Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Intro Ra Slides
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.


Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Intro Ra Slides


Wested Introduction to Reading Apprenticeship

Wested Introduction to Reading Apprenticeship

Published in Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Strengthening Post-Secondary Student Literacy through Reading Apprenticeship ®
  • 2. WestEd’s Strategic Literacy Initiative (SLI )
    • A professional development and research organization focusing on improving academic literacy in diverse populations of adolescents and post-secondary students using Reading Apprenticeship, a research-based instructional framework.
  • 3. Reading Apprenticeship
    • A partnership of expertise between the teacher and students, drawing on what content area teachers know and do as skilled discipline-based readers and on learners’ unique and often underestimated strengths
  • 4. Dimensions of Reading Apprenticeship
  • 5. What does a Reading Apprenticeship Classroom Look Like?
    • A focus on comprehension and metacognitive conversation
    • A climate of collaboration
    • An emphasis on student independence
  • 6. Where is Reading Apprenticeship Implemented?
    • RA is making learning visible in. . .
      • 35+ California community colleges and
      • 10 community colleges in Michigan, Arkansas, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington and Saskatchewan
  • 7. History of Reading Apprenticeship in Community Colleges
    • SPECC Project (Strengthening Pre-Collegiate Education in Community Colleges), Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
    • 2004-2008 Reading Apprenticeship Leadership Institutes
    • 2006 Faculty Inquiry Groups
  • 8. Faculty Inquiry to Improve Teaching and Learning
    • SLI’s Community College Literacy Research Group (CCLRG)
    • Lumina Foundation support for CCLRG 2007-2010
    • 10 community college teachers representing
      • CA, WA, PA, TX, MS
      • English, Science, Developmental Studies, Adult Basic Education, ESL
  • 9. Student Outcomes
    • More reading
    • Increased engagement and confidence as readers
    • Development of a range of strategies to support comprehension
    • Higher levels of interaction between and among teachers and students
    • Increased retention
  • 10. Teacher Outcomes
    • New ways of looking at student thinking and reading difficulties
    • Wider repertoire of resources and tools for addressing student reading difficulty
    • Increased sense of responsibility for addressing reading and literacy in subject area classes
    • Growth in teacher leadership
  • 11. Campus-wide Outcomes
    • Increased student focused interactions with colleagues
    • Campus-wide emphasis on literacy improvement
    • Agreements about a common language and strategic approaches to reading
    • Professional learning communities: inquiry and use of protocols for looking at classroom practices, student work
    • Interactions with other RA practitioners becomes a source of information sharing, learning and support
    • Growth of campus leaders in literacy
  • 12. Outcomes of my own classroom research while introducing RA routines:
    • ESL 21B, Fall 2007/Spring 2008:
    • Increase in reading comprehension scores
    • Increase in the variety of reading strategies that students report using
    • Shift in “classroom culture”
  • 13. Outcomes of my own classroom research while introducing RA routines:
    • ESL 251B, Fall 2008
    • Students work with more challenging texts and
    • Produce more interesting and complex writing.
    • Skills-based writing lessons did not produce better grammar or organization than freer written responses to challenging readings.
  • 14. Teacher training site and complete research reports: