• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Namibia Tourism Concessions Peter John Massyn
 

Namibia Tourism Concessions Peter John Massyn

on

  • 614 views

This presentation by Peter John Massyn was delivered at the 'Concessioning tourism opportunities in conservation areas and maximising rural development' workshop, held in Maputo between 19-22 March ...

This presentation by Peter John Massyn was delivered at the 'Concessioning tourism opportunities in conservation areas and maximising rural development' workshop, held in Maputo between 19-22 March 2012 (Day 1, Session 2, Legal frameworks)

Statistics

Views

Total Views
614
Views on SlideShare
614
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Namibia Tourism Concessions Peter John Massyn Namibia Tourism Concessions Peter John Massyn Document Transcript

    • Protected Areas Network Tourism Concessionsin Namibia’s Protected Areas ✓ Line ministry responsible for environment and tourism (MET) ✓ Extensive network of PAs & conservancies with considerable tourism potential ✓ 20 national parks covering 13% of country Peter John Massyn ✓ 71 communal conservancies covering 20% of Maputo country 19 March 2012 ✓ 3 ‘state concessions’ destined to become ‘Kunene Peoples Park’ ( including 6,000km2 Palmwag Concession) Institutional Framework ✓ Concessions policy approved by Cabinet in 2007 ✓ Operates within existing & draft legal frameworks (Nature Conservation Ordinance & Parks & Wildlife Bill) ✓ Replaces ad hoc approach of the past ✓ Establishes “standard & robust procedure” for award & management of tourism concessions on state land ✓ Institutional structure: − Minister is responsible authority with wide discretion − Concessions Committee appointed by Minister provides advice & oversight − Concessions Unit in the Directorate of Tourism does day-to- day implementation ✓ Integrated with national CBNRM/conservancy programme ✓ Strong donor & NGO support (EU, World Bank, UNDP, KfW, MCA, NACSO, etc.) Policy Objectives Award Process Balances conservation, commerce & rural development “The process for awarding concessions will be transparent, objective and fair, but with the empowerment of formerly disadvantaged Namibians as a priority, and preference given to rural communities…” ✓ To enhance biodiversity conservation through regulation of commercial operations in PAs ✓ To improve management & control of PAs ✓ To increase revenue generation from PAs Direct award ✓ To increase economic contribution of PAs Auction ✓ To advance the ‘economic empowerment’ of park neighbours and all ‘formerly Tender disadvantaged Namibians’ ✓ To promote sustainable rural development, poverty alleviation & job creation
    • Direct Award Progress to Date✓ At the discretion of the Minister (after consultation & guided by policy) ✓ Concessions Committee and Concessions Unit established & operational (with donor & NGO support)✓ Preference to ‘communities’ resident in or near protected areas ✓ Standardized procedures & templates adopted & routinely used✓ Objective is to ‘mitigate costs’, build incentives & stimulate rural development ✓ Several competitive tenders awarding concessions in parks to private firms✓ Community concessionaires must be legally incorporated, “representative, successfully concluded accountable and stable” ✓ Direct award of ‘head concessions’ to communities✓ MET’s role is to: at Palmwag/Skeleton Coast, Etendeka, Hobatere/Etosha State & Bwabwata (more to follow) ‘Head Concession Contract’ − award ‘head concessions’ to qualifying communities (mostly conservancies) ✓ Some community concessionaires opted for competitive tenders to select operating partners (Hobatere, Conservancy − standardize subaward procedures & oversee ‘Concession Operator Contract’ selection of operating partners White Sands, Bwabwata) − ensure that communities act in terms of ✓ Others used structured negotiation (RFP, evaluation, Operator their mandates & are ‘not exploited’ negotiations, closure) with trusted incumbents to reappoint operating partners (Etendeka & Palmwag) Balance Sheet ✓ Extensive & under-developed resource base ✓ Well-developed institutional environment: − Enabling legislation & policy in place Thank You! − MET concessions unit operational − Standardized procedures & documents in use − Well-developed CBNRM programme − Established network of support NGOs − Fairly large domestic tourism sector ✓ Track record of success ✗ Uneven political support ✗ Competition from state resort company (NWR) ✗ Competition from mining (trumps all) ✗ Sustainability beyond donor support? ✗ Recession in tourism source markets