Federalist paper

Federalist paper



https://assignmentlab.com/landing/slideshare .That's a sample paper - essay / paper on the topic "Federalist paper" created by our writers at Register NOW and get 30$ to your account. ...

https://assignmentlab.com/landing/slideshare .That's a sample paper - essay / paper on the topic "Federalist paper" created by our writers at Register NOW and get 30$ to your account.

Disclaimer: The paper above have been completed for actual clients. We have acclaimed personal permission from the customers to post it.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Federalist paper Federalist paper Document Transcript

  • Yourlastname 1 Student Name Professor Name Government Date Federalist Paper #15 In the article in question, Alexander Hamilton presents his views concerning the nature and purpose of the Union. He asserts that the powers of states should be abridged in favor of the federal government in order to ensure observance of the existing laws by local authorities. He says that an alliance based only on good faith is doomed to failure. General superintendence which has enough authority to prescribe and to coerce (a central government, in other words) is indispensable to the well-being of the nation and the autonomy of local bodies, leading to its being split and eventually destroyed by its enemies. In my opinion, Hamilton was right. Subsequent events showed that a strong federal government was necessary for the USA to win wars, acquire new territories, and maintain peace and stability within their borders. The first assumption Hamilton makes is that all misfortunes characteristic of the first period of American history were due to the weakness of the federal government, which failed to tame states pursuing their selfish goals and disregarding matters of common interest. He later adds that only a centralized state is able to effectively mobilize resources (money, men and goods) in the face of an imminent external danger. In the times of Hamilton, the USA was confronted with many such dangers. England was the main enemy of the young state, trying to subdue it during the War of Independence and the Anglo-American War of 1812. Spain and France had large colonies in North America and were afraid of losing them after the rise of American power. In fact, America had no friends and was forced to rely only on its own forces to deter possible aggression. At second, the author stresses that bodies of people are very often more selfish and rebellious than individuals. Therefore, states should be prevented from pursuing their local goals to the detriment of the whole. The government should address citizens, not states, which are only
  • Yourlastname 2 an intermediate link between the people and central authorities. It is an advisable model for every society with an unripe political culture, having no experience of solving problems and addressing challenges of a rapidly changing world. If there are too many intermediaries between the state and the citizen, the state can force nobody to obey its orders and requisitions, and the whole system is plunged into chaos. I generally approve of Hamilton’s approach to the political problems in question. History has shown that the weakness of the federal government led to two different social systems evolving in the USA: the slave-owning one and the capitalist one. Their supporters waged a bloody war against one another, destabilizing the country and giving rise to a wide range of economic, political and humanitarian problems. If the central government had been stronger, this catastrophe would not have happened. It took the line of thought represented by Hamilton many years to become an integral part of American political culture. In 1801, Thomas Jefferson was elected President of the USA. He was a Democratic Republican and intended to grant states greater political and economic independence. In 1804, Hamilton was killed in a duel, and the Federalist Party began losing popularity among voters. The Democratic-Republican Party was to dominate America’s political life for the next two decades, but supporters of a strong federal government regained political influence after the Civil War. In my opinion, the author should have provided a more profound analysis of the Jeffersonian state model. It has many advantages, although the enumeration of its shortcomings in the Federalist Papers is quite impressive. In subsequent years, the USA was engaged in a series of wars against Indians and Mexicans. The ability of these states to act independently and quickly in critical situations may have enabled Americans to defeat their enemies and acquire enormous territories in the South and the West. In his thoughtful and convincing article, Hamilton foresaw and described the main directions of the political evolution of American society. Nevertheless, his political opponents also rendered invaluable services to this country, and the significance of their views cannot be downplayed. His essays must be viewed within the general political context of the epoch, and
  • Yourlastname 3 one must remember that things were different two hundred years ago. The First Party System was still imperfect, and the future course of its development could not be predicted.
  • Yourlastname 4 Works Cited The Federalist Papers. Federalist № 15 [Online] Available at: http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed15.htm [Accessed on September 13]