When French mathematician and astronomer Pierre Laplace was asked why his new book on astronomy made no mention of God, he is said to have replied, "Je n'avais pas besoin de cette hypothèse-là"-- "I have had no need of that hypothesis." Now Victor Stenger has given us an exceedingly eye-opening book-length expansion upon that concept--that the purported existence of God is an hypothesis which does not help in any way to explain the universe we see around us and for which there is no need whatever, when the natural observations of science explain the world quite nicely.
Richard Dawkins has long since argued successfully that since a universe with a creative, intercessional, propitiatory God would be a very different universe from one without such an entity, the notion of God is an hypothesis that requires testing and verification by the methods of science and logic just like any other hypothesis that makes claims about the nature of the world. Victor Stenger has taken up that challenge in a book that brings to bear all the penetrating light of the scientific method. Not surprisingly to those of us who have never seen any reason to credit the notion of God, the hypothesis fails. The universe looks precisely as it should under the realization that there is no God: "[T]he reason I deem the God hypothesis to have failed is precisely because no physical phenomena have been reliably shown to exist that require us to go beyond natural explanations."
Time and again throughout the book, Stenger presents tightly reasoned yet highly readable arguments to the effect that if the God hypothesis were true, there definitely should be multitudinous kinds of evidence that in fact we find utterly lacking. Hypotheses, when they are true, leave observable effects that false hypotheses do not leave. This approach proves to be fatal to the God hypothesis, as Stenger demonstrates repeatedly from various angles
Taking up the notion of intelligent design, for example, he shows that the universe as we actually see it looks precisely as it should in the absence of a designer, its spontaneous development being quite evident. Likewise, examining the quaint notion that a God exists who is omniscient, omnipotent, and omni-benevolent, Stenger has no difficulty arguing that, on the contrary, the world looks precisely as it should when such a creature is entirely imaginary. "The universe," he wryly observes, "is not congenial to human life."
Indeed the whole notion of God is not only foolish but harmful to humankind: "By ridding the world of God, science helps us to control our own lives rather than submitting them to the arbitrary authority of priests and kings who justify their acts by divine will." Needless to say, the religion-inspired atrocities of 9-11 have taught us very clearly that allegiance to fictional gods is not something the world can any longer afford.
Everyone should read this. Everyone.
less
0 comments
Post a comment