2. SOCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL
Community Score Card : Environmental and CSR Aspects Assessment on
JOB Pertamina-Petrochina East Java (PPEJ) in Bojonegoro
Maryati Abdullah
Program Manager Extractive Industries Governance Reform-PATTIRO
maryati@pattiro.org
3. Background & Objective
Good mining practices obligate the
company to apply environmental and
social standard in its activities
Society and stakeholders neighboring
the mine are the most environmentally
and socially impacted parties from the
oil & gas mining activities.
Assessment from the stakeholders is
important to provide input in improving
the environmental and social aspects of
oil and gas mining in Bojonegoro
4. Community Scorecard
Scorecard, as one of the social accountability
tools - in this matter it is selected as one of the
methods to describe stakeholder assessment n
the environmental and social aspect of the oil &
gas mining activities of the company
Scorecard is implemented by engaging the
respondent from the villagers near the mine
(sambiroto, campurejo, ngampel), local
government and the company itself.
Scorecard is conducted in the 2 months term
(December 2011-January 2012)
5. Aspects scored
Environmental Aspect:
SOP for HSE
Prevention & managing the air pollution and green house emission
Prevention & managing the sound and water pollution
Prevention & toxic and hazardous waste management
Prevention & disease management due to mining activities
Emergency contingency plan standard
Post-mining rehabilitation
Access and public information transparency
Social Aspect (society development program) :
Planning and program scope aspects
Program implementation aspect (executor, area scope)
Budget allocation
Progress report and implementation report
Access and public information transparency
7. Scoring
Scoring (in general):
Current standard/regulation/SOP
Standard/regulation/SOP implementation
Socialization and public information
transparency and
Engagement/multi-parties dialogue
Score : 0 to 5
5 : Very good
4 : Good
3 : Adequate
2 : Poor
1 : Very Poor
0 : Bad
8. Scoring result :
Community, Local Government, Company (1)
Scoring
Scoring aspect Commun Local
Compa
ity Gov
ny (ave)
(average) (ave)
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT
There is SOP for work security, health security and
environment (HSE) (is there any SOP, socialization and 2 5 5
complaint handling))
Prevention and management for air pollution and
reduction of greenhouse gas emission
(There is standard/SOP, flare stack distance, leakage
2.75 4.25 4.75
management, the existence of leak detectors : gas
detector gas, siren, worker, wind sock, evacuation path
and evacuation area)
Noise and Air Pollution management
(There is SOP, socialization and division to handle 1.33 3 4
complaint)
Prevention and management of water pollution
(SOP, waste water disposal, liquid waste injection, 3 4 5
socialization and division to handle complaint)
Prevention and Management for Toxic and Hazardous
Waste
3.67 5 5
(special container for hazardous waste, implementation
and division to handle public complaint)
9. Scoring result :
Community, Local Government, Company (2)
Disease prevention and management due to mining
(program, time of implementation, scope area, socialization and public 2.17 4.5 5
complaint division)
Emergency contingency plan standard : H2S presentation, oil leak
and spill, fire, and other emergency potential
2.7 4.44 5
(SOP, emergency team, early warning system, complete emergency kit,
socialization, multi-parties engagement and public complaint division)
Abandonment and Site Restoration
1 3 4
(budget allocation, socialization and information access)
Access and Public Information Transparency related to
environmental aspect
2 4.67 5
(Document, information availability, access of information from the
following documents: HSE standard, AMDAL & RKL/RPL, as well as
Contingency Plan)
SOCIAL ASPECT (Community Development Program)
Community Development Program planning
1.67 5 5
(planning, socialization, and multi-parties dialog)
Scope of Community development program
(program scope : development of economy, education, health,
4.33 5 5
community empowerment, environmental facility support, religious aid,
and infrastructure)
10. Scoring result :
Community, Local Government, Company (3)
Implementation of the community development program
3 4.5 5
(Engaging the society as executor, having the procedure for
proposal and its socialization, program area scope)
Progress report and community development program
implementation
1.67 3 3
(The existence of progress and execution report, socialization
and reporting to the local government)
Fund allocation for the community development program
2.33 2 5
(there are specific budget allocation for socialization and
information of allocation per area)
Access and Public Information transparency related to the
community development program
1.67 3.67 5
(Availability of document/information, accessible document:
comdev planning, progress report and activity execution report,
budget allocation per village)
11. Community Recommendation
• Company should do more intense socialization and simulation as well
as engage more community members so they are better prepared in
emergency evacuation.
• Placement of equipment and emergency signs should not only be
placed in the drilling area, but also in settlement area, at least the
closest village to the drilling location.
• Several early warning systems should be repaired (e.g. wind sock).
The amount should be added, e.g. face masks should be distributed
before emergencies.
• Community empowerment program should be improved, since now
the priority for it declines, and the program in fact really benefited the
community.
• Local worker should be given more opportunity, recruitment should
be more transparent so that the community will not be harmed by the
job broker’s trick.
• Community engagement in socialization of the mining activities and
CSR-Comdev program execution should involve wider grass-root
community so it will not lean on the village’s elite.
12. Recommendation
• Local Government
• The company should be more compliant to the procedure related with
mining activities implementation (e.g. related with location permit, should
comply to Environmental Impact Assessment - AMDAL, community
should be asked for their opinions)
• Company should be more transparent, e.g. to the natural resources
division that will check the safety aspect, etc, so that the local
government could help explaining it to the community
• Company should have conduct periodic coordination (e.g. for
environmental aspect with environment service, and for CSR-Comdev
with Regional Development Planning Agency/Bappeda)
• Company
• The community should confirm first, if there is matter to be clarified, don’t
act on their own
• Local government should be more active to help explaining the
community what the company had done
• Information should be balanced, community should not only see the
weaknesses of the company, but also seek for strength and positive
things from the company
13. Multi-parties Forum Agreement
• 1. JOB PPEJ will conduct evaluation to the
CSR/Comdev implementation committee
related to the public complaint on the
company program. The result will be reported
to the society (company has audit
mechanism from National Audit Body, and
BPMIGAS). There will be follow up (multi-
parties dialog) to talk about CSR-Comdev
mechanism.
14. • 2. Socialization (public campaign) and
simulation of environmental impact handling
through PKDB (time of each drill,
improvement of PKDB work mechanism,
noting the representation of society in Ring-
I, socialization of PKDB team names,
society needs to to be updated and notified
on the evaluation result).
15. • Recommendation and commitment
resulted from this forum will not be
published to the media/external parties.
This will be forwarded to the Regent
first and will also issue recommendation
letter
16. Lesson learned
• Lesson learned in conducting approach to the
company so the company “want” to be assessed
• Lesson learned in conducting approach to the society
surrounding the mine and the local government so
they “want” to be assessed
• Lesson learned in building commitment to the
scorecard results
• Replication Plan/Suggestion in other area
