The Self Organizing School - Presentation Transcript
Leadership and The Self-Organizing School David F. Bower, Ed.D. Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference October 2004 [email_address]
Abstract
Background
Questions about my school
Questions about my role as leader
Questions about new theories of organization
From holonomy to chaos theory to self-organization to my study
Problem statement
What do we know about successful schools that have sustained reform efforts over time? How can a study of such schools inform our work of school improvement? How can current organizational theories become a lens to help us focus on successful practices?
Purpose
The purpose of this research is to study the dynamics of self-organization in a school.
Research questions
1. What characterizes self-organization and renewal within a school?
2. How do self-organization and renewal sustain reform and improvement?
3. How does leadership support and sustain the dynamics of self-organization, renewal, and improvement?
Conceptual framework Emergence Level Ownership Process Level The Core: Principles/ Philosophy/ Values Renewal Self-Organization Creativity Safe/trusting environment Engagement Feedback Relationships Communication Sense making Dialogue
Literature review
Part One:
Educational Reform
Organizational change
Chaos and complexity
Self-organization
Part Two:
Leadership
Purpose of literature review
Set research study in context of educational reform, organizational change, and new organizational theories
Self-organization offers a new approach to sustaining reform and improvement by organizing from the inside out
Methods and Procedures
Qualitative research and phenomenology
Research design
Context of study
Data collection methods
Data analysis
Population and participants
Research Design
First round of open-ended questions
Document and history review
Second round of semi-structured questions
Transcription
Categories and themes
Focus group questions
Final analysis
Research Methods
Constant comparative method
Comparison of interview data with historical data and with topics from literature review
Journal notes from researcher
Context, Population, and Participants
One school – Roosevelt Middle School
Population includes 47 certified teaching and non-teaching staff
21 staff members participated
All participation was voluntary
Researcher was also a participant
Historical Background
History of Roosevelt Middle School
First interviews (open-ended) 2000-2001
Records summary
The garden metaphor
Emerging patterns
Emerging Patterns
Topics of leadership, freedom and autonomy, relationships, ecology (location, size, community) emerge from the data
Emerging topics lead to further research questions
Data Findings and Analysis
Second interviews (semi-structured) 2001-2002
Research questions:
1. What characterizes self-organization within a school?
2. How do self-organization and renewal sustain reform and improvement?
3. How does leadership support and sustain the dynamics of self-organization, renewal, and improvement?
What characterizes self-organization and renewal within a school?
Focus
Student focus; Internalized focus; Principles and Philosophy
Interaction
Relationships and Teams; Communication and Feedback; Conversation
Emergence
Renewal; Creativity; Personal Engagement
Summary: Developing patterns
How do self-organization and renewal sustain reform and improvement?
Sense Making
Collective and Individual Sense-Making
Sustaining conditions
Freedom; Safe/Supportive Environment; Ownership
Summary: Developing patterns
How does leadership support and sustain the dynamics of self-organization, renewal, and improvement?
Individual leadership: Principal
Principal as buffer/filter; Leadership; Support
Collective leadership: Principal and teachers
Shared leadership; Inside/Out organization
Putting it together: The story of a school retreat
Summary: Developing patterns
Focus Group Interviews
Three focus group sessions – May 2002
Voluntary participants
Methodology
Seven focus questions; transcribe taped interviews; analyze for patterns; correlate to prior interviews
Summary: Confirming patterns
Discussion of Data
Review of problem
Look at interaction of parts
Study change that originates from within
Examine renewal, sustained change, and self-organization
Link data to literature
First research question
What characterizes self-organization and renewal within a school?
Focus
Interaction
Emergence
What characterizes self-organization and renewal is what emerges from within.
Focus
Core principles create a foundation for work; work emerges from within and organizes around focus; boundaries are open
“Generative cultures have no boundaries” (Chawla and Renesch, 1995).
Interaction
Teamed relationships support communication and conversation
Focus is student-centered
Genuine accountability
“…contrasting the effectiveness of ten individuals acting alone with that of the same ten people acting in concert” (Marion, 1999).
Emergence
Renewal, creativity, personal engagement come from within
Co-creation links change to renewal (people support what they create)
Edge of chaos or bounded instability avoids complacency, stability, and routine
“… edge of chaos…(Pascale, 2000).
Ecotone – “…edges where differences come together are the richest of habitats… (Krall, 1999).
Second research question
How do self-organization and renewal sustain reform and improvement?
Sense making
Sustaining conditions
Self-organization and renewal sustain reform and renewal indirectly and are related to emergence.
Sense making
Individual and collective sense-making reduces isolation, supports sense of “fit”, and fosters internalization of purpose
Holonomy – the interaction of individual and collective
“…integrative and self-assertive tendencies of holons” (Capra, 1982).
Sustaining conditions
Safety and freedom support risk-taking and creativity
Ownership emerges from shared leadership and internalized focus on principles
Autonomy + freedom = coherence through self-organization (Wheatley,1992)
Third research question
How does leadership support and sustain the dynamics of of self-organization, renewal, and improvement?
Leadership supports these dynamics by shifting the concept of leadership from individual to collective. Attention to processes and relationships supports this shift.
Individual leadership:Principal
Buffer/filter; listen; support;focus
Balance process and content
“All managers can do is to establish the conditions that enable groups of people to learn…” (Stacey, 1992)
Collective leadership: Principal and teachers
Collective leadership is based upon sound relationships
Leadership must be redefined
Leading from inside/out is collective and creative process
“ If self-management is our goal, then leadership will have to be reinvented in a fashion that places ‘followership’ first (Sergiovanni, 1992).
What I have learned about leadership in a self-organizing school
Shift focus to relationships and to interaction of the parts
Support the processes
Be patient while results emerge
Communicate values and leadership philosophy clearly
Balance direction with improvisation
What leaders can do
Move organizations to edge of chaos or bounded instability
Remember that the whole determines the behavior of the parts
Keep the focus clear; complexity will emerge
Unanticipated findings
Teams cannot support interaction, internalization, or emergence if relationships are dysfunctional
Public nature of teaching can intimidate as isolation ends
An independent/autonomous school may lack ability to integrate and to balance self-assertion with integration.
Further research
Serendipity and synchronicity may exist with self-organization. Do we have the “lens” to see these phenomena?
Applying principles of self-organization to district-level work
Can self-organizing schools sustain their work?
Conclusion
Education : from Latin roots ex meaning out and ducere meaning lead
If education is about leading out, then it is about what emerges from within
Self-organization, emergence, and leadership support this dynamic
References
Chawla, S. & Renesch, J. (Eds). (1995). Learning organizations: Developing cultures for tomorrow’s workplace. Portland, Oregon: Productivity Press.
Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society, and the rising culture. NY: Bantam Books.
Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pascale, R.T., Milleman, M., & Gioja, L. (2000). Surfing the edge of chaos: The laws of nature and the new laws of business. New York: Crown Business.
Krall, F.R. (1994). Ecotone: Wayfaring on the margins . Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Wheatley, M. J. (1992). Leadership and the new science. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Stacey, R. (1992). Managing the unknowable: Strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
About the Author
David F. Bower is an assistant professor of teacher education in the College of Education at Ohio University. His primary program affiliation is Middle Childhood Education.
Dr. Bower joined the faculty at Ohio University in the fall of 2003. He completed his Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership at the University of New Mexico in May 2003. He received his Master of Arts degree in Educational Administration from UNM in 1996. He also holds a BA degree in English, Theater Arts, and Education from Grove City College in Pennsylvania.
Dr. Bower was a high school English and drama teacher for twenty years prior to his work as a middle school administrator. He is a former principal of Roosevelt Middle School in Albuquerque, NM.
Dr. Bower has presented at a variety of conferences including the Coalition of Essential Schools Fall Forum, the NM Administrators Conference on Education, and the South Australian Middle Schooling Conference.
Research interests include teacher preparation, quality, and leadership; chaos and complexity theory as applied to schools and organizations; and middle childhood education.
0 comments
Post a comment