View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new iOS app!Introducing SlideShare for AndroidExplore all your favorite topics in the SlideShare appGet the SlideShare app to Save for Later — even offline
View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new Android app!View stunning SlideShares in full-screen with the new iOS app!
Summary of EPRI-NSF Workshop held in Playacar, Mexico, April 2002, on GLOBAL DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF THE ELECTRIC POWER GRID By Ronald G. Harley Duke Power Company Distinguished Professor November 3-4, 2003
Over the next ten years, demand for electric power in the USA is expected to increase by about 20% while under the current plans the electric transmission capacity will increase only by 4%.
Three-day workshop, sponsored by EPRI and NSF, held in Playacar, Mexico, from April 11 to 13, 2002.
Theme centered around optimizing the dynamic behavior of the electric power grid on a global scale in order to produce and transmit more electric power with existing generators and transmission networks, without jeopardizing various operating constraints.
26 persons from academia, industry, EPRI and NSF attended selected from the power engineering, control and computational science communities.
Six Grand Challenges were considered.
Conclusions from the workshop are that some technology already exists, but some power engineers seem to be unaware of this, and in other cases new technology will have to be developed.
Some research groups have already developed optimization algorithms, which should now be demonstrated and validated on a small pilot electric network.
1: How to select the type of control hardware, size it and choose its location.
2: Integrated network control
3: Should we have centralized or decentralized control; how to coordinate?
4: What infrastructure hardware will the various implementation strategies require?
5: A benchmark network model is needed for testing theories
6: Pilot schemes will be needed to prove validity of concepts after simulation
Grand Challenge 1: How to select the type of control hardware, size it and choose its location.
Placement of control devices, such as FACTS devices, phase shifters, tap changers, switched capacitors.
Transient stability improvement.
Inter-area oscillation damping.
Voltage collapse avoidance.
Subsynchronous resonance mitigation.
Tools to select, size, locate and control one or more of these control devices in a network according to some optimization criteria and avoid dynamic interaction between these devices and the rest of the network.
Global coordination suitable for dynamic control requires knowledge of states of control devices at speeds much higher than currently in use.
Electric grid is a sprawling network with many operational levels involving a range of energy sources with many interaction points.
Modern power system problems are becoming increasingly complex, diverse and heterogeneous.
The need for seamless interaction of numerous heterogeneous power network components represents a formidable challenge, especially for networks that have traditionally used simple methods of system optimization and control.
Mathematical models of such systems are typically derived based on linear techniques, and wide margins of safety are allowed in order to ensure stable operation.
Optimization would have to be subject to boundary conditions such as dynamic and voltage stability, security, reliability, thermal overloads and market forces.
Current corrective measures for emergency recovery depend on preprogrammed actions based on local information, and are executed independently in many control rooms. These should rather be dynamic actions based on both local and global information, executed in a coordinated fashion by local or global intelligent agents.
End-use technologies with adaptability and robustness.
Real time techniques to detect dynamic stability margins, and predict dynamic voltage collapse.
Multilayered intelligent agents capable of carrying out the following tasks during dynamically changing local and global conditions:
Present SCADA systems are usually refreshed at a rate of about once every second. This is sufficient for slow steady state controls, but is inadequate for dynamic control especially when higher bandwidths are needed (10 – 100 Hz).
Intelligent sensors and actuators, and techniques for verification and validation are required for system identification. Some existing techniques can be used in automatically providing updates and relayed via wireless or other networks to control centers to carry out global optimal control of the electric power grid.
Tools for optimal selection and placement of sensors.
Real time wide-area sensing will open issues on who accesses such information while maintaining security.
Some information and encryption technology agents are required.
Grand Challenge 5: A benchmark network model is needed for testing theories
Currently, no suitable large benchmark networks exist for studies involving controllers.
In order to compare and evaluate the potentials of different control and optimization approaches and devices to solving similar problems, a benchmark network with standard traditional controllers is needed.
These benchmark systems need to be accepted and widely used by researchers and industries.
Grand Challenge 6: Pilot schemes will be needed to prove validity of concepts after simulation
There is a wide gap between simulation studies and real time practical implementations. Some laboratory scale tests have been conducted, but a pilot scheme on a practical plant is needed.
Most US universities no longer have power programs, and most of the power programs do not have a power systems lab containing a number of synchronous generators, transmission line simulators, etc.