Asimovs Guide to the Bible: A Historical Look at the Old and New Testaments by Isaac Asimov

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Asimovs Guide to the Bible: A Historical Look at the Old and New Testaments by Isaac Asimov - Presentation Transcript

    1. Asimovs Guide to the Bible: A Historical Look at the Old and New Testaments by Isaac Asimov The Genius Of Doubting Isaac Isaac Asimov thinks big; readers of his science fiction works are familiar with his grasp and mastery of scale and how the individual stories unfold within the epic work. In Asimovs Guide to the Bible he utilizes this skill to pare down and untangle the many intertwined threads of biblical history and mythology. He views this guide as a way to illuminate the world of the Bible by incorporating the secular aspects of history, biography, and geography into a deeper understanding. Asimovs Guide to the Bible is not a book to be read in continuum but an indispensable companion to any journey through the Bible. Situating the writers of the various books of the Bible in time and space, Asimov gives its writings context and also explains how that context has morphed with time. While some of his conclusions and qualified speculations may challenge certain traditional assumptions (for example, there is no reference in the gospels to Mary
    2. Magdalene as a prostitute; rather, she was a madwoman whom Jesus cured by casting out seven demons), his aim is not to tear it apart but to flush out some of its mysteries, give it a context that the average Bible reader can understand, and therefore make it more real. --Jodie Buller Personal Review: Asimovs Guide to the Bible: A Historical Look at the Old and New Testaments by Isaac Asimov Isaac Asimov's "Guide to the Bible" is one of the best works to get a grasp of the large and complicated book, the Bible. Asimov is out to put the Bible in concrete historical terms and explain what was happening sans mysticism or superstition. Asimov takes many liberties in trying to explain occurrences giving them rational or scientific validation and these as he usually will admit should be just taken as possibilities. Asimov does put events into an historical context, which he does well. Nothing, as Asimov said, is really new his writing and most of it has been said before but the conciseness of it was worth while. Asimov paints Jesus as a spin master in Mathew rather than take him at his word, which as things went along does have a prophetic quality, although Asimov doesn't pursue this. Also Asimov doesn't discount the reality that a few people were profoundly moved by the reserection, or what they believed to be one. He seems to hold up Mark as the most historically accurate Gospel Luke and Mathew each had a spin to put on and John is totally political with little if any historical accuracy in his, Asimov's, view. Revelations is about things that have happened on the ground recently, with the strong possibility that it is talking about the Christian persecution by Nero and other things in the recent past or predictions about the near future and 666 is Greek alphabetical code meaning Nero. There is probably a better historical interpretation of the Bible, but I don't know what that would be, it would seem there should be. This was pretty good, but again Asimov does do a lot of guessing and scientific explaininations as well as good historical research - the two need to be taken seperately. For instance Asimov speculates that St Paul went blind due to an epileptic siezure and then, at least partially, rejects that idea by saying that a man who did as much traveling as Paul must be in the finest shape - he just grasps at straws. Some of Asimov's ideas were far off track, and yet some obvious points that support Jesus as Messiah were not pursued at all. Asimov refers to the fact that the founders of Christianity really thought of them selves as Jews, Christians are Jews it is a question of semantics (Pagans would see little difference); so the Roman Emperor Constantine converted to Judaism which I think to Paul would be a prophetic if not a miraculous conclusion. He leaves his book saying that some dramatic conclusion was expectant yet didn't happen and seems to mock believers for this, yet 350 years after Caligula tried to build a statue of himself as god in the Temple of Jerusalem a Roman Emporer converts to Judaism.
    3. For More 5 Star Customer Reviews and Lowest Price: Asimovs Guide to the Bible: A Historical Look at the Old and New Testaments by Isaac Asimov 5 Star Customer Reviews and Lowest Price!
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + AutoSurfRestarterAutoSurfRestarter Nominate

    custom

    39 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Isaac Asimov's "Guide to the Bible" is on more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 39
      • 39 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories