Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
One stop station for diagnosis       and reduction          Dr/Ahmed Bahnassy         Consultant Radiologist          PSMM...
Diagnosing intussusception
Ultrasound value• High sensitivity and specificity (95-100%  respectively).• Large ..5 X 2,5 cm• Rapid learning curve even...
TYPICAL DIAGNOSTIC SIGNSTarget –Doughnut -HayFork–Sandwitch signs.
Target sign(Doughnut sign)
Pseudokidney
Trapped fluid• High correlation  with ischaemia  and  irreducibility(p=0,0  01)
Trapped mesentery
Frond surface• Ileo-ileo-colic.                                  Sonograms of residual ileoileal intussusception after pne...
Doppler value• Presence of flow  should encourage  more attempts and  more time (viable  bowel).• Absence of flow (24  hou...
Dangerous signs• Maximum trapped fluid.• Fronded surface of ileo-ileo-colic  intussusception.• Absence of doppler flow.  –...
Hydrostatic Reduction under US guidance
advantages:•   No ionizing radiation .•   More attempts and longer time .•   High success rate (76-95 %).•   Low incidence...
Preparation      Figure 1. The plastic enema ring is shown together with the Foley catheter, which is connected           ...
Preprocedure Checklist• 1. The patient should be stabilized clinically with an intravenous line in  place.• 2. The patient...
Figure 1. The plastic enema ring is shown together with the Foley catheter, which is connected              by plastic tub...
Reduction steps• 1. Place child in the left lateral or prone position. Insert  the catheter, and inflate the balloon, chec...
Figure 2. The child is placed in the plastic enema ring, and an 18-F Foley catheter is inserted into                      ...
Figure 3. Continuous US guidance is provided during hydrostatic reduction.                  Khong P L et al. Radiographics...
• Follow the progression of intussusception until it  is completely reduced, 5 minutes is reached, or  perfo- ration is su...
Repeat attempts• If unsuccessful after 5 minutes of continuous moni-toring, lower the  enema bag to relieve the pressure, ...
• If there is progression after the delayed attempt, a  second delayed attempt can be performed. If there is  no progressi...
Successful Reduction• 1. Follow the intussusception until successful reduction is attained,  defined by the following crit...
Reduction followed by US
Reduction criteria
Pros and cons• High sensitivity and    •   New=learning curve.  specificity of US       •   Writing PPG  diagnosis of     ...
Ultrasound and intussusception..One stop station for diagnosis and reduction
Ultrasound and intussusception..One stop station for diagnosis and reduction
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Ultrasound and intussusception..One stop station for diagnosis and reduction

2,076

Published on

presentation illustrating the role of ultrasound in diagnosing and treating intussusception.

Published in: Health & Medicine
1 Comment
12 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,076
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
76
Comments
1
Likes
12
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Ultrasound and intussusception..One stop station for diagnosis and reduction"

  1. 1. One stop station for diagnosis and reduction Dr/Ahmed Bahnassy Consultant Radiologist PSMMC-Riyadh-KSA
  2. 2. Diagnosing intussusception
  3. 3. Ultrasound value• High sensitivity and specificity (95-100% respectively).• Large ..5 X 2,5 cm• Rapid learning curve even for unexperienced sonographers,residents or radiologists.• Many typical signs.
  4. 4. TYPICAL DIAGNOSTIC SIGNSTarget –Doughnut -HayFork–Sandwitch signs.
  5. 5. Target sign(Doughnut sign)
  6. 6. Pseudokidney
  7. 7. Trapped fluid• High correlation with ischaemia and irreducibility(p=0,0 01)
  8. 8. Trapped mesentery
  9. 9. Frond surface• Ileo-ileo-colic. Sonograms of residual ileoileal intussusception after pneumatic reduction of ileocolic• Low possibility intussusception. of reduction. Yoon C H et al. Radiology 2001;218:85-88 ©2001 by Radiological Society of North America
  10. 10. Doppler value• Presence of flow should encourage more attempts and more time (viable bowel).• Absence of flow (24 hours)should make less attempts and vigor of reduction.
  11. 11. Dangerous signs• Maximum trapped fluid.• Fronded surface of ileo-ileo-colic intussusception.• Absence of doppler flow. – Limited attempts-low pressure.• Pneumoperitoneum (X-ray or US) – Contraindicated.
  12. 12. Hydrostatic Reduction under US guidance
  13. 13. advantages:• No ionizing radiation .• More attempts and longer time .• High success rate (76-95 %).• Low incidence of perforation.
  14. 14. Preparation Figure 1. The plastic enema ring is shown together with the Foley catheter, which is connected by plastic tubing and a three-way tap to a pressure gauge and a 50-mL syringe. Khong P L et al. Radiographics 2000;20:e1-e1©2000 by Radiological Society of North America
  15. 15. Preprocedure Checklist• 1. The patient should be stabilized clinically with an intravenous line in place.• 2. The patient should not have a clinical contraindication (peritonitis or perforation).• 3. The following supplies should be prepared:• a. Enema ring to prevent spills;• b. Saline (1–2 L)or Hartmann solution, warmed to body temperature, in an enema bag;• c. Foley catheter, the largest possible based on age; – the following can be used as a guide: – younger than 6 months…. 18F; 6 to 12 months … 20F; 12 to 24 months … 22F; and older than 24 months … 24F. d. A 20-mL syringe with water to inflate the Foley catheter balloon; and e. Water-resistant tape to seal the buttocks.
  16. 16. Figure 1. The plastic enema ring is shown together with the Foley catheter, which is connected by plastic tubing and a three-way tap to a pressure gauge and a 50-mL syringe. Khong P L et al. Radiographics 2000;20:e1-e1©2000 by Radiological Society of North America
  17. 17. Reduction steps• 1. Place child in the left lateral or prone position. Insert the catheter, and inflate the balloon, checking the position on sonography. Seal the buttocks tightly using water-resistant tape.• 2. Transfer the child to the supine position. Scan the patient to confirm the expected location of the intus- susception, and document and localize any free fluid in the abdomen and pelvis. Elevate the enema bag to 3 ft above the bed to generate approximately 80 mm Hg of pressure. Observe the flow of fluid from the rec- tum and colon on sonography to facilitate visualiza- tion of leading edge of the intussusception .
  18. 18. Figure 2. The child is placed in the plastic enema ring, and an 18-F Foley catheter is inserted into the rectum. Khong P L et al. Radiographics 2000;20:e1-e1©2000 by Radiological Society of North America
  19. 19. Figure 3. Continuous US guidance is provided during hydrostatic reduction. Khong P L et al. Radiographics 2000;20:e1-e1©2000 by Radiological Society of North America
  20. 20. • Follow the progression of intussusception until it is completely reduced, 5 minutes is reached, or perfo- ration is suspected.• Scan the abdomen and pelvis intermittently to look for the presence of a sudden increase in free fluid that would suggest perforation.• In a case of bowel perforation, abort immediately and drain the fluid out by lowering the enema bag below the bed. Refer to surgery.
  21. 21. Repeat attempts• If unsuccessful after 5 minutes of continuous moni-toring, lower the enema bag to relieve the pressure, and “rest the bowel” for 2 minutes.• 2. During this time, scan the pelvis to confirm that the Foley catheter is in place; assess for leaks; drain/clean the enema ring; and retape the buttocks if necessary.• 3. Once rested, raise the bag an extra 1 ft for every attempt, up to a maximum of 5.5 ft (for ≈120 mm Hg of hydrostatic pressure).• Repeat attempts may be performed up to 5 times.• 4. If there is progressive reduction during several attempts, and difficulty is encountered at the ileocecal valve, a delayed attempt may be performed after resting the bowel for 30 to 60 minutes.
  22. 22. • If there is progression after the delayed attempt, a second delayed attempt can be performed. If there is no progression, consider aborting the procedure.• 5. If there is no progression during the first 3 attempts, and the head of the intussusception is still at or distal to the splenic flexure, consider aborting the procedure.• 6. To abort the procedure, lower the enema bag to drain the colon to relieve the pressure, and remove the Foley catheter. Refer the patient for surgical intervention.
  23. 23. Successful Reduction• 1. Follow the intussusception until successful reduction is attained, defined by the following criteria:• a. Visualization of the entire cecum and disappear- ance of the intussusception• b. Visualization of a thickened but patent ileocecal valve• and c. Free flow of fluid into the distal small bowel• 2. After successful reduction, continue flow for 15 to 30 seconds to fill the small bowel and evaluate for small- bowel intussusception.• Stop the flow of fluid while carefully scanning for any lead points (eg, polyps, Meckel diverticulum, and duplication cyst).• At the end of the procedure, lower the enema bag to drain the colon, and remove the Foley catheter.• Scan the pelvis for free fluid.
  24. 24. Reduction followed by US
  25. 25. Reduction criteria
  26. 26. Pros and cons• High sensitivity and • New=learning curve. specificity of US • Writing PPG diagnosis of • Nurses orientation. intussusception. • Room availability .• Available resources. • Logistic issues.• No transportation and re-arrangements=save • Confidence bridge. time.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×