Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Textiles In Decline In The East
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Textiles In Decline In The East


Published on

Published in: Technology, Education

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. “ Bringing Cambridge to Consett? Building university-centred entrepreneurial networks in peripheral regions ” “ International Experiences in Promoting University Spin Off Firms” University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 26 th November 2004 Paul Benneworth (Newcastle University/ Radboud University Nijmegen)
  • 2. Acknowledgements
    • UK Economic and Social Research Council
    • David Charles, Catherine Hodgson & Aard Groen
    • Newcastle University & Twente University
    • Participants in the study
  • 3. Outline
    • The new knowledge economy
    • University spin-offs in periphery
    • The model of spin-offs and TENs
    • The network methodology
    • The case studies: Newcastle, Enschede
    • Further analytic directions
  • 4. The new knowledge economy
    • Knowledge as factor of production
    • Competitiveness through innovation
    • New successful places
      • Totemic sites of the new economy
    • Role for less successful places?
    • Double problem – the “double bind”
      • Poor performance
      • Lack of foundations for future performance
  • 5. Spin-offs and the knowledge economy
    • Totemic sites and spin-offs
    • High embodied knowledge value
    • Innovative and competitive firms
    • Entrepreneurial DNA for changing regional mentality
    • Idea of spin-offs as quintessential new economy activity
    • BUT drawn from limited pool of exemplars
    •  An ‘ecological fallacy for LFRs?
        • How far can inferences be stretched?
  • 6. Newcastle University in the North East of England
  • 7. Newcastle Uni: long term player
    • Origins in marine technology college and Medical College for Durham University
      • 1940s-1970s: d égagé
    • Long-term decline of regional industries
      • Newcastle as ‘Brasilia of the North’
    • 1980s – the Newcastle Technology Centre
    • 1990s – HESIN, Three Rivers
  • 8. Newcastle: traditional university, high technology industries
    • North East: low technology, old industrial
    • Universities major source of R&D
        • 60% Newcastle University
    • Good record of NU associated companies
        • Sage (1981) – world-leader in SME accountancy software
        • MARI (1985) – was large consultancy business in 80s
        • Novocastra (1990) – sold after decade for €50m
        • Arjuna Solutions (1998) – worth €20m in 3 months
    • Strong institutional commitment to promoting regional economic, cultural, social development
  • 9. Twente: peripheral region The central Netherlands and Overijssel Province Map 1 Provided from CIA world factbook, universities added manually Map2 and boundary data are copyrighted by FOTW - Flags of the world website
  • 10. Twente: de proef in de bos
    • 1961: Textiles in decline in the East
      • New university created to revitalise industry
    • 1970s: national debate over future of TUT
    • 1980s: van Tilburg as first spin-off
      • Harry van der Kroonenberg support
      • Creation of famous ‘TOP’ scheme
    • 1990s drift and loss of focus
    • 2000s MESA+ and the business accelerator
  • 11. UT: key summary
    • UT has been an entrepreneurial university for 20 years and has close links with the region, key commercial and public‑sector actors
    • Big financial pressures to generate the funds to pay off the mortgages on the new state development
    • Continuing declining funding in real terms for the HE budget
    • Importance of third tier funding to university but importance of funds from large funds rather than small local SMEs.
    • Requirement to have from 1980 proof that their research has benefit
    • They are an applied research university, so they do not have physics, chemistry etc, they have applied medical physics, electrical engineering etc.
    • University are a key player in the regional innovation system and opportunity to get public funds to support private activities.
  • 12. Building a new knowledge economy
    • 7,000 jobs created in spin-off (TOP) companies
    • Attraction of 2 (3?) national research centres (LTIs) to the East (CMET, TI, …)
    • Anchoring key companies in the region ?
      • Philips Signaal (  Thales)
      • Ericsson (closed 2002)
      • Vredestein (tyre manufacturers)
  • 13. Contribution to regional economy?
    • Small numbers of sustainable jobs
    • Not replacing declining industries (NVQ II/ VMBO/ MBO level occupations)
    • Long term strategies not matched by rising levels of new firm formation
    •  In what sense are USOs improving regional performance?
  • 14. A co-evolutionary spill-over model Source: Benneworth & Dawley, 2004 (after Muller & Zenker, 2000) University USO Knowledge about innovation Product innovation with IPR University/ business relationship Other firm Other product innovation Territorial knowledge pool
  • 15. Our model of spill-over Source: Benneworth & Charles, 2004 (after Muller & Zenker, 2000) University USO Knowledge about innovation USO (product) innovation University/ business relationship Other firm Other product innovation Territorial knowledge pool 1 2 3 Business support
  • 16. Key elements of our model
    • University/ spin-off relationships
    • Working with business support organisations & government
    • Working with other high technology small firms
    • Spinning-off as a ‘community of practise’
  • 17. Method and sample
    • 2 x 40 semi-structured interviews
      • University managers, professors
      • Spin off owners, partners
      • Third party innovation partners
      • Other key local partners
    • Focus on Universities of Newcastle, Twente
    • Snowball from initial sample
    • Analysis of notes and 2d documents
    • BUT first cut probe to structure analysis
  • 18. University/ spin-off interactions: Newcastle
    • Spin-offs as research partners
        • Putting research back into the university
        • Levering in external/ valourisation research
        • Spin-offs as research users
    • Professor as nexus – academic/ entrepreneur
    • Overlap: spinoff/ university labour markets
    • Third party firms drawing on commercialisation expertises
    • BUT third party also adds to knowledge pool
  • 19. University/ spin-off interactions: Twente
    • TOP programme using ‘waste’ in university
      • Increasing pressure from cutback environment
    • Spin-offs as research ‘atmosphere’
        • ‘ Forcing’ new ideas into other companies
        • Little feedback into development of research strengths
        • Focus on organic growth
    • Entrepreneur as nexus – full-time entrepreneurship
    • New models of spin-off with active commercialisation yet to be proven
    • “ Political value of spin-offs >> economic value”?
  • 20. Universities shaping the TEN: Newcastle
    • Universities in North East seen as quite good at spinning out companies – metrics
    • Problem with external CoE – university not seen as source of entrepreneurship
    • Government ended SMART - relied on by smallest USOs
    • Finance Act 2003: university legal action still pending
  • 21. Universities shaping the TEN: Twente
    • UT seen as THE Dutch exemplar
      • Fits with Balkenende/ Brinkhorst agenda
      • Frans van Vrucht part of so-called Innovation Platform
    • LTIs totally dependent on existing UT/ USO expertise
    • UT lost out in concentration agenda
      • ‘ broadening’ agenda never enacted!
    • UT vs. Philips for new nanotechnology LTI
      • Regional vs. ‘national’ agendas.
  • 22. USOs, universities and HTSFs: Newcastle
    • Good examples of collective action
        • Company works with USO on a project, and the USO MD supervised TCSs, Ph.D.s in key areas – one TCS associate became USO employee.
        • USO had problems and solved with local micro-business, which fed back into own products
        • Chemical corporate spin-off used uni kit & USO laboratories and is developing projects with USO
        • Service (software) business populates platform with domain/ expert knowledge from the university
    • Mediated through single person – bilateral?
  • 23. USOs, universities and HTSFs: Twente
    • Strong sequence of growth: new/ bigger/ stronger nodes & connections
        • CMET – spin-outs and research groups: still active today
        • Cluster activities in the sequence: TIMP, Nanotech Valley
        • MESA+ used by large companies outside the region
        • Companies help to create the land-use of a high technology economy: incubator, science park, wireless hotspot
    • Mediated through single person – bilateral?
    • Clusters in different areas
      • Near to the Spearpoint Institute areas but not perfect
  • 24. The nanotechnology sequence, Twente Centre for Micro-Electronics Technology Transfer Twente 3T Aquamarijn Twente Micro Products Kymata C2V Lion Technologies Lionix Medspray Twente Medical Products TMP Int’l MESA Institute (B) MEMS research group (E) ? Oldenzaal Rubber company ? Deventer PC training company NANOMI Membranes research group (W) Mosaic Systems (Breda) Phoenix European Membranes Institute Membrane Applications Centre Twente Pervatech Krabbe Engineering Membranes research group (S) X‑Flow Microflown MESA+ (R) Axis IO Axis MO Smart-tip Idefix Micronit
  • 25. ‘ Spinning-off as community of practise’: Newcastle
    • Little continuity between ‘regimes’ 1-3
        • The Manchester computer disaster (Bursar)
        • NUventures (NUWater, NUGround, Newchem)
        • HERO Business Development Managers
        • Business Development Directorate
    • Some progression from admin into companies, (regimes 3  4)
    • Internal ‘myths’ -- great companies – demonstration effect for other entrepreneurs
    • Dominance of professor/ entrepreneur model
      • Low rates of progression of student/ RA e’ship
  • 26. ‘ Spinning-off as community of practise’: Twente
    • Heavily personalised and antagonistic regime changes
        • van der Kroonenberg as an ‘external visionary’
        • ‘ ERDF drift’ and ‘Empire building’ in 1990s
        • Destroying the TOP programme to save it (1998)
        • The Business Accelerator idea (born on a mountain top)
    • Some progression from admin into companies, (regimes 3  4)
    • Internal ‘myths’ -- personal enrichment
      • demonstration (distraction) effect for academics
    • Dominance of ‘lone wolf’ entrepreneur model
      • High rates of progression of student/ RA e’ship
  • 27. The revised Newcastle TEN
    • Strongest element appears to be university/ USO relationships.
    • Community of practise started slowly, but some signs that a broader ‘network’ of practise building up;
      • two BDMs now CTOs for USOs
    • Universities not strong political actors and USOs not the critical asset necessary to improve political power
    • Very few “1 USO – many HTSF” relationships, so reworking existing not building new relationships
  • 28. The revised Twentish TEN
    • University part of strong technological network
    • Other (strong) nodes (sources of growth)
      • LTIs
      • Cluster organisations and activities
      • OOST (RDA), municipality, province (Elsevier)
    • University very strong political actor
        • but Frans van Vrucht now retiring (party last Wednesday)
    • Clear weakness around community of practise
  • 29. Future analytic directions
    • Newcastle Concentration in (1)
      • Cathedral in desert?
    • Twente: strong (1), (3) weak (4), v weak (2)
      • Growth pole but longevity?
    • Different types of peripherality  different types of mechanisms?
    • Does it all really make a difference?
      • Slow process of change vs external shocks