The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom by Gerald L. Schroeder

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom by Gerald L. Schroeder - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom by Gerald L. Schroeder Never Stop Searching In The Science of God, distinguished physicist and biblical scholar Gerald Schroeder compares key events from the Old Testament with the most current findings of biochemists, paleontologists, and physicists, arguing that the latest science and a close reading of the Bible are not just compatible but interdependent. In the vein of Francis Collinss The Language of God, The Science of God explores how religious belief is enhanced by an open-eyed investigation of the world and how honest science must be humble in the face of lifes extraordinary richness. Schroeders is an important voice in the raging debate between science and religion, and his insights into miracles, the origins of the universe, the
    2. origins of life on Earth, and the meaning of free will make The Science of God more relevant than ever. Personal Review: The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom by Gerald L. Schroeder I've read this book as a Christian, and a homeschooling parent, who was seeking a means of trying to talk to my students (who are also my children!) about Origins; this, after having been stymied by the apparent 'know-nothingism' of most modern 'Scientific Creationists' - and I say this, being a man who once thought Morris 'The Genesis Flood' was the be-all and end-all of scientific research in light of atheist Darwinian evolution! Now that I have read and understand the validity of the 'old-earth' model, I was led to read Schroeder, and what a find! First off, many, many of the reviews miss the author's astoundingly brilliant analysis of Creation; time/light; the apparent 'contradiction' of the Six Days of Genesis 1&2 with the scientific evidence of billions of years being the 'flip side of the coin', as it were in the eyes of God. Ross and Rana over at Reasons to Believe have sought to do the same from within a decidedly Evangelical Christian framework, but the inherent tacit multicultural paradigm - derived from a false eisogesis (reading into) of Acts 17:26 (and here they are right in line with Ken Ham's/AIG's fallacious 'One Blood' claptrap)- falls short, right at the anthropological point at which the Bible begins- Adam and his posterity, which includes (for Christians) the incarnate Christ. Schroeder (as a Jew) instead goes right to the heart of the matter, saying more or less what Watson (of DNA fame) said a year or two ago of the modern era, and for which scientific FACT, he subsequently lost his job. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,302836,00.html] Schroeder points out the historic reality behind the present avoidance. The hominids that lived before Adam (and his 'kind') were NOT related to Adam, nor his seed- indeed they were not 'MEN' at all- hominids, possibly, but 'Men' - no! The Kirkus review above got the nail on the head, and therefore damned Schroeder with faint praise, merely for saying what the West has long known, but which is now is considered the 'sin of all sins,' in this myopic multicultural age. "Schroeder's other theories include an odd insistence upon a pre-Adamic, soulless hominid ancestor. It's important to Schroeder that the literal Adam be the first ensouled human being, and since Genesis chronology (almost 6,000 years since Adam) doesn't mesh with what science tells us of the age of humankind, Schroeder sets out to prove that the Bible only picks up the story near the close of human development. Such hermeneutical gymnastics seem strangely outdated and obscure in an often intelligent, cogently argued book."
    3. Nope, sorry. Such POV's are neither obscure nor outdated- but their studied avoidance at all costs- is! It is now clear to me, that only with the advent of 'Adamkind' does our world's great ancient historic civilizations appear- and not in one isolated area, but on the GLOBE. It was not the 'indigenous tribes' that raised up these highly-technical civilizations; it was the advent of Adam's Eden- expelled heirs that brought technology (such as the pyramid's manner of construction that we are STILL in awe of) to the world. Moreover, since the (biblical) time of Noah's flood also coincides with written records in both Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilization, (and their continuity shows neither empire suffered from a 'world flood', both Whitcomb and Morris, as well as Ham et al. haven't a leg to stand on- whereas Ryan and Pitman's 'Noah's Flood', and Ian Wilson's 'Before the Flood' appear far more tenable; and since the Egyptians showed racial characteristics of their captives, (as well as of themselves) and these racial types existed PRIOR to the flood, the old 'curse of Ham' is pretty much toast as well. Schroeder put it all into perspective for me- it would be less than intellectually honest to deny these facts, and to seek to find some OTHER way to explain how all these multiple civilizations 'evolved'- like Darwin posited of undifferentiated matter, going from fish to Homo Sapiens. There is both purpose as well as design, from the Big Bang, to the Creation of Adamkind... and Schroeder makes it clear from the perspective of a scientist- for once. And that is the greatest recommendation for this book alone! Moreover, such pre-Davidic civilizations have mythos that speak of fair- haired, golden or red-headed 'gods' visiting the locals, 'giving them culture,' etc. Homer's epics stand at the end of a long line of this sort of literature, but he, too, gave us the images of Olympus that was peopled with fair and gray-eyed Gods -now also under scrutiny from a racial POV- 'The Baltic Homer'. This set of facts, too, I am sure the Kirkus reviewer would say is "strangely outdated and obscure," but there it is; an inconvenient set of corroborative FACTS, that no amount of 'Out of Africa' hype can remove. Think of Cortez, Quetzlcoatl, the clearly Caucasoid busts of Early (vs. late) Egyptian Pharaohs, etc. I'm not making this up, nor am I saying I personally believe it... I'm merely pointing it out. Where Schroeder does go wrong, however, (for which the Kirkus review is utterly silent- could there be a studied reason?) is attributing this Adamic perfection, this civilizational, created semi-divine status of post-edenic Adamkind to the race Schroeder belongs to- i.e., talmudic Judaism and her adherents. (As Schroeder is quite clear to quote both Talmudic as well as Kabbalistic writers- and to note this fact from the beginning- this observation cannot be construed (or 'mis-construed') as 'anti-semitism'- or else we truly are no longer a free nation, and rational discourse no longer exists.) Since Arthur Koestler demonstrated (in 1976!) that Modern Jewry is not related- ethnically, racially, or historically - to the tribes that come of Abraham, Isaac or Jacob's loins; nor, indeed, not even of the Jews of
    4. Christ's day, via his well-received and reprinted book [cf. 'The Thirteenth Tribe'] ...and as Koestler was a Jew himself, he MUST know - I am beginning to think that these two Jewish authors are telling us, the mantle of Schroeder's attribution of such grandeur, such overwhelming intellectual, scientific, artistic, and purely physical beauty on the part of Adam's descendants (and the talmudic 'traditions of the fathers' from which Schroeder garners these insights, collated on this 'semi-divine race' by the talmudic devotees, even if ONLY to be kept in 'custody' for another people ) must therefore inevitably (based on Schroeder's research) fall on another race, a 'lost tribe,' of which Christ is the consummate Second Adam- the Rose of Sharon. Such knowledge, such insights, of course, are anathema in an Obamanation, and that is why Schroeder's book is not touted by: a) the Evangelical Community- who too often see Zionist interest as equivalent to the Gospel- and/or Hagee as their 'pope' (that, and their bizarre grasping at 'scientific straws,' via the Hamite crowd), or b) the Romans, (now jumping on the 'smear Williamson to make us look good' bandwagon, thus aping 'a') or c) anyone else afflicted with the Multicultural 'we're all one/'hope and change' Mania (which has an uncanny resemblance to Weimar Germany, for some gnawing reason...) - which is merely the secular version of a+b above.... But, as Christ said, "Ye shall know the truth, and the Truth shall set you free." I believe Schroeder's books do just that- they did for me! I sincerely believe his writings need to be more seriously studied by Western Christendom, with an eye to realizing the possibility that the 'Adam' whom Schroeder mentions- as the Culmination of Creation- might be much closer at hand than one may at first realize....as Belloc once noted, "The Faith is Europe; Europe, the Faith." For More 5 Star Customer Reviews and Lowest Price: The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom by Gerald L. Schroeder 5 Star Customer Reviews and Lowest Price!
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + AutoSurfRestarterAutoSurfRestarter Nominate

    custom

    33 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    I've read this book as a Christian, and a homeschoo more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 33
      • 33 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories