This is a terribly interesting an unexpectedly good read, unlike its counterparts (by Tom Cahill "The Gift of the Jews," and "How the Irish Saved Civilization", or Thomas E. Woods "How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization," all of which I have reviewed here on Amazon), this is a more organic, more tighten woven narrative about the unusual juxtaposition in space and time of a small but important country; about its strong character and undying streak of independent, its fierce defense of democratic principles, and how these put that little nation in the right place at the right time to have a disproportionate impact on the development of the "New World."
In this sense it is less of a self-promoting ethnocentric claim to greatness as one would expect, or as the other books mentioned above, more or less, are. In the hands of this author, Scottish greatness is as much a natural byproduct of its sibling rivalry with its older, richer, more-powerful and much hated brother, England, as it is about the men, events and character that made Scotland a pivotal data point in modern history.
The first half of the book is tightly written important history, and simply sparkles with every revealing fact, with each scenario and with each multi-generational vendetta that weaves together a compelling story of the Scottish role in a world experiencing tectonic changing in its historical, political and economic contexts. The second half of the book is less interesting as it is more or less what one would expect from the title: a checklist of the great men and their contributions to the modern world.
Taken as a whole, the book reveals three aspects of Scottish history and character that seem determinant in the important role that nation played in inventing the modern world. First is its proximity to its incestuous but nevertheless sibling rival, England. The second lies in a full understanding of the meaning of the phrase "invention of the modern world." And finally the third is in the cantankerous, "in your face," "take no prisoners," Scottish character, best exemplified by the likes of Protestant Reformer John Knox.
With regard to the first two aspects, as a part of the British Isles, at the turn of the 17th Century, Scotland, along with Britain, Holland, Spain and Portugal, was well-placed at the very cusp of a newly emerging and very much uncharted era, the era of adventure and exploration, development of new markets (including slavery from Africa), and the infrastructure of banking needed to support them. This is by definition what is meant by: "inventing the modern world." None of these things played a pivotal role in history before the 16th Century. By virtue of being the little brother of England, Scotland thus got in on the ground floor of these enterprises, so much so, that arguably, without English support, circumstances may have been well beyond Scotland's ability to have been an independent player on the world stage, or have had a determinant impact on the course of modern history. That is to say, as a result of the juxtaposition in time and space alone, Scotland was thrust into the limelight on par with its larger, world-class maritime power, (but still) sibling rival, England.
The first several chapters of the book tells beautifully how Scotland both benefited and suffered from this proximity to the English Crown. It struggled mightily to maintain its independence, sovereignty and national integrity, against the constant and all-consuming encroachment from its larger, stronger, economically more robust and intimidating brother from the South. A large part of Scotland's spunkiness as a "crappy little nation" comes directly from its implacable need to constantly spar with England in order to defend against constant encroachments by one representative of the British Crown or another. In the end, with the Treaty of Union, Scotland was forced by a fait accompli borne out of a conspiracy of existing circumstances, into a compact with the English devil. It was a treaty of capitulation that traded Scottish independence for access to the bounties of British maritime trade and trade routes. This treaty set the course for English dominance over Scotland for the next two centuries.
As for the third and final aspect, although Scotland almost always found itself at a disadvantage, or in a slightly inferior position with regard to the British Crown, this was never perceived as a reason to capitulate, but as a patriotic rallying point to fight with ever more vigor. As the "old World" slowly changed into the "New World," increasingly, the tool of choice was intellectual. Even Scottish religious victories over the Crown and the flowering of Scottish intellectuals across the British Isles more generally, and eventually to the rest of the world, must in the end be seen primarily in intellectual terms. But also and more importantly, the Scottish people always maintained a strong sense of fairness, justice, democracy, rooting for the common man and the underdog, and always coated this with intellectualism for intellectualism's sake and an unadulterated dose of piousness, all of which served its designs well in its long-term struggles with England. As the "New World" opened up, no people were more ideally suited and prepared to take advantage of it than the Scottish. The U.S. became one of the primary beneficiaries of this preparation.
Five Stars
less
0 comments
Post a comment