Intelligence Led Policing for Police Decision Makers

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Intelligence Led Policing for Police Decision Makers - Presentation Transcript

    1. Intelligence-Led Policingfor Police Decision-Makers
      by Deborah Osborne © 2009
      Audio is at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Deborah-Osborne/2009/09/23/Intelligence-Led-Policing-for-Decision-Makers-Webinar
    2. Why ILP?
      “So if 9/11 happened in a Web 1.0 world, terrorists are certainly in a Web 2.0 world now.  And many of the technological tools that expedite communication today were in their infancy or didn't even exist in 2001. ”  
      Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, from her July 29, 2009 speech at the Council on Foreign Relations
    3. What is Intelligence?
      The Intelligence Elephant
    4. A Fable
      Six blind men encounter an elephant. The first blind man touches the elephant's leg, and he says an elephant is like a pillar. The second blind man touches the elephant's tail, and he says, no, an elephant is like a rope. The third blind man touches the elephant's trunk, and he says you're both crazy; an elephant is just like a tree branch. The fourth blind man touches the elephant's ear, and says he is certain that an elephant is like a hand held fan. The fifth man touches the elephant's belly, and he insists that an elephant is like a wall. The sixth man touches the elephant's tusk, and he says, you are all wrong—an elephant is like a solid pipe!
    5. The Fable Continued…
      The men were arguing about the elephant when a sighted man came along and asked them what was wrong. After they each told him what the elephant was like, he said, "You're all correct! An elephant has all the features you describe."
    6. Intelligence
      HUMINT, OSINT, COMINT, SIGINT etc
      Top Secret, LE sensitive, Open Source
      Surveillance, wiretaps, informants
      Files on criminals & organized crime activities
      Field intelligence
      Arrest records, parole, probation
      Crime incidents, calls for service, tip lines
      Maps, statistics, geography/frequency pattern analysis
      Analysis of patterns of weapons, targets, stolen goods, victims
      Modus Operandi analysis
      Activity flow analysis
    7. Elephant Problems
      Lack of total situational awareness
      Lack of mobility and functionality
      Lack of language to communicate
      Lack of ability to perceive reality
      Fear of the elephant by larger society
      Fear of change
      Territorialism
      Solving only parts of problems rather than whole problems
    8. Intelligence Cycle
      Planning
      Planning
      Re-evaluation
      Collection
      Collection
      Evaluation
      Evaluation
      Dissemination
      Collation
      Analysis
    9. Consider the Cycle
      Planning
      Collection
      Planning and direction involves decision-makers setting tactical and strategic goals
      Asking the right REALISTIC questions matters
      Planning and direction are not mentioned in the traditional crime analysis cycle
      Some of the best analysis involves unplanned analysis
      Quality and relevancy of information/data collection matters – we can’t analyze what has not been collected
      Gaps in collection will be uncovered and should be addressed
      Much of the data needed is already collected – but is untapped by analysts due to lack of knowledge, tools, imagination, training, and adequate staffing
    10. Consider Cycle
      evaluation
      collation
      Evaluating the information/data collected for reliability, accuracy and relevance is crucial
      Identification of collection gaps occurs here
      Good communication with collectors is needed
      Sorting the information/data to answer the right intelligence questions can be time-consuming
      Sometimes we overlook problems that involve multiple crime types or groups
      Technology helps immensely here – but data accuracy is needed to enhance effectiveness
    11. Consider the Cycle
      analysis
      dissemination
      Analysis means breaking apart into pieces to study the parts
      Synthesis occurs here as the analyst puts the parts into a new “whole” so that something new and useful is created – relevant analytical product
      Beware of the “if I have a hammer everything is a nail” syndrome
      Intelligence that does not get to the right people in a timely manner is useless
      Dissemination requires clear policies regarding who gets what
      Dissemination to other agencies can be very effective in creating goodwill as well as combating crime
    12. Consider the Cycle
      Re-evaluation
      Return to cycle
      Did the analytical product pass the “so-what” test? How can it be improved?
      Did the tactics and strategies to address the problem, employed by the decision-maker as a result of the analysis, work?
      Do we need to modify our actions?
      What else do we need to know?
      Did we find a new problem?
      The cycle usually involves going backwards and forward over and over again
      Analytical products should be updated and tracked
      Tactics and strategies put into place as a result of the analysis should be tracked
      New problems will arise and should be addressed
    13. ILP for Local LE
      “The second layer is local law enforcement.  And if you go out one ring from individuals and the private sector, you have 780,000 law enforcement officials across 18,000 state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies.  Let me just say those numbers again:  780,000 across 18,000 departments.  These men and women play an absolutely critical role, because they are the ones that can act on information they receive from individuals in the community, from their own observations, or from the intelligence community itself.  But the ability of state and local officials, as well as the private sector, to prepare for threats and to respond to a disaster is only as good as their ability to receive useful information, understand what it means and act upon it effectively. “Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
    14. Intelligence-led Policing
      Intelligence-led policing is a business model and managerial philosophy where data analysis and crime intelligence are pivotal to an objective, decision-making framework that facilitates crime and problem reduction, disruption and prevention through both strategic management and effective enforcement strategies that target prolific and serious offenders.
      • Source: Ratcliffe, JH (2008) 'Intelligence-Led Policing' (Willan Publishing: Cullompton, Devon).
    15. The 3 i’s Cycle
    16. Two Main Strategies
      Targeting the 6%
      Problem Analysis
      How do we identify the 6% of criminals who commit 60% of crime ?
      How do we target the 6% of criminals who commit 60% of crime ?
      Example: Why are some drug “markets” in the same place for decades in your town?
      What works and doesn’t work in addressing chronic crime problems?
    17. Laws of Intelligence
      #1 “The most reliable indicator of future criminal activity is current criminal activity.”
      #2 “Intelligence that does not influence a decision-maker is not intelligence.” (Ratcliffe 2009)
    18. Tasking & Coordination
      Recognizing that different levels of policing have differing missions
      The local intelligence requirement must address crime and disorder at the local level
      The regional intelligence requirement must address criminal activity that crosses jurisdictions
      The federal intelligence requirement is dependent on the mission of the particular agency
      Tasking analysts based on appropriate intelligence requirements is mandatory for ILP
      Recognizing the needs of various levels is often absent from ILP strategies in the US because they come from top down requirements
    19. Understanding Analytical Techniques & Products
    20. The Analytical Divide
      “Crime Analysis” focus
      “Intelligence Analysis” focus
      Crime incident analysis
      911 calls analysis
      Statistical analysis
      Geographic analysis
      MO analysis
      Local focus
      Associate analysis
      Financial analysis
      Communications analysis
      Commodities analysis
      Threat analysis
      State and federal focus
      We need integration and collaboration for improved situational awareness…
    21. Collaboration Is
      • joining together to make possible that which cannot be accomplished alone. That is, collaboration allows partners to reach an aspiration that would be impossible to achieve without each member of the team working toward the same end. It requires the partnership and the commitment of all members working toward a common goal to succeed. www.collaborativejustice.org
      It requires leadership and vision…
    22. Collaboration is Not These Things
      • Networking is best described as exchanging information (i.e., agencies may meet to inform one another of their procedures, processes, restrictions, resources, and guidelines);
      • Coordinating involves making slight alterations to activities to accommodate the needs of another (i.e., one agency might change their hours so that they have staff available to receive referrals from another agency); and
      • Cooperating entails the sharing of resources (i.e., one agency may provide office space while another provides staff so that services can be co–located).
    23. Stages of ILP Development
    24. Stage One: Reactive
      • many police agencies are in this stage
      • run to calls, investigate, do your best
      • no analytical support
      • little understanding of the value of crime
      intelligence analysis
      • random impact on the criminal environment
    25. Stage Two: Relies on Gut Feeling
      • agencies with unsophisticated or inadequate analytical capacities
      • generally rely on traditional policing based on trusting past experiences at the gut feeling level
      • random impact on the criminal environment
    26. Stage Three: Develops the Individual
      • agencies that allow individual officers and analysts the freedom to study problems and develop responses
      • supports creativity in problem-solving and long-term projects by select individuals
      • work is thus more isolated and limited by individual initiative and time/energy constraints
      • some targeted impact on criminal environment – not sustained
    27. Stage Four: Learns and Takes Risks
      • have engaged in some wide-spread problem
      oriented policing projects/grant-funded initiatives
      • have developed some broad-based analytical
      capacities and learned from them
      • continue to experiment with innovation on a limited
      basis, focused on a few problems
      • analysts provide basic analytical products and
      support as needed
      • impact on the criminal environment in a few areas,
      not sustained if funding ends/leadership changes
    28. Stage Five: Identifies with Institutions
      • implements Compstat and/or POP
      • meets regularly and analyze current crime
      problems tactically and/or specifically
      • use of intelligence and crime analysis information
      embedded in the work, not often strategic
      • more focus is on the immediate problems
      compared to the chronic problems
      • analysis may be diluted by adherence to strictly
      defined procedures/missions
      • recognized impact on criminal environment but still
      lack of strategic focus
    29. Stage Six: Combines Logic and Intuition
      • realizes the value of crime intelligence analysis,
      combining crime analysis with intelligence,
      quantitative information/qualitative information
      • uses the street knowledge of officers and
      investigators, incorporates with analytical info
      • analysis is a valued commodity to inform
      decision-making at the level of the working
      officer as well as the top decision-makers
      • lasting short-term and long-term impact on the
      criminal environment
    30. Stage Seven: Holistic and Adaptive Agencies
      • develops intelligence with all relevant sources
      • forms and maintain strategic partnerships - shares
      • identifies/addresses chronic problems/worst
      offenders
      • crime intel analysis central to decision-making
      • invest in quality & sufficient analytical staff –
      provide the technology and training needed
      • analysts and decision-makers collaborate
      • significant impact to the criminal environment,
      short-term and long-term, collaborate in problem-
      solving with those outside the jurisdiction with
      shared crime and criminal problems
    31. Fusion Centers are a Beginning
      “We've now moved three dozen intelligence analysts out to the field.  In other words, as we build the fusion centers, we need to move analytic capacity from the Beltway to the country.  So let's -- how this is used. And I'll take it out of the terrorism context for just a moment.  That if a law enforcement agency reports an increase in drug seizures of a particular type, that is a data point.  That's a piece of intelligence.  But a whole range of agencies working together in a particular fusion center can analyze that trend to understand what it means, how it will affect particular neighborhoods, and whether it foretells something even larger on the horizon. “  Janet Napolitano, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
    32. The Future of Decision-Making
      Tomorrow’s police leaders will understand the potential of technology (Web 2.0)
      They won’t settle for I-don’t-know
      They will be more collaborative
      They will be more networked
      They won’t be leaders for another 10-20 years
      Until then, the criminals will have the advantage – they are already connected, have hi-tech resources and the power to use them
    33. ILP resources
      Available Online
    34. http://www.jratcliffe.net/ilp
    35. www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA/topics/ilp
    36. http://www.it.ojp.gov/global
    37. http://www.it.ojp.gov/global
    38. http://www.kiernan-group.com/resources-policing.htm
    39. http://www.popcenter.org/
    40. Problem Analysis Module
    41. Consider this: Wilbur Wright didn’t have a pilot’s license.
      Questions?
    42. Thank you!
      www.analystscorner.com
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Deborah OsborneDeborah Osborne Nominate

    custom

    830 views, 0 favs, 4 embeds more stats

    Intelligence-Led Policing for Decision-Makers Webin more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 830
      • 717 on SlideShare
      • 113 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 36
    Most viewed embeds
    • 77 views on http://analystscorner.blogspot.com
    • 19 views on http://blog.crimereports.com
    • 16 views on http://www.analystscorner.blogspot.com
    • 1 views on http://undanalys.blogspot.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 77 views on http://analystscorner.blogspot.com
    • 19 views on http://blog.crimereports.com
    • 16 views on http://www.analystscorner.blogspot.com
    • 1 views on http://undanalys.blogspot.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories