Broadband Best Practices In Rural Mn 102009 - Presentation Transcript
Blandin Foundation Webinar Broadband Best Practices Bill Coleman Community Technology Advisors October 20, 2009
Discussion
What broadband changes are you struggling to make happen in your community?
Private Sector
Qwest
Regional carriers like Zayo and Enventis
Independent telephone companies
Cable television companies
CLECs
National carriers
Cellular carriers
Public Sector
State of Minnesota (mostly leased)
Public safety wireless
School districts (owned and leased)
Counties and municipalities
I-Nets
ISPs/Triple play
786k 10 Mb 100 Mb 1 Gb
According to Connected Nation, 96% of Minnesotans have access to broadband at 786k download or better
Almost all without broadband connection options are in rural areas
80/20 rule of deployment costs
What is the situation in your community?
How does your ubiquity change as the bandwidth standard goes up?
Is broadband ubiquitous if it is beyond the financial reach of many citizens?
Internet Connection Costs
100 Mb at the Minneapolis NAP = $4-$8/Mb
100 Mb to greater MN locations = $65-$88/Mb
Within a network
Operational costs of bandwidth flowing within a network are very low.
State BB task force recommends that providers make efforts to keep more network traffic in MN rather than pay to send it to Chicago and back
Stimulating Network Investment
Best Practices
Partnering in Brainerd Lakes Area to use school district fiber ring investment to jumpstart CLEC activities in Brainerd, Baxter and Nisswa – filling the “black hole” and stimulating competitive response from Qwest and Charter.
Partnering in Staples to build community fiber ring connecting key institutions and deploying wireless technology to serve the greater Staples area.
ECMECC ( East Central MN Education Cable Cooperative)
Cooperative connects 13 school districts throughout east central region with high capacity fiber
Fiber provided by US Cable and SGI Cable companies
Companies leveraged fiber investment to bring broadband to small communities within the region
High capacity fiber network investment in partnership with private sector to link all Scott County facilities and communities
Partnerships with Dakota and Blue Earth Counties and Minnesota State University-Mankato to add redundancy and value
Enables easier entry for competitive broadband services throughout the county
Committed municipal effort to build FTTH
TDS competitive response with FTTH
Is this really a best practice case study?
Double investment in fiber capacity
Huge legal fees by city and TDS
Lost time before deployment
Community energy
Emerging Projects
Southwest Fiber Project – extension of Windom city network to surrounding rural communities
Cook County – countywide FTTP network
Lake County – countywide FTTP network
Lac qui Parle County – county partnership with Farmers Telephone to explore 100% FTTH
Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe
The most important connections are within your own community
The network value accelerates with more people connected
0 comments
Post a comment