• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Web 2.0 intro
 

Web 2.0 intro

on

  • 8,289 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
8,289
Views on SlideShare
8,277
Embed Views
12

Actions

Likes
8
Downloads
0
Comments
0

3 Embeds 12

http://lightnessoflearning.wordpress.com 9
http://edgarleguizamontarazona.wordpress.com 2
http://www.slideshare.net 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Web 2.0 intro Web 2.0 intro Presentation Transcript

    • Web 2.0: The Next Wave of Collaboration and Storytelling NITLE Emerging Technologies workshop December, 2006 Union College
    • Plan of the talk
      • Web 2.0 in late 2006
      • Web 2.0 rich media
      • Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Brooding and provocations
      (Middlebury waterfall, spring 2006)
    • Thematics
      • Emergence in
      • time and space
      • Pedagogy
      • Dynamic information ecologicy
      (Radio Open Source blog/podcast, 2006)
    • One metaphor
      • Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and education: awareness is difficult
      • Huge, financially and quantitatively successful worlds
      • Global and rapidly developing
      • Bad anxieties, policies, and media coverage
    • One metaphor
      • Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and education: intersections are possible
      • Take advantage of preexisting projects
      • Mod/warp/hack
      • DIY
      • Literacy: IF/audience
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Microcontent, rather than sites or large documents
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Multiply authored microcontent, rather than sites or large documents
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Open content and/or services and/or standards
      (Pepysblog, 2003-)
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Network constructivism
      (Pepysblog, 2003-)
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Data mashups
    • I. Web 2.0
      • O’Reilly: perpetual beta
    • I. Web 2.0
      • O’Reilly: platforms for development
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements
      • Collaborative writing platforms: the wiki way
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Wiki pedagogies
      • Collective research
      • Group writing
      • Document editing
      • Information literacy
    • I. Web 2.0 Research: wikis are textually productive -Viégas, Wattenberg, Dave (IBM, 2004)
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Wikis are textually productive
      • OhMyNews! , WikiNews
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements
      • collaborative writing platforms: the blogosphere
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Addressable content chunks
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Distributed, attached conversations
    • I. Web 2.0
      • State of the blogosphere
      • 57 million blogs tracked by Technorati:
        • “ As of October 2006, about 100,000 new weblogs were created each day… the doubling of the blogosphere has slowed a bit (every 236 days or so…”
          • (David Sifry, November 2006)
        • Chart follows…
    • I. Web 2.0
    • I. Web 2.0
      • State of the blogosphere
      • 12 people million using three platforms, including LiveJournal: majority women (Anil Dash, MeshForum 2006)
      • Diversity: diaries, public intellectuals, carnivals, knitters, moblogs, warblogs home and abroad…
    • I. Web 2.0
      • State of the blogosphere
      • Did popular CMS/LMSes keep higher education from contributing?
      • Did academia’s lack of engagement make it harder to catch up now? (cf Technorati 2006 November report)
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements: social objects
      • Flickr
      http:// flickr.com /
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Reach of Flickr
      • 100 million images, as of Feb 2006
      • As of October 2006, 4 million Flickr members (3/4 not in the US)
      • 1 million photos uploaded each day
      • ( http://www.radioopensource.org/photography-20/ )
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Reach of Flickr
      • 22 million searchable, shareable images in Flickr (October 2006)
      (Ben Harris-Roxas, 2006)
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Reach of Flickr
      (Ben Harris-Roxas, 2006)
      • Its metadata is good enough
      • Did popular CMS/LMSes keep higher education from contributing?
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 enables the Web office
      • Example: Google Spreadsheets
      http://spreadsheets.google.com/
    • I. Web 2.0
      • What can we learn from this? Ton Zylstra:
      • “ In general you could say that both Flickr and delicious work in a triangle: person, picture/bookmark, and tag(s). Or more abstract a person, an object of sociality , and some descriptor...”
    • I. Web 2.0
      • “… In every triangle there always needs to be a person and an object of sociality . The third point of the triangle is free to define[,] as it were.”
      • - http://www.zylstra.org , 2006
      • (emphases added)
    • I. Web 2.0
      • What can we learn from this?
      • Jyri Engesrom is succinct:
      • “ The fallacy is to think that social networks are just made up of people. They're not; social networks consist of people who are connected by a shared object .”
      • - http://www.zengestrom.com/ , 2005
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Social object principles: tagging
      Flickr is one influential and leading tagging project
    • I. Web 2.0
        • “ Home
        • Owain
        • Hestia
        • Chickens
        • Ripton”
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Folksonomy
      • User benefit
      • Search
      • Retrieval
      • Self-awareness
        • http://del.icio.us/
        • for DoctorNemo
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Community surfacing
      • Ontology
      • Concepts
      • Collaborative research
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Case study, tagging museums:
      • the Steve project
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Tagging museums: the Steve project
      • Expert discourse, controlled vocab
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Tagging museums: the Steve project
      • Users tag differently
      • Curators get it
      • (Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2004)
    • Web 2.0
      • Tagging libraries: PennTags
      • Coded locally
    • I. Web 2.0
      • AJAX-based projects
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Components, movements
      • Mixing and mashing: the RSS feeding frenzy
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Components, movements: social objects
      • Collaborative
      • music: LastFM
      http:// www.last.fm /
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Teaching with Web 2.0
      • Distributed conversation
      • Collaborative writing
      • Object-oriented discussion
      http://smarthistory.blogspot.com/
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Social object: the person
      • FaceBook
      • MySpace
      • LinkedIn
      • ZoomInfo
      • Spock
      • CyWorld
        • “ Less than four years after its launch, 15 million people, or almost a third of the country's population, are members.” ( BusinessWeek , September 2005)
    • I. Web 2.0
      • Social news:
      • Memeorandum, Tailrank, Digg, TechMeme
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 influences rich media
      • Podcasting
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • What’s happened since February 2004?
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • What’s happened since?
      • “ More than 22 million American adults own iPods or MP3 players and 29% of them have downloaded podcasts from the Web so that they could listen to audio files at a time of their choosing.”
      • -Pew Internet and American Life study,
      • April 2005
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • What’s happened since? Neologisms:
      • godcasting
      • nanocasting
      • podfading
      • podsafe
      • podspamming
      • podvertising
      • porncasting
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Podcasts and teaching: profcasting
      • Bryn Mawr College: Michelle Francl, chemistry
      • Duke: Classroom recording
      • Learning objects: Gardner Campbell, University of Richmond
      • Duke: Course content dissemination
      • Information literacy
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Podcasts and research
      • Public intellectual
        • Out of the Past
        • Engines of Our Ingenuity
        • Napoleon 101
        • In Our Time
      • Trudi Abel, “Digital Durham and the New South” (Duke University, 2006)
      • Duke: Field recording
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Social media: Web 2.0 video
      (Gootube? Suetube?)
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Videoblogging
      • (vlog?
      • vog?)
      Rocketboom, Amanda Congdon
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Social media: Freesound archive
      (Freesound archive)
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • (Second Life, 2004-present)
      Social media: social gaming and Web 2.0?
    • II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Size of Second Life:
        • 1 million residents, October 2006
        • “ the new golf”, Second Life (Joi Ito)
      • Compare the field
        • 6 million players, World of Warcraft
        • 1 million players, Virtual Magic Kingdom
        • Diversity: platform, genre, content
    • III. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Nonfiction ( Pulse )
      • Fiction (“I Found a Camera…”)
      • ARGs
      • Public intellectuals
    • III. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Flickr and storytelling
      • Tell a story in 5 frames group
      “ Gender Miscommunication” (Nightingai1e, 2006)
    • III. Web 2.0 storytelling
    • III. Web 2.0 storytelling
    • III. Web 2.0 storytelling
    • III. Web 2.0 storytelling “ Gender Miscommunication” (Nightingai1e, 2006)
    • III. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Flickr and storytelling
      • In the Tell a story in 5 frames group, 'Alone With The Sand'
      (moliere1331, 2005)
    • III. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Lonelygirl15
      • One YouTube
      • Another YouTube
      • Myspace
      • Blogs
      • Discussion frenzy
      • Media attention
      (2006-)
    • IV. Anxieties and policies Policy fears - DOPA: “’ Social networking sites such as MySpace and chat rooms have allowed sexual predators to sneak into homes and solicit kids,’ said Rep. Ted Poe…” -C|Net (on the way to Bryan’s office, spring 2006)
    • IV. Anxieties and policies (Valdis Krebs, 2004)
    • IV. Anxieties and policies (Gwynneth Alexander, Fort Ticonderoga ferry landing, summer 2006)
      • National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education http:// nitle.org
      • NITLE blog http://b2e.nitle.org
      • NITLE Lab http:// nitle.org/index.php/nitle/laboratory