Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Miami Edison Middle
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Miami Edison Middle

830

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
830
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. DOES INCLUSION PROMOTE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AMONG 6 TH GRADE SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS IN AN URBAN SCHOOL? Dr. Onetha J. Gilliard, Principal Susana Mauri, Assistant Principal Nidia Ashby, Teacher Leader Superintendent’s Urban Principal Initiative Miami Edison Middle School 2005-2006
  • 2. Abstract of the Study
    • In order to promote academic achievement among 6 th grade Special Education Students (SPED), placed in an inclusive settings, ongoing staff development and support was provided for general and special education teachers. This resulted in a greater level of comfort and productivity from teachers and students.
  • 3. Background
    • As more special education students are placed in inclusive settings, on-going staff development and assistance must be provided to support the general and special education teachers. Some of the general education teachers have limited knowledge or skills as to what works with special education students. Approximately a third of the students enrolled at this targeted middle school are SPED students. The inclusive models provides the least restrictive settings for SPED students to access a free and appropriate education.
    • This targeted middle school serving students in grades 6-8 is a Title 1, inner city school located in the heart of a community recently named “Little Haiti”. The immediate neighborhood is made up of small shops and family operated businesses.
    • According to Miami-Dade County Public School Office of Research Services, 84% of the student population is of Haitian decent, born in America. Sixty percent of the students begin their schooling experience as non-English speakers. Many of the parents of these students have little or no formal education. Ninety-six percent of the students receive free or reduced priced meals. The mobility rate of students transferring into and out of the targeted middle school is 51%. Taking into consideration the aforementioned factors, and based on Chapter 1 (Title 1) Legislation enacted in 1965, these students are labeled at-risk.
  • 4. Research Question
    • How does inclusion promote academic achievement among 6 th graders in an urban school?
    • Will providing support and training to all 6 th grade teachers create a "buy in" attitude toward inclusion?
    •  
    • Will mentoring teachers mold attitudes towards teaching inclusion?
  • 5. Literature Review
    • In 1975, P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, was passed by Congress and later amended in 1997 as the Individual’s with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), to support and ensure children with disabilities access to a free, appropriate, public education (FAPE) and avoid discrimination based on their disabilities.
    • This law grants parents or legal guardians of children with disabilities the right to be equal partners in the development of the individualized education plan (IEP) for their children (Bateman, 2002).
    • IDEA embraces the notion that children with disabilities should be educated in the setting with the least amount of restriction, but the statute does not mandate inclusion in each case involving a child with disabilities (Essex, 2002, p.104-105).
  • 6. Literature Review
    • For inclusion to be successful in education, school leaders need to carefully plan by identifying factors that may affect the implementation process (Forest & Pearpoint, 2001).
    • Inclusion teaches children to work together and gives them a sense of belonging, value, and self-worth. Additionally, they attribute higher graduation percentage rate of special education children due to inclusion (Deloney & Tompkins, 2001).
    • Two influential cases, which drew major national attention to the needs of children with disabilities, were P.A.R.C. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Mills v. Board of Education. In the P.A.R.C. case, the district court ruled “that the state’s children with mental retardation were entitled to a public education and, whenever possible, should be educated in regular classrooms rather than classrooms that were isolated from normal school population” (Essex, 2002, p. 96).
  • 7. Literature Review
    • In Miami-Dade County Public Schools (MDCPS), the Special Education program works collaboratively with an array of partnerships in order to provide educational services and resources that would comply with IDEA and meet the needs of students with disabilities. MDCPS continues to make strides in promoting and supporting inclusive practices in school.
    • According to the accountability report Office of Program Policies and Government Analysis (OPPAGA)---in MDCPS over 175 schools are implementing inclusive education. However, the district average reflects only 28.2% of the students with disabilities spending 80% or more of their day in general education classrooms. It has become the goal of the district to increase the percentage to 40% (MDCPS, 2004).
  • 8. Methodology/Interventions
    • 1) Workshop for teachers to introduce Inclusion August 2005
    • 2) Workshop for parents and students on Inclusion August 2005
    • *What is inclusion?
    • *Role of the SPED teacher
    • *Role of the general education teacher
    • *Definition of the Co-Teaching Model
    • *Calendar for Planning
    • 3) Meetings
    • *Team Meetings (3 times a week)
    • *SPED Department Meeting (weekly)
    • *Department Meeting (weekly)
    • *District Support Personnel (weekly)
    • *Professional Development every Wednesday
    • 4) 2005 and 2006 FCAT Scores
    • 5) Tri-weekly and Mock Test
    • 6) Attendance
    • 7) Behavioral Referrals
    • 8)Academic grades
  • 9. Data Collection
    • 5 th Grade Annual Academic Grades
    • 6 th Grade Annual Academic Grades
    • Attendance for 5 th and 6 th grade
    • Discipline for 5 th and 6 th grade
    • Comparison of FCAT Scores 2005 and 2006
  • 10. Annual Academic Grades * Present for partial school term at Miami Edison Middle 1.51 1.94 TOTAL 2.0* 3.38 J.M. 1.6 2.16 F.N. 1.0 1.25 V.S. 1.3 2.25 C.C. 1.5 2.88 J.B. 1.5 1.38 C.H. 0.16 2.0 D.G. 1.5 2.0 T.A. 1.5 1.75 C.W. 1.3 1.75 J.L. 1.8 1.5 R.J. 1.6 1.0 D.J. 2.0 2.0 N.C. 2.1 1.62 K.C. 1.5 0.0 J.N. 0.3 * 1.0 L.C. 2006 GPA 2005 GPA Students
  • 11. Attendance 311 A 623 T 317A 146 T TOTAL 021A 02 T 001A 00 T J.M. 007A 29 T 017A 07 T F.N. 016A 111 T 006A 40 T V.S. 016A 03 T 016A 04 T C.C. 000A 00 T 004A 00 T J.B. 008A 69 T 018A 30 T C.H. 069A 69 T 043A 07 T D.G. 003A 54 T 007A 15 T T.A. 038A 77 T 014A 18 T C.W. 010A 45 T 022A 14 T J.L. 011A 18 T 008A 01 T R.J. 010A 10 T 014A 04 T D.J. 002A 22 T 003A 01 T N.C. 032A 56 T 035A 00 T K.C. 037A 49 T 102A 03 T J.N. 031A 09 T 007A 02 T L.C. 2006 Attendance 2005 Attendance Students
  • 12. Discipline * Suspension were given at previous school before attending Edison Middle 31 53 TOTAL 10* 01 J.M. 00 11 F.N. 03 00 V.S. 00 00 C.C. 00 00 J.B. 00 05 C.H. 01 00 D.G. 00 03 T.A. 00 00 C.W. 01 05 J.L. 00 01 R.J. 04 00 D.J. 00 00 N.C. 00 00 K.C. 00 20 J.N. 12* 07 L.C. 2006 Suspension 2005 Suspension Students
  • 13. Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test Data +113 1664 1777 +109 1778 1887 J.M. -182 1753 1571 -88 1481 1393 F.N. +451 569 1020 -29 1134 1105 V.S. -11 1315 1304 NR 681 NR C.C. -101 871 770 +238 894 1132 J.B. NR 1423 NR -35 1140 1105 C.H. -332 1102 770 +196 720 916 D.G. -18 1447 1429 +397 1229 1626 T.A. -814 1584 770 +187 1034 1221 C.W. -242 1447 1205 +154 1173 1327 J.L. +201 569 770 -483 1022 539 R.J. -781 1551 770 -109 1297 1188 D.J. -151 1584 1433 +492 1028 1520 N.C. -654 1532 878 +467 871 1338 K.C. NR NR NR +532 1510 2042 J.N. +327 770 1097 -160 1071 911 L.C. DSS Change 05 Math 06 Math DSS change 05 Read 06 Read Students
  • 14. Findings
    • The data indicates that SPED made gains in reading.
    • There was a decrease in mathematics scores.
    • Students can learn in an inclusive setting with support and structure.
    • The results indicates SPED students made academic gains in the inclusive setting.
  • 15. Conclusions
    • The Miami Dade County Public School District is mandating Inclusion throughout all schools and grade levels. As such, the support from the District is necessary to ensure the academic success of all students.
    • The transition from the elementary setting for SPED students can be difficult. A supportive student services systems must be provided.
    • The general and Special Education teachers must have ongoing staff development scheduled in a timely fashion.
    • Both general and Special Education teachers are equal partners with job duties, as well as have dual ownership and responsibility for all students.
    • Exemplary professional skills in the subject matter and classroom management are requirements for both teachers.
    • Parents need to be proactive in their children’s education to ensure gains and strive towards academic improvement in the general education curriculum courses.
  • 16. Plan of Action Recommendations
    • Support system among the team.
    • Support system from the District with regards to the inclusion model.
    • Professional Development Courses on Collaborative planning and co-teaching.
    • Professional Development Courses on Differentiated Instruction and Strategies.
    • Share Best Practices and success stories.
    • Observe different inclusive settings within our school (by teams) and other schools.
    • Be open to constructive criticism in order to improve the learning environment for the community of learners.

×