3. “Wholly new forms of encyclopedias will
appear, ready made with a mesh of
associative trails running through them,
ready to be dropped into the memex and
there amplified.”
– Vannevar Bush,
“As We May Think” (1945)
17. Use cases:
• Public debate and discussion
• Post-pub commentary
• Pre-pub annotated reviews
• Personal research
• Leveraging semantic relationships from
community data sets
• Tagging with vocabularies
• Copy-editing
• Critical review of images and data
20. Provides a communication channel for information about research resources
NIFbot
1
2
3
1. Research resource identifier:
unique identifier for software
2. Annotation with information
supplied via the
Neuroscience Information
Framework
3. Links to validation
information in the literature
21. 1
2
3
4
1. Text mining used to
assign RRID
2. Automated population
of RRID information
3. Link to RRID resolving
service
4. Link to validation
report from F1000
Research
NIFbot
NIFbot
22. Shortly, as a layer over any article:
• Are there any additional notes by the authors?
• Has the paper been retracted?
• What do my peers think of it?
• Exactly which antibodies and reagents does it
use?
• Have any issues been reported with them?
• Who else has tried to reproduce this protocol?
• What are helpful suggestions others have for
doing so?
30. Benefits of an annotated review
• In context, while reading
• Precise
• Copy-edits are more natural
• Threaded discussion between authors and
reviewers
• Selected discussions can persist post-
publication
• Via ORCID iDs annotation can become part of
a reviewer’s CV.