Walker ssm (2)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Walker ssm (2)

on

  • 593 views

jbuhgtyr56e54

jbuhgtyr56e54

Statistics

Views

Total Views
593
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
593
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Walker ssm (2) Walker ssm (2) Presentation Transcript

    • Same-Sex Marriage An Update on Overseas Developments
    • Canada: Provinces allow same-sex marriage
      • Ontario, British Columbia and Quebec courts have held that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires that marriage be extended to same-sex couples
      • Reason: constitutional right to equality: Art 15(1)
      • “ the dignity of persons in same-sex relationships is violated by the exclusion of same-sex couples from the institution of marriage”
      • Same-sex couples have been marrying in these provinces since 2003.
    • Canada: Federal Response
      • The Federal Parliament proposed a law to recognise same-sex marriage
      • The validity of the law was upheld by the Canadian Supreme Court
      • The meaning of the term “marriage” in the Constitution is not frozen to the meaning it had in the 1800s
      • The Bill has passed the second reading in the House of Commons, 163 to 138
    • USA: Massachusetts
      • The Massachusetts Supreme Court held that the Massachusetts Constitution requires recognition of same-sex marriage
      • Over 1000 same-sex couples were married on the first day the ruling took effect
      • A constitutional amendment has been proposed to reverse the Court’s ruling and substitute “civil unions” instead. The earliest it can pass is November 2006.
    • USA: California
      • The State Superior Court ruled that denying marriage to same-sex couples is unconstitutional. The decision is being appealed.
      • A Bill is before the State legislature to allow for same-sex marriage
      • A constitutional amendment is being sought to prohibit same-sex marriage
    • USA: New York State
      • The NY Supreme Court ruled that denial of same-sex marriage is unconstitutional
      • “Rote reliance on historical exclusion as a justification improperly forecloses constitutional analysis and would have served to justify slavery, anti-miscegenation laws and segregation”.
    • USA: Connecticut & Vermont
      • Legislation defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman
      • The legislation also provides for “civil unions” for same-sex couples
    • USA: Nebraska
      • State constitutional amendment preventing same-sex marriage and civil unions passed. 70% approval.
      • US District Court held the amendment to be unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the US Constitution:
      • Because it precludes access to the democratic legislative process to seek legal reform
    • USA: Federal Response
      • In 1996 the Defence of Marriage Act was passed
        • No State shall be required to give effect to a law of any other State with respect to a same-sex "marriage."
        • The words "marriage" and "spouse" are defined for purposes of Federal law.
      • A constitutional amendment has been suggested
      • President Bush: the amendment is necessary because of attempts by "activist judges" to redefine marriage
    • The Netherlands & Belgium
      • The Netherlands and Belgium allow full same-sex marriage
      • Extended through legislation, not judicial decision
    • South Africa
      • The Supreme Court developed the common law definition of marriage so as to conform with the constitutional Bill of Rights. It now includes same-sex marriages.
      • Reason: “The capacity for commitment and the ability to love and nurture and honour and sustain transcends the incidental fact of sexual orientation”
      • However, until the executive takes action under the Marriage Act , the Court’s decision does not operate.
    • Spain
      • Parliament is considering a Bill to allow for same-sex marriage
      • The Bill has passed the lower house
      • It is expected to pass the upper house
      • The Vatican has criticised the Bill
    • Non-Marriage Recognition
      • The following countries recognise same-sex relationships, but not marriage:
      Sweden Portugal Italy Israel Iceland Hungary Finland The United Kingdom Brazil Norway New Zealand Denmark Germany France
    • Relevance to Australia?
      • Trend internationally is towards recognition of same-sex marriage
      • And towards recognition of same-sex relationships in other ways (eg registered partnerships)
      • States in Australia are moving in these directions
      • The Commonwealth is moving backwards; similar to the US federal government. Different from other liberal, developed nations.
    • Do we want same-sex marriage?
      • Yes case:
        • Equality
        • Human dignity
        • Liberty/Freedom of choice
      • No case:
        • Marriage an inherently problematic institution
        • Recognising same-sex marriage will inevitably force same-sex relationships into a heterosexual model
        • Removes the freedom gay men and lesbians have to define their own relationships