• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Private Content
NISO Standards Update @ ALA Midwinter, January 27, 2013 in Seattle, WA
 

NISO Standards Update @ ALA Midwinter, January 27, 2013 in Seattle, WA

on

  • 728 views

Presentations at the NISO Standards Update session during ALA Midwineter 2013 on January 27, 2013 in Seattle.

Presentations at the NISO Standards Update session during ALA Midwineter 2013 on January 27, 2013 in Seattle.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
728
Views on SlideShare
657
Embed Views
71

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 71

http://www.niso.org 71

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • GuidelinesEducationInformation Hub
  • FocusLocal-area library courier servicesregional library, statewide and multi-state courier servicesInternal branch delivery systems – some stuff does applyUSPS, FedEx, UPS, etc.
  • Widely adopted by publishers, archives, and libraries for interchange and archiving journal articlesJATS moved from NLM to NISO to facilitate international adoptionTwo parts: The NISO Standard An official NISO documentZ39.96-201XSupporting MaterialUnofficialHosted by NLM - Web site and codeGuidance on usage and helpful toolsDocument models in DTD, XSD, and RNG formExtensive prose documentation (Tag Libraries)Tagged SamplesStarter XSLT code for formatting journal articles in HTML and PDF (through XSL-FO)Instructions on how to use the JATS to build additional Tag SetsCommittee working on both partsBoth parts maintained in parallel

NISO Standards Update @ ALA Midwinter, January 27, 2013 in Seattle, WA NISO Standards Update @ ALA Midwinter, January 27, 2013 in Seattle, WA Presentation Transcript

  • Standards Update Nettie LagaceNISO Associate Director for Programs nlagace@niso.org January 27, 2013 1
  • Active Working Groups 2
  • Today’s Slate PIE-J IOTA KBART Supplemental Journal Article Materials
  • KBART: A simple metadata exchange format
  • • More content visible to end users• Content linking is more accurate for end users• Increase in content usage• Maximum reach for authors and editors• Better return on investment for library• Favourable renewal decision• Protection of revenue for content providers
  • • Standards / industry • Rose Robinson, Publishing Technology • Andreas Biedenbach, Independent organisations • Ruth Wells, Taylor & Francis – UKSG and NISO • Julie Zhu, AIP• Working group members • AIP, T&F, Royal Society (stakeholders): Publishing, Publishing Technology, Cengage – Knowledge base vendors & Gale, Swets, Springer Subscription Agents – Libraries & Consortia • Ben Johnson, Serials Solutions • Magaly Bascones, JISC • Christine Stohn, Ex Libris • Sarah Price, University of Birmingham • Paul Moss, OCLC • Louise Cole, Kingston University • Sheri Meares, EBSCO • Chad Hutchens, University of • Marieke Heins, Swets Wyoming – Content Providers (Publisher & • Jason Price, Claremont Aggregators) Colleges/SCELC • Matthew Llewellin, The Royal Society • Liz Stephenson, University of • Gary Pollack, Cengage Learning Edinburgh
  • KBART’s lifespanPhase 1 – Universally accepted standardized publisher metadata, regularly distributed AND available on demandPhase 2 – Broad adoption, Consortia, More content type coverage (eBooks, conference proceedings), Open Access materials – Draft now in final stages – Available for public review in Q1 2013Phase 3? – Even more content types, automated delivery, institutional metadata????
  • KBART Phase IIAdoption – KBART Registry: https://sites.google.com/site/kbartregistry/Recommendations: E-Books (Monographs) and Conference Proceedings (Serials)• 8 New monographic fields• Book series: parent_publication_title_id/ preceding_publication_title_idRecommendations: Consortia• Recommendation for consortium-specific title lists when appropriate• Addition of labels (region/consortium value) to file namesRecommendations: Open Access• new field access_type• “F” – title is mostly fee-based (subscription/purchase)• “OA” – 50% or more of the title is OA/freely accessible.
  • Publisher Involvement1. Everything can be found at http://www.uksg.org/kbart/endorsement2. Review the requirements (data samples available)3. Format your title lists accordingly.4. Self-check to ensure they conform to the recommended practice5. Ensure that you have a process in place for regular data updates6. Register your organization on the KBART registry website: http://bit.ly/kbartregistry
  • Supplemental Journal Article Materials –now published! Business Working Group: • Linda Beebe, Co-Chair, APA • Marie McVeigh, Co-Chair, Thomson Reuters • Annette Flanagin, JAMA • Bonnie Lawlor, NFAIS • David Gillikin, NLM • Alison Loudon, AIP • Bruce Kiesel, Thomson Reuters • Skip Maier, APA • Rachael Hu, California Digital Library • Eefke Smit, STM • Amy Kirchoff, JSTOR/Portico • Scott Virkler, Elsevier Technical Working Group: • David Martinsen, Co-Chair, ACS • Alexander (Sasha) Schwarzman, Co-Chair, AGU and OSA • IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Elsevier • John Meyer, JSTOR/Portico • Ken Beauchamp, American Society for Clinical Investigation • Ira Polans, IEEE • Jeffrey Beck, NLM • Craig Rodkin, ACM • Chuck Koscher, CrossRef • Kathleen Sheedy, APA • John Kunze, California Digital Library • Keith Wollman, Elsevier • Kathy Kwan, NLM • Deborah Lapeyre, Mulberry Technologies, Inc.
  • Background• Technology now enables authors to expand or support published articles with “Supplemental Materials”• Multimedia• Text• Tables• Figures• Data, computer programs• Some Supplemental materials may be useful but not critical
  • Purpose• Help the scholarly publishing community develop a more standardized approach for supplemental materials• Rapidly changing technology environment• Lessen burden on all parties in publishing process• Help materials add substance to scholarship• Make these materials more discoverable• Aid in preservation of these materials
  • General principles of RP (12)• Respectful of variance in issues across disciplines and types of content• Determination of materials is responsibility of journal• Intended to address content owned, published and hosted by journal publisher• Data constitute a unique category of content – in general management of data is out of scope
  • Part A: Policies• Selection• Editing• Managing and Hosting• Ensuring discoverability and fundability (references, A&I, citations)• Metadata and packaging• Maintaining links,• Providing context• Preserving materials• Rights management
  • Part B: Technical Considerations• Metadata• Elements• Persistent identifiers• Preservation• Packaging and exchange• Location of material• supporting documentation – non-normative DTD to express metadata recommendations – a tag library to serve as an easy guide to the DTD - visual schema representation of the DTD and an HTML representation of the DTD – examples of metadata markup
  • Working Group Connection 21
  • Thank You!nlagace@niso.orgnisohq@niso.org