• Like
Audience feedback – moving foreword
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Audience feedback – moving foreword

  • 241 views
Uploaded on

A2 coursework

A2 coursework

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
241
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Emma Riddiough
  • 2. Gender Results 8 6 4 2 0 Male Female The results show that out of all the people we asked, all where female.
  • 3. Age Results 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 16-18 19-21 22-25 26-29 30+ When looking at the results, I noticed that it was those between the ages of 16 – 21 that answered the questionnaire that they filled out.
  • 4. 1 2 3 4 5 Interviews - - 3 2 1 Archive Footage - - 1 3 2 Voiceover - - - 3 3 Music 1 - 2 3 - Cutaways - - 1 5 - Opening Sequence - - - 2 4 The table above shows the ratings that all the people gave us on the various aspects of our fully completed documentary.
  • 5. Title Results 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that out of all the people we asked, only one believed that the title didn’t suit the documentary.
  • 6. Interview Relevance? Yes: 7 6 “lots of books in background” “very well done” “creative” 5 4 3 2 1 0 Yes No This slide shows what the people thought about the mise-en-scene of the interviews.
  • 7. Yes: 5 “Interesting , wanted to find out more” “I found it interesting” “It was interesting” “very interesting” 4 3 2 No: 1 “focuses to much on interviews” “not interested in topic” 0 yes no The slide shows both the graph and reasons in relation to whether they would watch it, (4/6 said they would).
  • 8. 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Graph shows that 5 out of the 6 people thought that the documentary related to our chosen target audience.
  • 9. 6 Yes: 5 “full of information” “through interviews, voiceover and archive footage” 4 3 No: 2 “could do with more but the five minutes did provide information” 1 0 yes no Following slide shows the reasons and the graphed results for the following question.
  • 10. Title Sequence Interviews Relevant Creative Clear Graphics Name three good things about the documentary: Cutaways Voiceovers Interesting Creatively Clever Storyline Archive Footage The following diagram shows what the people thought where good about the documentary we created.
  • 11. Wide range of interviews More Music Less archive Clear graphics Name three improvements: Music (random) Interviewee looking at camera Cuts early Shorter Interviews More cutaways Diagram shows the various improvements that the people thought where necessary to our documentary.
  • 12. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that all six thought that the radio trailer was relevant to our documentary.
  • 13. 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 yes no Results show that 4/6 people said they would watch the documentary if they heard the radio trailer.
  • 14. 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no 5/6 people said that the advert suited our target audience.
  • 15. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Looking at the results, I can see that the people thought that the music suited the trailer.
  • 16. Voiceover Sound effects Name three things good about the radio trailer: Music Vox pops Clarity of voiceover Information The following diagrams show the areas in which the people thought where good in relation to our radio trailer.
  • 17. Music More exciting Name three improvements: Too much interview Unsuitable for audience More upbeat music Better sound effects The following diagram shows what the people thought could be improved with the radio trailer.
  • 18. 1 2 3 4 5 Imagery - - - 2 4 Information Provided - - - 2 4 Documentary Title - - 1 3 2 Logo - - - 3 3 Slogan - - - 2 4 Background Colour - - - 1 5 The table shows the results as to how people have rated the following things.
  • 19. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Graph shows the results people gave in relation to whether they thought the advertisement was eye-catching or not.
  • 20. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Results show that all of them thought that the newspaper advertisement suited our target audience.
  • 21. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that all of them said that they would be encouraged to watch the documentary if they saw the newspaper advertisement in a newspaper or magazine.
  • 22. Title Information Effective Creative Name three good things about the newspaper advertisement: Clear Pictures Colours Unique Bold Slogan Graphics The following diagram shows what the people thought where good about our newspaper advertisement.
  • 23. More book references in images Name three improvements: This is the only improvement that the people pointed out when it came to the newspaper advertisement.