Achieving Compliance and
Strategy Execution Using
Microsoft Office Business
Scorecard Manager 2005




          1 of 13
This is a preliminary document and may be changed substantially prior to final commercial release
of the software describe...
Table of Contents
Achieving Compliance and Strategy Execution Using Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager 2005. 1
Ac...
Executive Summary
    As they strive to achieve compliance while continuing to strengthen their competitive edge,
    more...
One of the key benefits of BPM is its ability to open windows of insight into a company’s
business processes, but too ofte...
Figure 1
Dashboards are designed to enhance the scorecarding method by displaying contextual
information vis-à-vis the KPI...
their projects against actual expenditures and completion dates. With this type of information
    available to all depart...
What to Look for in a Scorecard Application
    For scorecarding to be both meaningful and effective it must do more than ...
A scorecarding system must be built on robust technology that can deliver speed and power
    while allowing for flexibili...
The finance department is commonly the primary advocate and spearhead of a company’s
    scorecarding initiative, and typi...
after it’s too late. At the same time, Business Scorecard Manager is robust and flexible enough
for enterprise installatio...
gather and disseminate insight throughout the organization. By linking Business Scorecard
    Manager to a SharePoint Port...
For additional information, please visit http://www.microsoft.com/office/bsm.




                                 13 of 13
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

ссÑ"Ð"Ðoа.doc

1,132

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,132
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
20
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

ссÑ"Ð"Ðoа.doc

  1. 1. Achieving Compliance and Strategy Execution Using Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager 2005 1 of 13
  2. 2. This is a preliminary document and may be changed substantially prior to final commercial release of the software described herein. The information contained in this document represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. This white paper is for informational purposes only. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in, or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property. © 2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. The example companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places, and events depicted herein are fictitious. No association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, e-mail address, logo, person, place, or event is intended or should be inferred. Microsoft, Excel, MapPoint, PowerPoint, SharePoint, Microsoft SQL Server, Visio, and the Office Logo are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. NUnit: Portions Copyright © 2002 James W. Newkirk, Michael C. Two, Alexei A. Vorontsov or Copyright © 2000–2002 Philip A. Craig. 2 of 13
  3. 3. Table of Contents Achieving Compliance and Strategy Execution Using Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager 2005. 1 Achieving Compliance and Strategy Execution Using Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager 2005. 1 Table of Contents....................................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................4 Examining the Critical Role of BPM............................................................................................................4 Examining the Critical Role of BPM................................................................................................................4 BPM Deployment Considerations...............................................................................................................4 BPM Deployment Considerations...................................................................................................................4 The Benefits of Using Scorecards..............................................................................................................7 The Benefits of Using Scorecards..................................................................................................................7 What to Look for in a Scorecard Application...............................................................................................8 What to Look for in a Scorecard Application...................................................................................................8 Implementing a Scorecard Solution............................................................................................................9 Implementing a Scorecard Solution................................................................................................................9 Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager ........................................................................................10 Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager ............................................................................................10 Speed....................................................................................................................................................10 Speed.......................................................................................................................................................10 Flexibility...............................................................................................................................................10 Flexibility...................................................................................................................................................10 A Low-Risk Solution..............................................................................................................................11 A Low-Risk Solution..................................................................................................................................11 Power....................................................................................................................................................11 Power........................................................................................................................................................11 A Better Way to Communicate..............................................................................................................11 A Better Way to Communicate..................................................................................................................11 Substantial Results in the Short- and Long-Term.....................................................................................12 Substantial Results in the Short- and Long-Term.........................................................................................12 3 of 13
  4. 4. Executive Summary As they strive to achieve compliance while continuing to strengthen their competitive edge, more and more organizations are turning a keenly interested eye toward Business Performance Management (BPM). But with the wrong approach, BPM can be a costly, high-risk proposition. The right approach – one that emphasizes incremental and validated stages, taking advantage of existing investments, and achieving fast user acceptance – can quickly deliver a high value solution while minimizing costs. This value can include reduced compliance costs, increased visibility, and improved execution of strategic initiatives across the organization. Microsoft® Office Business Scorecard Manager 2005, a new scorecard solution from Microsoft, provides a pragmatic solution that can anchor a complete BPM initiative and scale fully from projects in target areas to enterprise-wide implementations. Using familiar tools and existing technology, Business Scorecard Manager enhances visibility and compliance while helping companies align tactics with strategy to quickly achieve substantial improvements. Examining the Critical Role of BPM Whether they are publicly traded or privately owned, businesses today are working overtime to satisfy the more stringent legislative and industry-driven mandates created in the wake of this decade’s corporate scandals. Achieving this compliance requires a high level of visibility across the organization and into many disparate information technology (IT) systems. It also requires the ability to evaluate complex financial and performance data according to sophisticated criteria – requirements it shares with Business Performance Management (BPM) initiatives. Not surprisingly, many companies today are examining BPM as a framework for building a sustainable and repeatable system that ensures compliance and transparency. As the executives with the biggest stake in both compliance and financial performance, Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) have become well aware of BPM’s critical role in improving visibility into corporate data and metrics. In particular, the scorecarding component of BPM is increasingly seen by finance leaders as a powerful tool with which to forge a direct sightline to an organization’s data and processes, and to facilitate the timely filing of financial statements. But like most strategic initiatives, BPM solutions tend to be extensive and comprehensive and require substantial investments of capital and resources. Launching a large-scale BPM initiative also takes time; the significant risks involved make it more difficult to sell BPM to stakeholders, and pulling all the required data from various departments across the organization can be a complicated, protracted process. BPM Deployment Considerations The significant scale and scope of most BPM projects frequently translate into lengthy implementations. Consequently, organizations are unable to test their BPM results and validate their approach in a timely manner. In the meantime, the factors that drive their metrics continue to change, and they may be missing out on numerous market opportunities. 4 of 13
  5. 5. One of the key benefits of BPM is its ability to open windows of insight into a company’s business processes, but too often organizations use the metrics gleaned from BPM to formulate strategies for improvement without first building a proper framework for implementing change. They fail to connect strategy to action, and business goals to people and resources. In fact, this missing link between strategy and execution is one of the most common reasons BPM projects fail. So what can bridge the gap between strategy and execution and, in the process, help organizations achieve regulatory compliance? The answer is, surprisingly, pragmatic and low- risk. By implementing a solution that enables quick targeting of key areas with immediate, high-yield potential while offering the power and flexibility to expand to enterprise-wide deployments, companies can approach BPM gradually and without incurring large investments of time and money. This pragmatic, low-risk solution should be built upon the essential foundation for any BPM undertaking: the performance scorecard. Scorecard and dashboard solutions leverage the data generated and collected by disparate systems throughout an organization as it relates to Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), thus helping companies define and articulate strategy. The Gartner Group estimates that at least 40 percent of all Fortune 1000 companies are now using the Balanced Scorecard method as an analytical business management tool. Analysis based on financials alone will simply provide a historical view of performance prior to the moment of assessment. Instead, scorecards build on BPM by putting information in context and linking corporate strategy to line-of-business (LOB) actions, typically reporting on organizational performance in both financial and non-financial terms, according to KPIs. Scorecards are designed to articulate strategy and convert it into specific, measurable goals and to monitor progress towards their achievement. Typically, they signal important changes and exceptions using the conventional traffic light graphic indicator. This methodology supports the performance-driven closed loop of insight, strategy, monitoring, collaboration, execution, and feedback that leads to successful operations, as illustrated in Figure 1. 5 of 13
  6. 6. Figure 1 Dashboards are designed to enhance the scorecarding method by displaying contextual information vis-à-vis the KPIs and objectives. Dashboards provide the user with a personal data snapshot, tailoring the interface and information to the specific needs and preferences of the individual. This enables timely, corrective action in the user’s line-of-business. Dashboards provide a highly visual method for data analysis alongside the cornerstone scorecard, displaying trends in the form of graphs and as well as additional contextual information. It should be noted that not all scorecard applications incorporate dashboards to display and communicate information. Scorecarding has certainly worked for Getronics NV, a leading provider of information and communication technology and services, with more than 22,000 employees worldwide. Headquartered in Amsterdam, Getronics does business in more than 30 countries and distributes a series of monthly and quarterly reports. But to collect, format, and publish data into cohesive reports, the local and global teams at Getronics were putting in more than 200 hours of effort each quarter and often had to manually enter data from fax and e-mail documents. Getronics also had problems with inconsistent and sometimes incomplete or inaccurate data – the result of differences in software applications from one country to another. To resolve these problems, Getronics used Microsoft technology to build a scorecards-based business intelligence solution that reduced report creation time by 47 percent and improved the accessibility and flexibility of reports. A user-friendly portal ensured immediate adoption of the solution throughout the organization and enabled local Getronics offices around the world to contribute to reports in a consistent format. Similarly, New Century Mortgage, one of the United State's largest mortgage lenders, used scorecards to build a common framework in which employees can analyze and monitor key business metrics. For instance, branch managers can now compare budgets and timelines for 6 of 13
  7. 7. their projects against actual expenditures and completion dates. With this type of information available to all departments and executives, New Century Mortgage is now positioned to react quickly to market opportunities. Because scorecarding is an ongoing process, its impact on an organization’s compliance strategies and overall health and performance is long-term and cumulative. Greater visibility into processes and data, and easier access to financial information and ad hoc reports enable timely filings and help organizations comply with disclosure requirements such as those in Sarbanes-Oxley. And with the right metrics, the right technology, and a plan of action to tie scorecard results to corporate strategy, organizations that successfully implement scorecarding can achieve their business objectives sooner and more effectively. The Benefits of Using Scorecards Implemented properly, scorecards provide a powerful tool that supports the compliance and visibility efforts of Sarbanes-Oxley and other regulations. They afford quick access to real-time performance and financial data, show trends that can alert organizations to material changes, create constant awareness of internal controls and processes, and streamline reporting. Thus, scorecards – particularly those that incorporate a dashboard interface – make it easier for companies to detect business problems even before their scheduled audits are done, and to document and report material changes in real-time. Not surprisingly, most scorecard deployments originate in the finance department. The benefits of scorecarding, however, extend well beyond the finance arena, and many CFOs consider using scorecards not just a means of improving regulatory compliance but also an opportunity to bring organizational focus to their business strategies. Indeed, in addition to enhancing visibility and the reporting process, scorecards provide an ideal platform from which to drive an organization’s corporate objectives. The key reasons behind this observation are obvious: scorecards allow an organization to articulate its key performance drivers and targets. Then, by comparing actual performance results against these pre-defined values, scorecards provide a dynamic view of a company’s progress and help identify areas that require improvement. This real-time data is translated into action by providing each employee with an individual scorecard and KPIs that roll up to high-level objectives – thus, enabling the organization to align action with strategy. But while the concept of scorecarding is ideal for compliance and performance issues, in execution it has often been problematic, costly and too complex. This has been due, in large part, to the fact that most scorecarding technologies are limited to a certain range in scale. However, when deployed with the right mix of tools and applications – particularly with technology that offers the flexibility of either targeted or enterprise-wide installations – scorecards satisfy an organization’s needs not only in the finance arena but in the broader corporate strategy arena as well. So while a scorecarding initiative may start in finance as a response to compliance and visibility requirements, its adaptation as a part of a strategic BPM solution is practically a foregone conclusion. 7 of 13
  8. 8. What to Look for in a Scorecard Application For scorecarding to be both meaningful and effective it must do more than deliver business intelligence; it must support and enable employees to act on that intelligence. And to do that, it must have the ability to cast a wide net and draw information from multiple data sources, giving users a complete picture of the organization. Scorecards must present performance metrics in the context of policies, corporate objectives, research, and resources in order to truly inform the actionable decisions that need to be taken. Context beyond the KPI data itself is the critical ingredient that links strategy to organizational and individual execution. A scorecarding solution must also provide users with the ability to drill down to various hierarchical levels – organizational, regional, departmental, and individual. It should make it easy for users to get additional information when viewing or analyzing scorecard data. This additional information includes charts and reports on any given KPI, as well as unstructured data, such as those found in word processing documents and slide presentations. It should, for example, allow a finance manager to look at and analyze scorecarding results for bad-debt write-offs (structured data) against past and current policies for collecting on delinquent accounts (unstructured data). In the absence of such contextual information, the manager in this scenario is more likely to make decisions based on partial data and not the full picture. For scorecarding to work, performance results must be accessible to users throughout the company, providing a big-picture perspective of how the actions of each person, department, and level in the organization affect others and indeed the company as a whole. Expanding on the example given above, an effective scorecarding solution might tie the company’s bad debts to the actions of the credit department, which is responsible for investigating the credit worthiness of all prospective customers. Alerted by the scorecard’s red indicator for bad debts, the finance manager tries to get at the root cause of the problem, so she drills down and sees that the KPIs for timely credit checks and unapproved sales are also red. This reveals to her that credit checks are regularly delayed but, because of pressure from the sales department, orders are often pushed through without credit approval. Having identified all the root causes of its bad-debt problem, our imaginary company can now take the necessary course of action. A scorecarding system should also provide a platform for collaboration, leveraging familiar communication tools like e-mail, instant messaging, and discussion groups as well as calendaring and file sharing. This allows strategies to be translated to plans, plans to areas of responsibility, and areas of responsibility to specific tasks assigned to specific people. Without this platform for collaboration, implementing change can be a chaotic, uncoordinated affair, and the insights yielded by scorecarding are likely to remain localized within departments or worse, on the desktops of a few individuals. Ideally, a collaborative platform for scorecarding should be Web-based, secure, and feature project management capabilities. By logging on to a password-protected portal, users should be able to view and manage their scorecards, access related documents, and communicate with other users throughout the organization. This collaborative, dynamic environment helps reinforce people’s sense of their roles within the organization and gives users greater insight into the ripple effect of their actions. 8 of 13
  9. 9. A scorecarding system must be built on robust technology that can deliver speed and power while allowing for flexibility and ease of use. Organizations should be able to quickly map and manage their scorecard definitions and gather critical intelligence from various sources. Business analysts and department and team leaders should be able to manage and maintain their own key performance indicators instead of having to rely on IT staff. This places control in the hands of end users and fosters a stronger sense of project and KPI ownership. This also results in greater efficiency; KPIs managed directly by end users are more likely to be up-to- date than those that need to be funneled through IT. Another benefit is minimized pressure on already strained IT resources. As is the case in most other projects, a high rate of user adoption is essential to scorecarding success. To facilitate user adoption, organizations must do as much as they can to minimize the scorecard learning curve. One of the best ways to accomplish this is to find a solution that builds on existing technology with which users are already familiar. In addition to ensuring high user adoption, this approach allows organizations to roll out their scorecarding solutions sooner and go through measurement cycles more quickly. And, perhaps most importantly, it minimizes IT expenditures and lowers the risks of implementing a scorecarding solution. Finally, a scorecard solution must be fully extensible. It should be capable of completely satisfying scorecarding requirements at any level and of any size – from a single department to the entire enterprise, and from a small business to a large, global operation. Not only would such a system be cost-effective, it would also significantly accelerate new or expanded scorecarding projects. IT staff who have already accumulated expertise with the existing system would not have to “reinvent the wheel” each time their organization scales up their scorecarding initiative. Implementing a Scorecard Solution Fed with meaningful Key Performance Indicator (KPI) definitions, supported by accurate data – both structured and unstructured – and built on a secure, collaborative platform with the right mix of tools and applications, scorecards can deliver high-impact results with relatively minimal investment. The initial deployment does not necessarily have to be enterprise-wide to yield high returns; companies can take a more effective, focused approach by targeting areas where they can make the most significant improvements in a short period of time. This could mean addressing a specific department first, or narrowing the approach even further by measuring only a particular set of KPIs in a specific department. For instance, if a manufacturer determines that reducing equipment down-time on the shop floor is a critical area that will take some time to resolve, then it could decide to tackle assembly-line defects instead or focus first on reducing employee absenteeism. This focused approach allows companies to validate their KPIs and technology choice early in the process and make adjustments for the next cycle. And once they’ve proven the value and financial returns of scorecarding, managers will find it easier to get buy-in for subsequent projects. By focusing first on crucial projects, companies are also giving their managers and employees a chance to build up their competence and experience before moving on to a wider scorecard deployment and, eventually, to a full BPM solution. 9 of 13
  10. 10. The finance department is commonly the primary advocate and spearhead of a company’s scorecarding initiative, and typically the initial target areas are directly related to governance and regulatory compliance. But because many of these areas – such as sales, compensation, and benefits – operate outside finance, and given the strategic benefits of scorecarding, finance teams generally pull together other departments as they deploy the solution. Regardless of how an organization decides to approach scorecarding – as a focused project or as a broader initiative – its success or failure will be determined largely by the technology on which it is built. By choosing a scorecarding solution that meets all the criteria outlined in the previous section and adopting a scorecarding approach that optimizes opportunities for improvement in the short- and long-term, an organization can ease the way towards regulatory compliance and successful strategy execution. With the right scorecarding system in place, organizations can translate their high-level goals into everyday actions and decisions. So a shipping manager can see how getting the pallets to the docks on time can allow the company to increase its profit margins without adding a cent to their product prices. And a purchaser can realize that the money he thinks he’s saving by buying parts in bulk is actually costing the company more in real estate and inventory spoilage. Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager To be feasible and effective, a scorecarding solution must satisfy compliance and transparency requirements, support strategic initiatives, and deliver insight within the proper organizational context. At the same time, it needs to provide an easy-to-use, collaborative stage on which to map out and execute plans of action for achieving an organization’s business strategy. Ideally, such a solution would require only a minimal investment. Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager 2005, a high-impact, low-risk scorecarding solution from Microsoft, meets all of the preceding requirements and more. Speed Business Scorecard Manager works with familiar applications – including all the tools in Microsoft Office – and employs common skill sets. This significantly shortens the implementation period and helps speed up performance measurement cycles. The use of familiar tools also allows end users to quickly create their own scorecards and reports, encouraging a sense of ownership while having the added benefit of eliminating bottlenecks in IT. Ready access to real-time financial and other performance data also facilitates regulatory compliance by accelerating the closure of accounting books and ensuring that financial reports are generated from the most current data available. Flexibility Business Scorecard Manager can be scaled to focus on key areas most likely to yield high- impact results. This focused approach allows organizations to go through multiple cycles of measuring, validating, and improving within a compressed period. With Business Scorecard Manager, companies can react to business changes and new information as they arise, not 10 of 13
  11. 11. after it’s too late. At the same time, Business Scorecard Manager is robust and flexible enough for enterprise installations. A Low-Risk Solution Business Scorecard Manager builds on existing technology investments. It supports programs that most organizations – particularly those using Microsoft SQL Server™– already have, such as Microsoft Office Excel® and Microsoft Office PowerPoint®. Short cycle times allow users to evaluate results immediately, eliminating the need to commit to risky, big-ticket solutions. Power Business Scorecard Manager enables a wide range of capabilities, including scorecarding, analysis, and reporting. Integration with collaboration, project management and data visualization tools gives it extra muscle. Business Scorecard Manager also has the ability to work with unstructured data, allowing users to gain deep contextual insight into the business. And while Business Scorecard Manager is well-suited to focused, local projects, it is also powerful enough to handle full-scale enterprise installments. A Better Way to Communicate Business Scorecard Manager works seamlessly with Microsoft Office SharePoint® Portal Server and Microsoft Office Project, making it easy for companies to collaborate and share insight across the organization. By layering Business Scorecard Manager onto Office Project, companies can effectively break down high-level strategy and link it to specific activities and tasks at various levels within the organization. As the pragmatic solution to today’s regulatory compliance challenges, Business Scorecard Manager enhances transparency and visibility throughout the organization by putting performance objectives and results at the eye level of decision-makers, relevant users, and other stakeholders. In addition, ready access to real-time performance and financial data – combined with an alert function that can be set to flag material changes – improves visibility, speeds reporting, and eases compliance. Business Scorecard Manager is a powerful tool for monitoring KPIs against actual and target performance values, and provides a solid foundation for the advancement of strategic initiatives. Its key differentiators are the depth and quality of insight it delivers. Along with providing real-time perspective of a company’s performance indicators, Business Scorecard Manager allows users to view this structured data against the contextual relief of unstructured data, such as market research documents, policy papers, company manuals, spreadsheets, graphic charts, and even geographical maps. It supports commonly-used tools such as Office Word, Office Excel, Office PowerPoint, Office Visio® and Office MapPoint®, enabling users to open material created in various formats while reviewing KPI results. It also allows users to present multidimensional views of scorecard data, and it supports the creation of interactive reports and sophisticated analyses on large volumes of performance data with the addition of Microsoft SQL Server Reporting and Analysis Services. The integration of collaboration and project management technology, namely SharePoint Portal Server and Office Project, further elevates the ability of Business Scorecard Manager to 11 of 13
  12. 12. gather and disseminate insight throughout the organization. By linking Business Scorecard Manager to a SharePoint Portal Server-based Web site, organizations can provide authorized access to scorecarding projects through the Internet. Advanced collaboration features in SharePoint Portal Server – such as document sharing, live chat, and links to subject matter expert sites – help sharpen insight into an organization’s overall strategy and make it easier for managers to establish chains of responsibility based on their strategy map. Adding a Visio-based diagram allows users of Business Scorecard Manager to render performance and financial data into easily-understood graphical representations. Similarly, sales results tracked in Business Scorecard Manager can be presented in a geographical context through MapPoint. From a cost perspective, building a scorecarding solution with Business Scorecard Manager makes solid business sense because it dovetails neatly with existing Microsoft technology, encourages high user adoption with the use of familiar technology, and makes minimal demands on IT staff. Not surprisingly, its cost of ownership is relatively low. Business Scorecard Manager’s return on investment, however, can be substantial and is likely to increase further as organizations refine their KPIs, expand their deployments, and solidify the links between strategic objectives, scorecarding results, and process improvements. Eventually, with the addition of even more advanced technology – such as forecasting and modeling tools – organizations can build on the successes and lessons of their Business Scorecard Manager projects and move towards a full-fledged BPM implementation. Substantial Results in the Short- and Long-Term For companies that see BPM as the ultimate means to achieving compliance and realizing the promises of their overall strategy, Microsoft Office Business Scorecard Manager provides a low-risk, low-cost point of entry to BPM while delivering substantial results and ensuring a high rate of success. By implementing a Business Scorecard Manager solution, organizations can quickly satisfy the more immediate demands for transparency in process and governance and, at the same time, develop a long-term strategy for full regulatory compliance. By tracking their critical performance and financial data in Business Scorecard Manager, organizations greatly enhance visibility and accelerate reporting. Consequently, they become more alert to material changes in their business and can quickly comply with disclosure and filing requirements. From a strategic perspective, the value of Business Scorecard Manager will also prove to be significant in the short and long term. Its ability to present in-depth data in the proper context and in a larger organizational perspective will improve decision-making and help companies see the links between individual actions, execution plans, and strategic objectives. At the same time, its speed and effectiveness in tackling tightly-focused projects, combined with its seamless compatibility with existing technology investments, make Business Scorecard Manager a low-risk, pragmatic first step towards BPM. Indeed, by choosing to develop a scorecard solution with Business Scorecard Manager, organizations are building a solid foundation for a fully realized BPM solution in the future while forging a healthier bottom line today. 12 of 13
  13. 13. For additional information, please visit http://www.microsoft.com/office/bsm. 13 of 13

×