Alt c 11-09-08-a pike-nonotes
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 1 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide
  • Thank-you


  • 1. Investigating the Digital Divide for the HE Distance Learners in Prison Anne Pike Alt-C Conference 9-11 th September 2008
  • 2. Aims of the Research
    • To investigate the experiences of the Open University student in a prison environment
    • To determine what influences students to embark on an Open University course
    • To understand how technology, is affecting their learning, choice of study and future decisions
  • 3. Methodology
    • Interviews/Questionnaires
      • 35 prison students (33 male, 2 female)
      • 56 staff (OU, prison, stakeholders)
    • Prisons
      • Cat A – D,
      • Male & female
      • public, private
    • Ongoing
  • 4. Educational Qualifications before entering prison
  • 5. Decision to study with the OU
    • Completed all other education – next step
    • Through a friend already studying
    • Always wanted to study with the Open University
    • Use time usefully
    • Influence from an important person
  • 6.
    • “ P kept following me, insisting on more and more exams. I told him I couldn’t do it. He said I had the potential. …P was like a father to me - I still remember him.”
    • [10, 28]
    “ I have no-one outside to write to but I would like M and P to come if possible.” [10, 28]
  • 7. Support
    • Dedicated staff both internal and external to the OU
    • Insufficient resources, funding or policy to adequately meet the needs of the OU students
    “… They [the tutors] fired my imagination… the astronomy tutor was brilliant – looked like a biker with pictures of telescopes, stars. He made the subject come alive” [5, 4].
  • 8. Benefits of HE for Offenders
    • Confidence – can study, stay the course, succeed
    • (student comments)
    • “ If I’d been on the outside I’d never have done this
    • … I want to do a degree now ….and use my time usefully.”
    • “ I built up confidence and pushed forward then I just took off ”
    • Empowerment – being a student, new knowledge, options
    • “ W hen you have a laptop it’s wonderful … It makes
    • you feel like you’re really a student ” (Female student (closed))
    • “ For the first time in my life I know what I want to do”
    • (Social Science Student)
    • “ Education gives you the option to stop re-offending”
    • (Male Student – close to release)
  • 9.
    • A new direction
    • “ I started the Open to Change course
    • because I wanted to see where life
    • had gone wrong”
    Benefits of HE for Offenders A mission “ It’s like the university of life here, you meet just the biggest cross section of people from every sort of background. I want them to have education too… I’m doing [a] Mental Health [course] now..I want to teach people with autism”
  • 10.
    • Gaining Employment
    • Northern Ireland - MLA
    • Guardian Columnist
    • Lecturers – PGCEs and Higher degrees after release
    • Own business
    • Senior roles with Charities working with
    • Offender and Ex-Offender
    • But….
    Benefits of HE for Offenders “ We must educate them to the right level… for employment they need to be better than the average” (HoLS)
  • 11. ICTs in prison: the challenge
  • 12. Digital Divide for Offender Learners
    • Access to IT – attitude, control
    • “ there’s no point in rehabilitating if you don’t know modern technology” (student)
    • Internet Access - safety, public perception
    • “ [without internet access] even relatively ‘media-rich’ institutions still feel profoundly isolated from the wider society ” Jewkes (2007)
    • Course Choice
    • “ I can’t get the degree that I wanted … all the courses are needing internet access now”
    • Access to the OU site
    • “ I have access to my own material but not the
    • OU library. … I have access to all the University Libraries
    • in the world except the OU.”
  • 13. Back
  • 14. Bridging the Digital Divide
    • University for Industry(UfI): Learndirect
    • Programme of Offender Learning and Resettlement Information Services ( POLARIS)
      • – 8 prisons in London, many now live. Openlearn provided. Conflict with Virtual Campus
    • Virtual Campus Trials
      • 2 test beds (West Midlands, Eastern). LSC run.
    • Intranets – Whitemoor WW
  • 15. Main areas of concern
    • Prison: Poor media and public perception. Main purpose of prison to protect the public. Need to raise awareness of the benefits of HE
    • Pedagogy: Unique prison culture and environment – need an adapted pedagogy which effectively identifies this – informal and formal learning links, role of prison officer, staff training
    • Technology: Appropriate use of modern technologies and the internet. Safe platforms exist but connectivity slow. Flexibility in program design, campus models the way forward.
  • 16. Prison
    • Much media coverage and academic writing invite us to view the ‘inadequate person’ not the ‘positive qualities and potential’
    • Education occupies contested space within the prison regime
    • How do we nurture a society which believes that prisoners can change?
    • Provide role models of prisoners ‘made good’
    • Quantitative research required exploring links between HE and reduced recidivism
    • 3-5% of European prisoners could undertake HE
    • (Callejo & Viedma, 2007).
    • Targets of just 2%, where possible, may provide
    • prison managers with a more compelling reason to
    • adopt HE (study group)
    Prisons can be described as ‘human dustbins’ (Parkinson, 1997)
  • 17. Pedagogy
    • Offender Education extremely demanding
    • Dearth of practical information
    • Initial induction and training for new educators
    • Day-to-day running of prison dependent on the good will of prison officers
    • Students’ view prison officers as ‘indifferent’ or ‘obstructive’ (Pike, 2007)
    • Prison officers have untapped interest in learning and
    • resent offender learning opportunities
    • (Irwin & Wilson, 2008)
    • Provide prison officers with easier access to HE
    • and develop their role to allow more participation in
    • the rehabilitation of offenders
  • 18. Technology
    • In 9 countries, 90% of prison HE students found computers and internet access inadequate or very inadequate ( Callejo & Viedma, 2007)
    • Fears around using technology in prison should be clearly identified and addressed (Mitra, 2008)
    • We need flexible learning programmes which use modern technologies and web access but allow for variability in the short term
    • Campus models of education in prison, either physical or virtual, may encourage communities of practice by all learners in prison, including staff
    • Linked e-learning networks could encourage the trial of
    • virtual spaces and develop distance education in other
    • languages
  • 19. Anne Pike COLMSCT CETL Fellow & Offender Learning Coordinator The Open University [email_address]