Since the late 1970’s, NASA’s space probes have reached all planets in the Solar System - and Pluto is no longer classed as a planet. Mainstream Astronomy has a view of the Solar System which considers it to be “dead” and “never alive”. Since the late 1990’s, our access to Image Data from Space Missions has grown considerably. Exploring some of this image data reveals a fair number of things which NASA and ESA seem reluctant to talk about. Some people say there is life on Mars - some of them are scientists who have worked for NASA. This presentation looks at some of the NASA photos and data which suggest there may be life on Mars. In most cases, NASA will not discuss what is shown on some of these photos - discussion and analysis is left to independent researchers. Why would it be left to Ron Bennett to spot small “bug like objects” moving in the soil on Mars? Why do the BBC lie about the way the colour of the Martian sky has been determined? Why is the evidence of liquid water muddled up and covered up? Is there anything to the idea about the Ringmakers of Saturn? In this presentation, we will explore some of the compelling evidence and try to uncover some of the secrets in the Solar System.

1. Secrets in the
Solar System

2. Introduction
This presentation asks, we will look at
NASA and other Scientific Data about
– Mars
– Phobos (an unusual Moon of Mars)
– Iapetus
– The Sun (from SOHO)
We can ask … are most scientists
deliberately ignoring the most intriguing
data?
Does the data indicate life and
intelligence – past or present –
elsewhere in the solar system?
Some of this I showed at New Horizons
in Feb 2009 – 4 years ago!
2

3. Mars – The Red Planet
Brief Facts and Figures

4. A Bit About Mars
Ratio
Mars Earth
(Mars/Earth)
Mass (1024 kg) 0.6419 5.9736 0.107
Volume (1010 km3) 16.318 108.32 0.151
Equatorial radius (km) 3397 6378 0.533
Polar radius (km) 3375 6356 0.531
Mean density (kg/m3) 3933 5520 0.713
Surface gravity (m/s2) 3.69 9.78 0.377
4

5. A Flotilla of Space
Probes…
A Flotilla of Space Probes…
Over 50 to date!

6. A Brief History of Mars Exploration
The first attempt was made in the Russian
Marsnik Programme, with Marsnik 1 in
1960.
Early attempts failed.
Mariner 4 was the 1st successful probe - flyby
took place in July 1965 (covered on Radio by
Richard Hoagland).
There have been over 50 mission attempts,
with a number of failed and aborted
missions – both from the USA and Russia
The most sophisticated to date is probably
the current “Curiosity” Rover.
6

7. Viking
Our journey of discovery starts here.
Viking 1 and Viking 2, each consisting
of an orbiter and a lander. The
primary mission objectives were to
obtain high resolution images of the
Martian surface, characterize the
structure and composition of the
atmosphere and surface, and search
for evidence of life.
Viking 1 was launched on August 20,
1975 and arrived at Mars on June 19,
1976
Viking 2 was launched on Sep 9, 1975
and arrived at Mars on 08 July 1976
The total cost of the Viking project
was roughly one billion dollars.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraftDisplay.do?id=1975-075A
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/viking.html
http://space.about.com/od/vikingmissions/p/vikinginfo.htm
7

8. Viking – Did it Indeed Discover David Darling-
Mars LR Exp.-
Microbial Life? Coast To Coast
22/3/10
The Viking Landers carried a Life Detection experiment
called “Labelled Release”.
The results seen by the Life Detection experiment were
said an initial positive result, for many years, to be
erroneous and due to the action of oxidants in the Martian
soil.
Space.com, 28 July 2001: Several scientists have found
compelling evidence that Viking Mars landers did indeed
discover life on the red planet in 1976. A re-examination of Gilbert Levin
findings relayed to Earth by the probes some 25 years ago,
claim the experts, show the tell-tale signs of microbes
lurking within the Martian soil… The inventor of the
Labelled Release experiment, Gilbert Levin said "The Viking
LR experiment detected living microorganisms in the soil of
Mars," He added that after years of tests, and over two
dozen non-biological explanations later, "none of the many
attempts to establish the oxidant's mimicry of the LR data
did so."
http://www.space.com/news/spacehistory/viking_life_010728-1.html 8

9. Viking Surface Pictures - 1
Hoagland claims that when Viking Landed on Mars, the initial
pictures showing a Grey/Bluish sky (left) were deliberately changed,
in the 1st 2 hours, to show the reddish colour (right).
Barry E. DiGregorio and Dr Gilbert V. Levin corroborate this story in
a book called Mars: The Living Planet (ISBN: 1883319587)
http://web.archive.org/web/20120229203013/http://mars.spherix.com/spie2003/SPIE_2003_Color_Paper.htm
9

10. Viking Surface Pictures - 2
Holger Isenberg has taken
original Viking Lander image
data and re-processed and
enhanced it to produce the
image on the right.
After 30 years of
development in Personal
Computing, we can take what
seems to be the image as we
would see it and “correct it”
in Paint Shop Pro to give
something which looks similar
to NASA images.
http://mars-news.de/color/blue.html
Comment: 10

11. BBC – 2009 Documentary Repeats False
Statements…
Hmmm – Something’s not right…
Colour Calibration Charts!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00p1crx
11

12. Mars Express Photographs
“Blue” Ice??
Hmmm –
could this
be
reflecting
the colour
of the sky??
28 July 2005 - Perspective view of crater with water ice - looking east
http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Mars_Express/SEMGKA808BE_0.html
12

13. Gusev Crater
A comparison between the publicly accessible Mars Express Images and those from
MGS.
This is where the Spirit Rover has landed.
These images seem to support Hoagland’s claim that either NASA images have been
filtered and/or camera equipment designed deliberately to be insensitive to the
detection of Chlorophyll (the compound responsible for photosynthesis in plants).
http://xfacts.com/gusev2004/gusev.html
Mars Express Image 13
Mars Global Surveyor Image

14. Life on Mars Discovered – Again!
In July 2004, it was stated by Professor Vittorio
Formisano that Mars Express instrumentation had
detected Ammonia Methane and even
Formaldehyde in the Martian Atmosphere – these
are “biomarker” gases, indicating ongoing life-
processes.
In Feb 2005, Formisano said:
"[My observations] should not be taken as a
statement that there is life on Mars today,
because we need to go there, to drill the soil, take
samples, and analyse them before possibly
concluding that life is there,“ Dr. Vittorio Formisano
ESA photo
Had Formisano forgotten about Viking and Dr
Levin’s labelled release experiment, 29 years
earlier…?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3896335.stm 14

15. Methane On Mars AGAIN
“NASA: Methane clouds could be
evidence of life on Mars” – Belfast
Telegraph, Jan 15th 2009
This is a repeat of the Formisano story
from over 4 years earlier! This image shows concentrations of
Methane discovered on
Mars. Credit:NASA
Levin’s experiment in 1976 also
discovered Methane…
They keep discovering water – it was first
pointed out on a 1979 Viking photo, but
then they keep talking about it was if it’s
a new discovery… Scientists don't yet know enough to
say with certainty what the source
On the same date, NASA Posted “Martian
of the Martian methane is, but this
artist's concept depicts a
possibility. In this illustration,
Methane Reveals the Red Planet is not a subsurface water, carbon dioxide
and the planet's internal heat
Dead Planet” combine to release methane.
Although we don’t have evidence
on Mars of active volcanoes today,
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/breakingnews/breakingnews_world/breakingnews_world_northamerica/nasa-methane-clouds-could-be-evidence-of-life-on-mars-28462352.html
ancient methane trapped in ice
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mars/news/marsmethane.html
15 "cages" might now be released.
Credit: NASA/Susan Twardy

16. Methane On Mars AGAIN, AGAIN!
We’ve had similar reports AGAIN on 04 Dec 2012
– Wired Magazine reports (with a caveat)
“Curiosity Rover detects water and organic
compounds on Mars”
“The rover also detected its first organic
compounds in the form of chlorinated methane
created during the analysis process within the
Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) tool. However,
while the chlorine is definitely from Mars, the
carbon might be of more Earthly origin, carried to
the planet by the rover.”
If you ask me, it’s a bit like saying “Yes, we have
discovered rocks and sand on Mars…”
But then, they “debunk” it days later on 13 Dec
2012, as Discovery News reports “Where's Mars'
Methane? Curiosity Draws a Blank”
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-12/04/mars-curiosity-soil-sample-results
http://news.discovery.com/space/alien-life-exoplanets/mars-methane-mystery-curiosity-results-121102.htm 16

17. Moving Martian Microbes?
A Video made by Ron Bennet -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhfSjJeQf58 based on images he
collected from:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/images/raw/OM/om_topgaller
Some might say dust was being moved by the wind – Ron Points out:
A dust devil would have that energy but these images are shot
minutes apart, so if a dust devil moved over the rover it would be
gone in a flash and wouldn't hang around for several minutes to
several hours during the time the first image was shot and the last
image was shot.
Formula for a wind generated movement is P = 1/2 Cd pAV³
P = power, Cd = Coefficient of drag, p = density of the air, A = surface
area, and V = velocity. For the load on different particles we can use
F = P/V
“Images from Phoenix's Optical Microscope show nearly 1,000
separate soil particles, down to sizes smaller than one-tenth the
diameter of a human hair. At least four distinct minerals are seen.”
17

18. Another Oddity Just Lying Around..
Hmmmm, I wonder
why this “random
rock formation” lies
like this….
http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/513/2P171912249EFFAAL4P2425R1M1.JPG 18

19. There Never Was ANY Life on
Mars – Um Was There?
Further photo anomalies
have been identified by Sir
Charles Shults III, a US
Scientist and researcher. (e.g.
http://www.shultslaboratories
Martian Fossilised Sea and
Urchin?
http://www.shultslaboratories
) He seems to have found
what look like small,
fossilised sea creatures.
Martian Fossilised Sea
Shell?
19

20. Why isn’t NASA talking about the
Fossils on Mars?
http://xenotechresearch.com/spicrin1.htm
http://www.xenotechresearch.com/mk443a.htm
20
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/443/1M167510798EFF55B0P2956M2M1.JPG

21. Mars Fossils on the (Local) News with
Charles Schults III
Sir Charles W. Shults III, in his A Fossil Hunter's Guide to Mars,
has unearthed (unmarsed?) several photos taken by the Spirit
rover of objects on the surface of Mars that look very much
like terrestrial seashells. One of them is shown here
compared to an Earth seashell (inset). It appears to have a
thin structure and a spiraling shape. If they are rocks, they are
mighty peculiar rocks.
http://www.wltx.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=134502
http://paranormal.about.com/od/marsanomalies/ig/Mysterious-Anomalies-of-Mars/Mars-Seashell.htm
21

22. “NASA Curiosity Photographed Gigantic
Creature Fossilized Spine On Mars”
Has a fossilized, reptilian spine
been spotted on Mars by the
Curiosity rover?
According to plenty of NASA
watchers on the web, it's possible.
In the latest round of photos
published by the space agency to
the Internet, one picture caught
the attention of the eagle-eyed
public dedicated to poring over
every pixel downloaded from the
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00109/mcam/0109MR0684021000E1_DXXX.jpg
http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2013/02/mars-fossilized-spine-nasa-curiosity.html
22
rover carefully making its way

23. “NASA Curiosity Photographed Gigantic
Creature Fossilized Spine On Mars”
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00109/mcam/0109MR0684021000E1_DXXX.jpg
http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2013/02/mars-fossilized-spine-nasa-curiosity.html
23

24. The Most Interesting
Large-Scale Anomalies
Let’s have a look…

25. More Anomalies
Much attention has been focused on Cydonia.
There are a number of other anomalies on Mars,
though.
Arthur C. Clarke (acclaimed Author) has stated his
beliefs about the discoveries on Mars. On 06 June
2001, he said:
"I'm quite serious when I say have a really good
look at these new Mars images,“ Clarke said.
"Something is actually moving and changing with
the seasons that suggests, at least, vegetation,"
he said.
Clarke repeated several times that he was serious
about his observations, pointing out that he sees
something akin to Banyan trees in some MGS
photos.
http://www.arthurcclarke.net/?interview=7
25

26. Trees?
Found near the Polar Region MGS
image m0804688a.
“…look like Banyan trees” explains
noted writer, Arthur Clarke.
Conversely, James Rice, a planetary
geologist at Arizona State University
said: "Most of the images in question
that I looked over are of dunes in the
polar regions. They are beginning to
defrost as winter draws to a close. The
sand composing the dunes is dark and
frost is bright, thereby causing the 1.4 km or
spotted pattern as the dune defrosts. 0.9 miles
This is not vegetation but rather the
natural defrosting of dunes and sand
sheets."
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m08046/m0804688.html
26

27. Rings on Mars – Alan Moen
The discovery that the gray spots around polar dunes on Mars
are shadows cast by surface features measuring upwards of 25
meters high and numbering over 11,000 in the 14 images
analyzed leads one to question the nature of these “mounds”.
How did they form? What are they composed of? Are they a
mineral deposit or life form? This study proposes possible
answers to those questions through the analysis of additional
image details. One of the best clues providing insight into the
nature of the “mounds” are the ring shadows in observed in
five MGS MOC images.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=8AtC4Woxi7M
http://homepage.mac.com/alandmoen/moundsonmars/index%20copy.html
27

28. A Contoured Landscape…
Hmm – more sand dunes,
ay?
Kalgoorlie Gold Mine (Australia)
http://spaceinimages.esa.int/Images/2006/01/Close-up_perspective_view_of_the_sulphate_mountain_-_looking_east
http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/marsexpress/0563D101JuventaeChasma_H.jpg
28

29. “T” Structure / Channel
MGS Image SP243004
(South east of
Olympus Mons)
Natural channels
rarely end in a
perpendicular 'T'-
shape for obvious
reasons.
I could find no other
references to this
image which
attempted to explain
its origin.
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/sp2430/sp243004.html
29

30. “Golf Ball” Dome?
This is from MGS Image m1501228.
This looks to me like some half-buried
domed structure, with ribbing
showing through.
I could find no NASA (or other
“qualified” explanation for this
structure) – only questions.
Perhaps it is even a Geodesic Dome:
30
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m15012/m1501228.html

31. Dome Comparison
http://eclipseedge.org/msgboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1025
31

32. “Caterpillar”
3.3 km (2 miles) below the “Golf
Ball” is this structure.
I couldn’t find any explanation
from NASA about this image.
This page:
http://palermoproject.com/lowell2004/grandcentral.htm
has an analysis of this image, and
states that the MOLA data for this
image is under “Peer Review” and
therefore not accessible.
If the “Golf Ball” didn’t clinch it
for you, then perhaps this will… it
did for me! 2.1 km or
1.3 miles
Go and look at the USGS Web Site
if you want to check it yourself!
This is the complete view:
Golf Ball and Tunnels
32

33. So now, let’s…
…have a “fly over” of
image strip
M1501228
(google it!)
33

34. New 2008 Images of Dome -
(PSP_007230_2170) – Original Posting
Mars Reconnaissance
Orbiter took a new
Image of the dome
on 10 Feb 2008.
It was posted on a
page hosted by the
University of Arizona.
Notice the
description
“Crater with
Textured Mound”
http://web.archive.org/web/20090511150126/http:/hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007230_2170
34

35. New 2008 Images of Dome -
(PSP_007230_2170) - 2
By about May 2011 –
the same page had
changed to show
this, though the title
was the same:
Where did our
“Mound” go?
Well… the image is
still there, if you click
the links…
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007230_2170
35

36. New 2008 Images of Dome -
(PSP_007230_2170) - 1
10 Feb 2008 -http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007230_2170
36

37. New 2008 Images of Dome -
(PSP_007230_2170) - 2
10 Feb 2008 -http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007230_2170
37

38. New 2008 Images of Dome and
“Caterpillar” - (PSP_007230_2170) - 3
10 Feb 2008 -http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007230_2170
38

39. New 2008 Images of Dome and
“Caterpillar” - (PSP_007230_2170) - 4
10 Feb 2008 -http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007230_2170
39

40. So, What do the
Scientists Say About
Some of This…?
“It’s just conspiracy nonsense!!”

41. A Response from The Beagle2 Team!
I sent an e-mail to the Beagle2 team saying I was making this presentation. I included
links to the “Golf Ball” structure and an analysis.
I asked could they explain these features or even provide a model (briefly) for how they
had formed.
I got 2 responses:
“They look like longitudinal dunes to me. It would be nice to get the topography, but Mars
Express will only have about one third of the resolution at this latitude.”
And:
“…these are natural features, as with 'the face', which was subsequently shown to be a
collection of hills. The human mind is of course pre-programmed by evolution to identify
patterns and assimulate them in to 'pictures' we recognise.More data is required of such
features to fully identify.”
I responded telling them that the word they were after was “pareidolia” and that I had
written to ask them if more data could be acquired anyway.
One of my friend’s suggestions was infinitely better – Lava tubes for the “tunnels” –
maybe he’s right! A much better suggestion than "teddies in the clouds".... esp. as there
is some much different vulcanism on Mars than Earth (no plate-tectonics on Mars -
hence the Highest volcano in the Solar System - Olympus Mons at approx 27km high!)
41

42. A 42nd Opinion
To try and get a qualified opinion about how some of these features may have formed,
on 18.11.04, I sent these pictures
to 42 geologists picked at random from University departments in the USA and the UK .
3 of them actually were kind enough to respond.
Hello, I am sorry to intrude with "unsolicited mail" but, in doing some private research,
for personal interest, I have been trying to get an opinion about the 2 images that I
have been looking at. These images are attached. I have only had limited feedback so
far, hence my reason for e-mailing you - I just did a search for "Geology Department"
and "Staff" and that is how I got your e-mail address. I would be very grateful, if you
have the time in your busy schedule, if you could offer me your opinion about these
images, so that I can better understand them. I realise that to give a detailed answer
could take a considerable amount of time, so any thoughts at all, however brief, would
be welcomed. 42

43. Some Responses…(1)
First response from an Assistant Professor in an American University
Geology Department, Received 18.11.04
Hi Andrew, These images look to me as the surface of a planetary body
and not as terrestrial features. Could you please give indication of the
scale if you have it ?
My response to him: Dear ___, Many thanks for your fast & kind response.
Much appreciated. The data about Image 1 can be found here: http://
ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/m15012/m1501228.html I calculated the central
feature to be roughly 500 metres across. The data for Image 2 can be
found here: http://www.msss.com/
moc_gallery/ab1_m04/images/SP243004.html I calculated the line
running in the "1 O'clock" position to be roughly 4.8km long. I would be
most interested to hear any further thoughts you may have - especially as
to what geological processes may have caused these features to have
formed. Again, thanks very much.
43

44. Some Responses…(2)
Hi Andrew, These two images from the surface of Mars are certainly
puzzling and have been floating around UFO web pages for some time. I
am sorry but I do not believe in big conspiracy theories and that the
government is trying to hide something from us concerning Mars or any
other planet. I believe that we still have a lot to learn from Mars and that
we should keep our minds as open as possible for interpretations that do
not necessarily conform with what we are used to on Earth. In a very
modest way, I am trying to address the question of the nature of the
bedrock in some regions of Mars where olivine has been found at the
surface. I have an intuition that there might be peridotites near or at the
surface of Mars and this might prove useful because peridotite generally
alter to serpentinites and serpentinites can hold a lot of water. This might
be a could place to look for life too since the serpentinization of
peridotites generally produces hydrogen which can be used by certain
micro-organisms as a source of energy. Good luck with your
investigations !
44

45. NASA Comes to
http://www.checktheevidence.com/
Sweet!
They were
searching for
news about
Life on
Mars!!
They stayed
for 5
minutes…
Remember,
I’m just
some guy in
Derbyshire
and have no
published
scientific
articles or
books…
45

46. NASA AGAIN Comes to
www.checktheevidence.com
Sweeter!
They stayed
for 12
minutes…
Again,
remember,
I’m just
some guy in
Derbyshire
and have no
published
scientific
articles or
books…
46

47. Visitation of the Earth – NASA Films
Let’s just pick a few…
STS 48 (1998) footage of
something that looks like a
weapons discharge.
NASA Footage – Tether
incident (STS-75) 1996
STS-80 – Bright circular
objects observed and
filmed for some time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBIrANSMihg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=As-wYmFYb3I 47

48. On the Surface – Let’s
Ignore the
Anomalies…
“Go get ‘em, Rover!”

49. Ah Heck - no time to airbrush
this one..."
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/013/2P127520307EFF0309P2365L7M1.JPG
49

50. Curiosity Rover Discovers Shiny Metal?
Another Weird Shiny Thing on Mars
by NANCY ATKINSON on FEBRUARY 5, 2013
Read more:
http://www.universetoday.com/99750/another-
weird-shiny-thing-on-mars-2/#ixzz2NEuOOOFF“As
Bonora pointed out, the protuberance seems
different than the rock on which it sits – it could be
composed of material more resistant to erosion
than the rest and similar material could be within
the rock, or it could be something that is “grown”
on the rock.
However, it looks fairly smooth, and in fact it is not
covered by dust as is the case for metal surfaces
that tend to clean easily.”
http://www.universetoday.com/99890/scientist-explains-the-weird-shiny-thing-on-mars/ 50
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?rawid=0173MR0926020000E1_DXXX&s=173

51. Posted By: Dan Berger, Faculty
Chemistry/Science, Bluffton College
What Colour is the Sky
Date: Fri Apr 25 14:39:44 1997
Area of science: Earth Sciences ID:
855889355.Es
on Mars?
------------------------------------------------
A blue sky, on earth or any other planet, is
caused by refraction. Red light is bent and
scattered less than blue light, so while we
see red/yellow coming only from the sun,
we see blue coming from all directions!
For the sky to be red, blue light would have
to be either completely absorbed or
reflected, and only red light allowed
through. This can actually happen on earth;
at sunrise and sunset we have red skies
because the greater depth of air ends up
completely absorbing or scattering the
shorter wavelengths of visible light.
To see a red sky all around, one would need
either a much thicker atmosphere (in which
case it's dubious whether any light would
get through at all) or an atmosphere rich in
compounds which preferentially absorb
blue light. It is actually thought, I believe,
that Titan may have a red sky due to the
high concentration of more-or-less complex
hydrocarbons (photochemically generated)
in its atmosphere.
51
http://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/mars-hiddencolors.htm

52. NASA is not Altering Colours
“Thanks for writing. The answer is that the color chips on the sundial have different colors in
the near-infrared range of Pancam filters. For example, the blue chip is dark near 600 nm,
where humans see red light, but is especially bright at 750 nm, which is used as "red" for
many Pancam images. So it appears pink in RGB composites. We chose the pigments for the
chips on purpose this way, so they could provide different patterns of brightnesses
regardless of which filters we used. The details of the colors of the pigments are published in
a paper I wrote in the December issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), in
case you want more details...
All of us tired folks on the team are really happy that so many people around the world are
following the mission and sending their support and encouragement...
Thanks, Jim Bell Cornell U.”
QUESTION: Did they also choose a particular pigment for the connector clips? (see below)
Comment:
52

53. More Strange Objects…
BUT WAIT…
… WHAT’S THIS…?
Original Caption Released with Image:
– This cylindrical-projection view combines several
frames from the navigation camera on NASA's Mars
Exploration Rover Opportunity. The rover acquired
these frames during its 115th Martian day, or "sol," in
the Meridiani Planum region of Mars, on May 21,
2004. The rover was near the edge of "Endurance
Crater," which dominates the right half of this view.
The crater is about 130 meters (about 430 feet) in
diameter.
– http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA05984
53

54. “The Plank” – Shall we ask NASA to “Walk It”?
And… What else…?
How can these ridges form
in dry, dusty Sand?
This is MUD ON MARS, FOLKS!
I sent some of the images I have MOISTURE! who is doing a course in Radar
SURFACE shown you to someone I know And, it was
Altimetry.I also sent here this image.
even reported… briefly…
Her response was quite interesting.:
“It could have got into that section by accident or mischief”
I asked: “Would you not think it irresponsible of NASA to shove in a few ‘faked images’ in their own
data?” The response came:
“yes, but its just what I could imagine a bored tech doing for 'fun' - even if irresponsible”
I remarked “Of course, it's a possibility, but I think if news of this leaked out, it would be quite
significant - and a blow to NASA's credibility. How could we then know which images were the ‘fun’
ones and which were the "real" ones? What yardstick would we use to judge them?
I got no suggestions in response to this comment. 54

55. It Looks like Mud!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3387903.stm
Last Updated: Monday, 12 January, 2004,
17:38 GMT
Scientists are intrigued by the marks
Spirit's airbags left on the surface. The
soil shows an unusual cohesiveness,
almost as if the soil grains were stuck
together like mud.
Steve Squyres is also puzzled: "The way
in which the surface has responded is
bizarre. It looks like mud, but it can't be
mud.
55

56. Water/Ice on Mars…
It is so often heard “there might be water on
Mars”.
But NASA told us there was in 1979!
“This color image shows
a thin layer of water ice
frost on the Martian
surface at Utopia
Planitia.”
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/vl2_p21873.html 56

57. …Oops.. Let’s correct those colours…
Thanks to
Holger
Isenberg…
http://mars-news.de/color/blue.html 57

58. Liquid Water on Mars 1
The left image is the "before" and the right image is the "after".
See how the red outline shows the long, thin runoff slot in the left
image? In the right image, it is completely erased.
http://xenotechresearch.com/newflow1.htm (now dead) 58

59. Liquid Water on Mars 2
At left, we see the Mossbäuer head and the mud stuck to it.
The dark area on the Mossbäuer exactly matches the soil that was
removed from the print. We see that this soil, which is very different
from dry sand, has the ability to take a sharp print and stick to a surface
pressed against it. 59
http://xenotechresearch.com/newflow1.htm (now dead)

60. “Hmmm. Now I know
you have gone mad!!”
Perhaps the most controversial anomaly from the surface is
shown in a Pathfinder image…
 You can’t see it?  You still can’t see it?
It’s a
SPHINX!!
http://www.enterprisemission.com/Path-sphinx.html
60

61. Well known Figures
Speak out about
Mars…
It really is pretty surprising when you
hear them!

62. Rush Limbaugh
“Therepersonality/commentatoron Mars…”
Rush Limbaugh is a News
WAS Life in the USA –
perhaps equivalent to someone like Jeremy Paxman
On Mar 4th 2004 he made a broadcast where he spoke of a secret “Gore
Report” (initially he called it “The Mars Report”)
So it's clear that there was life elsewhere and now that NASA has kind of
let the cat out of the bag, if there were habitable conditions up there we
know there was life there. In fact, they found some DNA evidence up
there that compares favorably to members of the Skull and Bones
Society here on earth.
In fact, they used the internal combustion engine. They were globalists;
they got rid of all the countries on that planet and they had just one
giant society, and the powerful, rich, just absorbed everything they
needed from the best parts of the planet, used it for themselves and
everybody basically suffered until everybody died out because what
happened was there were no checks and balances.
It's clear, ladies and gentlemen. Mars was once the jewel of the solar
system, and it was raped. Mars was raped. This is what NASA knows.
This is what The Gore Report says. Mars was raped by robber barons.
Capitalism, dependence on combustible engines led to global warming;
the ecosystem that sustained everybody was destroyed.
62
http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=302&Itemid=70

63. The Australian Cardinal
George Pell and Mars
In an article in the Daily Mail entitled “The
Pope condemns the climate change prophets
of doom” (13th Dec 2007) Earlier, I mis-
attributed a statement to the Pope:
It was actually Australian Cardinal George Pell,
the Archbishop of Sydney, who caused an
outcry when he noted that the atmospheric
temperature of Mars had risen by 0.5 degrees
celsius.
I must admit to being surprised at the use of
the Industrial Military Complex as a phrase
though...
"The industrial-military complex up on Mars
can't be blamed for that," he said in a criticism
of Australian scientists who had claimed that
carbon emissions would force temperatures on
earth to rise by almost five degrees by 2070
unless drastic solutions were enforced.
63
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-501316/The-Pope-condemns-climate-change-prophets-doom.html

64. Cydonia and… Avebury (UK)
David Percy notes the significant correspondence between Spiral
Mound/Silbury Hill and the Cydonia crater/Avebury Circle – see
http://www.aulis.com/mars.htm
64

65. Summary –
Theare non-natural structures on Mars. on Mars
1) There
Evidence for Life
2) Surface water ice was photographed 26 years ago, in some detail.
3) Dr Gilbert Levin, creator of the Viking Life Detection Experiment
says his experiment worked.
4) There is evidence of bio-marker gases being present in the Martian
atmosphere.
5) There is some evidence that photos that NASA have presented to
the public have not always shown appropriate colours.
6) A number of the recent rover pictures show evidence of soil
moisture.
7) Some rover pictures appear, following some close analysis, to show
fossils.
8) Other statements – but from arguably less reliable sources speak of
civilisation on Mars and even trips there!
9) The media never really focus down on the discoveries of water and
methane – and have essentially repeated the same stories roughly
every 4 years.
65

66. Phobos
Just a Rock Orbiting Mars, Right?

67. More about Phobos
Phobos, the inner and larger of
Mars’s two moons. It was
discovered telescopically with its
companion moon, Deimos, by
the American astronomer Asaph
Hall in 1877 and named for one
of the sons of Ares, the Greek
counterpart of the Roman god
Mars. Phobos is a small, irregular
rocky object with a crater-
scarred, grooved surface.
A roughly ellipsoidal body,
Phobos measures 26.6 km (16.5
miles) across at its widest point.
It revolves once around Mars
every 7 hours 39 minutes at an
exceptionally close mean
distance—9,378 km (5,827
miles)—in a nearly circular orbit
that lies only 1° from the
planet’s equatorial plane.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/457040/Phobos
67

68. Phobos and Vesta
Hmmm – what causes these lines of craters??
Vesta, second largest—and the brightest—
Phobos - measures 26.6 km (16.5 miles) asteroid of the asteroid belt – size
across at its widest point equivalent to a sphere with a diameter of
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap100317.html
526 km 68
http://dawn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/RC3_color_05-full.jpg

69. Is Phobos Hollow?
This image was taken by Mastcam: Right
(MAST_RIGHT) onboard NASA's Mars rover
Curiosity on Sol 45 (2012-09-21 13:27:23 UTC) .
Samuilovich Shklovsky
Shklovsky calculated the orbital motion of Martian satellite Phobos and came to the jaw-
dropping conclusion that the moon is artificial, hollow, and basically a titanic spaceship. But
Shklovsky was not the first one to believe this. First to put forward his ideas that the Martian
moon Phobos, generally accepted as a celestial body, actually may be an artificial satellite
launched long ago by an advanced Martian race, was Dr. S. Fred Singer, special advisor to
President Eisenhower on space developments. No mention was made of the other Mars
moon, Deimos. http://thearrowsoftruth.com/tag/phobos-monolith/
Now Shklovsky say that for the atmosphere to be responsible, Phobos would have to be
hollow, like an Easter Egg. If the moon were solid rock, the atmosphere would have little
effect. A hollow moon would be susceptible because it contained so much less mass.
But if the moon were hollow, it could not be a natural object. It therefore it must be artificial
made! In 1963, Raymond H. Wilson Jr., Chief of Applied Mathematics at NASA, joined
Shklovsky and Dr. Singer in their Martian conclusions. He stated that “Phobos might be a
colossal base orbiting Mars.” 69
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?rawid=0045MR0209002000E1_DXXX&s=45

70. Precise mass determination and the
nature of Phobos
“Precise mass determination and the nature of
Phobos”
T. P. Andert, P. Rosenblatt, M. Pätzold, B. Häusler,1
V. Dehant, G. L. Tyler and J. C. Marty
Received 3 December 2009; revised 8 March 2010;
accepted 22 March 2010; published 7 May 2010.
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 37, L09202,
We conclude that the interior of Phobos likely
contains large voids. When applied to various
hypotheses bearing on the origin of Phobos, these
results are inconsistent with the proposition that
Phobos is a captured asteroid.
http://webservices.esa.int/blog/post/7/1085
70

71. The Demise of Phobos II
A Soviet 'Close Encounter'
by Don Ecker - UFO magazine,
Vol. 7, No. 1 1992
The above print of an infrared
photograph of the Martian
moonlet Phobos accompanied
by an alleged UFO is being
seen for the first time in a U.S.
publication.
The photo was first made
public on the Nov. 22, 1991
show "Larry King Live," when
UFO Research Director Don
Ecker appeared on the show
with author Keith Thompson.
The story of this photo began
in July of 1988, when the
Soviet Union launched two
unmanned probes to
rendezvous with the planet
Mars and one of its two
moons, Phobos. Not long after
launch, the first spacecraft
Phobos I suffered a
malfunction, which the
http://www.angelfire.com/zine/UFORCE/page72.html
71
Russians blamed on a
combination of both human

72. The Demise of Phobos II
Phobos II
The second craft, Phobos II,
reached Mars in January,
1989. Unknown to most
citizens in the United States,
NASA was a part of this
mission; Phobos II had several
American and European
science packages on board,
along with a very powerful
Soviet laser. The laser was to
be fired at the moonlet
Phobos, and the resultant
gases analyzed by onboard
equipment. All this activity
was to assist with future
missions to Mars, and the
grand finale was hoped to be a
joint U.S./U.S.S.R. mission to
Mars.
All went well until March 25,
1989. Later, in the British
publication Nature, the Soviets
discussed their Phobos
mission, but only devoted a
couple of paragraphs to why it
failed. According to the
Russians, "something" turned
the Soviet probe Phobos II into
http://www.angelfire.com/zine/UFORCE/page72.html
72
a "spinner," and the
unmanned craft then

73. The Demise of Phobos II
According to Zechariah Sitchin in
his book Genesis Revisited, the
rumor going around was that the
Soviet spacecraft had encountered
a huge "UFO" while in Mars orbit.
In his book, Sitchin included a
photo that the Russians released,
which showed a large ellipse
shadow reflected off Mars. Sitchin
claims that the few photos Phobos
sent back prior to disappearing
were never released by the
Russians, and that they treated the
entire matter as "above top
secret."
Dr. Marina Popovich, the former
Soviet test pilot who has made
several trips to the U.S. to share
her views on the UFO issue,
claimed to UFO in May of 1991 that
the incident was discussed by
Soviet Gen. Secretary Mikhail
Gorbachev and President Bush at
the Malta conference.
The photo was given to Dr.
Popovich, she says, by Soviet
Cosmonaut Leonov in June of 1989,
and was reportedly taken by the
infrared cameras on board the ill-
fated Soviet craft. According to the
Russians, the long ellipsoid-shaped
object seen just outside of Phobos
http://www.angelfire.com/zine/UFORCE/page72.html
73
was 25 kilometers (approximately
15½ miles) in length.

74. Phobos II and “The Shadow”
But, what some have suggested was a missile, or a UFO is
probably, in this case, an image artefact.
“If you had any doubt about it being a
digital artifact and not an actual perfectly
aligned and geometrical 15 mile UFO, just
watch the animated GIF below, created by
Internos2k from ATS, source of mostly all
the evidence presented in this post:”
http://forgetomori.com/2009/ufos/phobos-2-a-bloody-soviet-close-encounter/
http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/Mars_Express/Light_and_shadow_on_the_surface_of_Mars
74

75. 75

76. Phobos Monolith
“…If you choose, God put it there.”
-- Buzz Aldrin

77. Phobos Monolith
This unusual Mars Global Surveyor
Image (labelled 55103) was taken in
1998.
For some reason, it started to be talked
about 11 years later – on 6 August 2009
the UK Daily Mail Published an article
“Buzz Aldrin stokes the mystery of the
monolith on Mars”.
This article actually muddled together 2
completely different pictures of
“monolithic objects” – one from the
surface of Mars and one from Phobos.
We will look at these in a little more
detail.
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/html/orb_0551/55103.html
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/fullres/divided/orb_0551/55103h.jpg
77
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1204254/Has-mystery-Mars-Monolith-solved.html#ixzz2JseiVgZn

78. Phobos Monolith
Here is an annotated view from
http://www.enterprisemission.com/Phobos2.html 78

79. Lots of Monoliths??
I decided to look at the
original image of the MGS
Website and make a “flyover
video”.
In the process I noticed there
seemed to be lots of
“monoliths”…
See what you think!
http://ida.wr.usgs.gov/fullres/divided/sp2551/sp255103l.jpg
79

80. HiRISE – Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Images Phobos
Monolith - PIA10369 / PSP_007769_9010
Two Images taken on 23 March 2008 – not mentioned in the
Daily Mail article, even though they are higher resolution.
PSP_007769_9010 and PSP_007769_9015 – which appears to
be the same as PIA10369.
These are just 1 part of 2 stunning images of Phobos… let’s
have a little look…
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA10369
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/images/2008/details/phobos/PSP_007769_9010_IRB.jpg
80
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA10369
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/phobos.php

81. Another Monolith – Valles Marineris
HiRise – Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
Acquisition date: 24 July 2008
Alfred McEwen, professor of planetary
science at the university and HiRise's
principal investigator, said: "Layering
from rock deposition combined with
tectonic fractures creates right-angle
planes of weakness such that
rectangular blocks tend to weather out
and separate from the bedrock."
He added: "It is not that unusual. There
are lots of rectangular structures on
Mars.
"It is striking when you see one that is
isolated, but they are common."
Veteran astronaut Buzz Aldrin recently
stoked space conspiracy theory further
by announcing that a similar "monolith"
had been detected on Mars's moon
Phobos.
http://www.marspages.eu/index.php?page=512
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/5981624/Mars-monolith-fuels-theories-of-alien-life.html
81
http://hirise-pds.lpl.arizona.edu/download/PDS/EXTRAS/RDR/PSP/ORB_009300_009399/PSP_009342_1725/PSP_009342_1725_MRGB.JP2

82. Valles Marineris Monolith – Close Up
Here is a close up of the circled area on image
PSP_009342_1725
82
http://hirise-pds.lpl.arizona.edu/download/PDS/EXTRAS/RDR/PSP/ORB_009300_009399/PSP_009342_1725/PSP_009342_1725_MRGB.JP2

83. Where is this one though?
This image was also prominently featured on the
Daily Mail Web Page (and several others), however, I
could not find it on the PSP_009342_1725 image
anywhere – it is clearly a different object anyway.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1204254/Has-mystery-Mars-Monolith-solved.html#axzz2JseVdJJW
83

84. Further Out in the Solar
System

85. Saturn
Cassini Saturn
Photo (“Hexagon”)
Between 1980 and 1996, the speed of rotation for Saturn’s
clouds at the equator reduced by 58.2%, described as an
“unexpected and dramatic change in weather.” The NASA
explanation is “seasonal changes”.
In Aug. 1981, Voyager 2 reached Saturn and photographed
unexpected “spokes” in the rings, caused by “bunching” of
particles.
In Dec 2003, With higher resolution and superior imaging, it
was hoped to get a better look at these with Cassini.
The Spokes had disappeared!
Saturn has also exhibited anomalous X-ray emissions
(observed by Chandra) and Auroral activity.
Apr 2007 – The Hexagon video was captured by Cassini
http://www.planetary.org/multimedia/space-images/saturn/saturn-north-polar-hexagon-vims-animation.html
85

86. Saturn Hexagon
Higher Resolution Images taken Nov 27 2012…
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=4736
86
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/multimedia/W00077197.html

87. Massive Storm in 2010
Part of the “climate change” across the solar
system…
http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod2010/28dec10/wesley1.jpg?PHPSESSID=fsjl7fe642n28prenc5k3ga432
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/multimedia/pia12826.html
87

88. Prometheus – a “Shepherd” Moon
Here is Carl Murray of ESA with some information
about Prometheus – a strange moon of Saturn…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vhcq_P0oNj4
88
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/display.cfm?IM_ID=8524

89. Airbrush Away…?
The person responsible for the
manipulation, Emily Lakdawalla, told
a forum of excitable theorists that she
made the changes because of the way
Cassini takes photos.
"Cassini takes colour pictures by
snapping three sequential photos
through red, green, and blue filters,"
she said.
"In the time that separated the three
frames, Dione moved, so if I did a
simple color composite I would be
able to make Titan look right, but not
Dione; or Dione look right, but not
Titan.
"So I aligned Dione, cut it out, and
then aligned Titan, and then had to
account for the missing bits of
shadow where the bits of Dione had
been in two of the three channels."
89
http://www.news.com.au/technology/conspiracy-theorists-confident-photoshopped-nasa-image-is-a-cover-up/story-e6frfro0-1225936084529
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/fap/image/1004/titandione_cassini_big.png

90. Ringmakers of Saturn?
Ringmakers of Saturn was a Book
by Norman Bergrun’s
He analysed Voyager photos using
optical methods (enlargement).
Though the book has got good
reviews, the pictures in it are
somewhat difficult to get excited
about.
However, a video Inspired by the
book and using a fair number of
Cassini photos has some VERY
interesting parts in it!
YouTube User trippy123 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibT4SFNcGcY
90

91. A Moon, A Mystery
What’s going on on Iapetus?

92. Iapetus – A Moon of Saturn
In Greek mythology, Iapetus was a Titan –
a God - the son of Uranus and Gaia and
the ancestor of mankind.
Discovered in 1671 by Giovanni Domenico
Cassini.
Cassini observed Iapetus, over 740 million
miles distant, using a 17th century
refracting telescope whose main lens was Giovanni Domenico
only two inches in diameter! Cassini
When Cassini observed Iapetus over a
period of time, he was puzzled – every 40
days or so, it seemed to disappear from
view, then re-appear 40 days later.
92Early Sketch of Saturn by
An
Cassini

93. Orbit of Iapetus
Saturn
Orbits of
Saturn’s Moons
(Size of Moons
Orbits of Other
not to Scale)
Moons
Orbit of Iapetus
Iapetus orbits at an angle inclined to the ring system of about
15º. (Phoebe’s orbit is inclined at about 5º in the opposite
direction).
It is thought that the object (Iapetus in this case) did not form
out of the same cloud of material as the rest of the system.
(Similar theories are used to explain the orbit of Pluto, which
is also inclined to the plane of all the other planetary orbits).
93

94. Voyager Photographs
Iapetus in 1981
In August 1981, we got
our first close-up view of
this orbiting oddity from
the Voyager 2 probe.
As Cassini had predicted,
Iapetus’s surface was half
dark and half light
dark half was about 10
times darker than the light
half. No explanation was
found or given.
Otherwise just cratered
rocky features.
Voyager made accurate
measurements of this
unusual moon – it was less Voyager 2 Composite Image August 22, 1981
spherical than it should be.
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Iapetus
94

95. Cassini at Iapetus - 1
Cassini Image - July 2004
In 1997, an advanced new probe, Cassini was launched. By July 2004,
Cassini had reached Iapetus in the Saturnian system. The picture it sent back
showed the same elliptically-shaped dark region on the surface of Iapetus
95

96. Cassini at Iapetus - 2
December 31st 2004, Cassini
had a much closer encounter
– passing at a distance of
40,000 miles.
Discovered a topographic
ridge that coincides almost
exactly with the geographic
equator. The ridge is
conspicuous in the picture as
an approximately 20-
kilometer wide (12 miles)
1,300 kilometers (800 miles)
long!
Equatorial Ridge - Cassini Image Jan 2005
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=1270
96

97. Iapetus – The Wall!
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=1270
97

98. Check those Craters!!
24 Miles!
Unusual Crater Features on Iapetus
98
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=1270

99. The “Whole of the Moon”
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=1270
99

100. Crater Line – Parallel with Wall?
From Richard C Hoagland: http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon1.htm
100

101. More Hexagonal Craters!!
From Richard C Hoagland: http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon1.htm
101

102. A New Angle on Iapetus??
From Richard C Hoagland: http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon1.htm
102

103. New NASA Pictures – 10th Sept 2007
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=2140 103

104. “We don’t need no education…”
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=2726
104

105. A Geodesic Construction?
From Richard C Hoagland: http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon1.htm
105

106. What was Mr Lucas thinking of?
From Richard C Hoagland: http://www.enterprisemission.com/moon1.htm
106

107. Imagine Standing on the Surface of
Titan…
107

108. …and then on Iapetus…
108

109. Arthur C Clarke on Iapetus…
Video greeting to NASA JPL to mark the Iapetus flyby of Cassini spacecraft -- Sept.
10, 2007. I have interspersed it with a video about some of the Oddities
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/video/videodetails/?videoID=160
109

110. SOHO Image Anomalies
Most of these Slides were sent to me
by BG in Germany in 2004

111. Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
111

112. 112

113. SOHO Anomalies - Info and Disinfo
Featured in UFO
Magazine and
elsewhere in
2003, Mike
Murray of
Euroseti claimed
to have captured
these images.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2662059.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2662787.stm
113
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2003_01_17/NewspaperSOHOsmall.jpg

114. NASA “Explains” These Anomalies…
On a page
entitled “HOW
TO MAKE YOUR
OWN UFO”
NASA talks
about how
“data can be
interpolated
(using one of a
zillion possible
methods)”.
It basically says
“images can be
faked” – so that
means they are,
right?
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2003_01_17/
114

115. One Satellite, More than 1 Camera
What is interesting is that this “Euroseti” seemed to
spring up and talk about these images – through Mike
Murray.
There is also a short paper about them by the National
space centre, where these images were displayed. It says
on Page 2:
– In an interview with UFO Magazine, Mr Murray
claimed their images were from two different
satellites, not just SOHO. He said, “…we looked at the
LASCO satellite, which is in pretty much the same
orbit as SOHO, but transmits in black and white, but
the images were in that one as well.” Actually, LASCO
is not a separate satellite, but one of the 12
instruments onboard SOHO.
I think there is more to these images than they want to
talk about – so they had to set up a “debunk” of them
early on.
http://solar.bnsc.rl.ac.uk/press/007/euroseti.pdf
115

116. SOHO – Comets and Planets
I created another short video just to show
what comets look like from SOHO:
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/gallery/Movies/comets.html
http://cometography.com/lcomets/2004f4.html
116

117. SOHO Picture
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/javagif/gifs/20050102_1230_c2.gif
117

118. Enlarged Version
You can search for images yourself from this page:
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/archive/index_ssa.html
though the search page is somewhat complicated.
118

119. NASA: Monkey business 3
SOHO 2003 hotshots III
 (A.D. Johnson) SOHO UFOs Manipulated?
http://www.rense.com/general62/manip.htm
 this gentlemen posted an article to rense.com
discussing the NASA hotshot and the attempt
to make-up the image
 he delivered a proof further down in the same
page
but didn‘t analyze the image in detail
 object „firing“ two beams into the sun.
Sun releases G-waves
 image zoomed +300% with PSP
(JPG downloaded from rense.com). Cut-out
done with Screenshot Pilot
Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
119

120. NASA: Monkey business 2
SOHO 2003 hotshots II
 NASA‘s attempt to teach us like chimpanzee:
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2003_01_17/
(extract from SOHO hotshots)
 these pages are designed by special purpose.
They help NASA not to give correct answers to
nasty questions they receive
 “How to make your own UFO” = misinformation!
 Original: Visual inspection of the
highlighted area tells the truth already!
 Step1: why did they modify the color scaling?
 Step2: which interpolation method has been
used out of the zillion possible methods?
 Step3: how did they touch-up the color table?
 conclusion:
- this EUV image has been re-touched by intention
 filters used: softener, interpolation filters
Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
120

121. Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
SOHO Samples I
why do planets „fire“ a beam?
shield?
space ship „fires“ a beam into sun
G-waves
121

122. Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
SOHO Samples II
122

123. SOHO Samples III
EIT image merged with
LASCO C3 image!
123
Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007

124. SOHO Samples IV
Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
124

125. Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
SOHO Samples V
LASCO C3, 2007/05/15, 03:18 LASCO C3, 2007/05/16, 03:18 LASCO C2, 2007/05/16, 20:06 LASCO C3, 2007/05/18, 09:18
LASCO C2, 2007/05/13, 09:54 LASCO C3, 2007/05/14, 08:42 LASCO C2, 2007/05/14, 14:06 LASCO C2, 2007/05/15, 02:54
cut-outs taken from GIF files (1024 x 1024 / 8BPP) -> 4096 x 4096 / 150 dpi -> zoom ->
filter: metallic ice (IrfanView 4.0) 125

126. Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
SOHO Samples VI
LASCO C2, 2007/05/10, 00:06 LASCO C3, 2007/05/10, 15:42 LASCO C2, 2007/05/11, 11:06 LASCO C2, 2007/05/12, 05:54
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sombrero_Galaxy
A mid-infrared image of the Sombrero Galaxy as seen by
the Spitzer Space Telescope (SST). The white colors represent
3.6 and 5.8 micrometre emission from starlight. The red colors
represent 8.0 micrometre emission from polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) within the dust ring.
credit: http://gallery.spitzer.caltech.edu/
LASCO C3, 2007/04/30, 23:18
cut-outs taken from GIF files (1024 x 1024 / 8BPP) -> 4096 x 4096 / 150 dpi -> zoom ->
filter: metallic ice (IrfanView 4.0) 126

127. NASA: Monkey business 2
advanced docking II
LASCO C2 - Step 1:
LASCO C3, 1. open GIF with Corel PSP X2
2007/10/21, 02:42 2. apply solarization filter
? 3. resize 16.384 x 16.384
Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
127

128. NASA: Monkey business 1
advanced docking I
LASCO C3 - Step 2:
LASCO C3 - Step 1: 1. open GIF with Corel PSP X2
1. open GIF with Corel PSP X2 2. apply solarization filter
2. apply solarization filter 3. resize 16.384 x 16.384
3. resize 8.192 x 8.192
object docking
at platform / huge
spaceship?
?
Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
128

129. NASA: Monkey business 3
“LASCO C2 autumn collection”
LASCO C2 LASCO C2 LASCO C2
2007/10/02, 06:30 2007/10/15, 16:54 2007/10/02, 07:06
LASCO C2
2007/10/08, 14:54 LASCO C2
2007/10/25, 13:06
LASCO C2 LASCO C2
2007/10/21, 16:06 2007/10/02, 06:54
LASCO C2
LASCO C2 2007/10/23, 22:30
2007/10/05, 00:06
LASCO C2
LASCO C2 2007/10/05, 11:54
2007/10/16, 04:30
LASCO C2 LASCO C2
LASCO C2 2007/10/24, 13:54 2007/10/12, 07:31
2007/10/07, 16:30
LASCO C2 LASCO C2
2007/10/24, 18:54 2007/10/25, 00:06
Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
129

130. NASA: Monkey business 4
“LASCO C3 autumn collection”
LASCO C3
2007/10/25, 08:42 LASCO C3
LASCO C3
LASCO C3 2007/10/05, 19:42
2007/10/01, 07:42
2007/10/03, 20:18
LASCO C3 LASCO C3
2007/10/25, 00:42 2007/10/25, 06:18
LASCO C3 LASCO C3
2007/10/02, 00:18 2007/10/10, 02:42
LASCO C3
2007/10/14, 02:18
LASCO C3
2007/10/06, 06:42
LASCO C3
LASCO C3 LASCO C3 2007/10/16, 07:42
2007/10/23, 03:18 2007/10/09, 00:18 LASCO C3
2007/10/24, 11:18
Slide Created by BG (Germany) , 2007
130

131. SOHO Stealth Object
Here is a video by Peter Dunn that I slightly edited this video (for length and to add Music)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCrOEmHHHAA
http://postimage.org/image/ndey4jdq5/00316115/
131
http://cognizantnationhq.weebly.com/

132. Some Conclusions
Summary of
Evidence for Life on Mars

133. A View from “Above Top Secret”
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread184836/pg1 (Dr Love)
Let me give you the whole Mars conspiracy in a nutshell. I have no doubt
that there is some real mind blowing stuff going on on Mars and our
governments know it. What they have to do is take the peoples' minds off
of Mars. They send these rovers up there and they send back pictures of
basically nothing. The TV and internet are flooded with these pictures of
nothing. Soon the people get tired of looking at pictures of nothing and
don't want to be bothered with Mars anymore. They trust that the
government will make them aware of any important happenings on Mars
should they occur. Of course this will never happen.
We the taxpayers paid for those rovers. We had a right to know when they
were launched and how they landed. We have a right to see the pictures,
so they give us a million pictures of nothing. Now we're so bored with the
pictures that we really don't care anymore. They know we won't ask
questions anymore for fear of being bored out of our minds.
133

134. A Disclosure…?
Movie - “Mission to Mars” (2000)
This was a Disney film in which
Was this (edited) clip a kind of
disclosure?
It was directed by Brian De Palma
– brother of Bruce De Palma…
http://www.enterprisemission.com/MTM.htm
134

135. Thank you for listening!
Websites to look at…
www.enterprisemission.com mars-news.de
www.shultslaboratories.com www.nasa.gov
hirise.lpl.arizona.edu sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov
ida.wr.usgs.gov www.aulis.com
www.msss.com marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov
web.archive.org/web/200504112257 www.goroadachi.cometemenanki
09/homepage.mac.com/alandmoen/ palermoproject.com
moundsonmars/index%20copy.html
135