• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Ariba Knowledge Nuggets: p2p Reducing Duplicate Payments Part 2
 

Ariba Knowledge Nuggets: p2p Reducing Duplicate Payments Part 2

on

  • 1,079 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,079
Views on SlideShare
1,079
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Ariba Knowledge Nuggets: p2p Reducing Duplicate Payments Part 2 Ariba Knowledge Nuggets: p2p Reducing Duplicate Payments Part 2 Document Transcript

    • A RI BA K N OW L ED G E N UG G ET SP 2 P : M I N I M I Z E D U P L I C AT EPAY M E N T S – PA R T I IAs purchasing systems evolve and offer more process flexibility and expanded payment options,it is imperative that procedures be re-engineered to eliminate weaknesses that allow duplicatepayments. The extent of the problem of over payment varies across companies and industries.However, it has been estimated that as much as 1% of all corporate remittances are duplicate orinaccurate payments.Should you realize that some of your current, or planned, processes are not consistent with therecommendations that follow, it does not mean that you have rampant duplicate payments. It isintended as a checklist to ensure you have done your best to provide the process controls tominimize payment error. And that you have established the necessary reporting for effectiveand frequent audit of disbursements. Establish formal processing standards • Accounts Payable should own the invoicing process • Pay extra attention to past due invoices • Require the supplier to identify the payment method on invoices • Minimize check requests • Pay invoices on time • Require requisitions for all but the smallest expenses • Create and train personnel on data entry standards • Worksheet spreadsheet should be based on a standardized template to prevent data error • Perform regular maintenance on the vendor master
    • Accounts Payable Should Own the Invoice Process Without a strict policy of invoice processing initiating with accounts payable they often circulate through the company. When this happens, payments are delayed, a second invoice is often issued, and, as discussed above, those second invoices can be mistakenly paid. If processors do not use the same strict coding standards when entering invoices those second invoices will appear to be new when they show up resulting in a duplicate payment.Pay extra attention to past due invoices There is a chance they have already been paid, perhaps using an alternate payment vehicle such as a wire transfer or p-card. Develop routines to check that payment hasn’t been made whenever an invoice that is really past due is presented for payment.Change Invoices to Reflect Payment Method Invoices paid by purchasing or credit card at the time the services or goods are requested may be the hardest to fix. Often vendors claim they cannot suppress the printing of invoices and continue to send them even though they were paid at the point of purchase (POP) with a credit card. One step you can take to guard against paying these vendors twice is to train invoice processing staff to check invoices closely. Many of the vendors who cannot suppress the printing of the invoice will mark it with a note saying it was paid by credit card. Many of these notes are in very small print so your staff will have to look closely to find the note.Minimize Check Requests Organizations rely on check requests to varying degree. Problems arise when backup is incomplete or even nonexistent for an invoice paid by check request. If an invoice is not attached, or the information is not keyed into the system immediately, a duplicate payment is often created when the original invoice finds its way into accounts payable. Research shows that rush checks (often issued with a check-request form) are one of the leading causes of duplicate payments. We realize that check-request forms and rush checks are here to stay. What we recommend is a stringent requirement for backup and that invoice information is keyed every time a check is issued. Before checks are released some routines should be incorporated to check for duplicates. Most organizations focus on larger payments during this checking. If you do not regularly follow up on uncashed checks and keep all back up documentation, you may find the unclaimed property auditors deeming those amounts as unclaimed property. Follow up and document to avoid having to turn those funds over to the states.
    • Paying on time Paying late may improve your cash flow; but it can actually lead to duplicate payments. When a vendor hasn’t been paid within 30 days, most issue another invoice. Unfortunately, these second invoices occasionally get paid. It is recommended that all organizations need corporate approval before unilaterally stretching payments to improve cash flow.Requisitions should be Required Relying on an account payable’s memory as a guard against duplicate payments is one of the weakest and most ineffective ways to protect against this problem. Ariba P2P will raise an exception when a purchase order exceeds the approved amount. If no purchase order is issued for an item; there is no programmatic check against a duplicate remittance. Example, if an invoice number is 000482, most OCR solutions will read in all of the digits, i.e. 000482, as the invoice number. If your manual process is not to enter leading zeros then you will entered the invoice as 482; causing a duplicate payment. Invoices without invoice numbers are another source of duplicate payments. A standard process for creating an invoice number where one does not exist should create the same unique number no matter who uses the strategy. For example; Supplier Number plus invoice date creates will create the same number no matter who processes this invoice.Standardize Spreadsheet Worksheets Spreadsheets are another point of trouble. Data entered with leading zero’s (as in the example, 000482, above) in a spreadsheet will lose those zero’s. Uploading a spreadsheet to the invoice application can cause the invoice number to miss a duplicate. Any invoice processing spreadsheet should be based on a standardized template that enforces data formats to prevent the loss of leading, trailing, or special characters.Maintain the Vendor Master If the master file in not cleansed at least once a year of all inactive accounts, employees may inadvertently pay an invoice against an inactive account and then pay the second invoice against the correct account. Also, inactive master vendor accounts facilitate fraud. Vendor master files should be reviewed quarterly, at a minimum, to inactivate old vendors not used anymore as well as identify and remove duplicate vendors. Ideally, one person should own the vendor master file. If this is not practical, then a report should be run of all changes made to the master vendor file periodically. This report should be delivered to the manager that owns suppliers to review it. The purpose of this file is two-fold: to prevent employees modifying the file for fraudulent purposes; and to make sure the vendor coding makes business sense.
    • Create and Enforce Data Entry Standards. Insisting on original invoices used to be a pretty good control against duplicate payments. That is no longer true. Today, many companies send invoices by e-mail. With advances in technology there can be 15 original copies of an invoice. Make sure your processors are not printing them before processing and then inadvertently processing the printed invoice as well as the electronic one. If you have very rigid standards for entering invoice numbers and coding standards this shouldnt cause you problems. But even the best trained staff can incorrectly process a payment. Most systems, including Ariba P2P, will not allow the entry of a duplicate invoice number. Unfortunately, all that is required to pass an invoice is an added blank space, a period, or some other insignificant character to the end of the invoice number and it will force it through. This can be done either inadvertently, or deliberately to get an invoice off their desk. Standard audit reporting on invoices, sorted by invoice number, will allow auditors insight into where an invoice may have been passed through the system. Items that should be considered when establishing data entry standards for entering an invoice number are: • Are leading zeros entered? • Are non alpha-numeric characters entered? • What should be entered if there is no invoice number? • What format is used to enter dates? • What should the invoice number be if there is only an account number? • What should be entered if the invoice number is longer than the allotted space within the field? Many companies are moving to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) software which scans the invoice and pulls off the vendor, invoice number, invoice date and amount. If you are using OCR technology, be sure that your manual data entry standards for entering an invoice are aligned with your OCR technology. For example, if an invoice number is 000482, most OCR solutions will read in all of the digits, i.e. 000482, as the invoice number. If your manual process is not to enter leading zeros then you will entered the invoice as 482; causing a duplicate payment. Invoices without invoice numbers are another source of duplicate payments. A standard process for creating an invoice number where one does not exist should create the same unique number no matter who uses the strategy. For example; Supplier Number plus invoice date creates will create the same number no matter who processes this invoice. With all the new payment and invoice delivery options now available, every company needs to be concerned about: • Payments being made twice using two different payment types • Unscrupulous employees or vendors taking advantage of the increased "opportunities" to hide a duplicate payment. • Professionals in numerous departments making payments without a formal process intended to avoid duplicate payments***Content for this Knowledge Nugget was contributed by David L. Brooks II , Ariba Technical Consultant