Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Audience feedback – moving foreword
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Audience feedback – moving foreword

261
views

Published on

A2 coursework

A2 coursework


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
261
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Emma Riddiough
  • 2. Gender Results 8 6 4 2 0 Male Female The results show that out of all the people we asked, all where female.
  • 3. Age Results 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 16-18 19-21 22-25 26-29 30+ When looking at the results, I noticed that it was those between the ages of 16 – 21 that answered the questionnaire that they filled out.
  • 4. 1 2 3 4 5 Interviews - - 3 2 1 Archive Footage - - 1 3 2 Voiceover - - - 3 3 Music 1 - 2 3 - Cutaways - - 1 5 - Opening Sequence - - - 2 4 The table above shows the ratings that all the people gave us on the various aspects of our fully completed documentary.
  • 5. Title Results 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that out of all the people we asked, only one believed that the title didn’t suit the documentary.
  • 6. Interview Relevance? Yes: 7 6 “lots of books in background” “very well done” “creative” 5 4 3 2 1 0 Yes No This slide shows what the people thought about the mise-en-scene of the interviews.
  • 7. Yes: 5 “Interesting , wanted to find out more” “I found it interesting” “It was interesting” “very interesting” 4 3 2 No: 1 “focuses to much on interviews” “not interested in topic” 0 yes no The slide shows both the graph and reasons in relation to whether they would watch it, (4/6 said they would).
  • 8. 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Graph shows that 5 out of the 6 people thought that the documentary related to our chosen target audience.
  • 9. 6 Yes: 5 “full of information” “through interviews, voiceover and archive footage” 4 3 No: 2 “could do with more but the five minutes did provide information” 1 0 yes no Following slide shows the reasons and the graphed results for the following question.
  • 10. Title Sequence Interviews Relevant Creative Clear Graphics Name three good things about the documentary: Cutaways Voiceovers Interesting Creatively Clever Storyline Archive Footage The following diagram shows what the people thought where good about the documentary we created.
  • 11. Wide range of interviews More Music Less archive Clear graphics Name three improvements: Music (random) Interviewee looking at camera Cuts early Shorter Interviews More cutaways Diagram shows the various improvements that the people thought where necessary to our documentary.
  • 12. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that all six thought that the radio trailer was relevant to our documentary.
  • 13. 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 yes no Results show that 4/6 people said they would watch the documentary if they heard the radio trailer.
  • 14. 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no 5/6 people said that the advert suited our target audience.
  • 15. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Looking at the results, I can see that the people thought that the music suited the trailer.
  • 16. Voiceover Sound effects Name three things good about the radio trailer: Music Vox pops Clarity of voiceover Information The following diagrams show the areas in which the people thought where good in relation to our radio trailer.
  • 17. Music More exciting Name three improvements: Too much interview Unsuitable for audience More upbeat music Better sound effects The following diagram shows what the people thought could be improved with the radio trailer.
  • 18. 1 2 3 4 5 Imagery - - - 2 4 Information Provided - - - 2 4 Documentary Title - - 1 3 2 Logo - - - 3 3 Slogan - - - 2 4 Background Colour - - - 1 5 The table shows the results as to how people have rated the following things.
  • 19. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Graph shows the results people gave in relation to whether they thought the advertisement was eye-catching or not.
  • 20. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Results show that all of them thought that the newspaper advertisement suited our target audience.
  • 21. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that all of them said that they would be encouraged to watch the documentary if they saw the newspaper advertisement in a newspaper or magazine.
  • 22. Title Information Effective Creative Name three good things about the newspaper advertisement: Clear Pictures Colours Unique Bold Slogan Graphics The following diagram shows what the people thought where good about our newspaper advertisement.
  • 23. More book references in images Name three improvements: This is the only improvement that the people pointed out when it came to the newspaper advertisement.