If you read more than the introduction, you will realize that Empire is not simply an "apology" or a "British" view of history. Ferguson has told the story of the British Empire without worrying about the ignorant political correctness of the day. While it may be fashionable to think that the British were savage rulers in red coats, it's simply not true on the whole.
I agree with Ferguson's history of the British Empire on three major points:
1. The British Empire, overall, more than any other power during the time, imposed, yes imposed, the Rule of Law on the world.
2. The British Empire facilitated the transfer of capital to the developing world, thereby beginning the process of globalization, opening up markets to competition, and overall, raising the standard of living for millions of people.
3. The British Empire, in a time of empires, prevented far more savage nations (Japan, Germany, etc) from subjugating the world.
As other reviewers have said, however, nothing is perfect. There were disasters, near-genocides, and corrupt politicians along the way. That's what happens in the real world. Empires and nations are forged by the sword if need be. The true test of any empire or nation is how it treats the conquered after the battle or coup.
The British Empire, with many exceptions and problems along the way, was a benevolent master. Critics like to say that the best path would have been one in which there were no empires or colonizers. This is an irrelevant critique, similar to claiming that life would be better without the existence of cancer. It's wishful thinking.
Portugal, France, Spain, Germany, Japan, and Russia have all, at one time or another, whether they admit it or not, been partakers of the great game known as Empire Building. I would choose to be a subject of the British Empire a thousand times over before I would choose any of the others. This is not a false dilemma. If the British Empire didn't colonize the world, one of the other powers most certainly would have.
Finally, the British have left a legacy of stable, industrial, first-world countries in their wake. Canada, the United States, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand spring to mind, not to mention the fact that Britain chose to oppose Germany rather than placate her in the second World War, which prevented countless atrocities from occurring. Former British Colonies are bastions of stability and law in a world that is anything but stable and law-abiding. What other conquering power has done so much?
It's easy to focus on one point or another (and admittedly there are many to chose from: Boer War, slave trade, etc.) and use that to damn the entire history of the British Empire; however, that is the type of sloppy thinking that belongs in coffee shops and meetings of the Young Campus Communists.
Looking at the broad sweep of history shows that the British Empire was not an evil entity, hell-bent on bringing misery to colonized peoples. Overall, the British Empire was a force for good, bringing light, law, order, free markets, progress, and yes, freedom to her peoples, both foreign and domestic.
less
0 comments
Post a comment