NMC 2006 regional

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    10 Favorites

    NMC 2006 regional - Presentation Transcript

    1. Web 2.0: The Next Wave of Collaboration, Publication, and Storytelling New Media Consortium Regional Conference November, 2006 Trinity University
    2. Plan of the talk
      • Web 2.0 in late 2006
      • Web 2.0 rich media
      • Browser gaming
      • Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Brooding and provocations
      (Middlebury waterfall, spring 2006)
    3. Thematics
      • Emergence in
      • time and space
      • Pedagogy
      • Dynamic information ecologicy
      (Radio Open Source blog/podcast, 2006)
    4. One theoretical question
      • “ Out of the dialectical exchange between the media-technological ‘base’ and the discursive ‘superstructure’ arise conflicts and tensions that sooner or late result in transformations at the level of media…”
      • -Friedrich Kittler, 1999
      • Also: Janet Murray’s two-step argument
      • ( Hamlet on the Holodeck , 1997)
    5. One historical flourish
      • Responses to overload
      • Cyclopedia (Ephraim Chambers, 1728)
      • Encyclopedie (1751-1772)
      • Another precursor, lacking the technology: Isidore of Seville, Etymologiae (636)
    6. One metaphor
      • Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and education: awareness is difficult
      • Huge, financially and quantitatively successful worlds
      • Global and rapidly developing
      • Bad anxieties, policies, and media coverage
    7. One metaphor
      • Web 2.0 and education is like gaming and education: intersections are possible
      • Take advantage of preexisting projects
      • Mod/warp/hack
      • DIY
      • Literacy: IF/audience
    8. I. Web 2.0
      • Microcontent, rather than sites or large documents
    9. I. Web 2.0
      • Multiply authored microcontent, rather than sites or large documents
    10. I. Web 2.0
      • Open content and/or services and/or standards
      (Pepysblog, 2003-)
    11. I. Web 2.0
      • Network constructivism
      (Pepysblog, 2003-)
    12. I. Web 2.0
      • O’Reilly: perpetual beta
    13. I. Web 2.0
      • O’Reilly: platforms for development
    14. I. Web 2.0
      • Data mashups
    15. I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements
      • Collaborative writing platforms: the wiki way
    16. I. Web 2.0
      • Wiki pedagogies
      • Collective research
      • Group writing
      • Document editing
      • Information literacy
    17. I. Web 2.0 Research: wikis are textually productive -Viégas, Wattenberg, Dave (IBM, 2004)
    18. I. Web 2.0
      • Wikis are textually productive
      • OhMyNews! , WikiNews
    19. I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements
      • collaborative writing platforms: the blogosphere
    20. I. Web 2.0
      • Addressable content chunks
    21. I. Web 2.0
      • Distributed, attached conversations
    22. I. Web 2.0
      • State of the blogosphere
      • 57 million blogs tracked by Technorati:
        • “ As of October 2006, about 100,000 new weblogs were created each day… the doubling of the blogosphere has slowed a bit (every 236 days or so…”
          • (David Sifry, November 2006)
        • Chart follows…
    23. I. Web 2.0
    24. I. Web 2.0
      • State of the blogosphere
      • 12 people million using three platforms, including LiveJournal: majority women (Anil Dash, MeshForum 2006)
      • Diversity: diaries, public intellectuals, carnivals, knitters, moblogs, warblogs home and abroad…
    25. I. Web 2.0
      • State of the blogosphere
      • Did popular CMS/LMSes keep higher education from contributing?
      • Did academia’s lack of engagement make it harder to catch up now? (cf Technorati 2006 November report)
    26. I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 components, movements: social objects
      • Flickr
      http:// flickr.com /
    27. I. Web 2.0
      • Reach of Flickr
      • 100 million images, as of Feb 2006
      • As of October 2006, 4 million Flickr members (3/4 not in the US)
      • 1 million photos uploaded each day
      • ( http://www.radioopensource.org/photography-20/ )
    28. I. Web 2.0
      • Reach of Flickr
      • 22 million searchable, shareable images in Flickr (October 2006)
      (Ben Harris-Roxas, 2006)
    29. I. Web 2.0
      • Reach of Flickr
      (Ben Harris-Roxas, 2006)
      • Did popular CMS/LMSes keep higher education from contributing?
    30. I. Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 enables the Web office
      • Example: Google Spreadsheets
      http://spreadsheets.google.com/
    31. I. Web 2.0
      • What can we learn from this? Ton Zylstra:
      • “ In general you could say that both Flickr and delicious work in a triangle: person, picture/bookmark, and tag(s). Or more abstract a person, an object of sociality , and some descriptor...”
    32. I. Web 2.0
      • “… In every triangle there always needs to be a person and an object of sociality . The third point of the triangle is free to define[,] as it were.”
      • - http://www.zylstra.org , 2006
      • (emphases added)
    33. I. Web 2.0
      • What can we learn from this?
      • Jyri Engesrom is succinct:
      • “ The fallacy is to think that social networks are just made up of people. They're not; social networks consist of people who are connected by a shared object .”
      • - http://www.zengestrom.com/ , 2005
    34. I. Web 2.0
      • Social object principles: tagging
      Flickr is one influential and leading tagging project
    35. I. Web 2.0
        • “ Home
        • Owain
        • Hestia
        • Chickens
        • Ripton”
    36. I. Web 2.0
      • Folksonomy
      • User benefit
      • Search
      • Retrieval
      • Self-awareness
        • http://del.icio.us/
        • for DoctorNemo
    37. I. Web 2.0
      • Community surfacing
      • Ontology
      • Concepts
      • Collaborative research
    38. I. Web 2.0
      • Case study, tagging museums:
      • the Steve project
    39. I. Web 2.0
      • Tagging museums: the Steve project
      • Expert discourse, controlled vocab
    40. I. Web 2.0
      • Tagging museums: the Steve project
      • Users tag differently
      • Curators get it
      • (Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2004)
    41. Web 2.0
      • Tagging libraries: PennTags
      • Coded locally
    42. I. Web 2.0
      • AJAX-based projects
    43. I. Web 2.0
      • Components, movements
      • Mixing and mashing: the RSS feeding frenzy
    44. I. Web 2.0
      • Components, movements: social objects
      • Collaborative
      • music: LastFM
      http:// www.last.fm /
    45. I. Web 2.0
      • Teaching with Web 2.0
      • Distributed conversation
      • Collaborative writing
      • Object-oriented discussion
      http://smarthistory.blogspot.com/
    46. I. Web 2.0
      • Social object: the person
      • FaceBook
      • MySpace
      • LinkedIn
      • ZoomInfo
      • Spock
      • CyWorld
        • “ Less than four years after its launch, 15 million people, or almost a third of the country's population, are members.” ( BusinessWeek , September 2005)
    47. I. Web 2.0
      • Social news:
      • Memeorandum, Tailrank, Digg, TechMeme
    48. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Web 2.0 influences rich media
      • Podcasting
    49. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • What’s happened since February 2004?
    50. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • What’s happened since?
      • “ More than 22 million American adults own iPods or MP3 players and 29% of them have downloaded podcasts from the Web so that they could listen to audio files at a time of their choosing.”
      • -Pew Internet and American Life study,
      • April 2005
    51. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • What’s happened since? Neologisms:
      • godcasting
      • nanocasting
      • podfading
      • podsafe
      • podspamming
      • podvertising
      • porncasting
    52. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Podcasts and teaching: profcasting
      • Bryn Mawr College: Michelle Francl, chemistry
      • Duke: Classroom recording
      • Learning objects: Gardner Campbell, University of Richmond
      • Duke: Course content dissemination
      • Information literacy
    53. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Podcasts and research
      • Public intellectual
        • Out of the Past
        • Engines of Our Ingenuity
        • Napoleon 101
        • In Our Time
      • Trudi Abel, “Digital Durham and the New South” (Duke University, 2006)
      • Duke: Field recording
    54. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Social media: Web 2.0 video
      (Gootube? Suetube?)
    55. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Videoblogging
      • (vlog?
      • vog?)
      Rocketboom, Amanda Congdon
    56. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Social media: Freesound archive
      (Freesound archive)
    57. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • (Second Life, 2004-present)
      Social media: social gaming and Web 2.0?
    58. II. Rich media and Web 2.0
      • Size of Second Life:
        • 1 million residents, October 2006
        • “ the new golf”, Second Life (Joi Ito)
      • Compare the field
        • 6 million players, World of Warcraft
        • 1 million players, Virtual Magic Kingdom
        • Diversity: platform, genre, content
    59. III. Browser gaming
      • Within the larger framework of gaming
      • Devices: Web-dependent
      • Relatively low cost
      • Small scale
      • Global
    60. III. Browser gaming
      • Within the larger framework of gaming: genre
      (Grow Chronon, 2006)
      • Puzzle
      • Adventure narrative
      • Action
    61. III. Browser gaming
      • Social network aspects
      • Contexts
      • Help files
      • Development
      (Grow Chronon, 2006)
    62. III. Browser gaming
      • Pedagogical issues
      • Student-authored games
      • Media landscape: minigames
      • “ The Phone” (Stacy Road, 2004)
    63. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Nonfiction ( Pulse )
      • Fiction (“I Found a Camera…”)
      • ARGs
      • Public intellectuals
    64. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • “ I Found a Camera Lost in the Woods” (2004)
    65. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    66. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    67. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    68. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    69. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    70. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    71. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    72. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    73. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    74. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    75. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    76. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • “ I Found a Camera Lost in the Woods” (2004)
    77. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    78. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    79. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    80. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    81. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    82. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    83. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    84. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    85. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    86. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    87.  
    88. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    89. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    90. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    91. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    92. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    93. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    94. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    95. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • “ I Found a Camera Lost in the Woods” (2004)
    96. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Flickr and storytelling
      • Tell a story in 5 frames group
      “ Gender Miscommunication” (Nightingai1e, 2006)
    97. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    98. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    99. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
    100. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling “ Gender Miscommunication” (Nightingai1e, 2006)
    101. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Flickr and storytelling
      • In the Tell a story in 5 frames group, 'Alone With The Sand'
      (moliere1331, 2005)
    102. IV. Web 2.0 storytelling
      • Lonelygirl15
      • One YouTube
      • Another YouTube
      • Myspace
      • Blogs
      • Discussion frenzy
      • Media attention
      (2006-)
    103. V. Anxieties and policies (Valdis Krebs, 2004)
    104. V. Anxieties and policies (Gwynneth Alexander, Fort Ticonderoga ferry landing, summer 2006)
    105. V. Anxieties and policies Policy fears - DOPA: “’ Social networking sites such as MySpace and chat rooms have allowed sexual predators to sneak into homes and solicit kids,’ said Rep. Ted Poe…” -C|Net (on the way to Bryan’s office, spring 2006)
      • National Institute for Technology and Liberal Education http:// nitle.org
      • NITLE blog http://b2e.nitle.org
      • NITLE Lab http:// nitle.org/index.php/nitle/laboratory

    + BryanAlexanderBryanAlexander, 4 years ago

    custom

    5009 views, 10 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 5009
      • 5009 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 10
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories