Criminology Powerpoint One 2008 - Presentation Transcript
Nature of Crime Nature of Deviance Community and Crime
Social Control
SOCIAL CONTROL
Attempts by society to regulate people’s thoughts and behavior
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
A formal response by police, courts, and prison officials to alleged violations of the law
Why does every society have deviance?
Why does every society have crime?
How does who and what are defined as deviant reflect social inequality?
How does the Criminal Justice System reflect societal influence?
Some Questions to Consider…
Crime and Deviance
"Deviance" is a wide-ranging term used by sociologists to refer to behavior that varies, in some way, from a social norm.
In this respect, it is evident that the concept of deviance refers to some form of "rule-breaking" behavior.
DEVIANCE
The recognized violation of cultural norms
CRIME
The violation of a society’s formally enacted criminal law
What is Deviance?
“ The Rules”
In relation to deviance, therefore, the concept relates to all forms of rule-breaking…
(whether this involves such things as murder, theft or arson - the breaking of formal social rules - or such things as wearing inappropriate clothing for a given social situation, failing to produce homework at school or being cheeky to a parent, teacher and so forth - more-or-less the breaking of relatively informal social rules).
As a general rule, we can say that there is a distinction between crime and deviance in terms of:
"All crime is, by definition, deviant behavior, but not all forms of deviance are criminal".
Self-Report Exercise
Take out a piece of paper and write down the 10 most deviant and/or illegal acts that you have committed.
Do not sign your name!
Really, do not sign your name…
Crime is a social phenomenon
Crime is common & normal
Because crime is so common, year after year, many Americans regard it as the most serious social problem facing the United States.
Crime affects everyone in society – either directly or indirectly:
Crime results in thousands of deaths
Millions of cases of physical injury or psychological damage
NIJ – Crime costs over $500 Billion per year
Although crime appears to be ubiquitous in our society, we often know very little about how our perceptions of crime are created, maintained, or modified.
The Criminological Enterprise
Criminal Statistics
Gathering valid crime data; devising new research methods; measuring crime patterns and trends
Psychology/Sociology of Law
Exploring the intersection between the disciplines of psychology, sociology, and law
Theory Construction, Development, and Verification
Criminal Behavior Systems
Determining the nature and cause of specific crime patterns; the examination of specific offense, e.g., white collar crime.
Penology
The correction and control of criminal behavior
Victimology
The nature and cause of victimization
Crime Prevention
Boundary
No Ultimate Definition of Crime
We do know that there is no single objective definition of crime.
There are legal definitions
There are social definitions
There are subjective (personal) definitions
There are organizational definitions
What is crime?
1. Unlawful behavior,
2. Behavior that is formally processed as criminal
3. Socially harmful behavior
4. Anything the state wants it to be?
What is Crime? Part I
A phenom enon of Society
Each society decides what conduct is criminal
Society also determines
enforcement
adjudication
punishment
What is a Crime? Part II
A crime is an act
committed in violation of a law forbidding it (e.g. theft, arson)
or omitted in violation of a law commanding it (paying taxes)
and for which society has provided a formally sanctioned punishment
What is crime? Part III
It it’s simplest definition, crime is any specific act prohibited by law for which society has provided a formally sanctioned punishment.
This can include the failure of a person to perform an act specifically required by law.
To Sum up: What is crime?
Crime : ‘An intentional act in violation of the criminal law committed without defense or excuse, and penalized by the state.’
A crime is an act in violation of a criminal law for which a punishment is prescribed; the person committing it must have intended to do so and must have done so without legally acceptable defense or justification.
Legislative bodies are continually revising, adding to, and deleting from, their criminal statutes.
Laws vary within the same culture from time to time as well as across different cultures.
Crimes pass out of existence
What constitutes a crime can be defined in and out of existence by the courts or by legislators.
06/10/09 Crime as a Moving Target
Some criminologists, such as Darnell Hawkins, say that crime is a socially constructed phenomenon that lacks any ‘real’ objective essence because crimes are defined into existence rather than discovered.
Social construction means nothing more than humans have perceived a phenomenon, named it, and categorized it according to some classificatory rule that makes note of the similarities and differences among the things being classified.
Crime as a Moving Target
Criminality
Criminality : A property of individuals that singles the willingness to commit acts of commission or omission contrary to the law and other harmful acts.
When criminologists study criminality, they study individuals who commit predatory harmful acts, regardless of the legal status of the acts.
Criminality is a clinical or scientific term rather than a legal one.
Involvement in crime varies in fine gradations.
The Legal Making of a Criminal
A person is not officially a criminal until he or she has been defined as such by the law.
Before the law can properly call a person a criminal, it must go through a series of actions governed at all junctures by well-defined legal rules collectively called criminal procedure.
06/10/09
Basic Principles of American Criminal Law
American criminal law has its origins in English common law, which was brought to these shores by the early British colonists.
06/10/09
Crime, Deviance, and Other Issues
Definitions I
Deviance involves breaking a norm and eliciting a negative reaction from others.
Informal punishment is mild and may involve raised eyebrows, gossip, ostracism or
Stigmatization . When people are stigmatized, they are negatively evaluated because of a perceptible sign that distinguishes them from others.
Formal punishment results from people breaking laws, which are norms stipulated and enforced by government bodies.
Definitions II
Social diversions are minor acts of deviance such as participating in fads.
Social deviations are more serious acts. A larger proportion of people agree they are deviant and somewhat harmful, and they are usually subject to institutional sanction.
The state defines conflict crimes as illegal but the definition is controversial in the wider society.
Consensus crimes are widely agreed to be bad in themselves.
Definitions III
Power is the probability that one actor within a social relationship will be in a position to carry out his or her own will despite resistance.
White‑collar crime refers to illegal acts committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his or her occupation.
Street crimes include arson, burglary, robbery, assault, and other illegal acts. They are committed disproportionately by people from lower classes.
Definitions IV
Victimless crimes (also called crimes against Public Order) such as prostitution and illegal drug use, involve violations of the law that arguably do not harm or violate the rights of anyone except perhaps the consensual participants themselves .
Self-report surveys are especially useful. In such surveys, respondents are asked to report their involvement in criminal activities, either as perpetrators or victims.
What is the discipline of Criminology?
What is Criminology?
Criminology is the scientific study of the nature, extent, cause, and control of criminal behavior.
Criminology is an interdisciplinary science:
Sociology
Criminal justice
Political science
Psychology
Economics
Natural science
What is criminology?
Criminology : The interdisciplinary science that gathers and analyzes data on crime and criminal behavior.
Criminology is the scientific study of crime and criminal behavior.
Criminologists use the scientific method to try to answer the questions they ask rather than simply speculate about them from their armchairs.
Criminology is an inherently interdisciplinary field.
The Science of Criminology
Police Productivity and Crime Rates:
Is violent crime increasing or decreasing?
Childhood Maltreatment and Delinquency:
Are mistreated children more likely to engage in delinquency?
Specific Deterrence and White Collar Offenders:
Are white collar offenders specifically deterred by prison?
What is Criminology?
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Criminology explains the origin, extent, and nature of crime in society
Criminal justice refers to agencies of social control
Both discipline areas overlap
What is Criminology?
Criminology and Deviance
Deviant behavior departs from social norms
Not all crimes are deviant and not all deviant acts are criminal
Criminologists study both criminology and deviance to understand the nature and purpose of law (I.E. drug use)
Development of the Discipline What do Criminologists Think and Do?
A Brief History of Criminology
Classical Criminology 18 th century
Utilitarianism emphasized behavior is considered purposeful and useful by the actor
Cesare Beccaria (1738-1794) believed people have free will to choose criminal or lawful solutions to meet their needs
Choice is controlled by fear of punishment
Punishment should be severe, swift, and certain to control behavior
A Brief History of Criminology
Nineteenth-Century Positivism
Application of scientific methods to study crime
Auguste Comte (1798-1857)
Two main elements: 1) human behavior is a function of forces beyond a person’s control and 2) embracing the scientific method to solve problems
Charles Darwin (1809-1882) popularized the positivist tradition
Rising crime rates can signal the need for social change
A Brief History of Criminology
The Chicago School and Beyond
Robert Ezra Park (1864-1944), Ernest W. Burgess (1886-1966), Louis Wirth (1897-1952)
The Chicago School - social ecology (reaction to an environment that was inadequate for proper human relations and development)
Edwin Sutherland suggested people learn criminality
Walter Reckless linked crime to an inadequate self-image.
Both views linked criminality to the failure of socialization
A Brief History of Criminology
Conflict Criminology
Karl Marx (1818-1883)
Relationship between bourgeoisie (capitalists) and proletariat (labor) developing class conflicts
Development of conflict theory (the linkage between crime and capitalism)
Impact on civil rights/women’s movements
A Brief History of Criminology
Contemporary Criminology
Rational choice theory argues people are rational decision makers
Social structure theory argues social environment controls criminal behavior
Social process theory argues criminal behavior is learned
What Criminologists Do: The Criminological Enterprise
Criminal Statistics
Measuring the amount and trends of criminal activity
Creating valid and reliable measurements of criminal activity
What Criminologists Do: The Criminological Enterprise
Sociology of Law
Subarea of criminology concerned with the role of social forces in shaping criminal law (I.E. legality of art works)
Criminologists help lawmakers alter the content of criminal law to respond to the changing times (I.E. sex offender registration)
What Criminologists Do: The Criminological Enterprise
Developing theories of Crime Causation
Psychological view contends crime is a function of personality, learning, or cognition
Biological view incorporates biochemical, genetic, and neurological linkages to crime
Sociological view includes social forces such as poverty, socialization, and group interaction
What Criminologists Do: The Criminological Enterprise
The Nature of Theory and Theory Development
Social theory is a systematic set of interrelated statements that explain some aspect of social life
Some theory may be grand, while others are narrow in their focus
Theory is based on social facts, which can be readily observed
What Criminologists Do: The Criminological Enterprise
Criminal Behavior Systems
Involves crime types and patterns (I.E. violent, public order, and organized crime)
Edwin Sutherland’s “white-collar” crime
Crime typologies involve different types of crime and criminals
What Criminologists Do: The Criminological Enterprise
Penology
Correction and control of known criminal offenders
Capital punishment is used as social control
Mandatory sentences are aimed at social control and prevention of criminal acts.
What Criminologists Do: The Criminological Enterprise
Victimology
Examines the critical role of the victim in the criminal process (Hans von Hentig andStephen Schafer)
Use of victim surveys to measure the nature and extent of criminal behavior
Creating probabilities of victimization risk
Victim culpability or precipitation of crime
Designing services and programs
How Criminologists View Crime
The Consensus View of Crime
Substantive criminal law defines crime and punishment
Criminal law is a function of beliefs, morality and rules
Laws apply equally to all members of society
Acts which are considered as social harms should be outlawed to protect the social fabric and members of society
How Criminologists View Crime
The Conflict view of Crime
Criminal law reflects and protects established economic, racial, gendered, and political power and privilege
Definition of crime is controlled by wealth, power, and social position
Crime is shaped by the values of the ruling class and not the moral consensus of all people
How Criminologists View Crime
The Interactionist View of Crime
This position holds 1) People act according to their own interpretations of reality, 2) People observe they way others react either positively or negatively, and 3) People reevaluate and interpret their own behavior according to the meaning and symbols they have learned from others
There is not objective reality, according to interactionists
The definition of crime reflects the preferences and opinions of people who hold social power
Crime is socially defined by moral entrepreneurs
How Criminologists View Crime
Defining Crime
Crime is a violation of societal rules of behavior as interpreted and expressed by the criminal law, which reflects public opinion, traditional values, and the viewpoint of people currently holding social and political power
The definition combines all three criminological perspectives (consensus, conflict, and interactionist)
Traditional Justice (retributive and rehabilitative) Restorative Justice Victims are peripheral to the process Victims are central to the process The focus is on punishing or on treating the offender The focus is on repairing the harm between an offender and victim, and perhaps also an offender and a wider community The community is represented by the state Community members or organizations take a more active role The process is characterized by adversarial relationships among the parties The process is characterized by dialogue and negotiation among parties
Crime is not new
1849 California Gold Rush
89,000 Miners
20% dead in first six months (mostly homicide)
Crime rate led to the creation of one of the first state prisons.
San Quentin Prison one of the first prisons ever constructed in the US
Crime and the Criminal Law
Code of Hammurabi (eye for an eye)
Mosaic Code (basis for U.S. legal system)
Compurgation (use of oathhelpers)
Trials by ordeal (divine intervention)
Crime and the Criminal Law
Common Law
English system of law based on precedent cases
Mala in se refers to crime considered as evil
Mala prohibita refers statutory crimes
Legislatures supplement common law with statutes
Crime and the Criminal Law
Contemporary Criminal Law
Felony offenses are serious criminal actions
Misdemeanor offenses are minor or petty criminal actions
Criminal law seeks to: Enforce social control, Discourage revenge, Express public opinion and morality, Deter criminal behavior, Punish wrongdoing, and Maintain social order
Crime and the Criminal Law
The Elements of a Crime
Actus Reus is the action of a crime
Mens Rea is the mental intent of a criminal action
Strict Liability does not necessarily require specific intent
Crime and the Criminal Law
Criminal Defenses
Excuse defenses – insanity, intoxication, and ignorance
Justification defenses – necessity, duress, self-defense, and entrapment
Crime and the Criminal Law
The Evolution of Criminal Law
Criminal law evolves to reflect social and economic conditions, such as stalking statutes or sexual predator laws (Megan’s Law)
Changing technology requires modifications in criminal law
Ethical Issues in Criminology
What to study (influence of research money)
Whom to study (unmasking the poor)
How to study (experiments and harm)
Crime does not always make sense: Odd laws
Minnesota:
--It is illegal to tease skunks.
--Every man in Brainerd is required by law to grow a beard.
Michigan:
--A state law stipulates that a woman's hair legally belongs to her husband.
--Under state law, dentists are officially classified as "mechanics."
--In Clawson, it is legal for a man to "sleep with his pigs, cows, horses, goats, and chickens."
The theme of the criminal justice system: Balancing the concern for individual rights with the need for public order.
Does the CJS Over-criminalize?
Story of the cursing canoist…
Curfews…
Influence of the Media Perception and Public Opinion CSI Effect
Public Opinion and the News Media
What is the relationship between public opinion and public policy?
How is crime data organized on an opinion level?
Crime Myths
Crime Myths get created out of situations of ambiguity and concern
Crime myths are “ an ill-founded belief held uncritically ”
Most people's ideas about crime and criminals were NOT formed through personal experience instead we form much of our ideas based on media depictions and illustrations of crime and criminals
Example of a Myth
How much crime is there? More difficult to answer because it varies and the media creates …
Myth of Child Abduction Kappeler, Blumberg, and Potter show that the hysteria that surrounded the scare of child abductions in the 1980s was not stranger-related but the result of other factors – e.g., divorce and custody issues.
Media Images
There is neither enough space in newspapers nor enough air time on television to cover all, or even most for that matter, criminal activities.
Research has shown that Violent crimes are more likely to gain the attention of the media
However, does the media cover violent crimes because of their interest or ours???
What does the Media depict?
Bob Roshier has shown that there are three factors influencing the selection of media crime stories
1. Unusual Circumstances
2. Dramatic elements
3. Involvement of famous people -- e.g., Robert Downey, jr.
Crime and Media
Crime is used to sell
Television portrays crime and criminals in a stereotypical manner
Most crime is violent, interpersonal, pathological
Glassner – “ The Construction of Fear ”
Criminological research on media images
A number of analyses on the influence of
media depictions of crime, criminals,
criminality, and victims exist.
According to Surette (1992) The media has a profound influence on the general public understanding of crime.
Media Images
Various sources of information, commentary, and
debate on crime exist in print, video and electronic
media outlets that establish the parameters of
perceived wisdom on crime.
Marsh (1991) demonstrates that most media
illustrate crime in a mainstream and sensational
fashion. One facet of this overly dramatic style has
been the manner in which victims are presented.
The media, however, is not alone in dramatizing
certain kinds of victims.
Even the officials …
Eitzen and Timmer 1989:39
Official crime statistics themselves fare no better because they pay far more attention to violent and property crime than to corporate and white-collar crime
Weiss and Chermak (1998) on Homicide Reporting
studied all homicides that occurred in
Indianapolis in 1995 and concluded that
murders of white victims receive more news
attention than when African-Americans are
victims.
Conclusions and Consequences
What consequences would this presentation have?
What patterns have you noticed on television and other media?
What do you think about Weiss and Chermak ’ s conclusions?
Zatz and Richey Mann (1998)
contend that popular conceptions of crime and criminality are constructed within the dominant paradigms of race, gender, and class.
“ By linking images of color with crime, the stereotypes underlying media reporting on crime and criminality become more apparent ” (1998:1).
Street vs. White Collar crime
Most research on media portrayals are based on street crime rather than white-collar or corporate crime. “ The most common image of a crime victim is surely the victim of murder, rape, robbery, burglary or some other conventional crime. ”
There can be little question that most people are likely to fear being victimized by such crime ” (Friedrichs 1996: 58).
Who to fear?
Rather than fearing white-collar or corporate crime, most American citizens are unaware of corporate misconduct because they are focused on conventional crime.
Thinking about Crime
Meithe and McCorkle Simple solutions to crime are rarely that!
Simplicity vs. Complexity
Criminal behavior is typically
1. described with Action verbs (beaten, stabbed, attacked)
2. referenced with legal terms (murder, kidnapping, etc … )
The "Crime Problem"
Raymond Mickalwski -- "crime problem" and "problem of crime"
Crime problem image refers to the traditional depiction
Problem of Crime image is concerned with common crime but understands that not all forms of socially harmful behavior are prohibited by law
The "Typical Criminal"
Jeffrey Reiman -- Typical Criminal -- a stereotypical image that is produced by existing criminal justice practices, starting with the lawmaking process and including law enforcement, corrections, and even media coverage of crime and criminals.
Carnival Mirror Image -- a distorted image of the danger: young, black, poor, urban, and male
Typical criminal and typical crime
Wrong: 1. Many crimes are not interpersonal
2. Most crimes are not violent
Meithe and McCorkle
They contend that we categorize and understand criminal action through constructing different kinds of categories.
They see four separate kinds or types of
understandings:
legal, offender, victim, and situational based.
Legal-based typologies
Limited because aspects of the offender are missing
What about plea-bargaining
Do we really know who did what?
Legal definitions vary from state to state
Criminals do not specialize
May be overly generalized?
Offender-based Typologies
These types are constructed on the characteristics of the offenders
Ancient form of criminological analysis
“ Classical School of Criminology ”
Victim-based Typologies
This is New …
What type of victim is chosen and why
Offender decision-making is critical
Victim response is useful information
Situation/Context-based Types
Opportunity structure, where the crime occurs
Substantive Criminal Law
What is crime
Before the criminal justice system can function we must first define what is:
Crime
The Concept of Crime is Important
A person is not criminally culpable (blameworthy) unless she acted:
voluntarily (or failed to act when required by law to do so)
with a “guilty mind”
in such a way that her action and intention coincided in time causing the harm
A legal definition is the basis of criminal justice in the United States.
Technically and ideally, a criminal offense has not been committed unless all seven of the previous elements are present.
True crimes
To establish that a true crime has been committed and to convict on it in court, it is neccessary to establish all of the following:
1. Harm
2. Legality
3. Actus Reus = action
4. Mens Rea = intent
5. Causation
6. Concurrence
7. Punishment
What Constitutes a Crime?
Corpus delicti : Refers to the elements of a given act that must be present in order to legally define it as a crime.
It is only necessary for the state to prove two elements to satisfy corpus delicti :
Actus reus
Mens Rea
Acts Reus : Means guilty act, and refers to the principle that a person must commit some forbidden act or neglect some mandatory act before he or she can be subjected to criminal sanctions.
What Constitutes a Crime?
Concurrence : Means that the act and the mental state occur in the sense that the criminal intention actuates the criminal act.
Causation : Refers to the necessity to establish a causal link between the criminal act and the harm suffered.
Harm : Refers to the negative impact a crime has either to the victim or to the general values of the community.
Reality vs. Ideal
It is only in a technical and ideal sense that all seven elements of a true crime must be present. In actual practice, a behavior is often considered a crime when one or more of these elements is absent.
Harm
For a crime there must be negative external consequences that are deemed contrary to normal life or experience.
A mental state or emotional state is not enough. Thinking about committing a crime or being angry enough to commit a crime, without acting on the thought or anger is not a crime.
Nature of Harm
The harm may be physical or verbal.
Physically striking another person without legal justification is an example of physical harm.
An example of an act that does verbal harm is a threat to strike someone, whether the threat is carried out or not.
Who says words can ’ t hurt
Another example of verbal harm includes writing something false about another person that dishonors or injures in some way and is called libel . The spoken equivalent is Slander .
Crime as a Subcategory of Social Harm
John Hagen views crime as a continuous variable and as a subcategory of all harmful acts.
Consensus : Agreement existing in the population about right and wrong.
There is substantial agreement among average citizens both within and across modern societies regarding the average seriousness ratings given to a variety of criminal offenses.
Crime as a Subcategory of Social Harm
Severity of the law’s response to a given crime
The more serious the legal penalty, the more serious the societal evaluation of the act.
Amount of harm caused by the crime.
The harm dimension underlies both consensus about wrongfulness and severity of legal responses.
Harmful acts, such as smoking tobacco or drinking in access are not considered anyone’s business other than the actor’s of they take place in private, or even in public if the person creates no annoyance.
06/10/09 Crime as a Subcategory of Social Harm
Crime as a Subcategory of Social Harm
Social harmful acts are acts in a category that some political body has decided in non-arbitrary ways are in need of regulation, but not by the criminal law except under exceptional circumstances.
Private wrongs ( torts ) are socially harmful, but not sufficiently so to require the heavy hand of the criminal law.
Crime as a Subcategory of Social Harm
A small subcategory of harmful acts is considered so socially harmful that they come under the purview of the coercive power of the criminal justice system.
Beyond Social Construction: The Stationary Core Crimes
Few people would argue that an act is not seriously harmful if it is universally condemned.
Mala in se : Crimes that ‘inherently bad’ .
Mala prohibita : Crimes that are considered bad because they are prohibited.
Victimful and Victimless Crimes
Three crime categories
Crimes for which there is an obvious intended victim.
Crimes in which victimization is the result of carelessness.
Crimes in which participation in the crime is voluntary.
A victimless crime is consensual and non predatory; a victimful crime is non-consensual and predatory, and mala in se almost by definition.
Figure 1.1 Mala in Se and Mala Prohibita Crimes as Subsets of all Harms All Harms |the criminal Mostly private matters; |justice system rare state intervention | All Social Harms State regulated but Harms outside not by criminal law the purview of All Crimes Low/moderate consensus, Mala in se and low/moderate penalties mala prohibita low to moderate harm Core Offenses High consensus, Mala in se severe penalties, high level of harm
Legality
First – the harm must be legally forbidden. Violation of union or school or religious rules may be wrong but they are not necessarily prohibited by criminal law.
Second – a criminal law must not be retroactive or Ex Post Facto . You can not declare an act illegal or increase punishment after an act or alter rules of evidence after it has been committed. The U.S. constitution forbids such laws.
Actus reus
A latin term that refers to criminal conduct. A prohibited act has taken place in violation of the criminal law. Or negligent (reckless) action or inaction that causes harm to another.
If people do not act in situations where the law requires them to act, they are committing crimes. Parents are legally provided to care for their children.
No crime w/o LAW
There is no crime without law. (Derived from Bentham & Beccaria, classical school. All crime defined with respect to the legal code.)
Remember again that you cannot be convicted for your thoughts; you must also have acted .
(Note Jimmy Carter's comment during his presidential campaign: "I have committed lust in my heart". It may have bothered his heart or his religious beliefs, but it is not illegal.)
Criminal Act (actus reus)
All crimes require an affirmative or negative act.
Affirmative acts (act of commission) require conscious and volitional movement--a product of the determination of the actor.
Involuntary acts are insufficient.
Negative acts (acts of omission) are failures to act where there is a legal duty to act, and where it was possible for the actor to act.
Involuntary Acts
Somnambulism
Unconsciousness
Seizure
Involuntary Neurological Response
Acts of Omission
Legal Relationship, e.g., parent-child
Contractual Obligation, e.g., lifeguard to swimmer
Statutory Obligation, e.g., taxes
Creation of Peril
Voluntary Assumption of care
Criminal Intent (mens rea)
Purposely - with conscious desire to cause a certain result
Knowingly - with awareness that something will occur
Recklessly - with a conscious disregard of a substantial risk or injury
Negligently - actions that the actor should have known would cause harm
Mens rea
Mens rea. Another latin term. Criminal intent, or predisposition, or premeditation, or a criminal state of mind.
Difficult to translate into English. Essentially, though, it means that you intended to do what you did, and that you were able to be responsible for and accountable for your actions.
Criminal Intent
Origins in Eighteenth century English common law although the principle goes back to the 1600s. How do we determine if offenders have the capacity for understanding the consequences of their actions?
Questions of competence are all issues of Mens Rea.
Criminal Intent
Criminal intent assumes all of the following:
Fairness
Free will (ability to choose between actions)
Rationality
Nature of punishment--from vengeance to deterrence
Degrees of Mental Fault Purposely Knowingly Recklessly Negligently Crime-Tort Barrier
Gradations of Intention
Purposely: A desires to kill B by blowing up a building in which he knows B is sleeping. He has acted purposely with regard to the death of B.
Knowingly: A intends to blow up a building in which he knows B is asleep on the top floor. Even though does not desire B’s death, if B dies, A has killed B knowingly because it is practically certain the B will die.
M'Naghten Rule
If you are not of sound mind, you can't be held responsible for your actions. From this we get the "innocent by reason of insanity" plea.
M'Naghten Rule:
To establish an insanity defense, "it must be clearly proved that at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing ; or if he did know it, that he did not know that he was doing what was wrong." Diminished Capacity
Gradations of Intention
Recklessly: A intends to blow up a building in which he knows B is asleep. He calls C and asks him to go to the building and wake up B.
B knows that C is not very responsible. If C fails to do wake B, and B dies, A has killed B recklessly because he consciously disregarded a significant risk of injury to B.
Gradations of Intention
Negligently: A desires to blow up a building. Although it would be apparent to the average person that B is in the building and will be killed, A is totally unaware of that possibility.
If B dies, A has acted with criminal negligence with regard to B’s death.
Strict Liability Crimes
Certain public welfare (e.g., hand gun possession) and sexual offenses (e.g., statutory rape, bigamy, and adultery) do not require proof of mens rea.
The act alone will suffice.
Two Tests for Causation
Factual Causation But for A’s act, the result would not have occurred when and as it did.
“ But for Bill’s act, Harry would not have been injured in the way in which he was.”
Proximate Causation
B’s injuries must have been the natural and probable consequences of A’s act.
B’s injuries must have been foreseeable, without any intervening factors sufficient to break the causal chain that would relieve A of liability.
Defenses: Excuses and Justifications
EXCUSES
Defenses in which the law recognizes the absence of mens rea or actus reus, and concludes that no crime has been committed
Insanity
Infancy
Intoxication
JUSTIFICATIONS
Defenses in which the law authorizes the violation of another law where there is a justification
Self Defense
Defense of Others
Duress
Necessity
The Law of Deadly Force
Constitutional Law
Tennessee v. Gardner
Police may not use deadly force against a fleeing unarmed felony suspect. Such force is an unconstitutional seizure of the person and violates the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.
State Statute
Justification by law enforcement
Departmental Policies
Examples: FBI Guidelines, PPD Directive 10
Use of Force No force Officer uses typical verbal commands Slight force Officer uses strong directive language and/or minimal physical force to encourage compliance Forcibly subdued suspects with hands Officer uses an arm/wrist lock, takedown, block, punch, or kick Forcibly subdued suspect using methods other than hands , e.g., gun or baton
What about insanity?
It is difficult to determine who is legally insane. What is a “ defect of reason? ” Or “ disease of the mind? ”
What if a person knows the difference between right and wrong but is unable to control their actions?
Irresistible impulse (or control) test
If an offender meets the criteria of M ’ Naughten then the irresistible impulse or control test is applied.
Don’t have to care about Insanity
States are free to abolish insanity as a defense … Montana (in 1979), Idaho, and Utah are states that have done so.
Guilty but insane
Following the 1982 acquittal of John Hickley, on the grounds that he was legally insane, several states enacted “ guilty but insane ” or “ guilty but mentally ill ” laws.
Serve in mental institution until cured then serve the remainder of sentence in the prison population
Causation
It must be shown that the criminal intent actually caused the prohibited act to occur. There must be a causal relationship between the legally forbidden harm and the actus reus (act itself).
It's not good enough to show that you thought about doing something and then it happened. It must be shown that you thought about doing something, this led you to plan to do it, and then you actually did it in accordance with your plans.
Concurrence
The criminal conduct and the criminal intent must occur together.
Repair person stealing your television on the way out.
Punishment For a behavior to be considered a crime, there must be statutory provisions for punishment or at least the threat of punishment. Without the threat of punishment, a law is unenforceable and is therefore not a criminal law.
Ohio Revised Code
A crime or public offense is an act committed or omitted in violation of a law forbidding or commanding it and to which is annexed, upon conviction, either of the following punishments:
Death or
Imprisonment
Fine
Removal from office
Disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit in this state
Crime simply… A crime or public offense is an act committed or omitted in violation of a law forbidding or commanding it.
As society becomes more complex, so do our laws and CJS
In 1990, California became the first state to enact a specific stalking law.
Misdemeanor vs. Felony
Wedding Cake
Criminal Behavior Systems
Classifications
Typologies
Specific Offenses
Groupings of Crimes
Violent Crime
Property / Economic Crime
Computer / High-Tech Crime
Organized Crime
White-collar Crime
Public Order Crime
What you need, legally, to have a crime
Corpus delicti: each crime has elements that must be meet to ‘prove’ the offense occurred
Actus reus = action
Mens rea = intent
Common law definition of Burglary
Entering the dwelling of another (act)
In the night time
To commit a felony within (intent)
Types of Offenses
Crimes are classified by the seriousness of the offenses as follows:
A felony is the most serious offense, for which the offender may be sentenced to state prison or death.
Felonies generally include violent crimes, sex offenses, and many types of drug and property violations.
Types of Offenses
A misdemeanor is a less serious offense for which the offender may be sentenced to probation, county jail, a fine, or some combination of the three.
Misdemeanors generally include crimes such as assault and battery, petty theft, and public drunkenness.
Types of Offenses
An infraction is the least serious offense and is generally punishable by a fine. Many motor vehicle violations are considered infractions.
Hate Crimes
A criminal act against a person or a person’s property by an offender motivated by racial or other bias
Based on
Race
Religion
Ancestry
Sexual orientation
Physical disability
Major Categories of Violent Crime
Murder, or unlawful killing of a human being
Sexual assault or rape
Assault and Battery
Robbery
Violent Crime
Violence Against the Person
Sexual Violence
Robbery
Perpetrators disproportionately young, male, lower social classes
Police Courts Corrections/Penology
What Stands between the Criminal and the People?
What Stands Between the Criminal and the People? Criminal Justice System
Components of the Criminal Justice System Components of Criminal Justice Police Courts Corrections The Criminal Justice System
The Criminal Justice System: Purpose and Goals
To control crime
To prevent crime – lower recidivism (re-offending)
To provide and maintain justice
To help strengthen communities
To establish and reflect common values
To deal with offenders inside and outside of the community
Others ???
Criminal case processing. Source: Adapted from U.S. Dept. of Justice
The Criminal Justice System: Purpose and Goals
To control crime
To prevent crime
To provide and maintain justice
Due Process
The criminal justice system must operate within the bounds of law
Grounded in first ten amendments to U.S. Constitution
Offers protection to any person charged with a crime
Due process limits the power of government
Criminal Justice Funnel Of 1,000 crimes that are committed Only 5 juveniles and 18 adults are incarcerated
Structure of the Criminal Justice System
Police
Local Law Enforcement
State Law Enforcement
Federal Law Enforcement
Courts
State Courts
Federal Courts
Prosecutors and Defenders
Structure of the Criminal Justice System
Corrections
Probation
Incarceration
Community Based Corrections
Parole
The Criminal Justice System: Size and Expense
55,000 different public agencies
$147 billion annual budget
2.2 million employees
20,000 police agencies
17,000 courts
The Criminal Justice System: Size and Expense
8,000 prosecutorial agencies
5,700 correctional institutions
3,500 probation and parole departments
15 million arrests per year
3 million for felonies
Correctional population of 2 million
Additional 4 million on probation or parole
The Criminal Justice System: Size and Expense
Law Enforcement employs over 1 million sworn personnel, not counting civilian employees
Corrections employs over 717,000 people
Court systems employ 455,000
It costs $70,000 to build a jail or prison cell
It costs $25,000 a year to house an inmate
Department of Homeland Security
The newest federal criminal justice agency was created by President George W. Bush on November 25, 2002.
Headed by Tom Ridge
Role of the Police
Protect lives and property
The only criminal justice component that deals with persons not charged with a crime.
Role of the Police
Duties are becoming more complex
Greater use of discretion
If possible use alternatives other than arrest.
When necessary arrest law violators
Role of the Police
Felony arrests require probable or reasonable cause
Misdemeanor arrests may be made if act is “in-presence” of officer
Role of the Courts
To seek truth & obtain justice
To adjudicate & sentence
Consists of:
municipal courts*
superior courts
appellate courts
supreme court
Role of the Courts
Plea Bargain accepted in 90% of criminal cases.
Also referred to as Bargain Justice.
Prosecution and defense form “adversary system” of justice
An Excursion Through the American Criminal Justice System
A preliminary arraignment has two purposes.
To advise suspects of their constitutional rights, and of the tentative charges against them.
To set bail.
06/10/09
An Excursion Through the American Criminal Justice System
Preliminary Hearing : The preliminary hearing usually takes place about ten days after the preliminary arraignment, and is a proceeding before a magistrate or municipal judge in which three major matters must be decided.
Whether or not a crime has actually been committed.
Whether or not there are reasonable grounds to believe the person before the bench committed it.
Whether or not the crime was committed in the jurisdiction of the court.
An Excursion Through the American Criminal Justice System
The Grand Jury : Prosecutors in some states must
seek an indictment from a grand jury.
The grand jury is normally an investigatory body and a buffer between the power of the state and its citizens.
An Excursion Through the American Criminal Justice System
Arraignment : The arraignment proceeding is the first time defendants have the opportunity to respond to the charges against them. After the charges are read to the defendant, he or she must then enter a formal response, known as a plea.
06/10/09
An Excursion Through the American Criminal Justice System
The Trial : The trial is an adversarial process pitting
the prosecutor against the defense attorney.
The prosecutor’s job is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
that the defendant is guilty; the defense need only to
plant the seed of reasonable doubt to upset the
prosecution’s case.
About 90% of all felony cases in the United States are settled by plea bargains in which the state extends some benefit to the defendant in exchange for his or her cooperation.
Probation: On the basis of presentence investigation reports, the probation officer offers a sentencing recommendation. The most important factors influencing these recommendations are crime seriousness and the defendant’s criminal history.
06/10/09 An Excursion Through the American Criminal Justice System
Is this your idea of Corrections?
It is also home arrest
Community supervision
Probation
Parole
And lastly, Confinement
Incarceration : Of the sentence imposed for a felony conviction is some form of incarceration, the judge has the option of sentencing the offender to a state penitentiary, a county jail, or a county work release program.
06/10/09 An Excursion Through the American Correctional System
Parole : Parole is a conditional release from prison granted to inmates some time prior to the completion of their sentence.
An inmate is granted parole by a parole board, which decides for or against parole based on such factors as inmate behavior while incarcerated and the urgency of the need for cell space.
An Excursion Through the American Correctional System
Community-Based Corrections
Correctional programs operating within society at large rather than behind prison walls
Three advantages:
Reduce costs
Supervision of convicts while eliminating hardships of prison life and stigma of jail
Not so much to punish as reform
Probation
A policy of permitting a convicted offender to remain in the community under conditions imposed by a court
Shock Probation
A policy by which a judge orders a convicted offender to prison for a short time and then suspends the remainder of the sentence in favor of probation
Parole
A policy of releasing inmates from prison to serve the remainder of their sentences in the local community under supervision of a parole officer
Discretion
Discretion permits justice officials at all levels to make decisions that will keep the system operating
Discretionary Decisions
Criminal justice officials must make decisions every day concerning their duties
Police
To enforce the law
Investigate specific crimes
Search people or buildings
Arrest or detain people
Discretionary Decisions
Prosecutors
File charges against suspects brought to them by the police
Drop cases
Reduce charges
Discretionary Decisions
Judges
Set conditions for pre-trial release
Accept pleas
Dismiss charges
Impose sentences
Discretionary Decisions
Correctional Officials
Assign convicts to prison or jail
Punish prisoners who misbehave
Reward prisoners who behave well
Crime in the United States
Prison and Jail Populations in the United States
Figure 1.8
Prison and Jail Populations in the United States, 1985 - 2000
Victimization: Percent of Offences by Type of Crime, Seven Countries, 2000 Percent of offences Note: Contact crimes include robberies, sexual incidents, and assaults and threats. Horizontal lines indicate international average for each type of crime for all 17 countries in the survey. Thirty-eight percent of the population of all 17 countries were victimized in the year preceding the survey. Percent of population victimized by all crimes
Criminal Statistics
Include only crimes known to the police
Researchers check crime statistics
Victimization Surveys
Demonstrates that the overall crime rate is three times higher than official reports indicate
Criminal Patterns and Trends
Race and Ethnicity
Strongly linked to crime rates
Reasons for disproportionate arrests among African Americans
Crime in a Global Perspective
U. S. crime rate high by world standards
Crime arises from culture’s emphasis on individual economic success
Extensive private ownership of guns
Crime high in some of the largest cities of the world
Different countries have different strategies for dealing with crime
Death penalty
Trends and Issues in Criminal Justice Today in the United States
Three Strikes You’re Out
Decline in the crime rate
Fear of crime
Crime as a political issue
Tougher sentencing laws
Abolition of parole in some states
Increased vigilance given to drug cases
Thinking about trends and Issues in Criminal Justice Today
Women in prison are growing faster than any other group!
Is this due to more female criminality or differences in how they are treated, or both?
Other Trends and Issues in Criminal Justice Today
Terrorism
Media Distortion of Crime getting worse?
False perception of a crime epidemic
Suggestion that crime rates are increasing
Impression that most crime is violent
White Collar and Corporate Crime
Esp. Fraud
Enjoy the reading!
Organizational and Corporate Issues
Corporate Criminal Liability: The Federal Law
A corporation may be held criminally liable for acts committed by its employees if they were acting within the scope of their authority, and for the benefit of the corporation even if such acts were against corporate policy or express instructions.
This rule extends corporate criminal liability to acts committed by:
The likelihood of a criminal investigation, indictment, aggressive prosecution, conviction, and significant fine may be reduced significantly by evidence of corporate compliance.
Vicarious liability might be defeated by active corporate compliance efforts.
Liability Corporate Compliance
What are the ingredients (elements) of all crimes?
ACT +
INTENT +
CONCURRENCE + CAUSATION +
INJURY +
HARM + PROHIBITED ACT = Crime
Biological Persons Corporate Persons
How can a corporation commit a crime?
Who acts
Who intends?
Who causes injury?
Who is punished?
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. U.S. (1909)
Corporations conduct the great majority of business transactions
Interstate commerce is almost entirely in their hands
The notion that corporations are incapable of committing crimes would “virtually take away the only means of effectively controlling” business transactions in interstate commerce
Corporations can commit crimes
Corporate Criminal Liability: The Federal Law
A corporation may be held criminally liable for acts committed by its employees if they were acting within the scope of their authority, and for the benefit of the corporation even if such acts were against corporate policy or express instructions.
This rule extends corporate criminal liability to acts committed by:
The likelihood of a criminal investigation, indictment, aggressive prosecution, conviction, and significant fine may be reduced significantly by evidence of corporate compliance.
Vicarious liability might be defeated by active corporate compliance efforts.
Liability Corporate Compliance
Minimum Requirements for an Effective Compliance Program
Standards and Procedures reasonably capable of preventing criminal conduct
Oversight of standards by high level personnel
Care in the delegation of substantial managerial authority to individuals
Effective communication of standards and procedures to employees
Reasonable steps taken to achieve compliance
Enforcement of disciplinary mechanisms
Appropriate response after detection of an offense
Key to Compliance
Proactive Compliance
Reactive Compliance
Edwin Sutherland and his view Challenging Issues: Genocide, Terrorism, Death Penalty
Criminology: Sutherland’s Definition--Modified
Criminology is the body of knowledge regarding crime and criminality as a social, psychological, and biological phenomena.
It includes within its scope the process of making laws, of breaking laws, and of reacting toward the breaking of laws.
The objective of criminology is the development of a body of knowledge regarding crime, criminality, and its prevention.
The Forgotten Criminology of Genocide
Why has the field of criminology neglected any consideration of the crime of genocide?
How could criminologists neglect an estimated sixteen million deaths in crimes against humanity since World War II?
What has the field of criminology lost by its neglect of the crime of genocide?
Terrorism
FBI Definition
The unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
Terrorism: Generating Publicity and Fear
Classifying Terrorism
Revolutionary Terrorism Forcing governments to respond; to encourage a revolution, e.g., PLO
State-Sponsored Terrorism
Terrorist activities by governments against their own citizens or other countries, e.g., Khmer Rouge
Religious Terrorism
Promoting a religious system or protect a set of religious beliefs, e.g., use of Jihad or holy war by Islamic fundamentalists
Terrorism
Punishment?
Symbolic
Retributive
Desert
Expressive
Restorative
Criminal Statistics: The Death Penalty
How many people have been executed since 1608?
How many people have been executed this year?
How many executions have taken place since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976?
How many jurisdictions have death penalty statutes?
Which states do not permit the death penalty?
What percentage of defendants executed since 1976 were white?
What percentage of defendants executed were convicted of killing a white victim?
Which two states can claim credit for more than 40% of all executions since 1976?
Do states still execute inmates either by hanging or with a firing squad?
Criminal Statistics: Death Penalty How many people have been executed since 1608? (19,500) How many people have been executed this year? (48) How many executions have taken place since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976? (731) How many states have death penalty statutes? (38) Which states do not permit the death penalty? Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia What percentage of defendants executed since 1976 were white? (45%) What percentage of defendants executed were convicted of killing a white victim? (81%) Which two states can claim credit for more than 40% of all executions since 1976? (Texas and Virginia) Do states still execute inmates either by hanging or with a firing squad? Delaware, Montana, and New Hampshire (H); Idaho, Oklahoma, Utah (FS)
Criminal Statistics: The Death Penalty
How many documented innocent people have been executed this century?
How many people have been released since 1972 as a result of being wrongfully convicted?
What percentage of Texas and California death row populations are people of color?
How many countries still execute people for crimes committed as children?
How many children have been sentenced to death in the U.S. since 1973?
The youngest person executed since WWII in the United States was___?
What is the youngest person ever to be executed in the United States?
How many people on death row today are known to be retarded?
How much evidence exists to prove or suggest that the death penalty deters murder?
Criminal Statistics: The Death Penalty
How many documented innocent people have been executed this century? (23)
How many people have been released since 1972 as a result of being wrongfully convicted? (98)
What percentage of Texas and California death row populations are people of color? (60%)
How many countries still execute people for crimes committed as children? (6) Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and U.S.
How many children have been sentenced to death in the U.S. since 1973? (160)
The youngest person executed since WWII in the United States was___? (14)
What is the youngest person ever to be executed in the United States? (10)
How many people on death row today are known to be retarded? (300)
How much evidence exists to prove or suggest that the death penalty deters murder?
Penology
What is punishment?
Goals of Punishment Retribution Deterrence Incapacitation Rehabilitation Proportional Penalty - Offense Determinative Deserved Penalty - Harm Determinative Expressive Penalty - Message Determinative Individualized Sentences Offender Culpability - Offense Offender Change - Intervention Crime Rates - Fear of Consequences Power of Deterrence - Swift, Certain***, Sufficiently Severe, Laws Known to Public Types: General and Specific (or Special) Collective Incapacitation Selective Incapacitation Restorative Justice Repairing the harm between Offender and victim
The Forgotten Criminology of Genocide
Genocide is a Political Act Reflecting the Will of Sovereignty
Genocide, it has been said, is a political rather than criminal act most often employed to enhance the solidarity and unification of nation-states.
Decisions to liquidate, exterminate, and cleanse a minority population are matters of political policy reflecting the will and ideologies of sovereignty. Genocide results from a modern, developed, state bureaucratic apparatus that moves the conception of systematic torture and killing from the criminal to the political.
The Forgotten Criminology of Genocide
Genocide as a Breach of International Norms and International Law
To understand the law of genocide, one must appreciate its place in law as an international crime.
The Forgotten Criminology of Genocide
Genocide is Committed by the State
Of all the many revelations over the last fifty years, criminologists seem to have the most difficulty with the notion that an organization or entity, whether a corporation or nation state, may commit a crime.
When crimes are imputed from an individual to an inanimate entity, the intellectual challenge becomes: Should an individual be blamed as well?
The Forgotten Criminology of Genocide
The Magnitude of Victimization in Genocide Defies Belief
Criminological research confirms intuitive ratings of crime seriousness from multiple murder to shoplifting. The differences in seriousness ratings for virtually all offenses are highly objective and quantifiable.
The extent of victimization and harm in genocide, however, strains any assessment of seriousness. Who appreciates differences in seriousness where the offense is, for example, 100,000, 250,000, or 500,000 butchered Hutus or Tutsis?
The Forgotten Criminology of Genocide
The Problems of Denying and Admitting Atrocity
Two prominent themes that emerge from the literature on genocide capture an ambivalence hard felt by some survivors and refugees of genocide.
This ambivalence is captured in the titles of two recently published books on the Holocaust—Deborah Lipstadt’s Denying the Holocaust (1994) and Lawrence L. Langer’s Admitting the Holocaust (1995).
Enjoy the reading!
Individualist and Sociological Explanations
Why do people commit crimes?
- lots of theories
- need to be careful: spurious correlation
The Role of Theory in Criminology
Theory Making: Trying to grasp how all the known correlates of a phenomenon are linked together in non-coincidental ways to produce an effect.
Criminologists are interested in finding out factors that cause crime and criminality.
The very first step in detected causes is to discover correlates , which are factors that are linked or related to the phenomenon a scientist is interested in.
Scientists have never uncovered a necessary cause (a factor that must be present for behavior to occur) or a sufficient cause (a factor that is able to produce criminal behavior without having been augmented by some other factor.
06/10/09 The Role of Theory in Criminology
Theories help us to make sense of a diversity of seemingly unrelated facts and propositions, and they even tell us where to look for more facts.
06/10/09 The Role of Theory in Criminology
What is a Theory?
Theory : Set of logically interconnected propositions explaining how phenomena are related, and from which a number of hypotheses can be derived and tested.
Hypotheses : Statements about relationships between and among factors we expect to find based on the logic of our theories.
Criteria for judging the merits of a theory :
Predictive accuracy: A theory has merit and is useful to the extent that it accurately predicts what is observed.
06/10/09
Predictive scope: Refers to the scope or range of the theory and thus the scope or range of the hypotheses that can be derived from it.
Simplicity: If two competing theories are essentially equal in terms of the first two criteria, then the less complicated one is considered more ‘elegant.’
Falsifiability: A theory is never proven true, but it must have the quality of being falsifiable or disprovable.
What is a Theory?
How to Think About Theories
There are theories that deal with different levels of analysis , or that segment of the phenomenon of interest that is measured and analyzed.
Questions of cause and effect must be answered at the same level of analysis at which they were posed.
Causal explanations are offered at different temporal levels: Ultimate (distant in time) and proximate (close in time).
Theory testing looks for causal explanations rather than simple descriptions.
06/10/09 Note: Evolutionary forces lead to species-specific genomes. Each person has a fairly unique genotype. These genotypes lead to differential central and peripheral nervous system (CNS and PNS) functioning. This functioning is modified by the person's developmental history. Working together, the person's temperament and developmental history forms his or her personality. This personality may often lead the person to different situations and lead him or her to appraise it different from other persons. The behavior elicited from that appraisal is thus the result of everything that preceded it, plus pure chance. Figure 1.2 The Ultimate-Proximate Levels of Explanation ___________________________________________________________________ Evolution Genetics Temperament Developmental History Personality Evolutionary Each person's CNS and PNS Family factors, attachment, Enduring traits history of the genetic inheritance functioning school, peers, etc. experiences of person forged species from genes and experience Immediate Situation Subjective Appraisal Behavior Each person brings to a People react differently situation everything he or she to similar situations has become due to the because they have preceding factors different genes and different experiences Figure 1.2 The Ultimate-Proximate Levels of Explanation
06/10/09 Figure 1.3 Interaction of Environmental and Individual Factors in the Probability of Moving from Law Abiding to Law Breaking Behavior Note: Angled lines each represent a hypothetical individual. Person A has a low underlying criminal disposition and thus requires strong environmental instigation to cross the threshold from law abiding to law breaking behavior. Person B has a strong underlying criminal disposition and will cross the threshold even under extremely low environmental instigation. (From A. Walsh, 2003. Reprinted with permission from Nova Science)
Ideology in Criminological Theory
Ideology : A way of looking at the world, a general emotional picture of ‘how things should be’
Constrained vision : Believers in this vision view human activities as constrained by an innate human nature that is self centered and largely unalterable
Unconstrained vision : Denies innate human nature, viewing it as formed anew in each different culture.
Ideology in Criminological Theory
Ideal types : Conceptual tools that accentuate differences between competing positions for the purposes of guiding the exploration of them.
A theory of criminal behavior is at least partly shaped by the ideological vision of the person who formulated it, and that in turn is due to the ideological atmosphere prevailing in society.
Theory Construction, Development, and Validation
Intuitive criminology
poverty
biological causes?
genetic predispositions?
social learning?
control – impulse, self and social?
social structure?
culture? subculture?
crime
Individual Explanations
Sociobiology
Free Will
NeoClassical
Psychological
Biology
Sociological explanations for criminal and deviant behavior
Subcultural
Social Disorganization
Anomie
Drift
Control theory
Deviant Subcultures
Cloward and Ohlin (1966)
Deviance or conformity depends on the relative opportunity structure that frames a person’s life
Conflict subcultures
Violence is ignited by frustration and a desire for respect
Retreatist subcultures
Deviants drop out and abuse alcohol or drugs
Cohen (1977)
Criminality is most common among lower-class youths-least likely to experience success
Miller (1970) characterized deviant subcultures
Trouble -arising from frequent conflict
Toughness -value placed on size, strength, and agility
Smartness -ability to succeed on the streets
A need for excitement
A belief in fate -no control over their own lives
A desire for freedom -anger towards authority
Subculture and Code of the Streets
Anderson (1994)
In poor urban neighborhoods, most people manage to conform to conventional values
“ Street Code”
Lifestyle of some young men
Neighborhood crime and violence
Indifference or hostility from the police
Parental neglect
Risk of jail is high
Subculture
There is differentiation amongst subcultural theorists but all share the belief:
People who commit crime share a different set of values which is different from the values of society as a whole. They have a different subculture
Brought up by their parents to have values sympathetic to crime
Chicago Ecological School 1920’s
Found that inner city and working class areas had more recorded crime than middle class suburban areas
J B Mays 1954: growing up in the city found that criminal subcultures are most likely in areas of acute social disadvantage (British sociologist examining Liverpool)
E.g. James Patrick, A Glasgow gang observed, 1973 (theory and methods, participant observation)
Cloward and Ohlin, Delinquency and Opportunity, 1961 found delinquent groups are most common in socially disadvantaged areas
Research your crime stats and find if this is representative of contemporary society…crime links at bottom of crime page…try to research your local police stats
Sutherland’s Differential Association Theory
Sutherland’s theory of Differential Association
A person’s tendency toward conformity or deviance depends on the amount of contact with others who encourage or reject conventional behavior
The likelihood of engaging in crime is determined by the values and attitudes of the people one associates with…
Cohen and ‘Status deprivation’
Albert Cohen -
Delinquent Boys 1955 found that Status deprivation was a key factor in joining a delinquent group.
Status failure at school becomes a ‘king’ in the streets.
W. Belson, Juvenile theft, 1975, a study of thieves in London found that they stole so as to be ‘accepted as part of the group, to gain prestige’
Graffiti spraying?
Anomie: Merton
All societies motivate people…they can achieve through hard work
For the majority this is impossible/difficult to attain (suggest who and when)
Merton argues this to an increased level of crime as people turn to crime to achieve financial success
This situation when the goals of society are not possible by conventional means anomie
Evaluations
Again like Durkheim this theory has been criticized for being too deterministic
Ignores Freechoice
What sociologists believe this to be?
Action v System, positivists v interpretivists, etc;
David Matza, Delinquency and Drift, 1964, says that individuals use techniques of neutralisation to explain their deviant behaviour away
Suggest two reasons why people explain their criminal/delinquent behaviour
David Matza
Subterranean values of pleasure seeking and risk-taking are found in mainstream suburban society as well as ‘areas’
Everyone is deviant sometimes and young people are more prone to this
Neo-Marxists theory sees some sub-cultures as representing challenge to the stabilised order
Hirschi’s Control Theory
Control Theory
Social control depends on people anticipating the consequences of their behavior
Conformity is linked to four different types of social control
Attachment, Opportunity, Involvement, Belief
But where are the girls?
Again examining sociological studies we find that women have been ignored.
Early sociology failed to take account of women.
Suggest reasons why sociologists would have ignored women
0 comments
Post a comment