F-4 Phantom II vs MiG-21: USAF & VPAF in the Vietnam War (Duel) by Peter Davies

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    F-4 Phantom II vs MiG-21: USAF & VPAF in the Vietnam War (Duel) by Peter Davies - Presentation Transcript

    1. F-4 Phantom II vs MiG-21: USAF & VPAF in the Vietnam War (Duel) by Peter Davies Face-Off: Phantom Vs. Fishbed! From difficult weather conditions to unreliable missile armament to unequal rules of engagement, this book tells the story of the challenges faced by the F-4 and MiG-21 pilots. Using first-hand accounts wherever possible the author draws us into the dangerous world experienced by American and North Vietnamese pilots. Influential leaders and tacticians will be profiled to provide a comparative evaluation of their contrasting skills. This book will also reveal the technical specifications of each jet with an analysis of the weaponry, avionics and survival devices of the Phantom and MiG-21. The fighters strengths and weaknesses will be compared also, including turn radius, performance at altitude, range and structural integrity. This was an intense and deadly duel between vastly different rivals. In the Phantom, a second crewmember and good radar compensated for the difficulty of providing command and control at long distances from the targets.
    2. However, the F-4s smoky engines and considerable bulk made it visible at much further distances than the small, clean MiG-21 and Phantoms were often hit by unseen MiG attacks. On the other hand, the F-4s eight-missile armament compared favorably with the two-missile provision of the MiG. Often pilot skill, if not luck, would be the determining factor between the smaller, faster MiG and bigger, better-gunned Phantom. First-person extracts will reflect on the dangers of these aerial duels while graphics based on records of engagement and technical manuals will illustrate the experience of air combat as they struggled to overcome their shortcomings and survive their deadly duels. Personal Review: F-4 Phantom II vs MiG-21: USAF & VPAF in the Vietnam War (Duel) by Peter Davies Now, I introduce a Review on this book which was sent from Young Ki Moon, a amateur Miltary Aviation Researcher,Seoul,Korea. Ihave personally many interests on Air Battles during WW11, korean War and Vietnam War. During Vietnam War,there were many crucial Air Battles between US representative fighter,F-4 series and Soviet's representative MIG-21 series which had backup of their National mobilizations,such as most advanced Technology of Raders, missiles,AAA and GCISystem,etc. Also, this Air Battle compairing between powerful,heavy, missile oriented F-4 series and light,small,cannon oriented MIG series. MIG serie beame easily revised from MIG-15,MIG-17 and MIG-19, to different delta winged MIG-21. In F-4 srriesdesin development,USN's attention started from successor of navy fighter F3H-G/H Demon to F-4 for Carrier based intercepter against attacking enemies for Carrier protection. on the otherhand, At that time, USAF seeked successor of F-101 Vodoo. NAVY accepted F-4 PhantomII from prototype,F4H-1. Army accepted F-4C modification of Phantom II. After collision of US destryer Maddok from attacking from N.Vietnamese torpedo boat on 2,Aug,1964,Crucial Air Battle started. F-4C/D became ground use after slight modifications. F-4D is 2-enginned, 2-seat interceter,grounnd attacking,deffense, multipurpose fighter. engine power 2x17,000lbs( MIG-31MF 1X14,307lbs) Max. speed: 1,75knots/40,000ft(MIG-21MF 1,204 knots/42,640ft Range: 429 nautical miles with 2xexternal tanks(MIG-21MF 400 nautical miles with 2x external tanks) climb: 49,oooft/min. (MIG-21MF 21,1000FT/min) service ceiling: 59,650ft (MIG21MF 56,740ft) Armament: at first USN oriented Air-to-air missile 4xAIM-7E Sparriow missile(infrare red to Rader guided, long ranged) Air-to-Air missile 4xAIM-9 Sidewinder(heat seeker, shorter range missiles) **** they persistet missile oriented reason mighty from endanger from additional cann.
    3. From commbat experience such as missile failuere, failure from fast tlght turn of enemy fighters,and inability of shooting missiles within sort range, F-4C/D needed Cannon or machine guns. F-4C,from 1965,The lack of an internal gun,M6 IAI vulcan rotary cannon into SUU-16/A gun pod on to the central pyron. F4D:put into a 6 baralled 20mm vulcan rotaey cannon->SUU-23A gun pod.this extra gun pad with existing gun sight made incomplete effect. F4E:Finally 1XM61A1'"Gatling" 6 baralled vulcan rotary cannon in the nose part of fuslage. F-4D has good maneuverbility with tight turn( but inferior than MIG-21PF),using superior low level maeuver and superior vertical flighing(MIG-21MF has superior high altitude maneuver and superior horizontal fligt), loweraltitude Air Combat is neccessary. In MIG-21 series,MIG-21F-13 was only the type of Soiet deliverd. in MIG-21F-13 Type,R-3S 'Atool",S-5 and S-24 are used in MIG-21PF with more powerfule engines.MIG-21MF and MIG-21bis has 2x extra wing pylons at first, MIG-21 had only 1x 30mm NR-30 cannon, later changed with 1x2barreled GSh-23. Generally, MIG-21 waited at low levei, then maximum approaced to bombing bombers, then escape for avoiding escorted fighters --so called "Hit and Run"technique. i I like introduce a brilliant,respectful,festy characterd,his feisty character,intolerance toinappriate USAF polices,-Col. Robin Olds. He try to improve for depressed pilots,teaching 1)Revvenge ! engagement of battle-> Fighting-> kILL !. 2)`Team work 3)Individual training of "Dogfighing"-US Thougt no more 'Dogfighting on missile oriented war. compare with rouine "Dogfighting"traing of Soviet pilots. ****note: "Top Gun"Training with small, maneuverable fast fighters. Col.Robin Old's "Operation Bolo"--1) F-105D fighter- bomber group formation start flying with a QRC-160(Electric Counter Measure) attached F-105D. 2) F-4C/D/E fighter's( with same Call Sign, same flight location, same Radio frequency) regular time intervaled formation start **QRC-160's made malfuntions of AAA,SAM missie, GCI controlled Intercepters.
    4. 3) scheduued bombing without enemy's proper counter measures. ( Quoted from 1)"DOGFIGHTS",complete series,DVD, History Channel,2008. 2) MIG-17 and MIG-19 units of the Vietnam War,by Istvan Toperczer. For More 5 Star Customer Reviews and Lowest Price: F-4 Phantom II vs MiG-21: USAF & VPAF in the Vietnam War (Duel) by Peter Davies 5 Star Customer Reviews and Lowest Price!
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + AutoSurfRestarterAutoSurfRestarter Nominate

    custom

    49 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Now, I introduce a Review on this book which was s more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 49
      • 49 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?