Is ROI a Good Way to Make the Case for Change?
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network


Is ROI a Good Way to Make the Case for Change?



Return on investment (ROI) calculators and tools can help implement B2B value selling & marketing to Fight Frugalnomics.

Return on investment (ROI) calculators and tools can help implement B2B value selling & marketing to Fight Frugalnomics.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds


Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Is ROI a Good Way to Make the Case for Change? Document Transcript

  • 1. Is ROI a Good Way to Make the Case for Change?Buying and selling of B2B solutions has fundamentally and permanently changed, an evolution calledFrugalnomics, requiring buyers to provide quantifiable proof to executives that proposed solutions will deliverbottom-line impact, and requiring vendors to help create and deliver the quantified proof-points and businesscase if they want to win the deal and avoid stalled sales cycles.One of the best and most commonly used methods used to calculate bottom-line value of proposed projectsis via an ROI analysis. Although many may be familiar with what is done to perform an ROI analysis, it isimportant to standardize the definitions as to what a typical ROI analysis is, and what key calculations arerequired.An ROI analysis, more descriptively called a discounted cash-flow analysis, is used to measure the value of aproposed project over time. The analysis compares the cost savings and other benefits of a proposed solutionversus the total investment in order to determine whether the project makes sense. Because of this, ROIanalysis is often referred to as ―making the case for change‖, providing the analysis and proof points as towhether the proposed project / change makes fiscal sense.The analysis compares the ―business as usual‖ scenario, where the organization continues to operate as itintends to without the solution (often called As Is), with the scenario where the solution is implemented (oftencalled To Be). The analysis usually is performed over 3 to 5 years to match the proposed lifetime/lifecycle ofthe investment.Examining the As Is (business as usual) scenario can help illuminate the cost-of-doing-nothing to buyers.The difference between the revenue and costs in the As Is (before) scenario with those in the To Be (after)scenario determines the bottom-line impact, and the overall cash flow of the project.To calculate the opportunity, the analysis first starts with an understanding of revenue and cost projectionsover the analysis period. The team gathers current revenue and costs, and projections of how the revenue andcosts are expected to grow without implementing the proposed solution.
  • 2. It should be noted that in many cases, if the project may only be focused on cost savings, and revenue is notrelevant. Therefore, only the cost portion of the equation is tallied for these cost savings projects and analyses.Next, the impact of the proposed project is simulated on the As Is revenue / cost projections to determine:  What incremental investment is required  What are the benefits – savings in IT and Business Costs, or improvements in RevenueSimulating the impact of the solution – both the required investments and benefits - generates a To Be scenario, which when compared to the As Isquantifies the ―ROI‖ of the project.The simulation lets the business tally the level and duration of required investments, which add to costsinitially, usually as capital investment such as hardware / software, and over time, usually in the form ofincremental operating expenses such as service agreements, support and management costs.The simulation also estimates the magnitude of benefits such as cost avoidance, savings and revenueimprovements, and importantly, how quickly the benefits can be realized.Comparing the incremental costs versus the benefits, the difference between As Is and To Be, creates a cashflow over time.When the difference is calculated, if the results are negative over time in total, a negative cash flow, this meansthe project, the To Be scenario, costs more over time than the As Is. This can be a result of the investmentbeing too high, or the benefits being too little to make up for the incremental investment.If the cash flow is positive, it means that the incremental investment to implement and manage the solution iscompensated for by savings and benefits.To make sure the cash flows make sense financially, and to compare the project with other projects andinvestment options, an ROI analysis typically summarizes the cash flow into financial key indicators. Theseindicators are typically:
  • 3.  Return on Investment (ROI) – ROI is a ratio of the net benefits divided by the total investment. A higher ratio means that the projects net benefits are much higher than the investment, and the project is often judged as less risky as a result. To calculate the value, ROI = net benefits / total investment, where net benefits are equal to total benefits – total investment.  Net Present Value (NPV) Savings – NPV savings is a calculation that measures the net benefit of a project in today’s dollar terms using a discount rate to discount future cash flows. Many times a project requires up-front investment, and this is more expensive in time value of money terms compared to future benefits, so looking at the cash flows over time assures that all cash flows over time are made equivalent. Sometimes a project may have a positive cash flow, but because of a large upfront investment and a long time to accumulate benefits, may actually have a negative NPV savings. A high NPV savings indicates that the project can deliver real bottom-line impact to the organization.  Payback Period - The payback period is the time frame needed for the project to yield a positive cumulative cash flow, which is typically specified in months. The payback period starts by comparing cumulative costs versus cumulative benefits by month from the beginning of a project until the point when the cumulative benefits exceed the cumulative costs. A quick payback on a project usually is a sign of less risk.  Internal Rate of Return (IRR) – The IRR calculates the effective interest rate that the project generates. A higher interest rate than competitive projects means that the project has a higher return and generates more effective interest on the investment. In mathematical terms, the Internal Rate of Return is calculated as the projected discount rate that makes the Net Present Value calculation equal to zero. The method of calculation involves a series of guesses, making it the most difficult to understand, but when comparing projects, one of the most effective metrics in selecting the best comparative project.The Bottom LineAs buyers require proof of financial benefits from each investment, sellers must create the compellingjustification content frugal buyers demand, and arm sales professionals with new tools to engage theseeconomic-focused buyers.Alinean can turn this ROI methodology into compelling on-line sales and marketing tools to help frugalbuyers justify the purchase of your solution. The tools automate the process, in easy to use customer-facingon-line ROI Calculators and ROI Sales Tools for sales professionals and channel partners.Click here for more information on Alinean ROI Calculators and ROI Sales Tools.About AlineanAlinean, the leading provider of dynamic sales and marketing tools, empowers B2B vendors to better sell totodays economic-focused buyer. Alinean-powered interactive white papers, assessments, ROI calculators andTCO comparison tools create more compelling value-based connections, workshops, presentations andproposals — delivering customized diagnostics, benchmarks, solution recommendations, benefits,investments, ROI, payback and TCO advantage proof points.
  • 4. Leading B2B firms leveraging Alinean tools include: HP, IBM, Microsoft, EMC, Dell, Intel, IDC/IDG, AT&T, Siemens, Unisys, Thomson Reuters, NetApp, Citrix, Symantec, Novell, Cisco, Oracle, Sybase, and CA. Learn more: at the Fight FrugalnomicsTM Resource Center, by visiting, or calling 407.382.0005. ©2010 Alinean is a trademark of Alinean, Inc., in the United States. All other brands, products or service names are or may be trademarks, registered trademarks or service marks of, and used to identify, products or services of their respective owners. For more information, please visit www.alinean.comAlinean, Inc., 111 North Magnolia, Suite 1050, Orlando, FL 32801TEL: 407.382.0005 | FAX: 407.382.0906 | TOLL FREE 866.693.6271