Since I have become convinced of the authenticity of the cosmo-centric world view that has clearly made the geo-centric and helio-centric perspectives only understandings of a limited and fragmented view of reality, I am not as certain about God as Borg's "The God We Never Knew." With exuberance, if not exaggeration, he claims a vision of that "unknownable" reality.
Having written that, I put my cynicism aside so that I could read this book with a perspective that, at minimum, leaves the options about the sacred open. Against the background of his own journey, Borg seeks to describe a vision of God that a modern human being can embrace.
Before filling in the contours of his image of God he rejects the concept of the God of supernatural theism. He goes to some detail to "package" the God of this perspective. The elements he sees in this view are: (1) God is one who intervenes in the world; (2) the Bible is a divine and authoritative product; (3) though created in the image of God, humans are sinful and guilty and God provides a solution for us in Jesus; (4) Jesus is God's only son and is the one who makes the forgiveness of our sins possible; (5) faith in Jesus is the only way of salvation; (6) faith is correct belief; (7) salvation means going to heaven but some go to hell.
Then this book moves on envision God -- "and the image of Christian faith that goes with it" -- in detail. If you, therefore, are struggling with what Gordon Kaufman of Harvard Divinity School calls "the God problem," then here is help. He will insist that you abandon the authoritative God of "supernatural theism." I, for one, agree that you must if you seek an "authentic view of God that is...compatible with good science, critical thinking and religious pluralism." If I wasn't already convinced of the power of such a perspective as his, this book would challenge me to give consideration to panentheism. Examine it carefully and you will profit from his discussion!
less
0 comments
Post a comment