100 Marketing Agencies and Their Own Social Media Use, 2010

804 views

Published on

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
804
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

100 Marketing Agencies and Their Own Social Media Use, 2010

  1. 1. Social Media Review<br />From An Agency Perspective<br />
  2. 2. Cutting through clutter<br />Source: Brian Solis – 2010<br />Let’s simplify:<br />Technographics<br />Categorize Behaviour<br />Identify Media<br />Determine SM Brands<br />
  3. 3. Not a fad, continued growth<br />New adoption and increased usage continues to prove this medium is not going away. <br /><ul><li> Canadians spend 18.1 hours online versus 16.9 hours watching TV. Malesspend 20 hours versus females at 16 hours (over age 35).
  4. 4. Users spent 82% more time on </li></ul>social network sites (SNS) up from <br />the same time last year in addition <br />to a 46% increase in unique audience.<br /><ul><li> Mintel reports a 20% increase of </li></ul>internet users adding a social network profile, now up to 61% from 12 months ago.<br />Source: Ipsos Reid, Nielsen, Mintel -2010<br />
  5. 5. App, fever is on the rise<br />Although Apps are not social media, a number of them contribute to the “connect to anyone, anywhere, anytime principle”. <br /><ul><li> Touch owners spend 100 </li></ul>minutes each month, WebOS at <br />minutes, Android – 80 minutes, <br />and iPhone at 79 minutes.<br /><ul><li> 150,000+ Apps at iPhone store </li></ul>with 3 billion downloads. Google’s <br />Android Apps are at 35,000 Appswhich grew 100% since January 2010.<br /><ul><li> Mobile is further stimulating SNS activity. Over 30% of smartphone</li></ul>users access sites, up 22% from 2008. Facebook saw a 112% increase and <br />Twitter increased by 347% from smartphone users.<br />Source: TechCrunch, Admob, Comscore - 2010<br />
  6. 6. Key social networks are holding strong<br />Leaders that are relevant to businesses are not going backwards. <br />These brands are positioned for entrenchment in business lexicons and culture.<br />
  7. 7. Big business is getting into the swing<br />Global 100 businesses are past putting their toe in the water. <br /><ul><li> For agencies this will mean a receptive audience to selling these services and building relationships with prospects through SM.</li></ul>Source: Burson Marstellar- 2010<br />
  8. 8. What do executives want from social media?<br /><ul><li> The good news is their needs reflect what agencies are well positioned to offer.</li></li></ul><li>What content businesses want<br />62% of followers want news/value most from a business. However building loyalty requires more.<br /><ul><li> Businesses need to show their human side by talking about more than just their view.</li></li></ul><li>U.S. and Canadian audiences are similar<br />As a Canadian agency the good news is U.S. participants in SM are nearly the same as ours.<br />Leading Network: Facebook<br />SN profiles: Access = 46.2% | Users = 10.2m<br />Photos: Access = 40.9% | Users = 9m<br />Videos: Access = 14.9% | Users = 3.3m<br />Blogging: Access = 10.6% | Users = 2.3m<br />Micro Blogging Access = 5.1% | Users = 1.1m<br />Leading Network: Facebook<br />SN profiles: Access = 44.2% | Users = 92.1m<br />Photos: Access = 42.6% | Users = 79.2m<br />Videos: Access = 15.3% | Users = 23.3m<br />Blogging: Access = 12.8% | Users = 17.6m<br />Micro Blogging Access = 7% | Users = 10.7m<br />Source: Engae- Brian Solis - 2010<br />
  9. 9. Group B Findings<br />48% offered social media links<br />Group A had less than 10% of sites integrated with SM<br />Qualitatively speaking:<br /><ul><li> this group’s SM site integration was more creative
  10. 10. higher adoption rates of SM site links attributed to:</li></ul>- smaller size<br /><ul><li> the desire to offer content and leadership
  11. 11. the U.S and U.K. being more progressive</li></li></ul><li>5 Pitfalls<br />Lacking monetization/success metrics<br />Expecting SM to do the work<br />No distribution strategy and process<br />No engagement<br />No conversion strategy<br />
  12. 12. Pitfall: lacking monetization/success metrics<br />Most common complaint is “why do SMwhen it’s not directly monetizable?”<br />This perspective is wrong.<br />Success can be measured through:<br />URL Clicks Increased Traffic Customer Retention<br />Incremental Sales Search Engine Returns Publicity ReachNew Sales Leads Nurture Marketing Database Build<br />“Circulation” Brand Recognition Share of Voice<br />And Much More…<br />
  13. 13. Pitfall: expecting SM to do the work<br />SM has been sold by Gurus as:<br />Where your customers are talking about you<br />Where everyone wants to hear your opinion<br />“build it and they will come”<br />This isn’t true. Businesses have fewer followers than their own staff.<br />Source LinkedIn<br />
  14. 14. Pitfall: no distribution strategy or process<br />You need to bring people to your SM<br />Low quantity is good, if you’re highly targeted<br />High quantity is good, if want mass reach<br />Failing at both is apathetic<br />Source LinkedIn<br />
  15. 15. Pitfall: no engagement<br />It’s highly common to not have dialog in SM.<br />5 reasons why:<br />1. Not original thinking, regurgitating other perspectives<br />2. Too polished, no personality<br />3 . Can’t easily find the comment section <br />4. No dialog from the author<br />5. Author didn’t ask you to comment<br />Dangers – your information is a commodity, dialog does not translate into offline conversation, you haven’t demonstrated value.<br />Source: crowdsourced research on LinkedIn. 300 people responded with over 1,000 points of data (advice/answers) October 2009.<br />
  16. 16. Pitfall: no conversion strategy<br />Just because it’s social media doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be a sales funnel.<br />
  17. 17. Frameworks For Success<br /><ul><li> The planning and implementation cycle
  18. 18. Defining monetization
  19. 19. Matching technographics to SM brands
  20. 20. Defining your ecosystems</li></li></ul><li>Planning<br />And Implementation<br />Relationships And <br />Conversion<br />Content and Distribution<br />Planning and implementation cycle<br />Missing any steps leads to a weakness in the following cycle components.<br />
  21. 21. Planning and implementation cycle<br />Blog – nil comments<br />Twitter – 1,117 followers<br />Facebook – 117 fans<br />LinkedIn – 756 employees<br />“We are Mindshare. The global media network. We are nearly 6,000 people in 67 countries with one aim: to make our clients’ brands more famous and more profitable.” - LinkedIn<br />
  22. 22. Defining monetization<br />Everything has a monetizable value in social media: it just needs to be defined with a realistic parallel activity.<br />Definitions:<br />Direct monetization – value that can be measured in new leads, sales, retention, incremental sales and cross sales.<br />Indirect monetization – the value that would be attributed to getting the same result if you spent money on the same activity. Examples includes; traffic, URL click throughs, search engine ranking, share of voice, advertising, new emails, and much more.<br />Indirect monetization work through:<br />If you were to drive 10,000 clicks through to your blog or video how much would it cost you to get that traffic via PPC, broadsheet ads, direct mail, etc?<br />
  23. 23. Matching technographics to SM brands<br />The conversation has been backward in business social media discussions for the past 3 years.<br />It’s not about Facebook<br />It’s not about Twitter<br />It’s not about YouTube, etc<br />It’s about what we know already, it’s about what the target audience’s psychographic and technographic profile is.<br />The foundation for engagement comes from giving people what they want creatively and pragmatically.<br />
  24. 24. Matching technographics to SM brands<br />Technographic Profile<br />Research<br />Customer service<br />Advice, News<br />Socialization<br />Avoids social sites<br />Prefers business sites<br />Checks once a week<br />Prefers Email or Twitter<br />Frequency of needs<br />Categorizing Behaviour<br />Livecasting Video and Audio<br />Events<br />Documents/Content<br />Customer Service<br />Crowdsourcing<br />Collaboration<br />Video<br />Location<br />Reviews and rating<br />What Digital Brands<br />LinkedIn<br />Twitter<br />Facebook<br />YouTube<br />Plaxo<br />Blogger<br />Wordpress<br />What Media<br />Phone Apps<br />Blogs<br />Bookmarking<br />Micromedia<br />Forums<br />Social Networks<br />Wiki’s<br />iPhone<br />Flickr<br />Vimeo<br />Digg<br />Slideshare<br />DocstockSocial Text<br />
  25. 25. Defining Your Ecosystem<br />Ecosystems in social media play a crucial role in assisting success or being an unseen force that makes it elusive.<br />Definition of Ecosystem<br />The relationship of one or multiple social networks with each other and online and offline factors contributing to people interacting those social networks. <br />Ecosystems Variables – Brief Overview<br />Time – the more social networks a business has the more nurture time required<br />Costs – these can remain low due to simplicity or become high due to complexity<br />Continuity – maintaining the same messages, frequency of communication, image, etc<br />Measurements – as complexity increases so does the difficulty for understanding ROI.<br />Relationships – these happen at 3 levels. The first level is with the host of the community. The second is with members between each other in the community. The third is relationships with members and the host in multiple communities.<br />
  26. 26. Social Media Ecosystem<br />Cozy Community<br />A community that revolves around a customized blog, Wiki, or forum. 80% of effortgoes into developing thiscommunity.Benefits<br />- Simplicity<br /><ul><li>Ease of measurement- More intimate relationships- Least resources required- Search engine optimization</li></ul>Downside<br />- Your audience may not like blogs<br />Internal Company Blog<br />Offline URL Referrals <br />Collateral, Advertising<br />
  27. 27. Social Media Ecosystem<br />Cozy Community<br />Secondary social centre<br />Primary social centre<br />Secondary social centre<br />
  28. 28. More Ecosystems<br />Busy Metropolis<br />This is a social network within a network with many other communities. Facebook and LinkedIn fit this description. You can customize your own community, create new communities, and participate with other members and their communities.<br />Multiple Municipality Management<br />This is an ecosystem where the host agency builds profiles on multiple social networks like YouTube, LinkedIn, a blog, Technoratti, etc. The goal is to build a number of fully active communities that are all fully maintained. <br />
  29. 29. Commitment For Success<br />Understanding the medium’s effort required<br />Technographics should lead to the SM selection.<br />Any form* of SM can be effective if the planning and implementation cycle is followed.<br />*pending technographics<br />
  30. 30. Commitment For Success<br />10 Steps<br />1. Integrate with marketing plans – branding, messages, resource<br />2. Interactive media plan – technographics, communication plan, resources, metrics, <br /> ecosystem<br />3. Social media platforms(s) – either in it or not, flirting doesn’t count<br />4. Unique content – you’re in the news business now<br />5. Distribution – integrate into all your channels, reach out to new and existing contacts<br />6. Audience Interaction – find reasons to motivate people to talk to you<br />7. Online dialogue – interact with the comments and people… this can be tough<br />8. Offline dialogue – transition comments to emails, phone calls and meetings<br />9. Relationship conversion – prospects move into a managed sales process to monetize<br />10. Program analysis – measuring, refining, managing the process, revamping<br />
  31. 31. Costs – rough estimates<br />Type of SM and weekly frequency low – 1 hr/wk ($25/hr *52) = $1,300med – 3 to 5 hrs/wk = $3,900 to $6,500<br /> high – 6 to 10 hrs/wk = $7,800 to $13,000<br />Scenario AScenario BScenario C <br />Existing SNS Bespoke SNS Bespoke SNS<br />Soft launch Soft launch Hard launch<br /> Integrated CRM PPC / SEO management<br />Potential Direct Costs<br />+ Labour + Labour + Labour <br />+ No cost + No cost + TBD… ?<br />+ % of overheads + % of overheads + % of overheads<br /> + $1,000 - $15,000 + $1,000 - $15,000<br /> + $5,000 - $15,000<br />+ labour and/or ads<br />
  32. 32. Matching technographics to SM brands<br />The conversation has been backward in social media conventions and articles since it hit the spotlight for the past 3 years.<br />It’s not about Facebook<br />It’s not about Twitter<br />It’s not about YouTube, etc<br />It’s about what we know already, it’s about what the target audience’s psychographic and technographic profile is.<br />The foundation comes from giving people what the want creatively and pragmatically.<br />
  33. 33. What effort is required to be in SM?<br /><ul><li> The source Marketing Sherpa 2010</li></li></ul><li>Decision Points<br /><ul><li> 1st draft vision and broad goals
  34. 34. Monetization/ROI goals
  35. 35. Technographics
  36. 36. Distribution model
  37. 37. Ecosystem architecture & bespoke IT spec
  38. 38. 1st draft ROI model</li></ul> - Communication plan<br /> - 1st draft project plan<br /><ul><li> Resource commitment & ROI evaluation</li></ul><br /><br /><br />

×