0
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/1
Outline
• Introduction
➡ What is a distributed DBMS
➡ Distributed DBMS...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/2
File Systems
program 1
data description 1
program 2
data description 2...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/3
Database Management
database
DBMS
Application
program 1
(with data
sem...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/4
Motivation
Database
Technology
Computer
Networks
integration distribut...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/5
Distributed Computing
• A number of autonomous processing elements (no...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/6
What is a Distributed Database
System?
A distributed database (DDB) is...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/7
What is not a DDBS?
• A timesharing computer system
• A loosely (separ...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/8
Centralized DBMS on a Network
Site 5
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3Site 4
Commun...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/9
Distributed DBMS Environment
Site 5
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3Site 4
Communi...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/10
Implicit Assumptions
• Data stored at a number of sites  each site l...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/11
Data Delivery Alternatives
• We characterize the data delivery altern...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/12
Data delivery
• Delivery modes
➡ Pull-only {the transfer of data from...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/13
Distributed DBMS Promises
Transparent management of distributed, fra...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/14
Transparency
• Transparency is the separation of the higher level sem...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/15
Example
SELECT ENAME,SAL
FROM EMP,ASG,PAY
WHERE DUR > 12
AND EMP.ENO ...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/16
Transparent Access
SELECT ENAME,SAL
FROM EMP,ASG,PAY
WHERE DUR > 12
A...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/17
Distributed Database - User View
Distributed Database
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/18
Distributed DBMS - Reality
Communication
Subsystem
DBMS
Software
User...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/19
Types of Transparency
• Data independence {It refers to the immunity ...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/20
Who Should Provide
Transparency?
• Nevertheless, the level of transpa...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/21
Reliability Through Transactions
• Replicated components and data sho...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/22
Potentially Improved
Performance
• Proximity of data to its points of...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/23
• Parallelism Requirements
• read only queries
Have as much of the da...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/24
System Expansion
• Issue is database scaling
• Emergence of microproc...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/25
Complications Introduced by
Distribution
• data may be replicated, th...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/26
Distributed DBMS Issues
• Distributed Database Design {chapter 3}
➡ H...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/27
Distributed DBMS Issues
• Query Processing {chapter 6-8}
➡ Convert us...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/28
• Distributed deadlock management
• The deadlock problem in DDBSs is ...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/29
Directory
Management
Relationship Between Issues
Reliability
Deadlock...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/30
Architecture
• Defines the structure of the system
➡ components ident...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/31
ANSI/SPARC Architecture
External
Schema
Conceptual
Schema
Internal
Sc...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/32
Differences between Three Levels
of ANSI-SPARC Architecture
© Pearson...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/33
Data Independence
• Logical Data Independence
➡ Refers to immunity of...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/34
Data Independence
• Physical Data Independence
➡ Refers to immunity o...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/35
Data Independence and the ANSI-
SPARC Three-Level Architecture
© Pear...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/36
Generic DBMS Architecture
The interface layer manages the
interface t...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/37
DBMS Implementation
Alternatives
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/38
Autonomy
Autonomy is a function of a number of factors such as whethe...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/39
Dimensions of the Problem
• Distribution
➡ Whether the components of ...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/40
In Figure 1.10, we have identified three alternative
architectures th...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/41
Client/Server Architecture
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/42
Advantages of Client-Server
Architectures
• More efficient division o...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/43
Database Server
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/44
Distributed Database Servers
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/45
Datalogical Distributed DBMS
Architecture
...
...
...
ES1 ES2 ESn
GCS...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/46
Peer-to-Peer Component
Architecture
Database
DATA PROCESSORUSER PROCE...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/47
Multidatabase systems (MDBS)
• Multidatabase systems (MDBS) represent...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/48
Datalogical Multi-DBMS
Architecture
...
GCS… …
GES1
LCS2 LCSn…
…LIS2 ...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/49
MDBS Components & Execution
Multi-DBMS
Layer
DBMS1 DBMS3DBMS2
Global
...
Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/50
Mediator/Wrapper Architecture
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Database , 1 Introduction

569

Published on

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
569
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
17
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Animated slide
  • Transcript of " Database , 1 Introduction"

    1. 1. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/1 Outline • Introduction ➡ What is a distributed DBMS ➡ Distributed DBMS Architecture • Background • Distributed Database Design • Database Integration • Semantic Data Control • Distributed Query Processing • Multidatabase query processing • Distributed Transaction Management • Data Replication • Parallel Database Systems • Distributed Object DBMS • Peer-to-Peer Data Management • Web Data Management • Current Issues
    2. 2. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/2 File Systems program 1 data description 1 program 2 data description 2 program 3 data description 3 File 1 File 2 File 3
    3. 3. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/3 Database Management database DBMS Application program 1 (with data semantics) Application program 2 (with data semantics) Application program 3 (with data semantics) description manipulation control
    4. 4. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/4 Motivation Database Technology Computer Networks integration distribution integration integration ≠ centralization Distributed Database Systems
    5. 5. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/5 Distributed Computing • A number of autonomous processing elements (not necessarily homogeneous) that are interconnected by a computer network and that cooperate in performing their assigned tasks. • What is being distributed? ➡ Processing logic ➡ Function ➡ Data ➡ Control
    6. 6. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/6 What is a Distributed Database System? A distributed database (DDB) is a collection of multiple, logically interrelated databases distributed over a computer network. A distributed database management system (D–DBMS) is the software that manages the DDB and provides an access mechanism that makes this distribution transparent to the users. Distributed database system (DDBS) = DDB + D–DBMS
    7. 7. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/7 What is not a DDBS? • A timesharing computer system • A loosely (separate primary memory and shared secondary memory) or tightly coupled (shared memory) multiprocessor system • A database system which resides at one of the nodes of a network of computers - this is a centralized database on a network node
    8. 8. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/8 Centralized DBMS on a Network Site 5 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3Site 4 Communication Network
    9. 9. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/9 Distributed DBMS Environment Site 5 Site 1 Site 2 Site 3Site 4 Communication Network
    10. 10. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/10 Implicit Assumptions • Data stored at a number of sites  each site logically consists of a single processor. • Processors at different sites are interconnected by a computer network  not a multiprocessor system ➡ Parallel database systems • Distributed database is a database, not a collection of files  data logically related as exhibited in the users’ access patterns ➡ Relational data model • D-DBMS is a full-fledged DBMS ➡ Not remote file system, not a TP system
    11. 11. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/11 Data Delivery Alternatives • We characterize the data delivery alternatives along three orthogonal dimensions: • Delivery modes • Frequency • Communication Methods • Note: not all combinations make sense
    12. 12. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/12 Data delivery • Delivery modes ➡ Pull-only {the transfer of data from servers to clients is initiated by a client pull} • Push-only {the transfer of data from servers to clients is initiated by a server push in the absence of any specific request from clients. periodic, irregular, or conditional} ➡ Hybrid (mix of pull and push) • Frequency • Periodic (A client request for IBM’s stock price every week is an example of a periodic pull.) • Conditional (An application that sends out stock prices only when they change is an example of conditional push.) ➡ Ad-hoc or irregular • Communication Methods {Unicast, One-to-many}
    13. 13. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/13 Distributed DBMS Promises Transparent management of distributed, fragmented, and replicated data Improved reliability/availability through distributed transactions Improved performance Easier and more economical system expansion
    14. 14. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/14 Transparency • Transparency is the separation of the higher level semantics of a system from the lower level implementation issues. • Fundamental issue is to provide data independence in the distributed environment ➡ Network (distribution) transparency ➡ Replication transparency ➡ Fragmentation transparency ✦ horizontal fragmentation: selection ✦ vertical fragmentation: projection ✦ hybrid
    15. 15. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/15 Example SELECT ENAME,SAL FROM EMP,ASG,PAY WHERE DUR > 12 AND EMP.ENO = ASG.ENO AND PAY.TITLE = EMP.TITLE
    16. 16. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/16 Transparent Access SELECT ENAME,SAL FROM EMP,ASG,PAY WHERE DUR > 12 AND EMP.ENO = ASG.ENO AND PAY.TITLE = EMP.TITLE Paris projects Paris employees Paris assignments Boston employees Montreal projects Paris projects New York projects with budget > 200000 Montreal employees Montreal assignments Boston Communication Network Montreal Paris New York Boston projects Boston employees Boston assignments Boston projects New York employees New York projects New York assignments Tokyo
    17. 17. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/17 Distributed Database - User View Distributed Database
    18. 18. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/18 Distributed DBMS - Reality Communication Subsystem DBMS Software User ApplicationUser Query DBMS Software DBMS Software DBMS Software User Query DBMS Software User Query User Application
    19. 19. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/19 Types of Transparency • Data independence {It refers to the immunity of user applications to changes in the definition and organization of data, and vice versa. • Logical data independence and physical data independence} • Network transparency (or distribution transparency) ➡ Location transparency ➡ Fragmentation transparency • Replication transparency • Fragmentation transparency {global queries to fragment gueries}
    20. 20. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/20 Who Should Provide Transparency? • Nevertheless, the level of transparency is inevitably a compromise between ease of use and the difficulty and overhead cost of providing high levels of transparency. • Gray argues that full transparency makes the management of distributed data very difficult and claims that “applications coded with transparent access to geographically distributed databases have: poor manageability, poor modularity, and poor message performance”. • He proposes a remote procedure call mechanism between the requestor • users and the server DBMSs whereby the users would direct their queries to a specific DBMS. • Application level {code of application, little transperancy} • Operating system {device drivers within the operating system} • DBMS
    21. 21. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/21 Reliability Through Transactions • Replicated components and data should make distributed DBMS more reliable. {eliminate single points of failure} • Distributed transactions provide • Concurrency transparency {sequence of database operations executed as an atomic action. consistent db transformed to another consistent db state} ➡ Failure atomicity {update salary by 10%} • Distributed transaction support requires implementation of ➡ Distributed concurrency control protocols ➡ Commit protocols
    22. 22. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/22 Potentially Improved Performance • Proximity of data to its points of use {data localization} ➡ Requires some support for fragmentation and replication 1. Since each site handles only a portion of the database, contention for CPU and I/O services is not as severe as for centralized databases. 2. Localization reduces remote access delays that are usually involved in wide area networks (for example, the minimum round-trip message propagation delay in satellite-based systems is about 1 second). • Parallelism in execution ➡ Inter-query parallelism ➡ Intra-query parallelism
    23. 23. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/23 • Parallelism Requirements • read only queries Have as much of the data required by each application at the site where the application executes ➡ Full replication • How about updates? ➡ Mutual consistency ➡ Freshness of copies
    24. 24. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/24 System Expansion • Issue is database scaling • Emergence of microprocessor and workstation technologies ➡ Demise of Grosh's law ➡ Client-server model of computing
    25. 25. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/25 Complications Introduced by Distribution • data may be replicated, the distributed database system is responsible for (1) choosing one of the stored copies of the requested data for access in case of retrievals, and (2) making sure that the effect of an update is reflected on each and every copy of that data item. • if some sites fail or communication fail, DBMS will ensure update for fail site as soon as system recovers • the synchronization of transactions on multiple sites is considerably harder than for a centralized system.
    26. 26. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/26 Distributed DBMS Issues • Distributed Database Design {chapter 3} ➡ How to distribute the database {portioned and replicated} ➡ Replicated (partial dupliacated or fully duplicated) & non-replicated database distribution ➡ Fragmentation ➡ {research area to minimize cost of storing, processing transactions and communication is NP hard. Proposed solution are based on heuristics} • Distributed directory management {chapter 3} ➡ Contains information such as description and location about items in db. ➡ Global directory to entire DDBS or local to each site, centralized or distributed, single copy or multiple copy
    27. 27. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/27 Distributed DBMS Issues • Query Processing {chapter 6-8} ➡ Convert user transactions to data manipulation instructions ➡ Optimization problem ✦ min{cost = data transmission + local processing} ➡ General formulation is NP-hard • Concurrency Control {chapter 11} ➡ Synchronization of concurrent accesses ➡ The condition that requires all the values of multiple copies of every data item to converge to the same value is called mutual consistency. ➡ Consistency and isolation of transactions' effects ➡ Deadlock management
    28. 28. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/28 • Distributed deadlock management • The deadlock problem in DDBSs is similar in nature to that encountered in operating systems. The competition among users for access to a set of resources (data, in this case) can result in a deadlock if the synchronization mechanism is based on locking. • The well-known alternatives of prevention, avoidance, and detection/recovery also apply to DDBSs. • Reliability and availability ➡ How to make the system resilient to failures ➡ Atomicity and durability
    29. 29. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/29 Directory Management Relationship Between Issues Reliability Deadlock Management Query Processing Concurrency Control Distribution Design The design of distributed databases affects many areas. It affects directory management, because the definition of fragments and their placement determine the contents of the directory (or directories) as well as the strategies that may be employed to manage them. The same information (i.e., fragment structure and placement) is used by the query processor to determine the query evaluation strategy. On the other hand, the access and usage patterns that are determined by the query processor are used as inputs to the data distribution and fragmentation algorithms. Similarly, directory placement and contents influence the processing of queries. The replication of fragments when they are distributed affects the concurrency control strategies that might be employed. There is a strong relationship among the concurrency control problem, the deadlock management problem, and reliability issues. This is to be expected, since together they are usually called the transaction management problem. The concurrency control algorithm that is employed will determine whether or not a separate deadlock management facility is required. If a locking-based algorithm is used, deadlocks will occur, whereas they will not if timestamping is the chosen alternative. Finally, the need for replication protocols arise if data distribution involves replicas. As indicated above, there is a strong relationship between replication protocols and concurrency control techniques, since both deal with the consistency of data, but from different perspectives.
    30. 30. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/30 Architecture • Defines the structure of the system ➡ components identified ➡ functions of each component defined ➡ interrelationships and interactions between components defined
    31. 31. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/31 ANSI/SPARC Architecture External Schema Conceptual Schema Internal Schema Internal view Users External view Conceptual view External view External view
    32. 32. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/32 Differences between Three Levels of ANSI-SPARC Architecture © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005
    33. 33. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/33 Data Independence • Logical Data Independence ➡ Refers to immunity of external schemas to changes in conceptual schema. ➡ Conceptual schema changes (e.g. addition/removal of entities). ➡ Should not require changes to external schema or rewrites of application programs. © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005
    34. 34. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/34 Data Independence • Physical Data Independence ➡ Refers to immunity of conceptual schema to changes in the internal schema. ➡ Internal schema changes (e.g. using different file organizations, storage structures/devices). ➡ Should not require change to conceptual or external schemas. © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005
    35. 35. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/35 Data Independence and the ANSI- SPARC Three-Level Architecture © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005
    36. 36. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/36 Generic DBMS Architecture The interface layer manages the interface to the applications. View management consists of translating the user query from external data to conceptual data.The control layer controls the query by adding semantic integrity predicates and authorization predicates.The query processing (or compilation) layer maps the query into an optimized sequence of lower-level operations. decomposes the query into a tree of algebra operations and tries to find the “optimal” ordering of the operations. The result is stored in an access plan. The output of this layer is a query expressed in lower- level code (algebra operations). The execution layer directs the execution of the access plans, including transaction management (commit, restart) and synchronization of algebra operations The data access layer manages the data structures that implement the files, indices, etc. It also manages the buffers by caching the most frequently accessed data. Finally, the consistency layer manages concurrency control and logging for update requests. This layer allows transaction, system, and media recovery after failure.
    37. 37. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/37 DBMS Implementation Alternatives
    38. 38. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/38 Autonomy Autonomy is a function of a number of factors such as whether the component systems (i.e., individual DBMSs) exchange information, whether they can independently execute transactions, and whether one is allowed to modify them. Degree to which member databases can operate independently 1. The local operations of the individual DBMSs are not affected by their participation in the distributed system. 2. The manner in which the individual DBMSs process queries and optimize them should not be affected by the execution of global queries that access multiple databases. 3. System consistency or operation should not be compromised when individual DBMSs join or leave the distributed system.
    39. 39. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/39 Dimensions of the Problem • Distribution ➡ Whether the components of the system are located on the same machine or not • Heterogeneity ➡ Various levels (hardware, communications, operating system) ➡ DBMS important one ✦ data model, query language, transaction management algorithms • Autonomy ➡ Not well understood and most troublesome ➡ Various versions ✦ Design autonomy: Ability of a component DBMS to decide on issues related to its own design. ✦ Communication autonomy: Ability of a component DBMS to decide whether and how to communicate with other DBMSs. ✦ Execution autonomy: Ability of a component DBMS to execute local operations in any manner it wants to.
    40. 40. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/40 In Figure 1.10, we have identified three alternative architectures that are the focus of this book and that we discus in more detail in the next three subsections: (A0, D1, H0) that corresponds to client/server distributed DBMSs, (A0, D2, H0) that is a peer-to-peer distributed DBMS and (A2, D2, H1) which represents a (peer-topeer) distributed, heterogeneous multidatabase system. Note that we discuss the heterogeneity issues within the context of one system architecture, although the issue arises in other models as well.
    41. 41. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/41 Client/Server Architecture
    42. 42. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/42 Advantages of Client-Server Architectures • More efficient division of labor • Horizontal and vertical scaling of resources • Better price/performance on client machines • Ability to use familiar tools on client machines • Client access to remote data (via standards) • Full DBMS functionality provided to client workstations • Overall better system price/performance
    43. 43. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/43 Database Server
    44. 44. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/44 Distributed Database Servers
    45. 45. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/45 Datalogical Distributed DBMS Architecture ... ... ... ES1 ES2 ESn GCS LCS1 LCS2 LCSn LIS1 LIS2 LISn We first note that the physical data organization on each machine may be, and probably is, different. This means that there needs to be an individual internal schema definition at each site, which we call the local internal schema (LIS). The enterprise view of the data is described by the global conceptual schema (GCS), which is global because it describes the logical structure of the data at all the sites. To handle data fragmentation and replication, the logical organization of data at each site needs to be described. Therefore, there needs to be a third layer in the architecture, the local conceptual schema (LCS). In the architectural model we have chosen, then, the global conceptual schema is the union of the local conceptual schemas. Finally, user applications and user access to the database is supported by external schemas (ESs), defined as being above the global conceptual schema. Data independence is supported since the model is an extension of ANSI/SPARC, which provides such independence naturally. Location and replication transparencies are supported by the definition of the local and global conceptual schemas and the mapping in between. Network transparency, on the other hand, is supported by the definition of the global conceptual schema.
    46. 46. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/46 Peer-to-Peer Component Architecture Database DATA PROCESSORUSER PROCESSOR USER User requests System responses External Schema UserInterface Handler Global Conceptual Schema SemanticData Controller Global Execution Monitor System Log LocalRecovery Manager Local Internal Schema Runtime Support Processor LocalQuery Processor Local Conceptual Schema GlobalQuery Optimizer GD/D The detailed components of a distributed DBMS are shown. One component handles the interaction with users, and another deals with the storage. The first major component, which we call the user processor, consists of four elements: The user interface handler is responsible for interpreting user commands as they come in, and formatting the result data as it is sent to the user. The semantic data controller uses the integrity constraints and authorizations that are defined as part of the global conceptual schema to check if the user query can be processed. The global query optimizer and decomposer determines an execution strategy to minimize a cost function, and translates the global queries into local ones using the global and local conceptual schemas as well as the global directory. The distributed execution monitor coordinates the distributed execution of the user request. The execution monitor is also called the distributed transaction manager. In executing queries in a distributed fashion, the execution monitors at various sites may, and usually do, communicate with one another. The second major component of a distributed DBMS is the data processor and consists of three elements: The local query optimizer, which actually acts as the access path selector, is responsible for choosing the best access path5 to access any data item The local recovery manager is responsible for making sure that the local database remains consistent even when failures occur The run-time support processor physically accesses the database according to the physical commands in the schedule generated by the query optimizer. The run-time support processor is the interface to the operating system and contains the database buffer (or cache) manager, which is responsible for maintaining the main memory buffers and managing the data accesses. It is important to note, at this point, that our use of the terms “user processor” and “data processor” does not imply a functional division similar to client/server systems. These divisions are merely organizational and there is no suggestion that they should be placed on different machines.
    47. 47. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/47 Multidatabase systems (MDBS) • Multidatabase systems (MDBS) represent the case where individual DBMSs (whether distributed or not) are fully autonomous and have no concept of cooperation; they may not even “know” of each other’s existence or how to talk to each other.
    48. 48. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/48 Datalogical Multi-DBMS Architecture ... GCS… … GES1 LCS2 LCSn… …LIS2 LISn LES11 LES1n LESn1 LESnm GES2 GESn LIS1 LCS1
    49. 49. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/49 MDBS Components & Execution Multi-DBMS Layer DBMS1 DBMS3DBMS2 Global User Request Local User Request Global Subrequest Global Subrequest Global Subrequest Local User Request
    50. 50. Distributed DBMS © M. T. Özsu & P. Valduriez Ch.1/50 Mediator/Wrapper Architecture
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×