Self Determination One of the most popular concept of Political science in our times.

History Mesopotamian and the Greek City States Idea has been traced to the French Revolution and the American Revolution (John Locke and Thomas Jefferson) Popular throughout Europe in the Twentieth century & reflected in the writings of Wilson and Lenin Granted independence to Canada, New Zealand and Ireland It inspired dependant people and evoked hope

Mesopotamian and the Greek City States

Idea has been traced to the French Revolution and the American Revolution (John Locke and Thomas Jefferson)

Popular throughout Europe in the Twentieth century & reflected in the writings of Wilson and Lenin

Granted independence to Canada, New Zealand and Ireland

It inspired dependant people and evoked hope

Post first world war scenario Was applied in a limited way only to Europe, Did not apply to colonial situations, Paris peace conference also identified ‘national minorities' that were not granted their own statehood, Guarantees were accorded to them to maintain their distinct identities.

Was applied in a limited way only to Europe,

Did not apply to colonial situations,

Paris peace conference also identified ‘national minorities' that were not granted their own statehood,

Guarantees were accorded to them to maintain their distinct identities.

The UN regime Article1, part 2 (UN Charter) states that purpose of the UN Charter is: “To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace” The Universal Declaration of Human rights, “the will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of the government” ICCPR, ICESCR, “All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.” Doctrine of uti possidetis juris , meaning that old administrative boundaries would become international boundaries upon independence, even if they had little relevance to linguistic, ethnic, and cultural boundaries was generally accepted to avoid unending claims cutting across international boundaries. After 1990s there has been a fresh challenge to the concept of territoriality.

Article1, part 2 (UN Charter) states that purpose of the UN Charter is: “To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace”

The Universal Declaration of Human rights, “the will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of the government”

ICCPR, ICESCR, “All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

Doctrine of uti possidetis juris , meaning that old administrative boundaries would become international boundaries upon independence, even if they had little relevance to linguistic, ethnic, and cultural boundaries was generally accepted to avoid unending claims cutting across international boundaries.

After 1990s there has been a fresh challenge to the concept of territoriality.

United Nations Millennium Declaration failed to deal with these new demands, mentioning only “the right to self-determination of peoples which remain under colonial domination and foreign occupation” Fresh angles were added to it after 911

United Nations Millennium Declaration failed to deal with these new demands, mentioning only “the right to self-determination of peoples which remain under colonial domination and foreign occupation”

Fresh angles were added to it after 911

Defining ‘People’ non-self-governing peoples (colonized and/or indigeneous) and foreign military occupation “a people” where people lack representation by a state’s government, the unrepresented become a separate people? Sir Ivor Jennings’ remark: “On the surface it seemed reasonable: let the people decide… the people cannot decide until somebody decides who are the people”.

non-self-governing peoples (colonized and/or indigeneous) and foreign military occupation “a people”

where people lack representation by a state’s government, the unrepresented become a separate people?

Sir Ivor Jennings’ remark: “On the surface it seemed reasonable: let the people decide… the people cannot decide until somebody decides who are the people”.

Demands of self determination Independence from colonial rule Irredentism Secession Autonomy Cultural rights Economic self determination Indigenous communities

Independence from colonial rule

Irredentism

Secession

Autonomy

Cultural rights

Economic self determination

Indigenous communities

Respect for diversities Claims of democracy: recognition of minority rights Federalism: devolution, decentralization Guarantees and protection of rights: affirmative actions Land rights Governance issues Electoral devices

Claims of democracy: recognition of minority rights

Federalism: devolution, decentralization

Guarantees and protection of rights: affirmative actions

Land rights

Governance issues

Electoral devices

Territorial Integrity The Realists: State boundaries are sacrosanct. The Liberal theorists: greater recognition of greater self-determination of peoples. a “Remedial Rights Only Theory” The ICJ, in Western Sahara case (1975), held that this is a right that belongs to the people and not only to governments. The insistance on making borders irrelevant.

The Realists: State boundaries are sacrosanct.

The Liberal theorists: greater recognition of greater self-determination of peoples.

a “Remedial Rights Only Theory”

The ICJ, in Western Sahara case (1975), held that this is a right that belongs to the people and not only to governments.

The insistance on making borders irrelevant.

The case of Kashmir No discussion on self determination can be complete without mentioning the Kashmir issue. For a long period it was looked upon by the Western powers as a disputed area. However of late, positions have undergone a change. Though Pakistan continues to raise the issue there is a near consensus that the issue will have to be resolved with mutual consent.

No discussion on self determination can be complete without mentioning the Kashmir issue. For a long period it was looked upon by the Western powers as a disputed area. However of late, positions have undergone a change. Though Pakistan continues to raise the issue there is a near consensus that the issue will have to be resolved with mutual consent.

Strident claims Indian subcontinent represents nearly all types of claims concerning self determination principle: religious, linguistic ethnic, regional and even irredentist. “ India’s Nationalist Myth” initially challenged by the ‘partition’ Secular India versus Islamic Pakistan. Birth of Bangladesh. Sikkim

Indian subcontinent represents nearly all types of claims concerning self determination principle: religious, linguistic ethnic, regional and even irredentist.

“ India’s Nationalist Myth” initially challenged by the ‘partition’

Secular India versus Islamic Pakistan.

Birth of Bangladesh.

Sikkim

Minimal Consensus Respect for Human Rights Representation in Government: Institutions are only worth as much as a population makes of them Legitimacy and participation Consultation, deliberation and cooperation Justice, integrity, enterprise, and courage Self restrain and participation

Respect for Human Rights

Representation in Government: Institutions are only worth as much as a population makes of them

Legitimacy and participation

Consultation, deliberation and cooperation

Justice, integrity, enterprise, and courage

Self restrain and participation