Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Research Proposal * Dr. Azadeh Asgari

1,036

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,036
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. WRITING ABILITY ATTRITION ON EFL LEARNER S Azadeh Asgari RESEARCH PROPOSAL
  • 2. Background of the Study
    • In literature, language loss and language attrition have been used interchangeably, but it seems that language attrition is preferable to language loss because language loss implies that linguistic information becomes inaccessible to the individual.
    • Weltens and Gurel (2004) are of the opinion that attrition is preferable to loss since many psychologists purport that something which is committed to long term memory cannot ever be really removed from it. So, many researchers consider “loss” as a misnomer since it suggests disappearance of information from memory.
    • De Bot, Gommans and Rossing (2000, as cited in Murtagh, 2003, p.24) state that “time alone cannot explain decline in skills; rather it is the combination of the lack of language contact and use during that time which brings about the change”.
  • 3. Background of the Study
    • Van Els (1986, as cited in Kopke and Schimd, 2004) has classified attrition studies into the following categories:
      • L1 loss in L1 environment: Dialect loss
      • L1 loss in L2 environment: Immigrant
      • L2 loss in L1 environment: Foreign language attrition
      • L2 loss in L2 environment: Language reversion in elderly people
    • Language attrition has been studied for two reasons. First, researchers have taken interest in knowing attrition processes and second, it has got considerable pedagogical implications (Hansen, 2001a). This variability in attrition studies can be attributed to duration of the period of disuse, original proficiency level, attitude, motivation and some other variables; researchers have also been concerned with the effect of individual, social and affective factors on the rate and amount of attrition because the study of attrition cannot be separated from the social environment in which the individual’s language in undergoing change.
    •  
  • 4. Statement of Problems
    • A huge amount of budget is remarked annually for the development of English proficiency.
    • English language is a foreign language for Iranian people.
    • Teachers simply ignored students’ cultures.
    • The university syllabus for TEFL
    • The macro and micro skills of writing
    • Method of teaching language (i.e., the Grammar-Translation Method)
    •   Environment
    • Lack of mastery of their grammatical competence
    •  
  • 5. Research Objectives
    • To identify the differences between EFL attrition rate of lexical density on writing performance among continuing and non-continuing students across different proficiency levels.
    • To identify the differences between EFL attrition rate of using grammatical morphemes on writing performance among continuing and non-continuing students across different proficiency levels.
    • To determine the differences between EFL attrition rate of syntactic complexity on writing performance among continuing and non-continuing students across different proficiency levels.
    • To clarify the L2 attrition rates of nouns with high and low frequencies among continuing and non-continuing students across different proficiency levels.
    • To clarify the L2 attrition rates of mechanics among continuing and non-continuing students across different proficiency levels.
    • To clarify the L2 attrition rates of organization among continuing and non-continuing students across different proficiency levels.
  • 6. Limitation of the Study
    • Just investigated in use of grammatical morphemes, lexical density, syntactic complexity, mechanism and organization.
    • Learners had no choice and had to write on a pre-assigned topic
    • The attrition of learning strategies and teaching methodology are not controlled.
    • The amount of out-of-class exposure to l2 in stage one and the age of initial exposure to l2, the degree of motivate, attitude and affective are not controlled in this study.
    • The number of respondents involved in this study is only four hundred and fifty students.
    • For non-continuing students, it was not possible to control for extraneous variables such as references to dictionaries or other forms of assistance.
    • In addition, this study investigates attrition in adult learners only.
    •  
  • 7. Research Design
    • In this research, the researcher used the quantitative method. The objective of quantitative research is to develop and employ mathematical models, theories and hypotheses pertaining to natural phenomena. Measuring is key in quantitative research because it shows the relationship between data and observation (Cohen, Lawrence, Manion, Morrison, 2004).
    • As there is no treatment in this study and the researcher determines the relationships between the variables. This research compares two groups on the same variables measure. So, the design of this study is quantitative research (ex-post facto).
    • Ex-post facto method is also called “causal comparative” because its purpose is to investigate cause-and-effect relationships between independent and dependent variables when the researcher cannot randomly assign subjects to different conditions or directly manipulate the independent variable.
    •  
  • 8. Research Design (IV & DV)
    • The independent variables in this study include both between groups and within-group variables. The between group variables include status with two levels: continuing vs. non-continuing students and level of proficiency with three levels: elementary, intermediate and advanced. The within-group variable include: stages with two levels: stage 1 and stage 2 (the comparison of which shows whether attrition has taken place or not); mode with five levels: lexical density, using grammatical, syntactic complexity, mechanism and organization; nouns with two levels: high and low frequency.
    • And, the dependent variables include student’s scores in the composition test across modalities and contexts.
  • 9. Area of the Research
    • .
    L1 Attrition vs. L2 Attrition Variables Independent Variables Dependent Variables Between Group Within Group Stage Aspects of Writing Status Proficiency Level Student’s score in lexical density Student’s score in grammatical morphemes Student’s score in syntactic complexity Student’s score in noun frequency Student’s score in mechanics Student’s score in organization
  • 10. Research Instrument
    • A number of field procedures have been used for collecting information for language learning research, such as questionnaires, interviews, tests, observations, think-aloud, and dairy use.
    • A test is a procedure used to collect data on subject's ability or knowledge of certain disciplines. In second/foreign language acquisition research, tests are generally used to collect data about the subject's ability and knowledge of second/foreign language in different areas. Composition test will be employed in the present study for data elicitation in two stages between two groups (continuing & non-continuing students) across different proficiency level.
  • 11. Data Collection
    • Data of this study was collected in two stages with an interval period of six months. In stage one, all participants will take the composition test. The after period of six months, in stage two, the continuing group (those who attended the classes in the next term) will take the same tests in class and after making sure that the non-continuing students (those who for a variety of reason could not come to classes in the next semester) had no contact with English language during the interval. They will ask to read the instructions very carefully and take the test within the time allowed. Furthermore, they will ask not to look up the meaning of any word in dictionary and consider it as a real test. Finally, to find out the amount of attrition on writing ability, the performance of participants in stage two will be compared with their performance in stage one.
  • 12. Data Analysis
    • The data collected were coded and entered into Statistical Package for the Social Science [SPSS version 16 for Windows Vista] as a means of analyzing.
    • Data analysis procedures for this phase of the study include calculating descriptive statistics such as means, standard deviations, frequency distribution and measure of central tendency for whole sample and for subgroups related to variables were utilized to describe the profile of the respondents and for comparison use the t-test and repeated measure ANOVA .
    •  

×