Rod Bennett's "FOUR WITNESSES" indicates that in some instances there is a vivid image, rather than an obscure image, regarding some of the figures of early Christianity. This happens to be so regarding four important martyrs:
Clement of Rome
( Clement of Rome St. Clement of Rome is believed to have been the fourth bishop of Rome and served during the last decade of the first century. )
Ignatius of Antioch ( Third bishop of Antioch )
Justin Martyr ( Raised as a Pagan, he had wealth but studied philosophy, converted to Christianity. He was an astute student of words and their philosophical meanings. )
Irenaeus of Lyons ( 2nd century AD - c. 202, a Catholic Bishop of Lugdunum in Gaul (present day Lyon in France)
Each of these men has left an important mark in history.
Roman governors had the power to authorize the death of any citizen of a Roman province. For example, if it was required that all citizens offer sacrifice to Roman Gods, and Christians refused, they were subject to death, usually preceded by horrific tortures to force a recanting of their faith in Jesus Christ.
By the middle of the 1st Century A.D. (50 A.D.) Rome was near the peak of its military might in history. It was also an era in which many Romans were addicted to luxury and excess; but as author Rod Bennett shows, Rome had also entered a period of disdain for even its own religion. In fact, Roman religion had entered a period where the prevalent doctrines closely parallell the modern NEW AGE movement, in which a sythesis of all doctrines is proposed, producing a confusing milieu of ideas which lacks substantial meaning. There were no ethical absolutes. This is the world in which Christianity appeared.
The familiar Nature worship of the past with offerings of Wheat and Wine, had degenerated into a Sex God worship, through infant sacrifice and orgiastic sexuality. This was combined with a sophisticated philosophy of cold cynicism, not unlike that found amongst modern proposals for Atheism today.
The parallel with modern times is that it was a synthesis by an immersion in a hundred different philosophies, characterized by an absence of logic, with nothing but a fatalistic offering of a silent grave to look forward to.
[As I write this, I am struck by the poignancy of the author's comparisons, as I have been reviewing several New Age books. Notably, these are such popular works as "Seat of the Soul," The Secret," "The End of Faith," "A History of God" and "Captivating".]
Christians in the Roman Empire, were despised as narrow minded bigots. (Sound familiar?)
Christians emerged in a world where there were a multitude of "Pop" philosophies, where public speakers offered "long-winded word games". These were offered in a pursuit to obtain money usually, which appears so familiar to those of us who review books, and tire of the endless stream of best-sellers that do not stand up to objective analysis.
However, the modern citizenry seems drawn to such writings, as though to believe a thing, was to make it factually to be so. Also, modern people seem to have entirely disregarded Aristotle's Laws of Thought;
(1) The Law of Identity
(2) The Law of Non-Contradiction
(3) The Law of the Excluded Middle
So that what emerges, is a populace who follow writers, who make no rational sense whatsoever. They commonly heap contempt upon what they characterize as FUNDAMENTALISTS, and in fact, they hold a factual standard in complete disdain.
The Roman citizens had a great deal in common with modern peoples, at least in the ideological sense.
less
0 comments
Post a comment