In Real Sex: The Naked Truth About Chastity (Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, c. 2005), Lauren F. Winner persuasively argues (from a very modern perspective) the case for an ancient virtue. "Chastity," she notes, "is one of the many Christian practices that are at odds with the dictates of our surrounding, secular culture" (p. 9). However unpopular, however, it is perennially right, for it "is God's very best for us. God created sex for marriage and that is where it belongs" (p. 15).
Real Sex, in many ways, is a profoundly personal story, for Winner transparently details her less-than-chaste pre-Christian life. Coming to faith in Christ, however, led to conviction for sin (while receiving the sacrament of penance in an Episcopal church) and (through many struggles) commitment to chastity. Her position, importantly, is deeply rooted in the scriptures and traditions of the church. Neither a subjective personal opinion nor a simplistic citing of selected Bible verses, it's an ethic grounded "in the faithful living of the fullness of the gospel" (p. 30).
What's needed in our day is a faithful explication of this gospel. Everyone seems to freely talk about sex. Talk is truly cheap when it's about sex! All the talk, all the sex education, all the "liberated" TV and seminar discussions of a "new morality" have de-sanctified and vulgarized what ought to be one of the most precious of human interactions. "The problem is not that we talk about sex," Winner says. "The problem is how we talk about sex" (p. 63). We need some "straight talk," refuting the secular lie that "sex can be wholly separated from procreation" (p. 64). Christians need to carefully consider the ethical ramifications of contraception. For "if contraception invites us to be carefree, it also encourages us to be people who think we can control and schedule everything including the creation of our families, down to the month, down to the week. And, most important, it invites us to be people who have utterly separated sex from procreation" (p. 65).
Talking straight also leads us to reject the lie that "how you dress doesn't matter" (p. 70). Modesty and appropriate clothing cannot be severed, though we have, as a society, increasingly failed "to discern why clothes matter, and what clothing is appropriate when" (p. 71). Winner argues that "casual Fridays" reveal much about our "confusion about clothes. Professional workplaces have dress codes in part because managers know that how we dress shapes our behavior" (p. 74). This is powerfully evident in students' classroom behavior, where casual clothing encourages "a casual attitude, a slouching, an irreverence. But it is not my students' fault. Some of their teachers wear blue jeans to class, so why should students dress up? They are, as it were, just following suit" (p. 76). So too, she says, casual dress (e.g. flip-flops) in church leavens a flippant attitude towards God and the holy.
Christians in earlier eras understood this. Granted, some preachers erred in their single-minded criticism of women's fashions. But both men and women need to take seriously their appearance. "There is," she argues, "a certain power in modest dressing, an assertion that though my body is beautiful, I am more than a sex object designed for your passing entertainment. But the power of dressing is also the power of narrative. For our clothes tell stories, and it would be naïve and irresponsible to pretend otherwise" (p. 77).
The "straight talk" Winner desires means the church must stop telling lies about sex! Despite much rhetoric, it's not true that premarital sex will "make you feel lousy." In truth, it often feels great. But feelings, of course, are often deceiving! And the Father of Lies generally "whispers to us about the goodness of something not good. It makes distortions feel good" (p. 89). What the church ought to clarify is this: "premarital sex is bad for us, even if it happens to feel great. In other words, sexual sin is not subjectively felt" (p. 90). That women dislike sex, that sex is somehow dirty, are other lies occasionally promoted within Christian circles.
Supported by "straight talk," Christians can live chastely. Winner explains why fornication--and pornography and masturbation as well--must be rejected if one practices chastity. It takes self-discipline and the support of a strong faith community, but it's possible to follow God's will in this area. And it's truly what's good for us. "That people have sex outside marriage is understandable; we fornicate for the same reason we practice idolatry. Idolatry carries in it the seed of a good impulse--the impulse to worship our maker. Idolatry is that good impulse wrongly directed to disastrous ends. Like idolatry, fornication is a wrong reflection of a right creational impulse. We were made for sex. And so premarital sex tells a partial truth; that's why it resonates with something. But partial truths are destructive. They push us to created goods wrongly lived. To borrow a phrase from Thomas Cranmer again: they are ultimately destructive to our selves, our souls and bodies" (p. 121).
less
0 comments
Post a comment