• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
DPR Case Study
 

DPR Case Study

on

  • 1,134 views

DPR Case Study

DPR Case Study
BNIM served as sustainable design consultant

WIN-GEM Case Study
BNIM with Moore Ruble Yudell

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,134
Views on SlideShare
1,132
Embed Views
2

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
2
Comments
0

1 Embed 2

http://twitter.com 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • We are indebted to many who have made it possible for us to receive this award beginning with Marlene, Charles Lynn and the COD.And current and former employee, clients and collaborators, and 1000s of green volunteers.
  • …a water treatment facility. It is an example of what systems thinking can look and feel like.
  • SiteStorm WaterPlanted roofsBlack water treatmentCentral for Phase I and IIUCLA capacity FixturesDual flush toiletsWaterless urinals v ½ pint flushGrey waterCondensate reuse

DPR Case Study DPR Case Study Presentation Transcript

  • Matthew Porreca, AIA LEED AP
    mporreca@bnim.com
  • DPR Construction
    San Diego Office
  • August 28, 2008
    Programming Presentation
    DPR New Office Project
  • Front of House
    Front Desk
    60 SF
    New
    Side Area
    168 SF
    Lobby
    Storage
    72 SF
    Operations
    Operations
    Waiting Area
    441 SF
    w/ Aquarium
    Surf Boards
    231 SF
    Sub & Mail
    Pick-up
    120 SF
    Windnsea 2
    168 SF
    Core
    20 Person
    Conf R
    500 SF
    Sub Room
    300 SF
    Phone Booth
    40 SF
    Copy Print Area
    220 SF
    Phone Booth
    40 SF
    Wine Cellar
    Innovation
    Room
    175 SF
    Copy Area
    544 SF
    Rumple
    221 SF
    Virtual Cave
    300 SF
    Delta 2
    400 SF
    Birdrock
    336 SF
    Training
    1500 SF
    Wine Bar
    Library
    Cafe
    192 SF
    Phone Booth
    40 SF
    Delta
    400 SF
    Windnsea
    168 SF
    Windnsea
    168 SF
    War Room
    285 SF
    Rumple
    221 SF
    Media/Game
    Room
    300 SF
    Transitional
    Storage
    375 SF
    IT Workshop
    120 SF
    Kitchen
    800 SF
    Archive
    Storage
    375 SF
    Basic
    Storage
    180 SF
    Gym
    400 SF
    Marketing
    Storage
    160 SF
    Back of House
  • Solatubes– Daylighting analysis
    Because Solatube photometric data is yet unavailable from the manufacturer, they are modeled as light fixtures with static output for average exterior conditions based on climate.
    Results showed that this scheme produced some of the most uniform and consistent daylight distribution on an annual basis.
    Relative advantages:
    • Occupy less than 1% roof area, minimizing conductive roof heat gains and losses.
    • Amount of daylight can be controlled through dampers connected to an operable switch on the wall.
    • Low first cost.
    24’ 0” x 40’ 0”
    24’ 0” x 48’ 0”
  • Skylights – Daylighting analysis
    The Daylight Saturation Percentage (DSP) is in a very desirable range and very uniform, owing to the diffusing nature of the skylight. 99% of the space has a DSP of 70 or higher. Such uniformity on an annual basis would lead to high lighting energy savings.
    Most of the illuminances for all UDI sensors lie between 10 to 200 foot-candles range. Only a few sensors have a small percentage between 200 and 400 foot-candles, which was the objective.
    This scheme would qualify for the LEED EQ Credit 8.1 for daylighting
  • Continuous Roof Monitors – Daylightinganalysis
    65% of the space has a DSP of 70 or higher but the distribution of is not as uniform as in other schemes. This may be because the roof monitors face southeast, an orientation towards which the sun movement is not symmetrical.
    UDI numbers are scattered between 10 to 200 fc and above 200 fc ranges. Further optimization is needed to bring a majority of sensors into the 10 to 200 fc range for a larger portion of the year.
    This scheme would not qualify for the LEED EQ Credit 8.1 for daylighting
  • Scheme 1: Courtyards
  • Scheme 1: Courtyards – Daylighting analysis
    Introducing courtyards improves the daylight distribution at the core of the building away from periphery but interior space immediately south of the courtyard experiences glare.
    While the majority of the illuminances lie between 10 to 200 foot-candles range, there is a considerable amount of time when UDI for some sensors lies between 200 and 400 foot-candles, especially closer to the periphery.
    Courtyard sizes and visible transmittance of glazing can be further optimized to achieve maximum potential for this option.
    This scheme would qualify for the LEED EQ Credit 8.1 for daylighting
  • Scheme 1: Courtyards
  • Scheme 1: Courtyards
  • Scheme 1: Courtyards
  • Scheme 3’: Conference Spine
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    WIN-GEM BUILDINGandENGINEERING VI BUILDING
  • Layers of Design
    MARCH 30, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    UCLA I HSSEAS
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
  • Layers of Design
    MARCH 30, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    UCLA I HSSEAS
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
  • "A great building must begin with the unmeasurable, must go through measurable means when it is being designed and in the end must be unmeasurable."
    Louis I. Kahn
  • APRIL 11, 2011
    WIN-GEM: PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • REPLICATION
    INNOVATION
  • LE CONTE
    MARCH 30, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    UCLA I HSSEAS
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
  • ENGINEERING V
    ENGINEERING IV
    ACKERMAN
    WESTWOOD PLAZA
    SITE INFLUENCES – WESTWOOD PLAZA / PORTOLA STEPS
    SITE CIRCULATION
    SITE VENTILATION
    SITE CONNECTIONS – INSIDE / OUTSIDE
    SITE DESIGN – CAMPUS CONTEXT AND INFLUENCES
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • MARCH 30, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    UCLA I HSSEAS
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
  • MARCH 12, 2011
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6
    MARCH 12, 2011
  • MARCH 30, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    UCLA I HSSEAS
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
  • Massing Scheme A
    Massing Scheme B
    N
    N
    Model Assumptions:
    Annual cooling plant load
    Massing A: 90 kBtu/sf
    Massing B: 84.4 kBtu/sf
    This is based on one system serving the entire building without any heat recovery.
    No major impact of the 2 massing on the annual cooling load with proper shading.
    Annual solar gain:
    Massing A: 10 kBtu/sf
    Massing B: 6.7 kBtu/sf
    • Glazing Area: 50% (3ft wide overhangs)
    • LPD: 1.4 W/sf (lab) - 1.1 W/sf (offices)
    • EPD: 15 W/sf (lab)
    • lab ventilation rate: 5-15 ach
  • Massing Scheme A
    Typical Lab perimeter space West Facade
    Massing Scheme B
    Typical Lab perimeter space South Facade
    N
    N
  • WIN-GEM
    ENGINEERING V
    ENGINEERING VI
    TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – CONNECTING TO ENGINEERING IV and V
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 - LABORATORIES
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – SOCIAL SPACES
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – FACULTY SUITE AND COLLABORATIVE AREAS
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN – LOBBY
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AUDITORIUM
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN – GARDEN / COURTYARD AREA
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – NATURAL LIGHT
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN FOR LEVELS 3-5 – NATURAL VENTILATION / MIXED MODE
    APRIL 20, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI
    BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI
    SECOND LEVEL PLAN
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI
    TYPCIAL THIRD thru FIFTH LEVEL PLAN
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI
    TYPCIAL THIRD thru FIFTH LEVEL PLAN
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • MASSING PARTI
    BRICK BRACKETS
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • MASSING PARTI
    MAY 2, 2011
    LIMESTONE AT WESTERN BASE
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • MASSING PARTI
    LIMESTONE/BRICK DATUM REINFORCES PARTI/PLAN RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OFFICE AND LAB
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • MASSING PARTI
    LIMESTONE EXTENSION (LIMESTONE TRANSLATED INTO LIGHTER TERRA COTTA ABOVE 2ND FLOOR)
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • MASSING PARTI
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • MASSING PARTI
    MAY 2, 2011
    LIMESTONE EXTENSION (LIMESTONE TRANSLATED INTO LIGHTER TERRA COTTA ABOVE 2ND FLOOR)
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • MASSING PARTI
    MAY 2, 2011
    LIMESTONE EXTENSION (LIMESTONE TRANSLATED INTO LIGHTER TERRA COTTA ABOVE 2ND FLOOR)
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • 80° summer solstice
    33° winter solstice
    APRIL 11, 2011
    PHASE II: CONTINUATION OF PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • APRIL 11, 2011
    WIN GEM NORTH FAÇADE: LAB PERFORMANCE & CAMPUS CONTEXT
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • 80° summer solstice
    33° winter solstice
    Indirect North daylight
    APRIL 11, 2011
    SECTION THROUGH WIN-GEM: PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • Natural Ventilation
    Operable windows to capture prevailing west breeze
    APRIL 11, 2011
    WIN-GEM WEST FAÇADE: OFFICE PERFORMANCE & FRONT DOOR
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • APRIL 11, 2011
    WIN-GEM SOUTH FAÇADE: LIVING LABORATORY FOR SUSTAINAIBLITY RESEARCH
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SUMMER SOLSTICE
    WINTER SOLSTICE
    MAY 2, 2011
    SECTION @ DRY LABS
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • SHADING AND DAYLIGHTING
    MAY 2, 2011
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • Phase I & Phase II: ENGINEERING VI
    A
    B
    C
    MAY 2, 2011
    FAÇADE OPENING STUDIES
    WIN-GEM / ENGINEERING VI
    moore ruble yudellarchitects & plannersI BNIM IResearch Facilities Design I Buro Happold I OLIN I Englekirk
    UCLA I HSSEAS
  • Lighting & Daylighting
    Percentage glazing - 80%-
    Percentage glazing - 60%-
    Percentage glazing - 40%-
    Percentage glazing - 40%-
    Percentage glazing - 60%-
    Percentage glazing - 80%-
    Ceiling height – 12’
    Ceiling height – 10’
  • Ceiling height – 10’
    Ceiling height – 12’
    Percentage glazing - 40%-
    40% area with DF>2%UDI<100=16%UDI100-2000=14%UDI>2000=70%
    46% area with DF>2%UDI<100=11%UDI100-2000=13%UDI>2000=76%
    49% area with DF>2%UDI<100=11%UDI100-2000=10%UDI>2000=79%
    Percentage glazing - 60%-
    63% area with DF>2%UDI<100=7%UDI100-2000=9%UDI>2000=84%
    Percentage glazing - 80%-
    64% area with DF>2%UDI<100=7%UDI100-2000=7%UDI>2000=86%
    81% area with DF>2%UDI<100=5%UDI100-2000=8%UDI>2000=88%
  • Ceiling height – 10’
    Ceiling height – 12’
    Percentage glazing - 80%-
    Percentage glazing - 40%-
    Percentage glazing - 60%-
    Percentage glazing - 80%-
    Percentage glazing - 60%-
    Percentage glazing - 40%-
    200 lux
    300 lux
    400 lux
    N
    Illuminance – sunny sky – March 21st 2pm
  • UCLA - PRELIM. DAYLIGHT STUDYNORTH LAB
    30ft
    11ft
    9.5ft
    15ft
    80% glazing
    12ft
    60% glazing
    N
    GLAZING ASSUMPTIONS:
    0.71 Tvis
    0.28 U
    0.39 SHGC
    (SOLARBAN 60)
  • UCLA - PRELIM. DAYLIGHT STUDY
    NORTH LAB
    60% glazing
    80% glazing
    N
    Daylight Autonomy
    TARGET LIGHT LEVEL: 60FC
  • UCLA - PRELIM. DAYLIGHT STUDY
    NORTH LAB
    60% glazing
    80% glazing
    N
    N
    Daylight Factor
  • N
    Section Through Daylight Study
  • Illuminance
    Luminance
    Ackerman Bldg to the North: South Facing Façade (unobstructed) – March 21st, 2pm Sunny with Sun Sky
  • Sustainability Goals
    LEED Gold, possible Platinum
    Net Zero Energy
    Respecting Water as a Resource
    Carbon Footprint
    Expressive of the Work Within
  • High Performance Matrix
    Lighting
    Building Envelope
    Fenestration
    HVAC Systems
    Renewable Energy
    Water
    Systems
    Gen-2 elevator
    Chilled Beams
    Aircircuitry system
    Dynamic V8 filters
    Heat Recovery
    Raised Access floor
    Net Zero Energy
  • Respecting Water as a Resource
    Photo © Omega Sustainable Living Center
  • Carbon Footprint
  • Energy Modeling
    5 Different scenarios investigated:
    • VAV without Heat Recovery with 50% glazing on all facades
    • VAV with Heat Recovery with 50% glazing on all facades
    • VAV with Heat Recovery with 80% glazing on all facades
    • VAV with HR and D/I evaporative cooling with 50% glazing on all facades
    • VAV with HR and Chilled Beams for the Offices with 50% glazing on all facades
  • Expressive of the Work Within
  • Five facades
    Project Approach
    SUN SHADING
  • Renewable Energy Systems
  • Biomimetic Materials: Kinetic Shade System