular importance to mining/metalsties that are not part of the market economy and therefore not operations in many parts of the world.captured in the accounting systems that underlie our systems Figure 16.2-12 is a simple characterization of the tra-of taxation or the national accounts. ditional and nonmarket aspects that require consideration. National accounts are used to track the flow of goods Table 16.2-7 responds to the question—“Are traditional andand services in the economy. Contributing data are organized nonmarket activities in the community and surrounding areain an indtustry classification system, which provides a use- accounted for in a way that is acceptable to the local people?”ful indication of human activity. The compiled data are used It then offers an ideal answer to that question and a set ofto calculate such indicators as national income and gross example indicators that can be compiled to assess how close adomestic product or gross national product. However, many given operation is to the ideal condition.activities important from a sustainability perspective lie out-side the formal market economy. One way of getting a sense Institutional Arrangements and Governanceof these is to consider the vast array of organizations of civil This category addresses the effectiveness of the formal andsociety, those engaged in not-for-profit work. Table 16.2-6 is informal rules that society creates to govern activities such
  • 15. Mining and Sustainability 1679 Economy Project or Government and Operational Economic Community/Regional Operation Broader Society Efficiencies Contributions Economics Economics EconomicsCourtesy of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Figure 16.2-11 Elements for assessing the economic viability of mining/metals operations over the long termTable 16.2-5 Economy: Is the economic viability of the project assured?Question (Goal) Ideal Answer (Objectives) Example IndicatorsIs the financial health of the project/company The financial health of the project/company is assured andassured and will the project or operation the project or operation will contribute (through planning, Inputcontribute (through planning, evaluations, evaluations, decision making, and action) to the long-term ⇓decision making, and action) to the long-term viability of the local, regional, and global economy, as Outputviability of the local and regional economy in indicated by: ⇓ways that will help ensure sufficiency for all Resultand provide specific opportunities for the lessadvantaged? Project or operation economics. Project or operation • Demonstrated positive project economics as calcu- economic success targets are achieved. lated in the feasibility study; economic targets met as the project proceeds Operational efficiencies • Mining efficiency • Processing efficiency • Refining efficiency Economic contributions: annual/total Contributions • To the local economy • To the regional economy • To the national economy • To the global economy • Total Community/regional economics. Community and adjacent • Demonstrated positive project economics as calcu- regional economic success targets are met, including direct lated in the feasibility study; economic targets met employment, indirect employment, and small and medium as project proceeds business development. • Distribution of economic benefits resulting from the project between the company, government, and local community, and within the local community between men and women and between the wealthy and the disadvantaged Government/broader society economics. A net economic • Net financial gain for government as the project contribution to governments and broader society is achieved. proceeds and meets economic targets, which contributes to economic growth and increased standards of livingSource: Adapted from MMSD North America mining/mineral projects and operations. This is a complex Standardization (ISO), which has developed widely acceptedarea that includes internal corporate management systems as quality management systems (ISO 9001), environmental man-well those found in broader society. Although some rules are agement systems (ISO 14001), and risk management princi-written, others are unwritten and simply accepted as part of ples and guidelines (ISO 31001).culture—internal corporate culture and culture of the hostcommunity and country. Reporting and Assurance Since the mid-1990s, there have been a number of significantInternal Management Systems developments regarding how a mining/metals company pub-Adaptation of internal management systems to sustainabil- licly reports its sustainability-related performance and howity is well under way. A useful overview of many related that reported progress is assured using independent third-issues is provided by Botvin 2009. An early foundation was party assurance. Three initiatives are particularly relevant toprovided by the work of the International Organization for the mining industry:
  • 16. 1680 SME Mining Engineering HandbookTable 16.2-6 United Nations classification of nonprofit institutionsGroup Subgroups 1. Culture and Recreation Culture and Arts, Sports, Other 2. Education and Research Primary and Secondary, Higher, Other, Research 3. Health Hospitals and Rehabilitation Nursing Homes, Mental Health and Crisis Intervention, Other 4. Social Services Social Services, Emergency Relief, Income Support and Maintenance 5. Environment Environment, Animal Protection 6. Development and Housing Economic, Social and Community Development, Housing, Employment and Training 7. Law, Advocacy, and Politics Civic and Advocacy Organizations, Law and Legal Services, Political Organizations 8. Philanthropic Intermediaries and Volunteerism Promotion Grant-Making Foundations, Other 9. International International Activities10. Religion Religious Congregations and Associations11. Business and Professional Associations, Unions Business Associations, Professional Associations, Unions12. Not elsewhere classified Not elsewhere classifiedSource: United Nations 2003. 1. Mining and Metals Sector Supplement (MMSS) of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Traditional 2. ICMM Reporting and Assurance System and Nonmarket 3. Towards Sustainable Mining (TSM) system of the Mining Activities Association of Canada (MAC)All of these initiatives recognize that for the industry toimprove its reputation and credibility, improved performancelinked to an alignment with public values is essential. Froma company perspective, there is a close link to risk manage- Activity/Use Traditional Culturalment. All three of these initiatives are cognizant of the need Levels Attributesto synchronize. GRI MMSS. The GRI is a network-based organizationthat over the past decade has pioneered the development of the Courtesy of the International Institute for Sustainable’s most widely used sustainability reporting framework. Figure 16.2-12 Elements for considering implications of mining/The GRI framework sets out principles and indicators that metals operation on traditional and nonmarket activityorganizations can use to measure and report their economic,environmental, and social performances. At its heart sits thegeneric 2006 G3 Guidelines that refer to all applications. In a process for finding common ground with our communitiesaddition, sector supplements and national annexes are being of interest, to build a better mining industry today and in thedeveloped over time. As of 2010, 15 sector supplements have future” (MAC 2010). TSM focuses on company managementbeen developed, one of which is focused on mining. systems and provides a means of evaluating their quality, Following 6 years of intense multistakeholder develop- comprehensiveness, and robustness. As of 2010, four per-ment, the GRI MMSS was released in March 2010 (ICMM formance elements were finalized: (1) tailings management,2010c). MMSS addresses the following nine main sector topics: (2) energy use and greenhouse gas emission management, (3) external outreach, and (4) crisis management planning. In 1. Biodiversity addition, work on aboriginal relations, biodiversity conserva- 2. Emissions, effluents, and waste tion, safety and health, and mine closure is in varying states 3. Labor of implementation. 4. Indigenous rights 5. Community Nation-Based Mining Law 6. Artisanal and small-scale mining In all cases, host countries own the natural resources. Thus 7. Resettlement complex systems of laws and regulations are put in place to 8. Closure planning guide exploration, production, closure, use, reuse and recy- 9. Materials stewardship cling. Every company is responsible for developing an under- ICMM’s reporting and assurance system. ICMM’s standing of the particular regulatory regime that is in placesystem serves as a means to demonstrate that members have where it is active.delivered on the commitments contained in the 10 ICMMprinciples and the related position statements (Figure 16.2-1). Important International AgreementsMembers must meet GRI reporting requirements, and inde- A large number of international agreements have significantpendent third-party assurance is required on an overall com- implications for the mining, minerals, and metals industry.pany system basis. These range from the transport of hazardous materials to MAC’s TSM initiative. MAC describes TSM as “a strat- human rights and chemicals management. Here, too, it is theegy for improving the mining industry’s performance by align- responsibility of companies to understand this complex part ofing its actions with the priorities and values of Canadians; and the operating environment.
  • 17. Mining and Sustainability 1681Table 16.2-7 Traditional and nonmarket activities: Are traditional and nonmarket activities accounted for in a way that is acceptable tothe local people?Question (Goal) Ideal Answer (Objectives) Example IndicatorsWill the project/operation contribute to the long-term The project/operation will contribute to the long-termviability of traditional and nonmarket activities in the viability of traditional and nonmarket activities in the Inputimplicated community and region? implicated community and region, as indicated by: ⇓ Output ⇓ Result Activity/use levels. Maintenance of activity/use levels • Baseline study of traditional and nonmarket is designated by the community in question. activities completed • Dependency levels on traditional and nonmarket activities Traditional cultural attributes. Maintenance of • Use of indigenous language traditional cultural attributes is designated by the • See also Table 16.2-3 community in question.Source: Adapted from MMSD North America 2002.Assessing the Effectiveness of Institutional Arrangements exploration sets the stage for all that follows, the nature ofand Governance the relationship established between the exploration team andElements that could contribute to an assessment of the effective- affected communities of interest sets the tone going forward.ness of institutional arrangements and governance are shown in Only in the last few years have models for appropriate engage-Figure 16.2-13 and are described in greater detail in Table 16.2-8. ment during exploration begun to emerge (e.g., see Thomson and Joyce 2006 and 2008).Synthesis and Continuous Learning The leading node of guidance on exploration and sus-Many companies employ an internal system of planning, deci- tainability comes from the Prospectors and Developerssion making, implementation, performance assessment, and Association of Canada (PDAC) and its e3 Plus Framework foradjustment as a matter of course. This element of the 7QS Responsible Exploration (PDAC 2010). The program is aimedframework calls for the same kind of approach to be taken but at helping exploration companies continuously improve theirusing the lens of sustainability as the driver. Example elements social, environmental, and health and safety performances andthat could contribute to an assessment of the effectiveness of to comprehensively integrate these three aspects into all theiran overall integrated evaluation and capacity for continuous exploration programs. It includes a set of overarching princi-learning and improvement are summarized in Figure 16.2-14 ples and explanatory guidance notes; and three comprehensiveand described in greater detail in Table 16.2-9. tool kits addressing social responsibility, environmental stew- ardship, and health and safety. For their part, the principlesPERSPECTIVES BY PROJECT LIFE-CYCLE PHASES deal withApplication of sustainability concepts to the mining, minerals, • Responsible governance and management,and metals industry requires attention paid to the full project • Ethical business practices,and mineral life cycles (see earlier discussion in the “Boundary • Human rights,Conditions for Applying Sustainability Ideas to Mining” sec- • Project due diligence and risk assessment,tion). A cursory summary of phase-by-phase observations fol- • Engagement with host communities and other affectedlows. (This discussion is modified from MMSD 2002.) and interested parties, • Contributing to community development and socialExploration well-beingExploration is the starting point of the entire mineral project • Protecting the environment, andlife cycle. However, only 1 out of 1,000 exploration projects • Safeguarding the health and safety of workers and theever evolves to the next level of activity (often more explora- local population.tion). Explorationists generally have the objective of gettinginto and out of areas quickly and moving on to the next evalu- The e3 Plus program is currently examining options foration. Exploration is highly competitive and therefore secre- reporting and assurance that will echo those described. Ative by design. Without positive relationships with the local significant driver is the demand by senior firms that the con-community, serious tensions can occur. For their part, local ditions they might inherit through acquisition of advancedresidents want to know what is happening and how their lives exploration projects take into consideration the full range ofmight be affected. Left to ferment, anger and/or unintended sustainability components, in particular the need for effectiveexpectations can grow—either of which can subsequently engagement with host communities.cause difficulty. Although the extent of the human and envi-ronmental implications is less than in later phases of activity, Design and Constructionthey can be profound. Oftentimes concerns center on access Relative to other phases of activity, the design and construc-routes, which can open up large areas of untouched territory. tion phase is short. However, this intense pulse of activities Exploration is the first time that the desirability or appro- and related social and environmental implications can bepriateness of mining in a particular area is considered. Because destructive if not carefully managed. This phase of activity
  • 18. 1682 SME Mining Engineering Handbook Institutional Arrangements and Governance Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Mix of Legislated Overall Confidence That Capacity to Address Bridging to Rules, Voluntary Programs, Commitments Made Will Operational Consequences Postclosure Conditions Market Incentives, and Be Fulfilled Unspoken Cultural NormsCourtesy of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Figure 16.2-13 Example elements for assessing the effectiveness of institutional arrangements and governanceTable 16.2-8 Institutional arrangements and governance: Are capacities in place to address project or operational consequences?Question (Goal) Ideal Answer (Objectives) Example IndicatorsAre the institutional arrangements and Satisfactory institutional arrangements and governancesystems of governance in place to provide mechanisms are in place, as indicated by: Inputa reasonable degree of confidence that the ⇓capacity to address project or operation Outputconsequences will continue to exist through ⇓the full life cycle, including postclosure? Result Mix of rules, market incentives, voluntary programs, and • Satisfaction with mix from the perspective of cultural norms. An effective mix of legislated rules, market the various communities of interest, including incentives, voluntary programs, and cultural norms is in company, community, indigenous peoples, place for governing project activities. NGOs, government Capacity. A reasonable degree of confidence is held by • Capacity of community support infrastructure all communities of interest that the capacity to address to meet the needs of residents and workers of project or operation consequences is in place now and will the region continue to exist throughout the full project/operation life • Monitoring and enforcement programs in place cycle, including postclosure. with adequate resources committed for the full project life cycle Bridging. A reasonable degree of confidence is held by • Existence of community-based nonmining all communities of interest that sufficient local capacity and economic and social development initiatives commitment will be developed and an adequate level of resources will be accumulated and set aside throughout the life of the project/operation to ensure a smooth transition to an acceptable postclosure condition (ecological, social, cultural, economic) for the community that remains. Confidence that commitments made will be fulfilled. A • System of publicly reported reporting and reasonable degree of confidence is held by all communities assurance in place of interest that commitments that have been made will be • Level of funding to cover rehabilitation/recla- fulfilled. mation costs during operations and at closureSource: Adapted from MMSD North America 2002.also marks the time that formal approvals are sought and practices as the project owner or manager. Effective systemsreceived. During approvals processes, key opportunities (policy, management, oversight, incentives) for ensuring goodexist for engagement with communities of interest (see pre- practices are essential.vious discussion of effective engagement in the “EffectiveEngagement” section). Operation The influx of outsiders seeking employment and new The operation phase typically receives the greatest amountopportunities can create significant changes within the of attention. When the general public conjures an image of acommunity—often for the worse—and preparation and imple- mining/mineral project or operation, it is the operation phasementation of a project-induced migration management plan that is imagined, whether the activity be mining, smelting,that is acceptable to the established community population can refining, metals manufacturing, or recycling. Economic, social,help manage the impacts. Many of the activities are under- cultural, and environmental implications are relatively welltaken by subcontractors who may or may not follow the same understood, although their treatment is uneven in practice.
  • 19. Mining and Sustainability 1683 Overall Integrated Assessment and Continuous Learning Project-Level Stretegic-Level Continuous Learning Overall Synthesis Alternatives Alternatives and ImprovementCourtesy of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Figure 16.2-14 Synthesis and continuous learning—elements to considerTable 16.2-9 Synthesis and continuous learning: Does synthesis show that the net result will be positive or negative?Question (Goal) Ideal Answer (Objectives) Example IndicatorsHas an overall evaluation been made and An overall evaluation been made and a system is in placeis a system in place for periodic revaluation for periodic revaluation based on consideration of Inputbased on • At the project level, consideration of all reasonable ⇓ • At the project level, consideration of all alternative configurations including the no-go option; Output reasonable alternative configurations • At the overarching strategic level, consideration of all ⇓ and designs (including the no-go option reasonable alternatives for supplying the commodity and Result in the initial evaluation); the services it provides for meeting society’s needs; and • At the overarching strategic level, con- • Synthesis of all the factors raised in this list of questions, sideration of all reasonable alternatives leading to an overall judgment that the contribution to for supplying the commodity and the people and ecosystems will be net positive in the long services it provides for meeting society’s term; needs; and • A synthesis of all the factors raised As indicated by: in this list of questions, leading to an overall judgment that the contribution Project-level alternatives. All reasonable project alternatives • All key alternatives considered, for example: to people and ecosystems will be net have been considered. – Access positive in the long term? – Transportation – Energy supply – Water supply – Local infrastructure – Tailings and effluent management – Mineral processing options Strategic-level alternatives • Strategic level review that confirms project need Overall synthesis. A synthesis has been completed, and the • Synthesis undertaken system is in place to for periodic reassessment. Continuous learning and improvement. A commitment to • Mechanism(s) and resources in place to continuous learning and improvement is held by all interests, periodically repeat the overall sustainability including company, community, government, and others. assessment and report the results publiclySource: Adapted from MMSD North America 2002.Closure: Temporary, Final, Post Today, design-for-closure includes (1) physical environmen-Temporary closure (due to changing metal prices, accident, tal aspects, (2) social and community sustainability aspects,disaster, or labor strife) rarely receives the pre-event planning and, importantly, (3) financial assurance that resources will beand consideration that it should. Though often a temporary available for needed closure and postclosure activities.closure can run a few short days or weeks, sometimes so-called Design-for-postclosure involves a significant increase intemporary closures can stretch into many years’ duration. the time horizon governing project design criteria, whether the While concepts of design-for-closure date from the 1970s focus be social or environmental in nature. Furthermore, suc-(J. Gadsby, personal communication), concepts of sustain- cessful design-for-postclosure identifies a need for involve-ability now demand design-for-postclosure. Huge benefits can ment of those affected by postclosure conditions from thebe realized by ensuring that closure and postclosure activi- earliest phases of any project. Fortunately, in the case of clo-ties are conceived of and implementation is begun during the sure and postclosure, research and experience have produceddesign and construction and operational phases of activity. a number of successful models. One thing emerges from all
  • 20. 1684 SME Mining Engineering Handbook Be a good Do what is desired Growing expectation that corporations will corporate citizen by the community demonstrate good citizenship; is very culture specific Philanthropic Responsibility Be ethical Do what is expected Governs reputation that is critical to the social by the community license to operate; is very culture specific; includes Ethical Responsibility host country and more fundamental aspects Obey the law Do what is required Social contract varies by country but legal Legal Responsibility by the community responsibility always exists Be profitable Do what is required by Foundation of business; acceptable rate of Economic Responsibility the economic system return or growth rate may varySource: Carroll 1991.Figure 16.2-15 Carroll’s pyramid of corporate responsibility and performanceof them: succeeding custodians, the people who will remain and serves to illustrate a kind of hierarchy that applies to cor-nearby long after mining operations cease, need to be at the porate responsibility.table. It is only with their presence that their values can befactored into project implementation and the bridging role of Revenue Transparency and the Extractive Industriesa mine/mineral project or operation can be realized. Transparency Initiative One delicate issue that the industry is now examining, One dimension of CSR that has been in the limelight haswhich emerges because of the longer time horizons now being been the question of the revenues that flow from an activeconsidered combined with the societal demand for greater operation to the government. Concerns that these revenuestransparency, is the whole question of estimating long-term were being intercepted for personal gain led to the creationclosure liability and related financial assurance. of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Launched at the World Summit on Sustainable DevelopmentCORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY in Johannesburg, South Africa, in September 2002, EITI hasApplication of sustainability concepts to the mining, miner- grown to become a broad coalition of governments, majorals and metals industry evokes yet another perspective that is organizations of civil society, institutional investors, interna-growing in importance—the issue of corporate social respon- tional organizations, international financial institutions, andsibility (CSR). Establishing the nature and extent of a com- companies (oil and gas, mining). EITI is active in 47 countriespany’s social responsibility is of deep importance in today’s in which mining plays a significant role in the CSR provides a critical and natural overarching sup- EITI represents a global standard for (1) extractiveplement to sustainable development and sustainability ideas companies to publish the revenues they pay to governmentsand provides another direct connection to values through the in implementing countries (taxes, royalties, licenses, fees);addition of an ethical lens. At the same time, contemporary (2) national governments to disclose what they receive; andideas of applied sustainability provide a foundation for CSR; (3) the payments and receipts to be reconciled in a third-partythey are closely linked but not the same. assured process. Each national application is overseen by an Values are “something which is prized as of great worth in-country tripartite multistakeholder committee consisting ofand desirability: that which is respected and which motivates representatives of industry, government, and civil society.action...concepts which motivate actors in a general way tomore specific goals” (Chadwick 1978). The described treat- Bridging Issue of Human Rightsment of applied sustainability starts with a values-based Respecting human rights is clearly part of corporate respon-proposition, one that says that we care for both people and sibility. For the 19 corporate members of ICMM and the 30the environment. In contrast, ethics is the science of right or affiliated mining associations that, in turn, link to anotherwrong. It provides rules of behavior that signal what is con- 1,500 companies, respect for human rights is a key aspect ofsidered decent and honest as opposed to misleading, dishon- sustainable development.est, or unscrupulous. In 2005, the UN secretary-general appointed John Values and ethics combine to establish the boundaries of Ruggie, Berthold Beitz professor in human rights and inter-appropriate CSR. Over the last decade, there has been growing national affairs at the Kennedy School of Government,emphasis on CSR. The events in the financial services industry Harvard University, as his special representative on busi-that sparked the 2008 recession have added fuel to the debate. ness and human rights. Five thousand companies are nowCarroll (1991) offers an interesting and helpful pyramid of engaged worldwide in this initiative (Business and Humancorporate responsibility and performance (Figure 16.2-15) Rights Resource Centre n.d.). Ruggie played a central role
  • 21. Mining and Sustainability 1685 benefits, risks, and responsibilities among governments, men and women, rich and poor, and present and future generations. Citizen Values • Decision making, trade-offs: Designing and implement- ing optimum decision making systems and approaches Safety from Harm Responsibility that effectively and fairly address trade-offs in any given Adaptability site application. Accountability and Transparency • Need and alternatives: Effectively and fairly assessing Inclusion the need for a given project and/or commodity in light of Stewardship considerations and alternatives that span local to global Knowledge implications. • Achieving a whole system perspective: Seeing, under- Ehtical Principles Objectives standing, and factoring in a sense of the whole system, Sensitivity to Value Differences Fairness not just the small component parts. Respect for Future Generations Public Health and Safety • Uncertainty, precaution, and adaptive management: Respect for People and Cultures Worker Health and Safety Respect for Life Community Well-Being Dealing with uncertainty using an appropriate level of Justice Security precaution and an adaptive management approach. Fairness Environmental Integrity • Attribution problem and dealing with cumulative Economic Viability impacts: Effectively addressing the common situation Adaptability where a project is one of a number of contributors to social, cultural, economic, and environmental change or stress—establishing the cumulative implications, appor- tioning responsibility, and deciding who should takeSource: Data from Joanna Facella, Nuclear Waste Management Organiza- responsibility for the analysis.tion, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Figure 16.2-16 Toward an ethical lens for mining These issues are not new. Together, they are a testament to some of the complexities that must be faced in bringing the ideas of sustainability from theory to practice. In addition toin preparing the UN Millennium Summit in 2000, including the previous list, the following practical issues remain to bedrafting the summit’s final “Declaration,” which adopted the resolved to improve the contribution of the mining industry toMillennium Development Goals that have brought renewed sustainability:energy and focus to the fight against global poverty. In 2008, • Capacity building: Creating the necessary national andRuggie produced the now well-accepted “Protect, Respect, local governance systems that can facilitate effective andand Remedy” framework for corporate responsibility, which principled engagement among industry, government,outlined in clear terms the distinctive but complementary and civil society.roles of government and corporations regarding human rights: • Voluntary codes of conduct: Increasing participationWhile governments have the primary responsibility for the in and enhancement of values-based, principled codes ofprotection of human rights, companies have a responsibil- conduct that lift broad industry performance above legis-ity for respecting them. The reporting and assurance systems lated minimums.described previously include treatment of company respect for • Climate change: Establishing how the mining industryhuman rights. can most effectively contribute to addressing the issue of global warming.Toward an Ethical Lens for Mining • Artisanal and small-scale mining: Establishing howIt is inevitable that the material described in this chapter, taken such mining can be best managed in various countriestogether, signals that the world is moving toward developing and within the context of sustainable development, tak-a kind of ethical lens for assessing the mining, minerals, and ing into account environmental and social implications asmetals industry. During the period 2002–2005, a Canadian ini- well as links to large-scale mining (for a comprehensivetiative undertook a comprehensive review of alternatives for treatment of these issues, see CASM n.d.).managing used nuclear fuel over the long term. Figure 16.2-16 • Consistent application of performance standards:shows the results of an extensive discussion with Canadians Achieving consistency in the application of sustainableabout the values (Watling et al. 2004), ethical principles development ideas within countries, between countries,(NWMO 2005), and related objectives that were used to and across the industry from juniors to majors.assess options for long-term management of used nuclear fuel • Effective human resource management: Effectively(NWMO 2004). Together they serve as an innovative ethical creating the foundation of education, training, and sup-lens that is as applicable to mining in general as it is to the port that is required to ensure the needed flow of skilledmanagement of nuclear waste. personnel (see Freemen and Miller 2009).LOOKING FORWARD All the issues listed are critical to effective application of sustainable development concepts to the mining and metalsOngoing Issues industry.A number of issues remain to be fully addressed (modifiedfrom MMSD North America 2002 and Hodge 2004): New Perspectives • Fair distribution: Detailed site-specific procedures In current public debate, many challenge the consumptive for describing and addressing the distribution of costs, nature of modern society. Professor Saleem Ali has offered an
  • 22. 1686 SME Mining Engineering Handbookalternative perspective on this divisive topic that has signifi- • Consolidation among both operating firms and technol-cant implications for the mining, minerals, and metals industry ogy suppliers in response to commodity-price pressures(Ali 2009). He argues that simply disavowing consumption of and the desire to achieve economies of scale;materials is not likely to help in planning for a resource-scarce • Globalization of mining activities and the increased rolefuture, given the extent of inequity in today’s world, devel- of developing regions in mineral production and of min-opment imperatives, and our goals for a democratic global ing in the developing countries’ economies;society. Rather than suppress the creativity and desire to dis- • Conflict in weak governance zones;cover—which he calls “the treasure impulse”—Ali proposes • Increasing worldwide consumption of key mined com-a new environmental paradigm, one that accepts our need to modities with increasing demand in emerging economies;consume “treasure” for cultural and developmental reasons • Increased dependence on metals to support a shift to abut warns of our concomitant need to conserve. green economy; and In evaluating the impact of treasure consumption on • Growing formal recognition that no one party can do itresource-rich countries, he argues that a way exists to consume alone.responsibly and alleviate global poverty. Ali’s thesis brings a These drivers of change are not going to disappear; ifmuch needed additional perspective relevant to applying sus- anything, their significance will increase. The result is thattainability ideas to the mining industry. the mining industry is embracing change in an unprecedented manner, and the concepts that have emerged to guide thatChange and Change Management change in a strategic and systematic way are those of sustain-The role of metals and minerals in providing for both human ability and sustainable development.and ecosystem well-being is critical, and the mining and met-als industry enjoys a deep and rich heritage. However, this ACKNOWLEDGMENTSsame heritage brings with it an innate resistance to change This chapter greatly benefited from reviews by Laeequethat can impede needed change. There are many contributing Daneshmend, head of the Department of Mining Engineering,factors to this resistance, including Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Dirk van • Tradition: “We’ve always done it this way and it has Zyl, professor of mining, University of British Columbia, worked, why change now?” or “If it’s not broken, why Vancouver, Canada; Leigh Freeman, principal, Downing Teal, fix it?”; Denver, Colorado, United States; and John Strongman and col- • A number of economic factors that tend to favor risk-averse leagues in the Mining Group at the World Bank, Washington, behaviors, including the volatility and uncertainty inher- D.C., United States. Peter Darling provided ongoing useful ent in commodities markets, the scale and complexity of guidance throughout. Gemma Lee proofread and caught the operations, the highly competitive nature of the business, many inevitable small mistakes. All of these inputs are greatly and the resulting thin margins (Peterson et al. 2001); and appreciated. However, while the comments received added • A range of factors that can come into play at a personal much richness, responsibility for the substance as it stands level and apply not only in mining but in any industry. and, in particular, any remaining errors rest with the author. Examples include uncertainty, lack of training, lack of understanding about how change might affect a given job REFERENCES or activity, loss of job status, loss of security, and timing Ali, S. 2009. Treasures of the Earth Need, Greed, and a (summarized from Stanislao and Stanislao 1983). Sustainable Future. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. To overcome this resistance requires well-thought-out and Auty, R.M. 1993. Sustaining Development in Mineralappropriate change strategies. Sometimes this calls for a cata- Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis. London:lytic role, sometimes a role in bringing people together, some- Routledge.times the provision of resources, and sometimes the design of Botvin, J.A., ed. 2009. Sustainable Management of Mininga new and innovative solution. The key is to be strategic. Operations. Littleton, CO: SME. Since the 1980s, a number of factors have emerged to Business and Human Rights Resource Centre. n.d. wwwprovide a vital and exciting climate of change in the mining Accessed July 2010.industry. These factors include Carroll, A.B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social respon- • Increased public scrutiny of mining activities and the rise sibility: Toward the moral management of organizational in the activity level, sophistication, and significance of stakeholders. Bus. Horiz. 34(4):39–48. civil society organizations; CASM (Communities and Small Scale Mining). n.d. Web site • Public recognition of the significance of environmental hosted by the World Bank at and social risks and liabilities associated with mining index.cfm. Accessed July 2010. practices and, in both regulatory and financial services Chadwick, G. 1978. A Systems View of Planning—Towards a industry practices, a shift that clearly assigns those liabil- Theory of the Urban and Regional Planning Process, 2nd ities to project owners and proponents; ed. Vol. 1, Urban and Regional Planning Series. Oxford, • Changing practices in the financial services industry that England: Pergamon Press. p. 125. are increasingly linking access to capital to a demonstra- Corporate Responsibility. 2010. Corporate Responsibility tion of corporate responsibility using sustainability crite- magazine releases 11th annual 100 best corpo- ria in the assessment process—a factor much reinforced rate citizens list. by the 2008–2009 financial crisis; Corporate-Responsibility-Magazine-Releases-11th -Annual-100-Best-Corporate-Citizens-List. Accessed July 2010.
  • 23. Mining and Sustainability 1687Crowson, P. 2009. The resource curse: A modern myth? In ICMM (International Council on Mining and Metals). 2010c. Mining, Society and a Sustainable World. Edited by Sustainability Reporting Guidelines and Mining and J.P. Richards. Berlin: Springer. pp. 3–36. Metals Sector Supplement. London: ICMM.Davis, G.A. 2009. Extractive economies, growth and the poor. IFC (International Finance Corporation). 2006. IFC Sustain- In Mining, Society and a Sustainable World. Edited by ability Framework: Policy on Social and Environmental J.P. Richards. Berlin: Springer. pp. 37–60. Sustainability, Policy on Disclosure, and PerformanceEftimie, A., Heller, C., and Strongman, J. 2009a. Gender Standards on Social and Environmental Sustainability. www Dimensions of the Extractive Industries. Washington, DC: World Bank. _SocEnvSustainability2006/$FILE/SustainabilityPolicyEftimie, A., Heller, C., and Strongman, J. 2009b. Mainstreaming .pdf. Accessed July 2010. Gender into Extractive Industries Projects. Washington, IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development). DC: World Bank. n.d. Sustainable development principles., W. 1960. Man, Mind and Land—A Theory of Resource sd/principle.aspx. Accessed October 2010. Use. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. p. 20. ISO 9001. 2008. Quality Management Systems. Available fromFreeman, L.W., and Miller, H.B. 2009. Human resource management. In Sustainable Management of Mining _detail.htm?csnumber=46486. Operations. Littleton, CO: SME. pp. 133–176. ISO 14001. 2004/2009. Environmental ManagementFreeze, R.A. 1987. Technical Analysis and Social Decision- Systems. Available from Making: The 1987 Hagey Lecture. Waterloo, ON: catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?ics1=13&ics2= University of Waterloo Press. p. 34. 20&ics3=10&csnumber=54536.Gibson, G., and O’Faircheallaigh, C. 2010. IBA Community ISO 31001. 2009. Risk Management. Available from www Toolkit—Negotiation and Implementation of Impact and Benefit Agreements. www.ibacommunitytoolkit .htm?csnumber=43170. .ca/pdf/IBA_toolkit_March_2010_high_resolution.pdf. MAC (Mining Association of Canada). 2010. Towards Accessed July 2010. Sustainable Mining 101: A Primer., R.B. 2000. Favouring the higher test: Contribution www/media_lib/TSM_101/MAC_TSM_101_Primer to sustainability as the central criterion for reviews and _February_2010_FINAL.pdf. Accessed July 2010. decisions under the Canadian Environmental Assessment McPhail, K. 2008. Sustainable development in the mining and Act. J. Environ. Law Pract. 10(1):39–54. metals sector: The case for partnership at local, nationalHodge, R.A. 1995. Assessing progress toward sustainability: and global levels. Essay prepared for the ICMM, London. Development of a systemic framework and reporting Mitchell, B. 1991. “Beating” conflict and uncertainty in structure. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Urban Planning, resource management and development. In Resource Faculty of Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC. Management and Development. Edited by B. Mitchell.Hodge, R.A. 1996. A systemic approach to assessing prog- Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press. pp. 268–285. ress toward sustainability. In Achieving Sustainable MMSD (Mining Minerals and Sustainable Development). Development. Edited by A. Dale and J.B. Robinson. 2002. Breaking New Ground: Mining, Minerals and Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press. Sustainable Development. London: International InstituteHodge, R.A. 1997. Toward a conceptual framework for assess- for Environment and Development. ing progress toward sustainability. In Social Indicators MMSD North America. 2002. Seven Questions to Research, Vol. 40. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. Sustainability—Assessing How a Mine/Mineral Project pp. 5–98. or Operation Contributes to Sustainability. Winnipeg,Hodge, R.A. 2004. Mining’s seven questions to sustainabil- MB: International Institute for Sustainable Development. ity: From mitigating impacts to encouraging contribution. Newmont Gold Corporation. 2009. Community Relationships Episodes 27(3):177–185. Review., R.A. 2006. Mining, minerals and sustainability. In Accessed July 2010. Linking Industry and Ecology—A Question of Design. NWMO (Nuclear Waste Management Organization). Edited by R. Cote, J. Tansey, and A. Dale. Vancouver, 2004. Assessing the Options—Future Management of BC: University of British Columbia Press. pp. 151–175. Used Nuclear Fuel in Canada. NWMO AssessmentHodge, R.A. 2007. Tracking progress toward sustainability: Team Report. Linking the power of measurement and story. In Mining MediaFiles/1092_9-1assessingtheoptions_nwmoass Engineering. Littleton, CO: SME. .pdf. Accessed July 2010.Hodge, R.A., and Merkhofer, M.W. 2008. Faro Mine Closure, NWMO (Nuclear Waste Management Organization). 2005. Assessing the Alternatives: An Application of Multi- Ethical and Social Framework. Roundtable on Ethics, Attribute Utility Analysis. Final Report of the Faro Nuclear Waste Management Organization. www.nwmo. Closure Assessment Team. Whitehorse, YT: Assessment ca/ethicalandsocialframework. Accessed July 2010. and Abandoned Mines Branch, Department of Energy PDAC (Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada). Mines and Resources, Government of Yukon. 2010. e3 Plus, a framework for responsible exploration.ICMM (International Council on Mining and Metals). 2010a. Accessed July 2010. Making a Difference: Annual Review of the International Peterson, D.J., LaTourrettte, T., and Bartis, J.T. 2001. New Council on Mining and Metals. London: ICMM. Forces at Work in Mining—Industry Views of CriticalICMM (International Council on Mining and Metals). 2010b. Technology. Santa Monica, CA; Arlington, VA: RAND Good Practice Guide: Indigenous People and Mining. Science and Technology Policy Institute. p. 11. London: ICMM.
  • 24. 1688 SME Mining Engineering HandbookRender, J.M. 2006. Mining and Indigenous Peoples’ Issue Thomson, I., and Joyce, S.A. 2008. The social licence to Review. London: International Council on Mining and operate: What it is and why it seems so hard to obtain. Metals. In Proceedings, PDAC Convention. Toronto, ON:Robinson, J.G., Francis, G., Legge, R., and Lerner, S. 1990. Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada. Defining a sustainable society: values, principles, and United Nations. 2003. Handbook on Non-profit Institutions definitions. Alternatives 17(2):36–46. in the System of National Accounts., J.D., and Warner, A.M. 1995. Natural resource abun- publications/pdf/icnpo.pdf. Accessed July 2010. dance and economic growth. Working paper, Cambridge, United Nations Global Compact. n.d. Corporate Citizenship MA: Center for International Development and Harvard in the World Economy. Institute for International Development Harvard news_events/8.1/GC_brochure_FINAL.pdf. Accessed July University. 2010.Salim, E. 2003. Striking a Better Balance—The Final Report Watling, J., Maxwell, J., Saxena, N., and Taschereau, S. of the Extractive Industries Review. Washington, DC: 2004. Responsible Action—Citizens’ Dialogue on the Extractive Industries Review. Long-Term Management of Used Nuclear Fuel. Toronto, Accessed July 2010. ON: Nuclear Waste Management Organization. wwwSD Gateway. n.d. Introduction to sustainable development: Definitions. ResponsibleAction-CitizensDialogueontheLong Accessed July 2010. -termManagementofUsedNuclearFuel.pdf. Accessed JulyStanislao, J., and Stanislao, B.C. 1983. Dealing with resis- 2010. tance to change. Bus. Horiz. July-August. WCED (UN World Commission on Environment andThomson, I., and Joyce, S.A. 2000. Changing expectations: Development). 1987. Our Common Future—Report of Future social and economic realities for mineral explora- the World Commission on Environment and Development. tion. In Proceedings: Mining Millennium 2000. Toronto, London: Oxford University Press. p. 8. ON: Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Whitehorse Mining Initiative Leadership Council Accord. 1993. Petroleum; Montreal, QC: Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada. wmi-imw-eng.htm. Accessed July 2010.Thomson, I., and Joyce, S.A. 2006. Changing mineral explo- ration industry approaches to sustainability. In Wealth Creation in the Minerals Industry: Integrating Science, Business and Education. Edited by M.E. Doggett and J.R. Parry. Special Publication No. 12. Littleton, CO: Society of Economic Geologists.