Heavy Industries: Advancing American Manufacturing, Raymond Monroe, Steel Founders’ Society of America

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Heavy Industries: Advancing American Manufacturing, Raymond Monroe, Steel Founders’ Society of America - Presentation Transcript

    1. Heavy Industries: Advancing American Manufacturing
    2. Current Situation
      • U.S. manufacturers face intense global competition
      • Energy-intensive industries – low profit margins
      • Large capital investments required for new technology development & commercialization
      • Capital stock turnover is slow
      • Severe private under-investment in efficiency R&D
      • Changing workforce must be flexible and information nimble
      • High technical and financial risk inhibit investment in efficient process technology
    3. Energy- Intensive Industries Computers Pharmaceuticals Communication Equipment Scientific Equipment Manufacturing Avg. Electronics R&D Funding as a % of Net Sales Percent Source: NSF 2002, Research and Development in Industry ] R&D Intensity in Manufacturing 1986-1998 Stone, Clay, & Glass Paper & Products Petroleum Refining Primary Metals
    4.  
    5.  
    6.  
    7. Federal Role in Energy Efficiency in Energy Intensive Industries
      • Department on Energy shows energy is a public policy priority.
      • Federal Role includes
        • Developing technology for efficiency goals
        • Supporting the energy technology infrastructure
        • Encouraging the training of an energy efficient workforce
        • Convening energy intensive industries to adopt efficient technologies
        • Security-energy and military
    8. Energy-Intensive Industries
      • In 1994, ITP implemented an innovative, customer-driven research strategy known as Industries of the Future (IOF).
      • Each industry team develops a vision of its desired future and an associated “technology roadmap” which serves as a framework for guiding collaborative partnerships between ITP and industry.
      • Industry teams: Aluminum Chemicals Forest Products
      • Glass Metal Casting Mining
      • Steel
    9. Our Focus: Major Energy-Intensive Industries Sources: EIA 2001, 1998 Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey; U.S. DOE 2002, Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Mining Industry Energy Consumption (Trillion Btu) Petroleum Chemicals Paper Primary Metals Food Processing NONMETALLIC MINERALS Tobacco/Beverages Furniture Leather Machinery and Computers Wood Transportation Fabricated Metals Textiles/Apparel Plastics/ Rubber Electrical Printing Miscellaneous 1 10 100 1000 10 100 1000 10000 Energy Intensity (Thousand Btu/$ GDP) Energy-Intensive Industries Industrial Energy Intensity vs. Energy Consumption Mining
      • AMMEX is a partner in a federally funded initiative administered by the U.S. Department of Energy that maximizes technology investment through partnerships in 6 vital high energy-use industries:
      • Aluminum
      • Chemicals
      • Forest Products
      • 4. Glass
      • Metal Casting
      • Steel
      AMMEX includes other energy partners like ACEEE, State and regional Groups.
      • AMMEX industries collectively:
      • Consume 75% of energy used by Industry.
      • (or 25% of total energy)
      • Supply 90% of materials vital to our economy
      • Produce $1 trillion in annual shipments
      • Directly employ 3 million people
      • Indirectly provide additional 12 million jobs
    10. ITP Funding Shifts Industry R&D Focus to Energy Cross-cutting projects Process-specific projects Approval cutoff; approved projects to the right Distribution of possible company R&D projects Distribution of possible company energy R&D projects
    11.  
    12. ITP is a Model Federal Program
      • Represents a modest investment ($80.2 million in FY 2004)
      • Produces measurable benefits addressing key national energy, economic, and security policy goals
      • Utilizes industry sectors to identify technology priorities and compete for demonstration opportunities
      • Encourages significant private and state investment (economically justifiable, environmentally sound), including job creation
    13. ITP Funding Yields
      • Every federal $1 spent on ITP:
      • Saves $7.06 in annual energy costs
      • Saves1.3 million in annual source BTUs
    14. Emissions Reductions are Equally Significant Total Cumulative Emission Reductions Carbon 22,293,044 metric tons VOCs 14,847,884 metric tons NOx 162,026 metric tons PM 7,561 metric tons SOx 570,591 metric tons
    15.  
    16. Thanks! Questions? Raymond Monroe 815-455-8240 [email_address]

    + AllianceToSaveEnergyAllianceToSaveEnergy, 2 months ago

    custom

    166 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Nov 17, 2009: Alliance to Save Energy Congressional more

    More info about this presentation

    © All Rights Reserved

    • Total Views 166
      • 166 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories