Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
  • Save

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Presented at

Presented at

Published in Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. NISO’s Altmetrics Initiative Nettie Lagace (@abugseye) ACRL New England Scholarly Communication Interest Group November 14, 2013
  • 2. What’s NISO? • Non-profit industry trade association accredited by ANSI with 150+ members • Mission of developing and maintaining standards related to information, documentation, discovery and distribution of published materials and media • Represent US interests to ISO TC46 (Information and Documentation) and also serve as Secretariat for ISO TC46/SC 9 (Identification and Description) • Responsible for standards like ISSN, DOI, Dublin Core metadata, DAISY digital talking books, OpenURL, SIP, NCIP, MARC records and ISBN (indirectly) • Volunteer driven organization: 400+ spread out across the world
  • 3. Premise of “Standards” • Consensus standards created by a community with various stakeholders • Trust • Leading to broader acceptance • Standards as plumbing • Standards facilitate trade, commerce and innovation • Standards reduce costs • Standards support better communication and interoperability across systems
  • 4.
  • 5. The Altmetrics Project • Came out of breakout session at (ACM) altmetrics12 meeting in Chicago, June 2012 • Funded by $207,500 grant from Alfred P. Sloan Foundation • Premise of grant award: To help facilitate the adoption of altmetrics, development of community consensus standards can help address limitations and gaps that currently exist • Identify and prioritize needs and requirements
  • 6. Why worth funding? • Scholarly assessment is critical to the overall process – Which projects get funded – Who gets promoted and tenure – Which publications are prominent • Assessment has been based on citation since the 60s • Today’s scholars multiple types of interactions with scholarly content are not reflected – Is “non-traditional” scholarly output important too?
  • 7. Why worth funding? • In order to move out of “pilot” and “proof-of- concept” phases … • Altmetrics must coalesce around commonly understood definitions, calculations and data sharing practices • Altmetrics must be able to be audited • Organizations who want to apply metrics will need to understand them and ensure consistent application and meaning across the community
  • 8. What’s to Standardize? • Field is too new … no existing practice to build on; standards should not be “invented” / codified – a diversion from the real work that needs to be done? – No community practice: administrators, granting orgs etc. need accepted, trustworthy, verifiable info – This project is not taking place overnight; two stages for a reason – NISO open process invites engagement from all
  • 9. A few Questions about Altmetrics • What gets measured (counted)? • What are criteria for assessing quality of these measures? • How granular should the metrics be to enable computation and analysis? • What period(s) should the metrics cover? • What technical infrastructure is necessary to enable the exchange of the metrics data?
  • 10.
  • 11. 2 Phases • Phase 1: Hold meetings of stakeholders to define a high-level list of issues – October 2013, San Francisco – December 2013, Washington, DC – January 2014, Philadelphia – Public Webinars – White paper output, public presentations, public feedback • Phase 2: Create Working Group within NISO structure, to create recommended practice(s) and/or standard(s) – Education/training efforts to ensure implementation • Final report to Sloan due November 2015
  • 12. Steering Committee • Euan Adie, Altmetric • Amy Brand, Harvard University • Mike Buschman, Plum Analytics • Todd Carpenter, NISO • Martin Fenner, Public Library of Science (PLoS) (Chair) • Michael Habib, Reed Elsevier • Gregg Gordon, Social Science Research Network (SSRN) • William Gunn, Mendeley • Nettie Lagace, NISO • Jamie Liu, American Chemical Society (ACS) • Heather Piwowar, ImpactStory • John Sack, HighWire Press • Peter Shepherd, Project Counter • Christine Stohn, Ex Libris • Greg Tananbaum, SPARC (Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition)
  • 13. Meeting #1 – San Francisco • Held in conjuction with PLOS ALM Meeting • Livestreamed (video recordings now available) • Morning: lightning talks, post-it brainstorming • Afternoon: discussion groups – Business and use cases – Quality and data science – Definitions
  • 14. Meeting #1 – General outputs • The importance of best practices for media coverage of science (using DOIs, etc.) • More Altmetrics research is needed and could be promoted through this group • Providing a standard set of research outputs that we can use to compare different services • The importance of use cases for specific stakeholder groups in driving the discussion forward
  • 15. Business & Use Case Breakout • What people are doing and why • Publishers want to serve authors, make money • People don’t value a standard, they value something that helps them • Researchers have noticed differences between different altmetric services • How can altmetrics be used in collection development • How do altmetrics interact with traditional metrics • Transparency: people want to know where the data comes from (gaming) • Libraries, research funders, institutions want trust • Fear of altmetrics eliminating journal brand • … Couldn’t identify a logical standard need that actors in the space would value, and best practices are of interest
  • 16. Quality & Data Science Breakout • Themes: context, validation, provenance, quality, description & metadata • What’s out there and what does it mean? – Studies of the subject; find correlations (what do positive correlations/lack of correlations mean?) • Implicit and derived metrics • Discussion of experiments for Saturday hackfest • Need to balance signal/noise – want to have metrics accepted, and accepted soon • Regional views – Harvard doesn’t weight citations more than their judgment; China does • We'll never get to the point where assessment can be done without a human in the loop, but discovery and recommendation can
  • 17. Definitions Breakout • Define “ALM” and “Altmetrics” • Map the landscape • Disseminate the glossary and definitions • Simplifying and aggregating altmetrics • Define axes for measuring altmetrics • Create gold standard data set • Promote research • Who gets a seat in standards building?
  • 18. Upcoming Meetings • December 11, Capital Hilton, Washington DC (with CNI) • January 23, Site TBD, Philadelphia (with ALA) • Open meetings, RSVP on NISO site – Livestreaming both meetings
  • 19. ANSI Standards • Openness, lack of dominance, balance = everyone affected has a voice • Notifications, consideration of views and objections • Consensus votes and appeals • ANSI patent policy, commercial terms and conditions • Publication and maintenance • Credible & have Integrity
  • 20. Thank you! Questions? @abugseye