MuLLLti_International Conference Interactive and Competence-Orientated Education
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

MuLLLti_International Conference Interactive and Competence-Orientated Education

on

  • 196 views

04_05_2012_International Conference Interactive and Competence-Orientated Education

04_05_2012_International Conference Interactive and Competence-Orientated Education

Statistics

Views

Total Views
196
Views on SlideShare
192
Embed Views
4

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

1 Embed 4

http://www.slashdocs.com 4

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Large variation in age (basically from 18y to 65y) Often very motivated and strongly interested (but origin of their motivation varies) Obtain a diploma / refresh knowledge / out of interest Big difference in workload (certain students with a job have full-time jobs while others take a career break) Some have children, others don't Some have no diploma of secondary education while others already have a master's degree.
  • Economic Level: responsible for direct costs (e.g. tuition fees and study material) and indirect costs (e.g. childcare and reduction of working hours). Educational Level: sometimes confronted with courses that seem irrelevant or contradict their own professional experiences. Courses can also be very theoretical with little practical examples from the working atmosphere. Furthermore, inconveniences can occur due to the limited opening hours of administrative services and libraries. Especially older students can be faced with a lack of ICT knowledge. Students with a job often have little time for tasks and group assignments. Pride may sometimes prevent students from searching for help e.g. in connection with study choice, learning skills. Social Level: Thirdly, the combination of work, studying and family and social life can be very challenging. Lack of time can lead to drop out, social isolation or relation and health problems (Bowl, 2003 in Couttenier, 2007). Students with a job are forced to cope with new and changing roles which is a stress factor (Goodman et al., 2006 in Couttenier, 2007) Also relationships with friends and family change due to studying. Shown support by friends and family might be less than expected or entirely missing.
  • Ministry of Education in Flanders (Belgium), UNESCO, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development ( OECD), Vlaamse onderwijsraad (VLOR), European Union (EU), World Bank and the International Labour Organization (ILO)
  • Flllex consortium, 2012: 2012 Annual Growth Survey: education and training systems have to be modernized to reinforce their efficiency and quality and to equip people with the skills and competences they need to succeed on the labour market (national government, other HEI ’ s, other educational levels (VET) and with social partners )
  • Some implications: Certain Blends are desirable for specific groups of students. The success of the Blend may be largely determined by the degree to which it meets the specific needs of the targeted group. …
  • Enabling : to increase access and convenience for students Enhancing : increase instructor or student productivity Transforming : moving from an information transmission model towards a more active learning pedagogy Graham & Robison (2007)
  • the proliferation of superficial Blends ’ those Blends are not adding anything significant to the instruction. The risk lies in the fact that not enough time and costs are deployed. ‘ a focus on the scope of a Blend ’ . Sometimes, when designing a Blended Learning environment, the focus lies on the scope of the Blend (e.g. 25% online and 75 face-to-face; or a reduction of x% of class time). ‘ Too much consideration to efficiency and productivity at the expense of the goal of effective pedagogy. Technology should be used exclusively to increase productivity if this in turn frees up time and energy for the faculty or students to dedicate to more active and innovative face-to-face experiences

MuLLLti_International Conference Interactive and Competence-Orientated Education MuLLLti_International Conference Interactive and Competence-Orientated Education Presentation Transcript

  • MuLLLtiBlended Learning for Lifelong Learners in aMulticampus Context.Conference “Interactive and Competence-OrientatedEducation” - 04 05 2012Y. Blieck / M. De Jong / L. Vandeput (KHLeuven)
  • To conclude: possibilities andchallenges for all
  • LLL1 • Age: 25 • Bachelor marketing • Workweek 60-70h • Interested in master Psychology out of interest and for professional purposes. Would like to graduate at 30Photo: http://www.cepolina.com/fr/sourire_les_gens_fille_lunettes.htm
  • LLL2 • Age: 58 • Master Economics • Currently unemployed • Looking for a new professional challenge. Interested in a teacher education programimage &copy; <A HREF="http://miro.openphoto.net">MIROSLAV VAJDIĆ</A>for <A HREF="http://23895.openphoto.net">openphoto.net</A> CC:Attribution-ShareAlike
  • LLL3 • Age: 28 • Master of Law • Has resigned from job • Looking for other professional challenge. Not sure what.image &copy; <A HREF="http://pinarkbulut.openphoto.net">pinar </A>for <A HREF="http://17953.openphoto.net">openphoto.net</A> CC:Attribution-ShareAlike
  • LLL4 • Age 45 • Housewife • (did not finish high school) • Wants to finish high school and then pursue studies at universityimage &copy; <A HREF="http://rrosales.openphoto.net">Rene Rosales</A>for <A HREF="http://7624.openphoto.net">openphoto.net</A> CC:Attribution-NonCommercial
  • Welch, 2007 "Learners should have learning experiences that are tailored to the environment and situation in which they find themselves“ (p.232) In A. Picciano, & C. Dziuban, (EDs.) Blended Learning: Research Perspectives (pp.5- 19). United States of America: the Sloan Consortiumhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/pdenker/6001236724/sizes/n/in/photostream/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
  • Lifelong learning (LLL)
  • Lifelong learners who are they?• Age• Motivation and interest?• Origin of motivation…• Workload• Family• Prior education
  • What is lifelong learning?• Vague concept= extra learning activities that people undertake after the end of the initial learning career
  • MuLLLtiWe refer to lifelong learners as students in formal Higher Educational Institutions (HEI’s) who often combine work and study.
  • Imagine…• You being one of the people above,• wanting to earn a degree,• in the institution you are currently working/teaching.• What influences your chances off success?
  • Challenges • Educational • Social • Economicalhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/robinvanmourik/488068701/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
  • LLL and higher educationalinstitutes (hEI)?
  • Increasing demand• Knowledge society• Initial diploma quickly loses value• Diploma no lifelong guarantee for proper professional functioning• Shortage of human capital=> Lifelong learning high on the agenda in various organisations :
  • Challenges for HEI• Face mismatch skills levels and jobs requirements• Open flexible learning pathways• A lifelong approach to learning• Reform themselves in order to adapt• Be open for cooperation on all levels
  • Can Blended Learning help?
  • What is Blended Learning?• Variety of definitions, but no consensus• “a combination of face-to-face learning experiences and on-line learning experiences”• Describes an instructional rather than learning approach• Danger to define Blended Learning in this narrow way
  • MuLLLti“A good blend is a mix of study materials, work forms andlearning activities that contribute to the realization of theobjectives, which motivate and challenge the students to showthe best of themselves.”(Vandeput, 2011: p.1.11).
  • Why consider Blended Learning? 1. To increase accessibility to education 2. Can act as catalyst to transform traditional approaches of instruction and teaching 3. Enhance cost and resource effectivenesshttp://www.flickr.com/photos/wakingtiger/3157621376/sizes/m/in/photostream/http://www.flickr.com/photos/xandercage/4642632285/sizes/m/in/photostream/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/drb62/2474763910/sizes/m/in/photostream/
  • Why consider Blended Learning? 1. Improved learning outcomes should remain the reason to consider BL (Mitchell and Honore, 2007; Trasler, 2002 in Poon et al. (2010)).http://www.flickr.com/photos/wakingtiger/3157621376/sizes/m/in/photostream/http://www.flickr.com/photos/xandercage/4642632285/sizes/m/in/photostream/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/drb62/2474763910/sizes/m/in/photostream/
  • Types of Blends…What learner activity does the technology allow?
  • Transforming Blends?• Four fundamental characteristics of effective learning environments (Roschelle et al., 2000): (1) Active engagement (2) Participation in groups (3) Frequent interaction and feedback (4) Connections to real world contexts
  • Hurdles to take…• ‘The proliferation of superficial Blends’• ‘A focus on the scope of a Blend’• ‘Too much consideration to efficiency and productivity at the expense of the goal of effective pedagogy
  • Blended Courses can offer solutions• Increased access• Increased flexibility• Suited to educational needs• Suited to social needs• Active engagement• Connection to real life contexts
  • But…• Sufficient Blended courses have to be offered• Course design involves a lot of effort (know-how as well as time and costs) for the HEI• Effective participation of adults in various forms of lifelong learning in Belgium remains low• Unlikely that HEI’s will be able to redesign any, if enough, courses to increase accessibility for lifelong learners
  • Can Multicampus education(MCE) help?
  • Multicampus Education (MCE)• Multicampus education within KU Leuven Association is defined as‘Education that is designed, offered, supported and/or assessed between two or more geographical sites’.
  • Multicampus Education (MCE)• Spearhead of KU Leuven Association• Institutions can choose to combine resources (staff and infrastructure)• Several institutions could provide entire curricula (for lifelong learners)• Cooperation can be national and international
  • MuLLLti – 3 MCE groups 1. Social Work 2. Teacher Education 3. Business Administration
  • Some implications of BL in MCE• New teaching roles for lecturers• Copyright, Creative Commons and Open Educational Resources• Quality Control
  • To conclude: possibilities andchallenges for all
  • MuLLLti• Project Leader: Luc Vandeput: luc.vandeput@khleuven.be• Project assisstant: Yves Blieck: yves.blieck@khleuven.be• Twitter: @MuLLLti• Projectpartners:
  • Relevant literature• Boeren, E. & Nicaise, I. (2009). Onderwijs voor volwassenen: wie neemt deel en waarom? in L. Vanderleyden, M. Callens & J. Noppe (red.), De Sociale Staat van Vlaanderen 2009, pp. 315-333. Brussel: Studiedienst van de Vlaamse regering 466 p., ISBN 9789018179106 publicatienr. 1277• Flllex consortium (2012). FLLLEX: Towards an institutional strategy for lifelong long learning in professional higher education (in press).• Picciano, A. and Picciano, C. (EDs.) Blended Learning: Research Perspectives. United States of America: the Sloan Consortium.• Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N. & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Children and computer technology, 10(2), 76- 101. Any part of this document may be reproduced without permission but with attribution to the authors. © 2012 MuLLLti (Blieck, De Jong and Vandeput) under a Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/.