Social Software, teaching, and learning: fall 2007

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Social Software, teaching, and learning: fall 2007 - Presentation Transcript

    1. Social software for teaching and learning: Web 2.0, fall 2007 NITLE Workshop to go
    2. Plan of the talk
      • Web 2.0
      • Rich media web 2.0
      • More pedagogies
      • New forms
      (Middlebury waterfall, spring 2006)
    3. Thematics
      • Emergence in
      • time and space
      • Pedagogy
      • Open determinism
      (Radio Open Source blog/podcast, 2006)
    4. One problem
      • How to apprehend emerging technologies?
      • Panic/siege mode
      • Vendors
      • Futurism methods
      • Networks
    5. One response: antecedents
      • One response to too much information: humble marginal annotation
      • Glossators (Franciscus Accursius, Denis Godefroi)
      • Then the Geneva Bible
      • Managing texts, readers
      (Early English Books Online)
      • Another response to overload
      • Cyclopedia (Ephraim Chambers, 1728)
      • Encyclopedie (1751-1772)
      • Another response to overload
      • Cyclopedia (Ephraim Chambers, 1728)
      • Encyclopedie (1751-1772)
      • (Another precursor, lacking the technology: Isidore of Seville, Etymologiae , 636)
    6. One metaphor
      • Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and education: awareness is challenging
      • Huge, financially and quantitatively successful worlds
      • Global and rapidly developing scope
      • Bad anxieties, policies, and media coverage
      • Perceived lack of seriousness
    7. One metaphor
      • Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and education: intersections are possible
      • Take advantage of preexisting projects
      • Mod/warp/hack
      • DIY
      • Literacy: new media
      • Influence
      (World of Warcraft)
    8. I. Web 2.0
      • The term’s history: Tim O’Reilly, 2005
      • Expands “social software”
      • Draws on Web history
    9. I. Web 2.0
      • Microcontent, rather than sites or large documents
      (NITLE blog)
    10. I. Web 2.0
      • Multiply authored microcontent
    11. I. Web 2.0
      • Open content and/or services and/or standards…
      (Pepysblog, 2003-)
    12. I. Web 2.0
      • … leading to networked conversations
      (Pepysblog, 2003-)
    13. I. Web 2.0
      • Data mashups
      (Google Maps meets Twitter)
    14. I. Web 2.0
      • Perpetual beta (O’Reilly, now history)
    15. I. Web 2.0
      • O’Reilly: platforms for development
    16. I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements
      • Collaborative writing platforms: the wiki way
    17. I. Web 2.0 Research: wikis are textually productive -Viégas, Wattenberg, Dave (IBM, 2004)
    18. I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements
      • collaborative writing platforms: the blogosphere
    19. I. Web 2.0
      • Addressable content chunks
    20. I. Web 2.0
      • Distributed and/or attached conversations
    21. I. Web 2.0
      • State of the blogosphere
      • 70 million blogs tracked by Technorati:
        • “ Technorati is now tracking over 70 million weblogs, and we're seeing about 120,000 new weblogs being created worldwide each day. That's about 1.4 blogs created every second of every day.”
          • (David Sifry, April 2007 )
        • Chart follows…
    22. I. Web 2.0
    23. I. Web 2.0
      • State of the blogosphere, more
      • 12 people million using three platforms, including LiveJournal: majority women (Anil Dash, MeshForum 2006)
      • Diversity: diaries, public intellectuals, carnivals, knitters, moblogs, warblogs home and abroad…
    24. I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements: social objects
      http:// flickr.com /
      • Photo sharing:
      • Flickr
    25. I. Web 2.0
      • Reach of Flickr
      • 100 million images, as of Feb 2006
      • As of October 2006, 4 million Flickr members (3/4 not in the US)
      • 1 million photos uploaded each day
      • ( http://www.radioopensource.org/photography-20/ )
    26. I. Web 2.0
      • Reach of Flickr
      • 26 million searchable, shareable images in Flickr (December 2006)
      • Metadata is good enough
      • Gaming inspiration
      (Ben Harris-Roxas, 2006)
    27. I. Web 2.0
      • Social news:
      • Memeorandum, Tailrank, Digg, TechMeme
    28. I. Web 2.0
      • Social bookmarking
      • Del.icio.us
      • Also Furl, Scholar.com, StumbleUpon, Digg, Reddit, MyWeb (Yahoo)
    29. I. Web 2.0
      • Social object: the person
      • FaceBook
      • MySpace
      • LinkedIn
      • ZoomInfo
      • CyWorld
      “ Less than four years after its launch, 15 million people, or almost a third of the country's population, are members.” ( BusinessWeek , September 2005)
      • This can all be a bit overwhelming
      (“Online Communities”, XKCD, April 2007 )
    30. I. Web 2.0
      • What can we learn from this? Ton Zylstra:
      • “ In general you could say that both Flickr and del.icio.us work in a triangle: person, picture/bookmark, and tag(s). Or more abstract a person, an object of sociality , and some descriptor...”
    31. I. Web 2.0
      • “…In every triangle there always needs to be a person and an object of sociality . The third point of the triangle is free to define[,] as it were.”
      • - http://www.zylstra.org , 2006
      • (emphases added)
    32. I. Web 2.0
      • New forms: folksonomy
      • Search
      • Retrieval
      • Self-awareness
        • http://del.icio.us/
        • for DoctorNemo
    33. I. Web 2.0
      • Community surfacing
      • Ontology
      • Concepts
      • Collaborative research
    34. I. Web 2.0
      • Tagging museums: the Steve project
      • Users tag differently
      • Curators get it
      (Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2004)
    35. I. Web 2.0
      • Tagging libraries: PennTags
      • Coded locally
      • Also tags the open web
      http://tags.library.upenn.edu/
    36. I. Web 2.0
      • Components, movements
      • Mixing and mashing:
      • the RSS feed
    37. I. Web 2.0
      • -Alex Iskold, The Read/Write Web , April 2007
      • http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_future_of_rss.php
      “ RSS is basically a filtered push - the user subscribes (pulls in) to channels that he/she likes, and after that content is delivered automatically.”
    38. II. Web 2.0 and rich media
      • Web 2.0 influences rich media
      • Podcasting
    39. II. Web 2.0 and rich media
      • How old is the term? “… all the ingredients are there for a new boom in amateur radio.
        • But what to call it? Audioblogging? Podcasting ? GuerillaMedia?”
      • (Ben Hammersley, The Guardian
      • February 12, 2004)
    40. II. Web 2.0 and rich media
      • What’s happened since February 2004?
    41. II. Web 2.0 and rich media
      • What’s happened since “podcasting” in 2001? Neologisms:
      • godcasting
      • nanocasting
      • podfading
      • podsafe
      • podspamming
      • podvertising
      • porncasting
    42. II. Web 2.0 and rich media
      • Web 2.0 influences rich media: more audio
      • Freesound archive
      • DIY copyright
      • Social networking values
      (http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/)
    43. II. Web 2.0 and rich media
      • Web 2.0 influences rich media: video
      (Gootube? Suetube?)
    44. II. Web 2.0 and rich media
      • Videoblogging
      • (vlog?
      • vog?)
      (Rocketboom, Amanda Congdon) (already moved on) (Ask a Ninja)
    45. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Teaching with Web 2.0: it’s not all new
      • - Web 1.0, internet pedagogies
      • Hypertext
      • Web audience
      • Discussion fora
      • Collaborative document authoring
      • Groupware
    46. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Teaching with Web 2.0: it’s not all new
      • Earlier pedagogies
      • Journaling
      • Media literacy
    47. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Teaching with Web 2.0: CMS involvement
      • Moodle modules
    48. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Teaching with Web 2.0: Blackboard Beyond
    49. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Teaching with Web 2.0: principles
      • Distributed
      • conversation
      • Collaborative
      • writing
      • Object-oriented
      • discussion
      http://smarthistory.blogspot.com/
    50. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Teaching with Web 2.0: more principles
      • Ease of entry
      • Personalization
    51. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Wiki pedagogies
      • Collective research
      • Group writing
      • Document editing
      • Information literacy
      • Discussion
      • Knowledge accretion
      (Romantic Audiences project Bowdoin College, 2005-present
    52. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Social object pedagogies
      • Prompts
      • Discussion object
      • Composition materials
    53. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Social object pedagogies
      • Annotate details
      • Remix (“Make it mine”)
      Edugadget http://www.edugadget.com/2005/05/07/flickr-creative-commons
    54. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • New forms: profcasting
      • Bryn Mawr College: Michelle Francl, chemistry
      • Duke: Classroom recording
    55. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Student program podcasting on campus
      • War News Radio
      • (Swarthmore College)
    56. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Podcasts and research
      • Public intellectual
        • Out of the Past
        • Engines of Our Ingenuity
        • In Our Time
        • University Channel
        • (Napoleon 101)
    57. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Instrumental to pedagogy: enhance other media
      • Handouts: Allegheny College, Gothcast
    58. Illustrations in pdf format
    59. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Enhance other media
      • Middlebury College, Barbara Ganley
      • Podcasting with…
      • Blogging
      • Digital storytelling
      • Photography
      • Study abroad
    60. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Teaching with Web 2.0: “net.gen”:
      • “ Fully half of all teens and 57 percent of teens who use the Internet could be considered Content Creators, according to a survey by the Pew Internet & American Life Project.”
      http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/PIP_Teens_1105.pdf
    61. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • “ [S]tudents… write words on paper, yes— but… also compose words and images and create audio files on Web logs (blogs), in word processors, with video editors and Web editors and in e-mail and on presentation software and in instant messaging and on listservs and on bulletin boards—and no doubt in whatever genre will emerge in the next ten minutes.
      • Note that no one is making anyone do any of this writing.”
      Kathleen Blake Yancey, "Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key." CCC 56.2 (2004):297-328.
    62. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • RSS pedagogies
      • Shaping Web reading
      • Pushing student-created content (mother blog, Feed to Javascript)
      • Web 2.0 wrangling
      (Bloglines)
    63. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Podcasts and teaching: profcasting
      • Bryn Mawr College: Michelle Francl, chemistry
      • Duke: Classroom recording
      • Learning objects: Gardner Campbell, University of Richmond
      • Duke: Course content dissemination
      • Information literacy
    64. III. Web 2.0 pedagogies
      • Blog problem: privacy
      • Contrary to class safe space (Gary Kornblith, Oberlin College)
      • Culture of too much disclosure
      • Problem increasing archivally
      • Some responses
      • Can block comments and/or readers
      • Teachable moment: what is privacy in 2007?
      • Complement other practices
    65. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Lonelygirl15
      • One YouTube
      • Another YouTube
      • Myspace
      • Blogs
      • Discussion frenzy
      • Media attention
      (2006-)
    66. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Alternate reality games
      • Permeability of game boundary (space and time)
      • Focus on distributed, collaborative cognition
      • Increased ephemerality
      (Perplex City, 2003-2006)
    67. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • ARG pedagogy?
      • Creation for constructivism
      • Information literacy
      • Object of study
      (Nine Inch Nails game, ongoing)
    68. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Political ARG?
      (World Without Oil, May 2007)
    69. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Flickr and storytelling
      • Tell a story in 5 frames group
      “ Gender Miscommunication” (Nightingai1e, 2006)
    70. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    71. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    72. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    73. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling “ Gender Miscommunication” (Nightingai1e, 2006)
    74. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Flickr and storytelling
      • In the Tell a story in 5 frames group, 'Alone With The Sand'
      (moliere1331, 2005)
    75. One provocation (Valdis Krebs, 2004)
    76. A second provocation C.S. Mott Children's Hospital National Poll on Children’s Health, May 2007 The persistence of fears
    77. Keeping up
      • National Institute for Technology and
      • Liberal Education http:// nitle.org
      • NITLE blog http://b2e.nitle.org

    + BryanAlexanderBryanAlexander, 2 years ago

    custom

    614 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Overview of Web 2.0 for teaching and learning, upda more

    More Info

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version
    • Total Views 614
      • 614 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 30
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as innappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel

    Categories