REAL-TIME
RECOMMENDATION
SYSTEMS.
PRANAB GHOSH,
Big Data Consultant
Big Data Cloud Meetup
April 3 2014, Sunnyvale, CA
CONTENTS
 Recommendation processing concepts
 Hadoop, Storm & Redis based Recommendation
Engine implementation in ‘Sifar...
HADOOP AT 30,000 FT
 Power of functional programming and parallel
processing join hands to create Hadoop
 Basically para...
STORM AT 30,000 FT
 Clustered framework for scalable real time stream
processing
 Like Hadoop, parallel processing frame...
REDIS AT 30,000 FT
 It’s a wonderful glue for Big Data eco system
 Can be thought of as a distributed data
structure ser...
RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS
• You know recommender systems if you have visited
Amazon or Netflix.
• Very computationally intens...
CONTENT BASED RECOMMENDATION
 Recommendation is based on innate attributes of
items under consideration
 Each item is co...
CONTENT BASED RECOMMENDATION
 Distance between numerical attributes is simply
the difference in values
 Distance between...
COLD START
 When bootstrapping a business no user behavior
data is available.
 Content based recommendation is the only ...
WARM START
 Refers to the case when some limited amount
interaction data is available
 The user may have browsed and / o...
SOCIAL RECOMMENDATION
• Customers are fully engaged and significant amount of
user behavior data is available
• Recommenda...
SOCIAL RECOMMENDATION
• The purpose of recommenders is to fill in the blanks
in the utility matrix
• If an user has rated ...
DISTANCE BASED SOCIAL RECOMMENDATION
• Consider rows of the utility matrix, which are items
vectors. The vector is n dimen...
ITEM CORRELATION
• We can find distances between pair of item
vectors, using distance algorithms discussed
earlier.
• Item...
UTILITY MATRIX
Item/
User
u1 u2 u3 u4 u5 u6
i1
i2 r21 r24 r25
i3 r31 r32 r33
i4 r43 r46
i5 r54 r55
i6 r61 r63 r65
i7 r72 r...
IMPLICIT RATING ESTIMATE
• Generally users don’t explicitly rate items. It tends
to be biased because users with extreme v...
RATING PREDICTOR
• Based on rating by an user u1 for item i1, the rating
for an item i2 is predicted using the correlation...
ADDITIVE ITEM CORRELATION
• Also known as Slope One Recommender
• If a set of users have rated two items i1 and i2, we
fin...
AGGREGATION OF PREDICTED RATING
• If an user u1 has rated items i1, i2, ..i5, all of them
could be correlated to an item i...
BUSINESS GOAL INJECTION
• This is an optional processing phase, where items
are associated with scores indicative of busin...
GROUP BY USER
• This is an optional task that groups the
recommended items produced by the
processing steps discussed so f...
TIME SENSITIVE RECOMMENDATION
• Timestamp is associated with rating
data. Each cell in the rating matric has
an associated...
USER SEGMENTATION
• When user population is not homogenous, it
is better to segment the users by clustering
or other means...
KEY DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF SIFARISH
•Implicit rating generation from explicit user
engagement events for social recomm...
Applica-
tion
Servers
MapReduce
(Multiple)
HDFS Redis Cache
Redis Cache
Redis Queue
or Cache
Redis Queue Storm
1 2
4
5
6
7...
REAL TIME
RECOMMENDATION PROCESSING FLOW
• 1 - Copy historical event click stream data to HDFS
• 2 - Copy output of multip...
REAL TIME
RECOMMENDATION PROCESSING FLOW
• 6 - Storm consumes item correlation matrix from
Redis cache
• 7 - Storm consume...
REAL TIME
RECOMMENDATION PROCESSING
• Only recent user engagement data is used. Recency
is defined per session, by time wi...
REAL TIME RECOMMENDATION
PROCESSING
• Storm ingests real time user engagement click
stream data from a Redis queue and use...
GENERATE IMPLICIT RATING
• As mentioned earlier this is generated by a Hadoop MR
ImplicitRatingEstimator.
• Uses pre proce...
CONVERTING IMPLICIT RATING TO A
COMPACT FORM
• Implicit rating generated in the previous step is of the
format (userID, it...
ITEM CORRELATION
• The MR ItemDynamicAttributeSimilarity generates item
correlation with the output format (itemdID1, item...
CACHING ITEM CORRELATION
• Item correlation matrix is loaded into a Redis map
using a python script. The map key is the it...
CACHING USER EVENT TO RATING
MAPPING METADATA
• This mapping meta data is used by Storm bolt
to convert real time user eng...
STORM PROCESSING
• A Storm Redis Spout consumes user event data from a
Redis queue.
• The event data is distributed across...
STORM PROCESSING
• Predicted ratings are calculated for items correlated with the
item in the user event using the estimat...
EVENT CLICK STREAM
• The storm bolt maintains an window of recent user
engagement event click stream data in an in-memory
...
EVENT CLICK STREAM
• The storm bolt maintains an window of recent event click
stream data in an in memory cache
• The clic...
RESOURCES
•Sifarish github repository
•https://github.com/pranab/sifarish
•Various related blog posts on sifarish for
deta...
THANK YOU
Q & A
pranab@thirdeyecss.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pkghosh/
All Details @ Sifarish.org
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

REAL-TIME RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS

6,433

Published on

Generally in recommendation engines, user's past history on engagements with different items is a key input. However, in many situations in an enterprise’s business cycle, it is necessary to generate recommendations based on user activity in real time. In this Big Data Cloud's meetup on April 3, 2014, we discussed how to decipher real time click streams into meaningful recommendations in real time.
Pranab Ghosh discussed the real time recommendations feature of Sifarish, which is an open source project built on Hadoop, Storm and Redis.
Sifarish is a recommendation engine that does content based recommendation as well as social collaborative filtering based recommendation.

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
16 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
6,433
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
22
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
78
Comments
0
Likes
16
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

REAL-TIME RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS

  1. 1. REAL-TIME RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS. PRANAB GHOSH, Big Data Consultant Big Data Cloud Meetup April 3 2014, Sunnyvale, CA
  2. 2. CONTENTS  Recommendation processing concepts  Hadoop, Storm & Redis based Recommendation Engine implementation in ‘Sifarish’.  Content based recommendation and social recommendation  Key distinguishing features of ‘Sifarish’ compared to Apache Mahout  Real time Social Recommendations 2
  3. 3. HADOOP AT 30,000 FT  Power of functional programming and parallel processing join hands to create Hadoop  Basically parallel processing framework running on cluster of commodity machines  Stateless functional programming because processing of each row of data does not depend upon any other row or any state  Divide and conquer parallel processing. Data gets partitioned and each partition get processed by a separate mapper or reducer task. 3
  4. 4. STORM AT 30,000 FT  Clustered framework for scalable real time stream processing  Like Hadoop, parallel processing framework running on cluster of commodity machines  Instead of processes as in Hadoop, uses a combination of processes and threads for parallelism  Unlike 2 processing stages in Hadoop (map and reduce) there can be multiple processing stages defined in a Storm topology.  Unlike a Hadoop job, a topology once deployed runs continuously. 4
  5. 5. REDIS AT 30,000 FT  It’s a wonderful glue for Big Data eco system  Can be thought of as a distributed data structure server  Can be used as a list, queue, cache etc.  Supports master slave replication  There is no sharding support 5
  6. 6. RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS • You know recommender systems if you have visited Amazon or Netflix. • Very computationally intensive, ideal for Big Data processing. • In memory based recommendation engines, the entire data set is used directly e.g user behavior based recommendation a.k.a social recommendation or content based recommendation engine. This is our focus. • Model based recommendation, a model is built first by training the data and then predictions made e.g., Bayesian, decision tree 6
  7. 7. CONTENT BASED RECOMMENDATION  Recommendation is based on innate attributes of items under consideration  Each item is considered to be a point in an n dimensional feature space, where the item has n attributes  Distance between items in n dimensional space is computed to find similarities between items.  Similarity is inversely proportional to distance  Attributes can be numerical, categorical or text.  Not effective in for cross sell recommendation  Essential for boot strapping recommender system 7
  8. 8. CONTENT BASED RECOMMENDATION  Distance between numerical attributes is simply the difference in values  Distance between categorical attributes is 0 if same 1 otherwise  Distance between text attributes is based on either jaccard distance or cosine distance  Distance between corresponding attributes is aggregated to find distance between items  Different weights can be assigned to different attributes for the aggregation to control the contribution of particular attribute 8
  9. 9. COLD START  When bootstrapping a business no user behavior data is available.  Content based recommendation is the only option.  Distance calculation is performed between user profile and items.  Two different kinds of entities. Attributes from one entity is mapped to attributes of the other entity.  User profile may have been provided explicitly by user or derived from user behavior e.g. pages visited, search terms etc. 9
  10. 10. WARM START  Refers to the case when some limited amount interaction data is available  The user may have browsed and / or bought some item  We use content based recommendation again, but we find similarities between items of same type (e.g., product)  Use SameTypeSimilarity MR to find distance beween pairs of items for all possible pair 10
  11. 11. SOCIAL RECOMMENDATION • Customers are fully engaged and significant amount of user behavior data is available • Recommendation algorithms are based on user behavior data only • Consider a matrix of user and item. Items are rows and users are columns a.k.a utility matrix. The matrix is sparse • The cell value could be boolean e.g., whether user has purchased an item or shown interest in some way • The cell value could also be numeric representing rating. Rating could be exclusive and derived from user behavior data 11
  12. 12. SOCIAL RECOMMENDATION • The purpose of recommenders is to fill in the blanks in the utility matrix • If an user has rated A, then enough users must have rated A as well as other items, for recommendation to be effective • Effective in cross sell recommendation. • The utility matrix is dynamic causing drift in the underlying model. • Periodic re-computation is necessary depending upon the rate of change 12
  13. 13. DISTANCE BASED SOCIAL RECOMMENDATION • Consider rows of the utility matrix, which are items vectors. The vector is n dimensional if there n users • We can find distances between pair of item vectors • Consider a matrix of user and item. Items are rows and users are columns a.k.a utility matrix • The cell value could be boolean e.g., whether user has purchased an item or shown interest in some way • The cell value could also be numeric representing rating. Rating could be exclusive and derived from user behavior data 13
  14. 14. ITEM CORRELATION • We can find distances between pair of item vectors, using distance algorithms discussed earlier. • ItemDynamicAttributeSimilarity is the MR used. Distance or correlation algorithm can be configured to Jaccard, Cosine or Pearson. • This is known as item based correlation. The other, although less preferred, approach is user based correlation. 14
  15. 15. UTILITY MATRIX Item/ User u1 u2 u3 u4 u5 u6 i1 i2 r21 r24 r25 i3 r31 r32 r33 i4 r43 r46 i5 r54 r55 i6 r61 r63 r65 i7 r72 r74 r75 15
  16. 16. IMPLICIT RATING ESTIMATE • Generally users don’t explicitly rate items. It tends to be biased because users with extreme views tend to rate more • The MR ImplicitRatingEstimator converts user engagement data (e.g, browsing product description page, product review page, placing item in shopping cart etc) to a rating value. • This is an optional processing phase necessary, when explicit rating data is not available 16
  17. 17. RATING PREDICTOR • Based on rating by an user u1 for item i1, the rating for an item i2 is predicted using the correlation between i1 and i2 • The MR job for rating prediction is UtilityPredictor • The correlation between items can be multiplicative or additive. The type of correlation to be used can be set through a configuration parameter. • For multiplicative correlation, the algorithms are Jaccard, Cosine or Pearson, as mentioned earlier. • The next slide is on additive correlation 17
  18. 18. ADDITIVE ITEM CORRELATION • Also known as Slope One Recommender • If a set of users have rated two items i1 and i2, we find the average rating difference between and i2 and i1. • If an user has rating for i2, we can predict the rating for i1 based on the average of the difference • The steps can be repeated, e.g. find average rating difference between i3 and i1 and if the user has rating for i3, get another prediction for rating of i1. 18
  19. 19. AGGREGATION OF PREDICTED RATING • If an user u1 has rated items i1, i2, ..i5, all of them could be correlated to an item i9. All 5 items will contribute towards prediction of rating for the item i9 • The MR UtilityAggregator aggregates predicted rating. • We can either take average or median of all predicted ratings during. The choice can be made through configuration 19
  20. 20. BUSINESS GOAL INJECTION • This is an optional processing phase, where items are associated with scores indicative of business interest (e.g. preferring items with excess inventory) in recommending an item • Final recommendation score is a weighted average between predicted rating and the business goal score. The relative weights are configurable. • The MR for this processing is BusinessGoalInjector 20
  21. 21. GROUP BY USER • This is an optional task that groups the recommended items produced by the processing steps discussed so far by user ID • The MR class TextSorter performs this task 21
  22. 22. TIME SENSITIVE RECOMMENDATION • Timestamp is associated with rating data. Each cell in the rating matric has an associated time stamp. • When processing, past rating data beyond a specified time window is discarded. • Time window can be specified as a configuration parameter. 22
  23. 23. USER SEGMENTATION • When user population is not homogenous, it is better to segment the users by clustering or other means • Separate utility matrix should be built for each segment. • Ratings should be predicted for each segment separately by running the MR pipeline for each segment 23
  24. 24. KEY DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF SIFARISH •Implicit rating generation from explicit user engagement events for social recommendation •Semantic matching using RDF model for knowledge representation for content based recommendation •Supports time widow, location attributes for content based recommendation •Time sensitive social recommendation •Business goal infused social recommendation •Real time social recommendation •Serendipity and novelty in social recommendation (planned) 24
  25. 25. Applica- tion Servers MapReduce (Multiple) HDFS Redis Cache Redis Cache Redis Queue or Cache Redis Queue Storm 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 REAL TIME PROCESSINGS BATCH PROCESSINGS
  26. 26. REAL TIME RECOMMENDATION PROCESSING FLOW • 1 - Copy historical event click stream data to HDFS • 2 - Copy output of multiple MR i.e. item correlation matrix to Redis cache. This needs to be done whenever correlation matrix is re computed • 3 - Copy event mapping metadata to Redis cache. This is one time operation. • 4 - Write real time event click stream data to Redis queue • 5 -Storm consumes event mapping metadata from Redis cache when the storm topology starts up. 26
  27. 27. REAL TIME RECOMMENDATION PROCESSING FLOW • 6 - Storm consumes item correlation matrix from Redis cache • 7 - Storm consumes event click stream data from Redis queue • 8 - Storm writes recommended items for an user to Redis queue or cache • 9 -Application server consumes recommended items from Redis queue or cache 27
  28. 28. REAL TIME RECOMMENDATION PROCESSING • Only recent user engagement data is used. Recency is defined per session, by time window or event count. • However, historical user engagement event is used to compute item correlation matrix using Hadoop. • Historical user engagement event data is converted to implicit rating by Hadoop MR which is consumed by several more Hadoop MR to generate the item correlation matrix. • Item correlation matrix is saved in Redis as a map for later consumption by Storm 28
  29. 29. REAL TIME RECOMMENDATION PROCESSING • Storm ingests real time user engagement click stream data from a Redis queue and uses items correlation matrix generated by Hadoop to make Real time recommendation • Storm writes recommended items to another Redis queue or cache • In the next several slides we will go through some details of the steps involved 29
  30. 30. GENERATE IMPLICIT RATING • As mentioned earlier this is generated by a Hadoop MR ImplicitRatingEstimator. • Uses pre processes click stream data consisting of (userID, sessionID, eventType, timestamp). • There are different event types indicative of user’s level of intent or interest for an item e.g. purchased item, in checkout, placed in shopping cart, browsed from search results etc. • Events with strongest intent level are extracted from the click stream along with the counts for such event. This information is mapped to an implicit rating based some heuristics. 30
  31. 31. CONVERTING IMPLICIT RATING TO A COMPACT FORM • Implicit rating generated in the previous step is of the format (userID, itemID, rating) • However item correlation generating MR ItemDynamicAttributeSimilarity expects data is a compact format as (itemdID1, userID1:rating1, userID2:rating2,..) • The format conversion is done through the Hadoop MR CompactRatingFormatter. It’s essentially a group by operation. 31
  32. 32. ITEM CORRELATION • The MR ItemDynamicAttributeSimilarity generates item correlation with the output format (itemdID1, itemID2, corr1) • There are many configuration parameters involved, the important being correlation algorithm, the choices being Jaccard, Cosine and Pearson • For real time processing the correlation data needs to be a sparse matrix form. • The MR CorrelationMatrixBuilder does the necessary transformation with the output being of the format (itemID1, itemID2:corr1, itemID2:corr2,….) 32
  33. 33. CACHING ITEM CORRELATION • Item correlation matrix is loaded into a Redis map using a python script. The map key is the item ID and the value is the list of correlated itemIDs along with corresponding correlation coefficients • A storm bolt reads the correlated items and coefficients from Redis, when it receives a new user engagement tuple from the Redis queue. The storm bolt also caches the correlation values in an in- memory Google Guava cache. 33
  34. 34. CACHING USER EVENT TO RATING MAPPING METADATA • This mapping meta data is used by Storm bolt to convert real time user engagement event data to implicit rating • The metadata JSON file content is loaded into a Redis cache by a python script. • This is an one time operation. However it needs to be reloaded, if the metadata is changed. 34
  35. 35. STORM PROCESSING • A Storm Redis Spout consumes user event data from a Redis queue. • The event data is distributed across multiple Storm Bolt instances. The data is partitioned by userID (field grouped in Storm terminology) • The bolt on receipt of the event data, estimates rating based on recent user engagement event click stream data • It also looks up the corresponding row of the item correlation matrix from the in memory Google Guava cache using itemID as the key • Guava cache loads from Redis cache in case of cache miss. 35
  36. 36. STORM PROCESSING • Predicted ratings are calculated for items correlated with the item in the user event using the estimated rating and the item correlation row vector • The predicted rating vector is aggregated with the cumulative predicted rating vector • The cumulative predicted rating vectors are sorted by rating value and the top n items along with associated predicted ratings are written to a Redis queue. • Output is written to the Redis queue in the format (userID1,itemIe1:rating1,itemdID2:rating2) • Optionally, the recommendation output can be written to a Redis cache with userID as the key and recommended items as the value 36
  37. 37. EVENT CLICK STREAM • The storm bolt maintains an window of recent user engagement event click stream data in an in-memory cache • The click stream data expiry in the window can be managed in several ways driven by configuration • If data is expired by session, whenever a new session is encountered for an user, the window is cleared • If data is expired by time span, any event data older is discarded from the window • If data is expired by a maximum count, older data is discarded from the window when the window size exceeds limit 37
  38. 38. EVENT CLICK STREAM • The storm bolt maintains an window of recent event click stream data in an in memory cache • The click stream data expiry in the window can be managed in several ways driven by configuration • If data is expired by session, whenever a new session is encountered for an user, the window is cleared • If data is expired by time span, any event data older is discarded from the window • If data is expired by a maximum count, older data is discarded from the window when the window size exceeds limit 38
  39. 39. RESOURCES •Sifarish github repository •https://github.com/pranab/sifarish •Various related blog posts on sifarish for details: •http://pkghosh.wordpress.com/?s=recommen dation 39
  40. 40. THANK YOU Q & A pranab@thirdeyecss.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/pkghosh/ All Details @ Sifarish.org
  1. Gostou de algum slide específico?

    Recortar slides é uma maneira fácil de colecionar informações para acessar mais tarde.

×