• Save
Drua Presentation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Drua Presentation

on

  • 5,771 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
5,771
Views on SlideShare
2,339
Embed Views
3,432

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
0
Comments
0

26 Embeds 3,432

http://arpex.blogspot.com 1741
http://sailingforsustainability.org 1362
http://www.sailingforsustainability.org 224
http://arpex.blogspot.fr 15
http://www.arpex.blogspot.com 15
http://arpex.blogspot.com.br 12
http://arpex.blogspot.com.au 12
http://honyaku.yahoofs.jp 7
http://arpex.blogspot.co.nz 7
http://arpex.blogspot.co.uk 6
http://arpex.blogspot.ca 4
http://arpex.blogspot.de 4
http://arpex.blogspot.com.es 3
http://arpex.blogspot.in 3
http://arpex.blogspot.pt 3
http://arpex.blogspot.com.ar 2
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com 2
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 2
http://arpex.blogspot.nl 1
http://wildfire.gigya.com 1
http://www.slideshare.net 1
http://arpex.blogspot.ch 1
http://arpex.blogspot.tw 1
http://arpex.blogspot.jp 1
http://arpex.blogspot.co.at 1
http://arpex.blogspot.se 1
More...

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Drua Presentation Drua Presentation Presentation Transcript

  • Sailing for Sustainability in Solodamu, Kadavu, Fiji
  • ISSUES and OPTIONS
  • In 2006 we held an informal workshop on our experiences in sustainability planning with the people of Solodamu, Kadavu. We had arrived in Fiji aboard our home, a 46ft sailing ketch from NZ.
  • A number of core issues were facing the village associated with the need to generate a sustainable cash income for the village. • Kadavu is not on the main tourist routes of Fiji • The village is located some distance from good gardening areas • The costs of transport for people and goods both outgoing from the village (primarily kava and honey) and incoming (basic food, building and fuel supplies) is high and rapidly increasing.
  •  The village has been a leader in Fiji in local conservation initiatives (a large bush reserve containing the last remnant of dry lowland forest in Fiji/home to the Kadavu parrot and a Local Marine Management Area/marine reserve.  The village had operated a small launch for many years, both for local hire to neighbouring villages and to contractors (such as telecommunications companies) but the vessel is now beached and in very poor repair.  Solodamu is seeking to increase income earning potential but is adamant that this must not be at the expense of traditional values or customary village lifestyle.  A limited number of low impact tourists would be welcomed but a large scale backpacker party resort would not, for example. Solodamu launch
  • After several workshop sessions and much informal discussion the concept of a village based sailing vessel arose. Solodamu, like most villages in Fiji (and throughout the South Pacific) is heavily reliant on outboard powered fiberglass skiffs (fibers) for transport of people and goods and for fishing.
  • While the South Pacific can claim to have developed and perfected sailing technology over several thousands of years of open-ocean voyaging, sailing culture is now almost entirely restricted to recreational sailing vessels by the urban elite. It is virtually unused for everyday village life except on some outer islands, the camakau of the southern Lau group in the case of Fiji.
  • Fijian Sailing History Traditionally the Fijian Drua was widely recognised as the pinnacle of Pacific sailing design, combining the unique properties of the vesi timber from the Lau with double hull design that utilised and advanced Tongan and Polynesian design concepts and sail design and technology originating in Micronesia. These large (up to 118feet) high performance vessels were capable of high speeds (in excess of 20 knots), high performance on all points of sail (they were able to sail within 45 degrees of the wind) and large payloads (carrying up to 150 fully armed warriors and in later years large tonnages of cargo). Both in terms of craftsmanship and operation they were complex pieces of machinery requiring a high degree of skill to construct, maintain and operate.
  • No full size drua have been built for over a century. In 1913 a half size vessel (45ft) Ratu Finau was built, reportedly to ensure that the knowledge of design and construction was not lost. That drua is now housed in the Fiji Museum in Suva. In the last 20 years a smaller scale model was commissioned by an American expatriate and it operated as a tourist novelty vessel in Suva and Nadi waters for some years but is now in a state of disrepair and beached. It is arguable whether that vessel was a full copy of traditional design. There are substantial historical records of Drua design, construction and operation including detailed drawings and specifications from experienced European naval officers. Restoration of the Drua, Ratu Finau by the Fiji National Museum has meant substantive local knowledge of construction has been retained.
  • Drua are characterised by their construction from traditionally treated vesi timber that is only found in the southern Lau islands. It is thought that insufficient vesi now exists on Kabara (the traditional source of wood) but may still be available on some of the smaller islands in the Lau. There has been a major replanting initiative of vesi seedlings on Kabara in the past two years. Camakau were the smaller inshore Fijian sailing vessel with an ama (outrigger) as opposed to a full second hull. Very fast and versatile within the reef system, they have been prone to capsize in open ocean waters. A comprehensive study in the early 1990s of remaining camakau in the Lau group has recorded both the history of the camakau and the construction techniques and process still in use today. In 2006 two camakau were brought to Suva from Kabara and used as models to construct a further five vessels as part of the Melanesian Spearhead festival of that year. Those vessels were built from mahogany rather than vesi. It is arguable whether the craftsmanship is equal to that traditionally employed.
  • A number of other designs were also found throughout Fiji including small single hulled vessels and rafts. Traditional sailing use declined rapidly with the introduction of European displacement craft and then disappeared almost entirely as motorised vessels were introduced. Small boat sailing (particularly hobbie and laser class) is popular as a recreational activity in Suva. . A large and increasing number of cruising yachts visit Fiji waters every year but the cost of this activity is prohibitive to the average Fijian villager. However, a significant number of overseas cruisers that we have discussed this project with have expressed a strong desire to assist, either by contributing labour, expertise and ideas, surplus equipment and even possible sponsorship
  • g fuel and engine costs mean that the outboard’s tenure as a c Sailing for Sustainability ible form of transport is limited. Given the island and coastal natur r many villagers boat transport is far more important than land rt is essential for daily movement, fishing, access to schools and he . Either village revenue will need to increase, a cheap local alte in Solodamu, Fiji ards will need to be developed (possibly coconut oil for diesel ugarcane), government or aid subsidies for fuel will need to be inc ssil-fuel powered water transport will have to decline. of village sailing culture appears to be a valid solution, in part at lea
  • SAIL OPTIONS FOR SOLODAMU We have identified at least five main options for sourcing a sail powered vessel to service Solodamu (and Kadavu); (a) an existing second-hand vessel, either displacement hull or catamaran, (b) A ply over stringer version of a Polynesian catamaran could be built in Solodamu; (c) a planked hull catamaran using local hardwood could be built in Fiji (d) a new purpose built vessel could be commissioned (e) a traditional drua could be built.
  • Each of these options has its own advantages and drawbacks No matter which option was chosen there are a set of common issues, in particular whether the construction should be “in survey” and how the project could be funded. Whichever option was decided, there would have to be a number of phases: (1) buying or construction of the vessel (2) commissioning and operating the vessel (3) maintaining the vessel.
  • Option 1: Purchase An Existing Vessel PROS  No time delay due to construction time. CONS  A second-hand vessel is likely to require significant modifications, refit or maintenance.  Vessel will not involve village labour or input in its construction.  Not purpose built for the job.  Is second-hand, likely to be high maintenance (and expensive).  Would need to be transported/imported to Fiji (probably) $  Ball-park figure $70 – 150,000 + (for 50 ft & 3 tonne load capacity).
  • Option 2: Build a plywood Polynesian -style Catamaran PROS • Proven design, easy to construct (plywood and resorcinol glues), • Shallow draught – allowing beach access.  Build in New Zealand or Fiji.  Maintenance friendly. CONS  Slow (but stable).  Not particularly high load carrying capacity. $  Ball park $100,000 + (for 50 – 60 ft & 3 – 5 tonne load capacity)
  • Option 3: Build a Planked Hull Catamaran PROS  Cheap, low-technology, build on the beach from local materials. Shallow draught – allowing beach access.   Based on traditional design and construction.  Maintenance friendly and low cost.  Combines speed and high performance with big load capacity. CONS  Hard to survey. $  Ball park $50 - 75,000 (for 70 ft & 7 tonne load capacity)
  • Option 4: Commission Purpose-Built Vessel PROS  Custom-built, all bells and whistles, state of the art. CONS  Expensive, probably unaffordable for any Fiji village. (not considered further) $  Ball park $800,00 - 1,000,000 +
  • Option 5: Build a Traditional Drua PROS  Iconic, flagship, cultural re-vitalisation.  Proven high performance, speed and load carrying capacity.  Guaranteed support from local, national and international community.  Multi-use (tourism, cultural flagship, trade, education), highly marketable.  Construction and operation well documented historically.  Soft target for sponsorship.  CONS Requires vesi (currently rare resource).  Requires incredibly high level of craftsmanship.  Politics of ownership and use likely to be intense.  Day to day use as common trading vessel limited due to iconic status.
  • Issues • Funding (Aid, Sponsorship or Private Enterprise?) • In Survey or Pirate Vessel • Operation and Maintenance • Vessel ownership Regardless of which option were to be selected there are a number of issues to be considered under these four headings (see attached paper for more detailed discussion).
  • Discussion Climate change, spiraling fuel and technology costs mean sail powered transport must be considered as a viable tool in the search for sustainability. We have focused here on its use for trade and transport but there are many other uses e.g. education, delivery of health and social services, as a platform to support research and other aid projects (FLMMA). We see strong potential for this project to support and collaborate with a number of existing initiatives. Whichever of the options presented are pursued the project should be well- documented and analysed in its entirety. This presentation is offered to spark and encourage debate and we welcome comment, criticism, ideas and discussion. Loloma, Pete and Ali September 2008
  • A number of options were considered and subject to very preliminary discussion over the type of vessel that might be constructed (a trading schooner, conventional catamaran capable of carrying passengers and goods, a traditional drua for tourist use) and the means of paying for such an enterprise (as an aid project, private enterprise or private donation). No firm conclusions were reached (although the majority of Fijian opinion strongly favoured a traditional drua). Since then I have discussed the concept at some length with sailing and boatbuilding colleagues in NZ.