Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Farmland by the Numbers: 2007 National Resources Inventory
Farmland by the Numbers: 2007 National Resources Inventory
Farmland by the Numbers: 2007 National Resources Inventory
Farmland by the Numbers: 2007 National Resources Inventory
Farmland by the Numbers: 2007 National Resources Inventory
Farmland by the Numbers: 2007 National Resources Inventory
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Farmland by the Numbers: 2007 National Resources Inventory

3,897

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,897
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
7
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Farmland loss is an issue of national importance. The largest acreage loss was in Texas, which had a staggering 2.9 million, followed by Florida and California with both losing more than 1.5 million acres. Another 34 states lost more than 250,000 acres each.
  • 2. In the United States, we’ve been losing more than an acre of farmland per minute. States losing the largest proportion of their land were clustered in the Northeast, with New Jersey and Rhode Island each losing more than 20 percent.
  • 3. Even farming areas that were thought to be so big, so productive and so important as to be almost untouchable are in danger. Florida and California, two of the three states experiencing the largest acre losses of agricultural land, currently account for 47 percent of the nation’s vegetables and 71 percent of its fruit production based on market value.
  • 4. Despite pressures from growth, some states developed relatively less land and were able to protect more acreage of land than what was lost.
  • 5. www.farmland.org/nri

×