Advancing Animal Welfare Standards within the Veterinary Profession
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network


Advancing Animal Welfare Standards within the Veterinary Profession



Veterinarians are widely considered to be experts on animal welfare. However, our survey of the positions of five of the world’s leading veterinary associations on five important animal use ...

Veterinarians are widely considered to be experts on animal welfare. However, our survey of the positions of five of the world’s leading veterinary associations on five important animal use practices revealed that their positions frequently lagged behind those of the general public. These practices were the close confinement of laying hens in ‘battery cages,’ of pregnant sows in gestation crates, of veal calves in small crates, the cosmetic tail-docking of dogs, and the use of animals in scientific research and education.

To further examine the attitudes of veterinarians towards animal welfare, we ascertained the positions of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) on a broad range of practices commonly considered to result in poor welfare. With a veterinary membership in excess of 72,000 by 2005—the largest of any veterinary association—and claiming to act as “a collective voice for its membership and for the profession,” the AVMA is ideally suited to this purpose. While the AVMA did not support all practices resulting in poor welfare, it did support a substantial number of them, in some cases contrary to strong scientific evidence.

Such poor positions of veterinarians on animal welfare issues are largely attributable to deficiencies in veterinary education. Although humane alternatives are being introduced, harmful animal use in surgical and preclinical training remains common in veterinary courses worldwide, and although animal welfare and bioethics courses are also being introduced, these remain minimal in most veterinary curricula. Additional causes may include deficiencies in the selection of veterinary students, and misrepresentation of the opinions of veterinarians by their professional associations.

Solutions could include consideration of animal welfare awareness and critical reasoning ability during the selection of veterinary students, increased bioethics and critical reasoning training during veterinary education, continuing education credits for veterinarians who participate in such post-graduate training, the replacement of remaining harmful animal use in veterinary education with humane alternatives, and the encouragement of more active involvement of veterinarians in their professional associations.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



4 Embeds 139 128 5 5 1


Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Hundreds of thousands of sheep die annually among millions shipped from Australian ports primarily to Middle-Eastern destinations
  • 2012: formation of Vets Against Live Export
  • Food/water restriction for 2+ weeks to shock hen ’s bodies into a new egg-laying cycle. Severe welfare problems.
  • ‘ Forced’ or ‘induced’ molting
  • 4 month gestation period: sows confined within metal cages slightly larger than own bodies. Transferred to farrowing crates few d before parturition, stay there until piglets weaned after 3 wks.
  • M ade from the excessively fattened livers of ducks and geese force-fed via oesophageal tubes, resulting in hepatic lipidosis, and not uncommonly, additional diseases and injuries.
  • Additionally, opinion polls have shown that a majority of citizens oppose several other modern farm husbandry practices, particularly the forced molting, beak trimming and caging of laying hens.
  • Many of the policies of the NZVA were in line with or exceeded the guidelines developed by that country’s National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC), and we used the more-readily available NAWAC guidelines to represent the NZVA’s positions in our survey.
  • The five animal-use practices considered were: so called “battery” cages for laying hens small crates and nutritionally-deficient diets for “veal” calves gestation crates for pregnant sows tail-docking of dogs Invasive animal use in scientific research and education
  • The concept of Five Freedoms originated with the Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals kept under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems , the ‘ Brambell Report ’ , 1965: 1. Freedom from Hunger and Thirst - by ready access to fresh water and a diet to maintain full health and vigour. 2. Freedom from Discomfort - by providing an appropriate environment including shelter and a comfortable resting area. 3. Freedom from Pain, Injury or Disease - by prevention or rapid diagnosis and treatment. 4. Freedom to Express Normal Behaviour - by providing sufficient space, proper facilities and company of the animal's own kind. 5. Freedom from Fear and Distress - by ensuring conditions and treatment which avoid mental suffering.
  • There was widespread and persistent public concern about many aspects of each of the five animal use practices, in all surveyed countries. Additionally, opinion polls have shown that a majority of citizens oppose several other modern farm husbandry practices, particularly the forced moulting, beak trimming and caging of laying hens. In contrast, many of these five animal use practices were not addressed clearly in the five veterinary associations’ positions. All of the veterinary associations either lacked positions on or were not categorically opposed to the close confinement of laying hens, pregnant sows and ‘veal’ calves, although the NZVA did recommend time limits on the use of sow gestation crates, and both the NZVA and the AVA recommended group, rather than individual, housing of ‘veal’ calves. The only practice to which the public and the associations appeared to share a common opposition was the cosmetic tail docking of dogs, although the AVMA did not take a firm stance against this. In the case of animal experimentation, both the general public and the veterinary profession appear to support experimentation for human medical research to some degree, although public opinion remains very critical.
  • To further examine the attitudes of veterinarians towards animal welfare, we ascertained the positions of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) on a broad range of practices commonly considered to result in poor welfare.
  • AVMA policies on animal use issues have expanded greatly in recent years
  • The forced moulting, beak trimming and caging of laying hens are thought by many to represent the greatest violations of animal welfare inflicted on large number of animals anywhere in the world, and consequently deserve close examination. ‘ Forced’ or ‘induced’ molting is used to shorten the dormant period at the end of the natural annual laying cycle in commercial laying hens. USDA statistics indicate that at any given time in the United States over six million hens are undergoing food limitation or withdrawal in forced molting operations (USDA). Light/dark manipulation: E.g., a 1-week pre-molt cycle of 16 hours of light/8 hours of darkness may be followed by 8 hours of light/16 hours of darkness (Holt and Porter 1992). Or a 1-week pre-molt cycle of 24 hours of continuous light may be followed by 8 hours of light which is increased on day 20 by 0.25 hours/week back up to the standard 16-17 hours of continuous light (Kalmbach Feeds undated).
  • The Salmonella enteritidis bacteria contaminate feathers for long periods and are readily spread by starvation-induced feather consumption (Holt 1995). The result is increased consumer risk from Salmonella contaminated eggs.
  • The Salmonella enteritidis bacteria contaminate feathers for long periods and are readily spread by starvation-induced feather consumption (Holt 1995). The result is increased consumer risk from Salmonella contaminated eggs.
  • The natural hierarchical pecking order of laying hens is compounded in the so-called ‘battery’ cages commonly used by excessive crowding and the inability to dustbathe or perch, and consequently hens lower on the pecking order particularly suffer from their inability to escape increased feather pecking by cage mates
  • Alternatives to debeaking include decreasing crowding, the provision of litter and perches (which markedly decreases aggression; Vestergaard 1989) and genetically selecting for increased docility.
  • Examination of one of the world ’ s largest veterinary associations— the AVMA—revealed that although the AVMA did not support all practices commonly resulting in poor animal welfare, it supported a range of practices that do, in some cases contrary to both substantial scientific evidence and public opinion. Overall our results clearly suggest that veterinarians lag behind the general public in their desire for animal welfare reform, unless the positions of veterinarians are not accurately represented by the veterinary associations surveyed. Anecdotal evidence and some research (Farm Sanctuary, 2004) indicate that a proportion of veterinarians do care deeply about these issues, and support animal welfare organisations, in some cases taking the lead on animal welfare issues. Furthermore, international veterinary bodies like the WVA, the Commonwealth Veterinary Association, the World Small Animal Veterinary Association and the Federation of European Companion Animal Veterinary Associations have all organised major animal welfare symposia in recent years. Thus, there may be some inconsistency between the apparent level of concern about animal welfare expressed by the surveyed veterinary associations and the level of concern of individual veterinarians and some other veterinary associations. Nevertheless, even if the surveyed associations do not fully represent the positions of the majority of veterinarians, it appears likely that a substantial proportion of veterinarians lags behind the general public in their desire for the advancement of animal welfare issues.
  • The highly demanding nature of a veterinary education warrants the selection of students able to demonstrate a strong academic record of success. Generally speaking, such success is most easily demonstrated in advanced mathematics and science subjects, considered among the most difficult. Despite the lack of relevance to veterinary practice of some of these disciplines, this selection tool most rapidly results in simple, quantitative outcomes, when compared to alternatives such as assessments of character or work experience, and both historically and in many countries today remains the major selection method for veterinary students. However, the high attrition rate of veterinarians in the first few years post-graduation has resulted in increasing recognition of the importance of substantial prior veterinary work experience, which has now become an important part of the selection process in many countries. Despite increasing recognition that good communication skills are essential to success in veterinary practice, rigorous examination of these are not yet incorporated into most selection criteria. And despite increasing social concern regarding animal welfare issues — about which veterinarians are widely expected by the general public to possess a considerable degree of expertise — selection criteria rarely, if ever, examine knowledge of animal welfare issues, underlying compassion for animals, or critical thinking ability. It may be hoped, however, that those wishing to embark upon a veterinary education are more likely than average to possess at least some of these attributes.
  • A growing number of publications have described the efficacy of humane teaching methods
  • Spanish translations are available here.
  • Both descriptive (existing and future trends), and prescriptive (suggested strategies to deliver change)
  • Although animal welfare is necessary as part of formal veterinary education throughout Europe as part of the European Community’s move towards harmonisation of professional qualifications, animal welfare education is underdeveloped in most veterinary schools and often has not received the attention it deserves in the curriculum. However, one of the animal welfare mandates of the World Animal Health Organisation (OIE) is promotion of the inclusion of animal welfare in undergraduate and post-graduate veterinary curricula (Anon, 2005). Fortunately, there are increasing numbers of courses on animal welfare being implemented around the world. Some of these courses are integrated into undergraduate veterinary education.
  • To encourage the introduction of animal welfare education into veterinary curricula worldwide, the World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) developed the “Concepts in Animal Welfare” syllabus in collaboration with the University of Bristol School of Clinical Veterinary Science which was launched on CD-ROM in 2003. This one or two semester curriculum in animal welfare science provides training in critical reasoning skills and a range of animal welfare issues, including farm and companion animal welfare, wildlife, and animal experiments (WSPA and the University of Bristol 2003). Currently being implemented in Thailand, the Philippines, and Latin America. Many other countries have shown great interest – including Indonesia, India, Malaysia, etc. 2012: The syllabus has been requested by over 850 universities worldwide.
  • To include, within a teaching pack, learning objectives, presentation material, supporting notes and workshop topics. To provide assessment material for project work and examinations that will include model answers and marking schedules.
  • WSPA now has an online version
  • Participation in such education on animal welfare science and issues should be encouraged by the recognition by veterinary licensing authorities of continuing education credits awarded to participating veterinarians.
  • Courses offered as of Jul. 2012
  • Courses offered as of Jul. 2012
  • Courses offered as of Jul. 2012
  • The Australian College of Veterinary Scientists has an established Animal Welfare Chapter that provides veterinarians with opportunities for training and certification reflecting a detailed knowledge of, and special competence in, animal welfare across all species.
  • Three peer-reviewed articles as first author, or as last author when they have led the work, and three additional articles as co-author, excluding non-peer reviewed articles, review articles, and proceedings abstracts
  • Animal welfare was identified in 2006 by the Executive Board of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) as one of the top five critical issues affecting the veterinary profession both in the United States and globally.
  • New veterinary organisations dedicated to animal welfare are being established, and the popularity and activities of existing organisations are increasing. AWSELVA’s vision is a global society that provides a good quality of life for animals Mission is to promote the welfare of animals through raising awareness and understanding of animal welfare science and ethics, and their application to policy and practice. AWSELVA achieves this by providing: Conferences Journal Continuing Education
  • The Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association (HSVMA) was formed as a home for veterinary professionals who want to engage in direct care programs for animals in need and educate the public and others in the profession about animal welfare issues. HSVMA Rural Area Veterinary Services (HSVMA-RAVS), is our primary direct care program. We are also actively involved in advocating for better public policies for animals and advancing humane alternatives in veterinary education. Mission: “To protect and advocate for animals while providing leadership and service opportunities that support a humane veterinary profession.”
  • Goals include: Disseminate and instigate scientific research relating to animal welfare, use and policy. Facilitate collaboration and informed debate amongst professionals, government, industry and the general public. Form strategic alliances with other welfare organisations. Lobby for legislative change to improve animal welfare. Provide an avenue for veterinarians to use their expertise to identify animal welfare needs and to address these by presenting scientific arguments and solutions.
  • Acknowledgements: Animal welfare scientist and educator Jasmijn de Boo conducted the survey of international veterinary association policies and provided the slides re: WSPA’s ‘Concepts’ syllabus Veterinarian Kevin Saldanha assisted with this presentation, particularly by sourcing some of the images used.

Advancing Animal Welfare Standards within the Veterinary Profession Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Advancing Animal Welfare Standards Within the Veterinary Profession   ANDREW KNIGHT DipECAWBM (WSEL), PhD, MRCVS, FOCAE
  • 2. Overview1. Animal welfare standards of veterinarians2. Causes of poor welfare standards3. Increasing animal welfare standards4. New European and American veterinary specialisations in animal welfare
  • 3. Part IAnimal welfare standards of veterinarians
  • 4. Several events in recent years suggestveterinary attitudes towards animal welfaretoo often lag behind those of the generalpublic…
  • 5. Live sheep exportsHundreds of thousands of sheep die annually amongmillions shipped from Australian ports primarily toMiddle-Eastern destinations.Widespread public opposition to the trade withinAustralia.However, at its 2005 annual general meeting, theAustralian Veterinary Association rejected a call forveterinarians to oppose the live sheep export trade(ABC News 2005).
  • 6. Widespread public opposition to the trade withinAustraliaHowever, the Australian Veterinary Association hasconsistently rejected calls to oppose the trade
  • 7. Forced molting of laying hens
  • 8. Resolutions to discourage forced molting had beenpresented to the Amer. Vet. Medical Assoc. annuallysince 1999.Only in 2004 did the AVMA finally adopt a policydiscouraging forced molting.
  • 9. Sow gestation/farrowing crates
  • 10. Overwhelming concern about poor welfare resulted inFloridians voting to amend their state constitution toprohibit gestation crates on November 5, 2002.However, in early 2002, the AVMA formally voted toendorse their use.
  • 11. Pate de foie gras production
  • 12. Bans: more than ½ dozen European countries,Argentina, Israel, CaliforniaHowever, in 2005 the AVMA rejected memberresolutions to oppose the force feeding of ducks andgeese to produce foie gras (AVAR 2005b).
  • 13. Veterinary associations survey 2005 - 2006  World Veterinary Association (WVA) American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) British Veterinary Association (BVA) New Zealand Veterinary Association (NZVA) Australian Veterinary Association (AVA)
  • 14. Animal use practices1. ‘Battery’ cages to house laying hens2. Small crates to house ‘veal’ calves3. Gestation crates to house pregnant sows4. Cosmetic tail docking of dogs5. The harmful use of animals in scientific research, toxicity testing and education
  • 15. Positive outcomes The WVA and BVA had adopted the Five Freedoms (Farm Animal Welfare Council, 1992) within their policies. The AVMA had guiding principles on welfare statements. The NZVA referred to extensive NAWAC codes, recommendations and minimum standards on animal welfare. The AVA had extensive policies on animal welfare issues.
  • 16. Negative outcomes Officialveterinary positions lagged behind those of the general public on important animal use issues:  close confinement of laying hens in battery cages  of veal calves in small crates  of pregnant sows in gestation crates Only practice condemned by most people and opposed by most veterinary associations:  cosmetic tail docking of dogs (although the AVMA did not take a firm stance against this)
  • 17. AVMA“more than 82,500 veterinarians working inprivate and corporate practice, government,industry, academia, and uniformed services”Claims  to  act  as  “a collective voice for itsmembership and for the profession.”
  • 18. ‘Forced’ moulting of laying hensThree main methods:  1. elimination or limitation of food and/or water;  2. feeding low nutrient rations deficient, for example, in  protein, calcium or sodium; and, less frequently,  3. the  administration  of  drugs  and  metals  including  methalibure, chlormadinone, and progesterone, high  levels of iodine, dietary aluminum, and zinc Light-dark manipulation often used
  • 19. Welfare impacts Increased but economically acceptable mortality  levels Body  weight  decreases  as  high  as  35%  in  the  survivors (Webster 2000) Increased levels of plasma corticosterone Behavioral  changes,  such  as  initial  aggression  and  heightened  alertness  followed  by  lethargy  (Webster 2003)
  • 20.  Severe  stress  decreases  cellular  and  humoral  immunocompetence  (Holt  1992),  and  alters  intestinal flora (Holt et al. 1995), predisposing to  Salmonellosis in particular.  In an attempt to obtain nutrients hens also pluck  and  consume  the  feathers  of  adjacent  hens,  causing further pain and stress (Holt 1995).
  • 21. AVMA supports forced molting: “Acceptable practices include reduction of photoperiod (day length) and specific nutrient restrictions”although it does recommend that neither water nor  food be completely withdrawn
  • 22. Beak trimming of laying hens Routinely  performed  at  1-10  days.  Up  to  half  of  the  maxilla  and  a  third  of  the  mandible  are  commonly  excised using a hot blade or wire (contrary to UK Codes  of Practice specifying that not more than one-third of the  upper and lower beak may be removed).  As chick beaks are tiny and the process mechanical and  executed  with  production  line  speed,  even  more  beak  may be removed.  If  beaks  have  regrown,  producers  may  repeat  the  procedure just prior to or during the laying period.
  • 23. Welfare impacts Chickens  have  nociceptors  (sensory  pain  receptors)  in  the  beak,  with  response  characteristics  similar  to  those  of  mammals  (Gentle  1989).  Consequently  debeaking  is  a  highly painful procedure producing:  immediate  responses,  including  visible  reactions  and  profound shock;  an economically-acceptable proportion of deaths; and  long-term  responses  such  as  phantom  and  stump  pain, due to the exposure of sensitive nerves and the  growth of neuromas (SVC 1996, Gentle et al. 1990). 
  • 24.  Guarding  behavior  indicative  of  severe  pain:  decreased  time  spent  pecking,  drinking,  preening  and  engaged  in  associated head shaking and beak wiping  Lasts at least 3-5 weeks (Duncan  et al. 1989, Gentle  et al. 1990),  although  experts  such  as  Broom  (1992)  have  asserted  these  neuromas  may  be  painful  for  the  rest  of  the bird’s life Consequently,  long  term  increases  in  dozing,  general  inactivity  (Eskeland  1981)  and  depression  (Fraser  and  Quine 1989) are observed
  • 25. Varying strength of opinion The  European  Commission  Scientific  Veterinary  Committee  Animal  Welfare  Section  (SVC  1992)  recommended  that  debeaking  “should be banned as soon as practicable since it is known to cause pain both during and after the operation.”  This  recommendation  was reiterated in the SVC’s 1996  Report on the Welfare of Laying Hens. The UK Ministry of Agriculture’s  Code of Practice stipulates that debeaking  “should be carried out only as a last resort” (MAFF 1987).  AVMA supports beak-trimming although  “encourages the development of alternative practices, including genetic selection, or management of light or nutrition, which may reduce or eliminate the practice of beak trimming.”
  • 26. Part IICauses of poor welfare standards
  • 27. 1. selection of veterinary students Use of advanced mathematics and science subjects, vs. alternatives such as assessments of character or work experience, as selection tools Little or no consideration:  communication skills  knowledge of animal welfare issues  compassion for animals  critical thinking ability
  • 28. The results Veterinary students are academically very strong, particularly in the sciences They may or may not possess substantial prior veterinary work experience They may not possess communication skills, knowledge of animal welfare issues, underlying compassion for animals, or critical thinking ability much different from that of the general student population
  • 29. 2. Education of veterinary studentsThe importance of educating veterinary studentsabout animal welfare issues and of assisting theirdevelopment of critical reasoning skills isincreasingly recognizedHowever, the proportion of veterinary studentsreceiving such formal education remains small
  • 30. ‘Hidden curriculum’ endorsing harmful animal use  Anatomy (dissection, often of purpose-killed animals or animals from ethically-debatable sources) Physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology (‘demonstration’ experiments on living animals, with animals usually killed during or after the experiment) ‘Terminal’ surgical and anaesthetic laboratories
  • 31. Alternatives in education high quality videos ‘ethically-sourced cadavers’ preserved specimens computer simulations non-invasive self-experimentation clinical/surgical skills models and simulators supervised clinical/surgical experiences
  • 32. Educational efficacy  - ‘Animal use in biomedical education’
  • 33.
  • 34. Comparative studies - ‘Published papers’ - ‘Comparative’ 12 papers published from 1989 to 2006 described 11 distinct studies of veterinary students: 9 assessed surgical training — historically the discipline involving greatest harmful animal use. Humane method: Superior Equivalent Inferior 45.5% (5/11) 45.5% (5/11) 9.1% (1/11)
  • 35. All educational disciplinesAt least 33 papers sourced from the biomedical and educationalliterature, covering all educational levels and disciplines, describestudies assessing the ability of humane alternatives to impartknowledge or clinical or surgical skills, when compared toharmful animal use Humane method: Superior Equivalent Inferior39.4% (13/33)  51.5% (17/33)  9.1% (3/33) 
  • 36. Attitudinal impacts Majority of veterinary students receive minimal or noformal education in animal welfare issues or criticalreasoning, and are directly required to harm and killanimals during their educationUnspoken messages: Harming and killing healthy animals is not only condoned, but is required to become a veterinarian Animal welfare concerns are subservient to human interests of debatable merit
  • 37. Veterinary student studies Decreasing awareness of veterinary students of animal sentience (specifically, the hunger, pain, fear and boredom of dogs, cats and cows) over the duration of their veterinary courses (Paul and Podberscek 2000) Decreased likelihood of fourth year students to provide analgesia when compared to second or third year students (Hellyer et al. 1999) Inhibition of normal development of moral reasoning ability during the four years of veterinary school (Self et al. 1991)
  • 38. Desensitisation-related phenomenaPsychological adaptations, enabling previouslycaring students to withstand psychological stresses,resulting from requirements to harm and kill sentientanimals in the absence of overwhelming necessity
  • 39. Part IIIIncreasing animal welfare standards within the veterinary profession
  • 40. 1. Demographic changesMarked feminisation of a previously male-dominatedprofession Cross-sectional study of veterinary students in their first preclinical year, first clinical year and final year of study: women in each group rated themselves as having significantly higher levels of empathy with animals than did the men. difference most marked in final-year students; moreover, the males in that group showed lower levels of empathy than their peers in earlier year-groups - Paul and Podberscek, 2000
  • 41. 2. Selection of veterinary students During veterinary student selection some weighting must be given to: awareness of animal welfare issues positive attitudes towards animal welfare critical reasoning ability
  • 42. 3. Formal veterinary education These foundations must be built upon during formal veterinary education by the incorporation of bioethics and critical reasoning courses into veterinary curricula.
  • 43. Concepts in Animal Welfare Syllabus: History and progress Jasmijn de Boo BSc (Hons), MSc, DipEd Former Education and Training Coordinator World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA)
  • 44.  WSPA realised:  importance of veterinarians in improvement of animal welfare  the omission of animal welfare topics from most veterinary curricula In 2003, WSPA and the University of Bristol, veterinary school launched the ‘Concepts in Animal Welfare’ syllabus Currently being implemented in many veterinary schools around the world
  • 45. “Concepts” – Objectives1. To develop an understanding of animal welfare relevant to an animal’s physiological and psychological well-being2. To recognise welfare, ethical and legal implications and to be able to apply critical analysis from each perspective, for different species in different situations3. To stimulate focused critical thinking on welfare issues, which can be developed throughout the course and the individual’s professional career
  • 46. “Concepts” – Methodology To provide theoretical teaching units To illustrate topics with practical examples and case studies To provide assessment material To provide suggested reading lists and additional relevant materials
  • 47. Teaching modules - overviewParticipatory material Small group discussion  3 topics with associated key points for the lecturer Project work  5 topics with associated key pointsExaminations 10 short answer questions with brief model answers
  • 48. 4. Continuing education
  • 49. Courses open to all Cambridge University course on animal welfare science, ethics and law, September annually  Five components: Welfare Concepts and Assessment, and Zoo Animal Welfare; Law and Companion Animal Welfare; Horse Welfare; Principles of Ethics in Relation to Animal Use; and Farm Animal Welfare  Can attend all or just some Royal Veterinary College distance learning courses  Currently offers MSc degrees, Postgraduate Diplomas and Postgraduate Certificates in Livestock Health and Production, Veterinary Epidemiology and Public Health
  • 50.  University of Edinburgh MSc in Applied Animal Behaviour and Animal Welfare  International reputation for its teaching on current issues in animal behaviour and welfare  Since 1990 the course has welcomed around 25 students annually from around the world University of Edinburgh Online MSc in International Animal Welfare, Ethics and Law  In association with the Jeanne Marchig International Centre for Animal Welfare Education  Focuses on the international use of animal welfare science, and associated ethics, policy and law. ‘The first and only online programme in International Animal Welfare, Ethics & Law’
  • 51.  Tufts University Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine MS in Animals and Public Policy  Offered within the Center for Animals and Public Policy, founded in 1983.  Guiding vision: "an institute for advanced education, research and policy study that investigates the ethical, legal, social and scientific dimensions of human-animal relationships.”  An intensive program exploring the "historical, philosophical, scientific, cultural, legal and political underpinnings of contemporary human- animal relationships."  Students "develop research, analytical, and communications skills that empower them to promote the status and welfare of animals, and deepen public understanding of the role of animals in society."
  • 52.  Michigan State University (MSU) Animal Behavior and Welfare Group  Undergraduate and graduate level courses in animal welfare, applied animal behavior and contemporary issues.  Taught in the classroom, on the farm and online.
  • 53.  MSU online course:  Principles of animal welfare science  Problem-based approach to develop ability to objectively assess welfare of species in production, research, zoos, companion, and other situations  Includes lectures, readings, notes, quizzes and exercises, assessment scenarios, evaluation and discussion  Because students taking the course come from across North America and around the globe, an asynchronous format allows discussion and interaction across multiple time zones and differing personal schedules  To further allow students to work at their own pace, course material has been divided into three 5-week-long units with a deadline at the end of each unit
  • 54.  University of Guelph MSc or PhD  Offered through the Department of Animal and Poultry Science  A core of graduate courses in animal welfare science and behavior with selected electives. Students can focus on the welfare of food, laboratory, or zoo animals, with the possibility of some projects related to companion animals  Students must complete a focused research project and paper or thesis  MSc can be completed in 1 year (three semesters)  Also: post-graduate distance education course: ‘Assessing Animal Welfare in Practice’
  • 55. Other examples:Plymouth University BSc (Hons) Animal Behaviour and WelfareUniversity of Northampton MSc in Animal Welfare  Delivered in partnership with Moulton CollegeCambridge e-Learning Institute  distance learning  certificates in animal behaviour, animal ethics, animal welfare, critical thinking
  • 56. Veterinary qualifications Australian College of Veterinary Scientists Membership in Animal Welfare  Membership: signifies expertise and competence in the subject  at least four years post-graduate experience as a veterinarian  written and oral/practical examinations The RCVS Certificate in Advanced Veterinary Practice (CertAVP)  Can include some modules to reflect personal interests, including those on the theory and practice of Animal Welfare Science, Ethics and Law
  • 57. Specialist qualifications Australian College of Veterinary Scientists Fellowship in Animal Welfare Science, Ethics and Law  Fellowship: signifies scholarly and technical excellence in the subject. standards of training and examination meet/exceed prerequisites for registration as an Australian/New Zealand Veterinary Specialist  96+ weeks of fulltime directly supervised training in the clinical and technical aspects of the discipline. To be completed within 6 years  candidate and the supervisor must spend 25+ hours per week working in the clinical and technical aspects of the discipline  written and oral/practical examinations
  • 58. Specialist qualifications RCVS Diploma in Animal Welfare Science, Ethics and Law  At least 200 days of formal training  dissertation, case reports  written and practical exams  RCVS Diplomas being phased out in favour of European diplomas, final enrolments: 1 November 2012
  • 59. Part IVNew European and American veterinary specialisations in animal welfare
  • 60. European sub-specialty in Welfare Science, Ethics and Law (WSEL) Created in 2011 within the College of Animal Welfare and Behavioural Medicine (ECAWBM). Working towards formal recognition by the European Board of Veterinary Specialisation Will replace the RCVS Diploma Will develop a diploma residency program and examinations First five years (until April 2016): will accept de facto diplomates: not required to undertake a residency programme or submit to examination initially. Eligibility:  seven years of professional experience in the speciality  spend at least 60% of full-time work in AWSEL  publications: three as first author, three as co-author
  • 61. American speciality in Animal Welfare American College of Animal Welfare petitioned for formal recognition by the American Board of Veterinary Specialties in 2010 Training Route to credentialing:  Undertake an ACAW recognized training program  Publication requirements: first author of two original articles  Examination Provisional Route to credentialing:  Five years of training and/or experience in animal welfare  Publication requirements: as above  Must sit the exam within the first 7 years following ABVS approval of ACAW
  • 62. 5-6. Additional steps The replacement of remaining harmful animal use in veterinary education with humane alternatives must be accelerated. Veterinarians must become more actively involved in their professional associations, in order to ensure these accurately reflect their positions.
  • 63. Expected outcomesSuch initiatives would all be expected to increaseanimal welfare standards within the veterinaryprofession.The profession could then become a leader, ratherthan a follower, of evolving social standards onanimal welfare issues.
  • 64. References/