It has been typical of the mainstream (read "old guard") to look down upon new popular entertainment technologies. Movies, TV, video games, the Internet--all have received criticism about how they ruin the mind unlike, say, more classic entertainments like reading. While Mr. Johnson acknowledges various weaknesses of these media, his thesis is that they are not the mindless (bread and) circuses of the modern age. In fact, these entertainments are making us smarter.
In his section on video and computer games, for example, he notes some of the same results that Marc Prensky covers in more depth in his book, Don't Bother Me, Mom. I'm Learning. Namely, that for a game to be successful, it must stimulate the brain's learning response by keeping the challenge slightly above the ability of the user and provide help along the way when necessary. It is the complexity of the modern game with it's intricacy, embedded problems, and cooperative aspects that keep a gamer interested, not the supposed appeal of flashy graphics, speed, and puerile story lines.
In the section on TV, Johnson illustrates how the complexity of story lines has increased a hundred-fold since the beginnings of the medium. He points out that the most popular shows of today do things that older shows would never do: assume background knowledge of the audience, leave out crucial pieces of information to be discovered later (or forever left unanswered), follow a huge cast of characters through multiple intersecting plot lines that arc over an entire season (or more) as opposed to a single episode. (Compare Dragnet to Starsky & Hutch to Hill Street Blues to The Sopranos.)
He completes his argument by noting that modern technologies are rewiring the brain and, in many cases, that's a positive thing. Most everyone's basic abilities in things like pattern recognition and problem-solving have been increasing steadily for the past century. Many school-taught abilities may be stagnant, but many underlying fundamentals are improving, thanks to the challenges of modern media.
Of course, like anything, too much technology use can be a bad thing. So can too much reading, as my parents constantly reminded me when I was a kid, devouring books when they would have rather me be outside playing. The point is, instead of highlighting the worst of today with the best of the past--why is it that no one ever compares The Sopranos to the thousands of forgotten novels of the 19th century?--we should compare apples to apples. Not only, as Mr. Johnson points out, our best to their best, but also our worst to their worst. Modern technology still comes out ahead. When I see my mother downloading digital pictures of her grandchildren, when I see the positive social networking with distant friends and relatives I've done through Facebook, when I see the things that can be learned from 500 cable channels, I can't help but agree.
less
0 comments
Post a comment