How soon can the Arab world accept mPayment? Janti Abdallah STS - Presentation Transcript
A Leading e-Payment Solution/ Service Provider How soon can the Arab world accept mPayment? Remittance . m/eCommerce . Topup . Bill Payment Janti M. Abdallah, MBA Division Manager, ePayment Solutions (STS) Executive Director, PAYNET (an STS subsidiary)
Outline
Introduction
Market landscape
Business opportunity
Involved stakeholders & their needs
Defining a mobile payment scheme
Advantages of suggested scheme
Observations & Conclusion
Q/A
Introduction
The ever-growing number of mobile phone users is a target group that represents an enormous potential for revenue generation
Number of Mobile Payment (MP) users worldwide is expected to increase 70% in 2009 *
43.1 million users in 2008 -> 73.4 million in 2009
Developing countries are among the most suitable environments for MP
* Source: Gartner, Inc 2009
The Market Landscape (Banks & MNOs)
Monthly ARPU of MNOs in Jordan decreased to $16.8 in 2007 (from $18.7 in 2006 and $28 in 2004) – source: Arab Advisors Group, 2008
Prices are going down due to increased competition
Need to consider VAS that help increase ARPU & reduce churn
Banks can’t heavily rely on generating interest on deposits/ loans, as a consequence of global economic crisis
Banks are seeking to have other revenue streams in the form of service fees/ transaction fees
A sample business opportunity
GCC countries host almost an expatriate community of 12.3 million people
Inbound remittance to Jordan officially exceeded $3.4 bn in 2007 (a 36% growth compared to 2006), mostly from GCC counrtries (source: Central Bank of Jordan, 2008)
What could/ should our market share be?
Can we make relevant revenues after funds have been remitted?
Research Problem
Finding out the factors affecting the adoption of various MP schemes in Arab world countries by relevant stakeholders
This will lead to having an answer to our question: “How soon can the Arab World accept mPayment?”
The following variables are suggested by academic research (For Merchants)
Cost
Customer base
Ease of use
Reliability
Security
Value proposition improvement
Variables Affecting MP Adoption
The following variables are suggested by academic research (For Providers)
Cost
Organizational change
Security
Standard
Revenues
Legal barriers
Variables Affecting MP Adoption
The following variables are suggested by academic research (For Consumers)
Cost
Ease of use
Usefulness
Expressiveness
Trust
Universality
Classification of MP (Model 1) Source: ONDRUS and PIGNEUR, 2006
Classification of MP (Model 2) Source: KREYER, POUSTTCHI and TUROWSKI , 2003
Classification of MP (Model 3) Source: MALLAT, ROSSI and TUUNAINEN 2004 Telephone bill credit card offline payment Direct debiting electronic cash/ digital wallet smart cards/ prepaid cards Method for Settlement post-paid instant-paid Prepaid Deduction Time subscription / standing order Pay per product unit pay per time unit Payment Frequency Account based Token based Basis of Payment Operational Special payment software Dual slot/ dual card phone Internet enabled phone Text message exchange Technology Required No Yes Pre-registration Needed? No Body Merchant Bank/ Financial Service Provider MNO Payment service provider Receiver of Customer Data Others Spec intermediary Bank/ Financial Service Provider MNO Payment Service Provider Participants Macro payments (< $50) Macro-payments (< 5$ to $50) Micro-payments (> 10 cents to $5) Pico-payments (≤ 10 cents) Payment Levels C2C Stationary Merchant (Auto) Stationary Merchant (Person) EC MC Payment scenarios Strategic Instances Characteristics
A suggested mPayment Program
A dedicated third party “Program Manager” shall spearhead a regional program in alliance with 1 MNO and 1 Bank in each country
Issuing and managing m-Wallets; serving wallet-holders and merchants)
Rule of thumb: do not reinvent the wheel (work with others)
Accepting Deposits? mWallet n ($10) mWallet 3 ($50) mWallet 2 ($15) mWallet 1 ($10) Account Z Account C Account B ($85) Account A vAMS @ Program Manager Core Banking System @ Partner Bank Neither Program Manager, nor MNO should handle real cash/ funds
Supported Dr/ Cr Transaction mWallet 1 mWallet 2 [1] Via EFT POS terminals deployed @ post offices, exchange houses [2] Via Bank ATMs/ CDMs [3] Via Internet [4] Via EFT POS terminals deployed participating merchants/ outlets [5] Via GSM handset - USSD Bank Account [2,3] GSM airtime? [5] Transfer [5] Top-up [3,5] Goods purchase [3,4] Cash-in [1,2] Credit/ Debit Card [3] Cash-out [1,2] Bill Payment [3,4,5]
Revenue Streams * Ancillary revenues shall be used to achieve desired levels of profitability with lower transaction fees (to ensure high competitiveness) Value for MNOs: Reduce churn and increase VAS ARPU Value for Banks: Reach users who were previously unreachable (unbanked)
Interest on mWallet balances
Advertising revenue (on EFT POS paper receipts & auth tokens)
Ancillary * (not borne by any) Fees/ Transaction (Borne by merchant)
Good purchase
Bill payment
Top-up
Fees/ Transaction (Borne by consumer)
Cash-in/ Cash-out
Balance Transfer
Monthly subscription
3 players = 1 provider (1+1+1 > 3)
Program manager: Issue mWallets, acquire TXNs, set fees, sign-up merchants
MNO: Enable user enrollment, conduct marketing/ customer care, provide access channel (USSD, SMS/ MMS, etc)
Also suitable for card/account holders who do not wish to expose their cards/ banks account numbers to merchants
Seamless customer enrollment (Wallet ID & PIN) via USSD – prepaid & post paid
Service is immediately usable on ALL GSM devices, no need for special software nor SIM card
Why USSD?
Session-based
Quick
Free
Roam-able
Centrally manageable
Compatible (with all GSM handsets)
Portable (not bound to a certain GSM handset)
Doesn’t require special SIM card nor special software
Easy to use
Secure
Advantages of suggested approach (for MNOs and Banks)
Achieving the sought values with low investment/ organizational change
Leveraging the focus and dedication of the third party (Program Manager)
Being a part of a bigger regional scheme
Program Manager Business Enablers
Investment in infrastructure (data center & software platform)
Subject-matter expertise
Commercial/ legal status
Merchant relationships
Market exposure and regional outreach
Focus and dedication
Observations & Conclusion
Mobile Payment is becoming a buzz word especially for money transfer/ remittance
Big names like Visa, MasterCard, Western Union are trying not to be left out of the competition
Some MNOs and banks are moving into circles, trying to attack the opportunity from the right angle
TRCs/ TRAs and Central banks are keeping a closer eye on relevant initiatives
Huge mobile payment initiatives have already failed
The Arab World shall start accepting mPayment very soon (2009/ 2010), given that a proper scheme is chosen
Models that have succeeded in other regions might/ might not be suitable for our region
ePayment @ STS Running National Payment platforms in Jordan, Qatar, KSA and UAE.. Contracted to process more than 15 million payment transactions a year (> $1 billion in value) Well positioned to undertake a leading role that will help shape a successful MP scheme
Thank You! For more information please contact: Janti M. Abdallah, MBA Division Manager, ePayment Solutions (STS) Executive Director, PAYNET (an STS subsidiary) e-mail: [email_address] Mob (JOR): +962 79 697 6771 Mob (UAE): +971 50 1577 637
0 comments
Post a comment